“If the people engineering our dam told us to build a bigger dam, we would have built a bigger dam,” he said. Kynoch said there was enough rock placed on the outside of the dam. “The dam continuously grows — it gets bigger. For each level we are at, we have to have so much. So, yeah, we need to put more because we fully expected to go higher. But at any given time, we have the right amount for that elevation,” he said.
Steve Robertson, Imperial’s vice-president of corporate affairs, said that when consulting engineering firm AMEC “puts a design out in front of us, that’s what we’ve built.”
AMEC was hired to provide advice on raising the height of the dam necessary to contain the growing amount of tailings and water. On Friday, Knight Piesold’s Smyth said in the statement that the company’s original work — conducted between 1995 and 1997 — passed an independent third-party review. He added that the tailings facility “operated safely and as it was designed” during Knight Piesold’s involvement, and the structure passed a third-party dam safety review, conducted by AMEC, in 2006.
Smyth said the firm is no longer familiar with the design, its operation or water-management practices and could not comment on the incident.
However, Smyth said “the original engineering done by Knight Piesold accommodated a significantly lower water volume that the tailings storage facility reportedly held at the time of the breach.”
All AMEC spokeswoman Lauren Gallagher would say about the situation Friday is that the firm, “along with several other firms, assisted Imperial Metals with dam designs and annual reports.”
She added that AMEC is aware of the investigation that is underway, but “until all the facts are understood, (any statements) would be speculative.”
Likely resident Larry Chambers, who was dismissed from the mine, said he also raised safety and environmental concerns to the company.
Environment Minister Mary Polak said Friday afternoon that her ministry didn’t have any of these complaints on record and that she was “very, very concerned about what we’re hearing anecdotally from people in the community, those that have been employees, former employees, First Nations — we’re asking them please to come forward to talk to our inspectors.”
She added that six inspectors from the Conservation Officer Service are now in and around Likely eliciting complaints. Each officer is “like a police officer”that is independent of the ministry and has the ability to recommend charges to provincial Crown counsel, Polak said.
United Steelworkers local 1-425 president Paul French confirmed there had been complaints from workers about the integrity of the tailings dam, but said when they talked to management, they got answers that satisfied them at the time that things were being done right.
with files from Mike Hager
[email protected]
Click here to report a typo or visit vancouversun.com/typo.
Is there more to this story? We'd like to hear from you about this or any other stories you think we should know about. CLICK HERE or go to vancouversun.com/moretothestory

An aerial view shows an excavator on top of the Mount Polley mine dam at the tailings pond near the town of Likely on Tuesday, a day after the tailings dam broke, spilling waste water and tailings into nearby waterways and lakes. |