返回列表 發帖

10-08-2011大陸高鐵下月起全面減速



I wonder what 膠鐵Peter has to say about the speed reduction. As usual, I fully expect him to 跌落地下都要拿返渣沙,話「你睇,偉大祖國幾咁注重安全!」但對之前用搞高及超出安全系數嘅速度又會隻字不睇,而且成套訊號系統嘅 debugging 同更重要嘅重新反覆 testing 就更加唔會提起。

訊號系統就算真係更正過(個人來講,我真係好懷疑佢響咁短時間之內有無可能可以搵出問題所在),響無足夠嘅反覆安全測試,根本就唔應該再繼續載人。你淨係減速來行又有Q用呀?

-力

I believe speed reduction is the first step, there will be more safety measures coming after...
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"
竹乃清,竹乃霸道

TOP

減慢到原來設計時速?
無希望無失望

TOP

本帖最後由 satil 於 2011-8-10 14:15 編輯

減速根本沒有直接觸及問題所在.
最高速度, 跟本不是全程的均速. 200km的列車可能只有數分鐘是達到這速度.
系統問題不是在數分鐘高速會有問題, 是全程都有問題.
所謂天下第一的封閉系統根本唔work.
一秒行55m 與 60m 跟本沒有分別, 司機亦不能以目視人力控制, 始終要先全面測驗操控系統.
前英國殖民地香港華裔漢族加拿大藉人
"現在談愛國,那是愛誰的國...少數人的國,他們少數人去愛吧"

TOP

回復 4# satil

They didn't mention the speed reduction has solved the problem, I believe there will be something followed. But at least, that's a correct step.

TOP

要全面進行反覆嘅安全測試,根本就即係要阿爺跪低認衰仔。響國際舞台上,阿爺點都要死撐嘅就係面子。你叫佢認低威,佢又點會肯?

反正死10個當5傷,死200幾個到係當34條命之嘛~對阿爺來講,佢13億條命裡面起碼有12億係可以用來同你慢慢玩。反正死嘅係賤民,佢領導人又點會在意?

-力

TOP

ha, no overclocking

TOP

回復 6# Lik

You are right, grandpa won't think there's any different between 20 or 200. They only care about the numbers of people riding on the rails, that's all about $$.

TOP

減慢到原來設計時速?
ricrick 發表於 2011-8-10 13:55


呢句可圈可點,
即係原本設計係唔可以行咁快?

TOP

If the accident was cause by human/procedure error, slower speed won't stop the accident from happening.

TOP

返回列表