原帖由 Manlau 於 2009-3-6 02:59 發表 
第一句是對的。但既然她還要留下來，這樣做無可口非吧！難道為自己努力是錯的嗎？
至於說她『假到爆』，只是我們不認同她的表達方式而已。但說實在的，當全世界都興高采烈地傳閱她的私房照時，有沒想過正在侵犯她的私隱，又憑什麼對她批評哩？說到底她的職業是賣藝，而不是賣私生活吧！
For example, pop artists smoke in the street, drink in a bar, go crazy shopping, having late-night dinner at a hot-pot restaurant.... all are their private acts too, does it count as 侵犯私隱 for reporting them? Despite rightful or wrongful judgments, the public would have interest to them (which is one of the essential elements to keep those artists survive in the industry).
It's like, you put a $100 note on the ground, and then a person walks by and pick it up and puts into his/her pocket. Of course taking the money not belongs to him/her is not correct, but the fact is, it's so tempting for anyone to take it. Same as the CX case, if no one had done anything "abnormal" in the public, no one would have had interest in taping it down. As a pop artist, gotta know what should do and what shouldn't do (or have high risk to bear), in order to give no negative image to public interest.
作為觀眾，我們有資格批評她的地方，就只有在幕前的演出是否精湛，是否夠水平吧！.
Yes. Yet, there are also people think she neither sings nor acts well. |
發表於 2009-3-6 10:31
| 
