溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 鳩山太太曾被外星人綁架？ (陶傑) [打印本頁]

作者: kipposhi 時間: 2009-10-4 17:49 標題: 鳩山太太曾被外星人綁架？ (陶傑)

<<早晨陶傑>>

鳩山太太曾被外星人綁架？
30.09.2009

身為第一夫人最重要是儀容端莊及談吐高雅，這次日本新任首相鳩山的太太，她的神智是否清醒便惹人關注了。因為日本的這位第一夫人平時便作風「騎呢」，不是大膽放蕩，而是好像患有妄想症。

她接受電視訪問便曾經透露，她每天早上吃早餐，都是一口把太陽吞下肚子的；另外她平時的嗜好便十分省儉，喜歡將一些沒人要的咖啡豆的麻包袋，便將它剪成碎布，然後縫紉成裙，是否拿來穿、以及穿出去一些高等的宴會場合便沒人知道了。另外她自己亦都寫過一本書，那本書名叫《我一生遇到的奇怪事》，便自稱在20 年前曾經被外星人綁架，她說當她睡著以後，發現她的靈魂出竅，她的靈魂被一些外星人邀請了上一個三角形的飛船，然後這個飛碟便載著她飛到水星。水星的情形是怎樣的呢？日本的第一夫人說，到處一片草綠，而且是一個很美麗的地方。

是否有妄想症便見仁見智，但是這位第一夫人從此一旦上位，便幾乎可以保證日後日本的國民一定不愁寂寞。「爆完一單又一單」，今天去過水星，明天再去冥王星，然後她的前一世是《神雕俠侶》的女主角小龍女也說不定。

作者: CWong 時間: 2009-10-18 23:13

老友四號有曰：多謝轉載

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-19 11:39

I support you, kipposhi
people who dont like these post can skip it
I enjoy reading those from 陶傑

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-19 13:30

I support you, kipposhi
people who dont like these post can skip it
I enjoy reading those from 陶傑
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-19 11:39

It's not a 陶傑 private forum, you can go read his articles easily anywhere else. LYK is not a means for people to focus on one particular person. Especially only copy and paste meaninglessly.

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-19 14:52

It's not a 陶傑 private forum, you can go read his articles easily anywhere else. LYK is not a means for people to focus on one particular person. Especially only copy and paste meaninglessly.
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-19 14:30

I didn't say its private forum for 陶傑 and I know LYK is not a means for people to focus on one particular person. BUT....
now there are no other topics in the first 2 pages since people dont post things here. I enjoy reading the posts, and the posts so far didnt violate any law or forum rules

also, meaningless or not, its very subjective
if u dont like his post, why dont u share some other things that can be popular section?
or simply just go away?

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-19 15:10

That's not an excuse. So, since nobody post new things here, people can simply copy whatever news from any newspaper and articles from any magazine and make the LYK forum a posting billboard for own use?! If nobody wants to post, just eat it, no need to make up garbage and treat it as gold.

I meant meaningless was not the article content, it's the pointless and endless action of copy & paste...... copy & paste...... copy & paste...... copy & paste...... copy & paste...... copy & paste...... copy & paste...... copy & paste...... copy & paste...... copy & paste...... copy & paste......
Understand?!

作者: daimo 時間: 2009-10-19 15:25

5# chunsh

"violate any law"

I have yet to see the prove that it doesn't violate the copyrights. I don't see any statements in Appledaily that allows people to re-publish their content on the internet.

If I miss it (cos I'm blind at times) then here is my apology UPFRONT.

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-19 15:27

That's not an excuse. So, since nobody post new things here, people can simply copy whatever news from any newspaper and articles from any magazine and make the LYK forum a posting billboard for own u ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-19 16:10

look at entertainment and the news section and if u find no post is just copy and paste, I will have nothing to say

another thing, a lots of forums have members do regular copy and paste, those can be articles, pictures, and musics ,etc .... Thats how forum works -- sharing information

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-19 15:28

5# chunsh

"violate any law"

I have yet to see the prove that it doesn't violate the copyrights. I don't see any statements in Appledaily that allows people to re-publish their content on the int ...
daimo 發表於 2009-10-19 16:25

a lot of entertainment news in entertainment sections are also copy and pastes, even though the poster give their comments, those are still copy and pastes, those news contents and pictures,....are all copyright content. You gonna sue those LYK members?

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-19 15:34

look at entertainment and the news section and if u find no post is just copy and paste, I will have nothing to say

another thing, a lots of forums have members do regular copy and paste, those ca ...
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-19 15:27

Do you read and understand "pointless" and "meaningless" and "endless"? It's like whatever news comes up then they're being copied and pasted here! Everybody can do that everyday, in one hour interval or 5 mins interval, and then makes LYK a place for copy and paste media. You can make a poll and see if that is what most members like.

作者: daimo 時間: 2009-10-19 15:47

8# chunsh

so some other people are also breaking the law then it's ok to break the law?

Nowadays I just paste the URL and the subject. I don't even know if it's ok. I stopped cut-n paste ever since I'm aware of the implications.

Oh yes, Admin has the responsibility to clean up the copyrighted content in his site - that includes the entertainment section.

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-19 16:20

Do you read and understand "pointless" and "meaningless" and "endless"? It's like whatever news comes up then they're being copied and pasted here! Everybody can do that everyday, in one hour interva ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-19 16:34

but I and some other LYK (even though there are not many) think those posts are interesting wor
again, why dont u go post something with POINTS and MEANINGFUL here???
what is it? nobody got good and interesting posts to share but not allowing others to share?
I dont know anything about copy and paste, I just care if the CONTENTs are interesting to me or not

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-19 16:21

8# chunsh

so some other people are also breaking the law then it's ok to break the law?

Nowadays I just paste the URL and the subject. I don't even know if it's ok. I stopped cut-n paste ever s ...
daimo 發表於 2009-10-19 16:47

nice, and let see how much will be left in news and entertainment section after admin erased those posts

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-19 16:57

but I and some other LYK (even though there are not many) think those posts are interesting wor
again, why dont u go post something with POINTS and MEANINGFUL here???
what is it? nobody got good and ...
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-19 16:20

Well, all I can imagine is you are a lazy guy. You like to check here to read articles that can be easily found in many other news medias. And you don't care about copy right at all, just like many other people, and that's how people survive in BT "sharing" world.
Some people also don't care about breaking the law or not, as long as they need food, money, women.... , they just grab them whenever they need.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-19 16:58

nice, and let see how much will be left in news and entertainment section after admin erased those posts
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-19 16:21

Many members said, admin doesn't really care about the traffic here, all he cares is whether the content is legal or not.

作者: Nam 時間: 2009-10-19 18:30

I support you, kipposhi
people who dont like these post can skip it
I enjoy reading those from 陶傑
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-19 12:39

Agree x2!

I do appreciated Kipposhi sharing 陶傑 writing...
May be I'm getting old now, I prefer reading meaningful writing.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-19 18:43

A guy robs other people's money and shares with his friends and neighbors. Of course those folks who receive a money share are very happy with that. Yet, it doesn't mean the guy who robs is right.

作者: Nam 時間: 2009-10-19 19:26

本帖最後由 Nam 於 2009-10-19 20:28 編輯

A guy robs other people's money and shares with his friends and neighbors. Of course those folks who receive a money share are very happy with that. Yet, it doesn't mean the guy who robs is right.
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-19 19:43

By saying that, meaning nobody should copy and paste on LYK; including news and video clips.
And for the very same reason, majority of forums should not be exist at first place.
One of the major function of forums is sharing information.

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-10-19 19:29

Then credit them and do whatever you want

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-19 20:02

By saying that, meaning nobody should copy and paste on LYK; including news and video clips.
And for the very same reason, majority of forums should not be exist at first place.
One of the major fun ...
Nam 發表於 2009-10-19 19:26

I'm not sure for the main purpose of all forums. Are they to share any kind of copy and paste information from other sources or to share personal comment and feeling among members? But it's not too difficult to find a warning or claim of copy rights such as "版權所有 · 不得轉載", "Copyright © 200X XXXX.com All rights reserved"... etc on the bottom of most media websites.

Of course, copy right is one thing. Flooding the whole LYK forum is another. I can also copy and paste some "I-think-it's-interesting" articles here, 50 of them in an hour and do it every two hours everyday. And of course, whether my action is annoying or not is subjective.
On the other hand, that member only keep posting (copy and paste) those kind of articles from time to time, without further comment or sharing or response afterward. Isn't it a good way to gain points?

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-10-19 21:23

Isn't it a good way to gain points?
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-20 12:02

賺到d 分係唔係可以換贈品? 係又好woh, 我都開始儲下分喇!
人地鍾意post 咪由得佢law, admin 都唔care 啦, 我地可以點? 唔通hack 左admin 個account 去delete陶生d thread 咩?
我覺得可以做既野有:
1. 向admin 投訴
2. post d 野去flood 返佢, 以暴逆暴
3. 當自己時運高乜都睇唔到
4. 鬧到佢狗血淋頭, 令佢冇癮, 知難之退

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-19 21:39

Well, all I can imagine is you are a lazy guy. You like to check here to read articles that can be easily found in many other news medias. And you don't care about copy right at all, just like many o ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-19 17:57

I am lazy guy or not, is not your business
the thing is, if copy and paste is an act of stealing other ppl stuffs, then 娛樂版同時事版就一路都係偷緊人野﹐ 又唔見你嘈﹐ 正義!!!

作者: playingtoy 時間: 2009-10-19 22:27

論題：kipposhi 應否繼續轉載陶傑

正方： chunsh
反方： ultraman

由於時間關係。本節目暫停播放。敬請原諒。

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-19 22:50

論題：kipposhi 應否繼續轉載陶傑

正方： chunsh
反方： ultraman

由於時間關係。本節目暫停播放。敬請原諒。
playingtoy 發表於 2009-10-19 23:27

hm....actually我想你搞清楚一點
無錯我係喜歡陶傑既articles﹐ 但我最睇唔過眼係覺得點解的人唔中意個的articles/作者﹐就
唔俾人post﹐ 喂你地唔好入中共o個o的multimedia既評審委員會。一陣又話侵犯版權﹐
又話人無誠意﹐無限上崗.....又唔用腦想過大半個娛樂版同新聞版都係copy人地的野

作者: ricrick 時間: 2009-10-19 23:12

等我黎幫admin講野:「o拿，你地一d繼續post野，一d繼續鬧，一d繼續睇，甘先有traffic，甘我先有客仔」

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-20 00:51

賺到d 分係唔係可以換贈品? 係又好woh, 我都開始儲下分喇!
人地鍾意post 咪由得佢law, admin 都唔care 啦, 我地可以點? 唔通hack 左admin 個account 去delete陶生d thread 咩?
我覺得可以做既野有:
1. 向admin 投訴 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-10-19 21:23

"賺到d 分係唔係可以換贈品? 係又好woh, 我都開始儲下分喇!"
Ans.: That's another stupid thing. I really don't know what's the purpose and use of those "points". Yet besides that, I can't think of another reason for flooding the forum here.

人地鍾意post 咪由得佢law, admin 都唔care 啦, 我地可以點? 唔通hack 左admin 個account 去delete陶生d thread 咩?
我覺得可以做既野有:
1. 向admin 投訴
Ans.: Already did. But maybe he's just too busy, or wants to ignore me/that, or thinks it's not a problem at all, so I didn't see any action has been taken.
2. post d 野去flood 返佢, 以暴逆暴
Ans.: Nope. First, I'm not that type of person. Second, I have lots more meaningful things to do. Third, even I don't love LYK as much as many members do, I don't want to ruin the flow here.
3. 當自己時運高乜都睇唔到
Ans.: So I can post as many AV pictures as I like here, all ladies and admin can pretend that they don't see them?
4. 鬧到佢狗血淋頭, 令佢冇癮, 知難之退
Ans.: He/she only cares to post, nothing can really harm him/her.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-20 00:55

I am lazy guy or not, is not your business
the thing is, if copy and paste is an act of stealing other ppl stuffs, then 娛樂版同時事版就一路都係偷緊人野﹐ 又唔見你嘈﹐ 正義!!! ...
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-19 21:39

There is one theory called "one eye open one eye closed". When it happens too often that exceeds a "reasonable" frequent, it becomes pretty annoying and intolerable.
And actually "flooding" is not allowed here. Or else there won't be a 30sec interval needed between each post.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-20 00:59

hm....actually我想你搞清楚一點
無錯我係喜歡陶傑既articles﹐ 但我最睇唔過眼係覺得點解的人唔中意個的articles/作者﹐就
唔俾人post﹐ 喂你地唔好入中共o個o的multimedia既評審委員會。一陣又話侵犯版權﹐
又話 ...
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-19 22:50

First, I'm not the only one who thinks that is a problem. Please refer to some other threads that you can see other members' complaints. I might be the rare one who have more patience to discuss in this thread in further.

Second, and again, it's not whether I (and some other members) like the contents being copy and paste or not, it's that attitude which bother some members here. Hope you can understand this time.

作者: CWong 時間: 2009-10-20 04:13

┬┴┬┴▏　　▏▔▔▔▔＼
┴┬┴／＼　／　　　　　　﹨
┬┴∕　　　　　　　／　　　
┴┬▏　　　　　　　　●　　▏
┬┴▏　　　　　　　　　　　▔█
┴◢██◣　　　　　　／＼＿＿／講得好!
┬█████◣　　　　　　　／　　　
┴█████████████◣　 ★
◢██████████████▆▄
█◤◢██◣◥█████████◤＼　　
◥◢████　████████◤　　＼
┴█████　██████◤　　　　　 ﹨
┬│　　　│█████◤　　　　　　　　▏
┴│　　　│　　　　　　　　　　　　　　▏
┬∕　　　∕　　　　／▔▔▔＼　　　　 ∕
*∕＿＿_／﹨　　　∕　　　　　＼　　／＼
┴┬┴┬┴┬┴ ＼＿＿＿＼　　　　 ﹨／▔＼﹨／▔＼
▲△▲▲╓╥╥╥╥╥╥╥╥＼　　 ∕　／▔﹨　／▔
　＊＊＊╠╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬＊﹨　　／　　／

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-20 06:06

First, I'm not the only one who thinks that is a problem. Please refer to some other threads that you can see other members' complaints. I might be the rare one who have more patience to discuss in t ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-20 01:59

oh?
since when attitude become a forum's rule?
and how do u judge?
copy and pasting entertainment news is an action that "with heart"?

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-10-20 07:19

我淨係知成兩版都係陶生D行貨抽水散文就真係令人好反感。

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-10-20 08:38

本帖最後由 Littleprince 於 2009-10-20 09:41 編輯

我很喜歡看深雪 (相信也有其他人喜歡)﹐但係若我同時登三版深雪黎洗版﹐你又會覺得點﹖

本身我唔介意看陶生的東西﹐雖然唔同意他某D觀點﹐但每人都可以有自己觀點﹐一個凡中必反胡亂托外國大腳的所謂爛仔才子﹐你不能要求他太多吧﹐難道他會某天變成金庸不成﹖ 世上有各種各樣的人﹐我對他無偏見。。。所以 K 生可以繼續貼﹐我只關心你是否在洗版而已。。。你將別人想看的文章或討論推到4-5頁後很倒胃的﹐你不知道嗎﹖ 參考一下另一個 LYK 具建設性的建議吧﹕ 把陶生的帖子都放在同一處﹐或者同一帖﹐不斷 UPDATE﹐這樣不好嗎﹖ 如果你還是不同意﹐ 難道你這樣做的目的真是要洗版﹖ ADMIN 同你是否過不去﹐你要趕走所有 LYK嗎﹖

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-20 09:01

我很喜歡看深雪 (相信也有其他人喜歡)﹐但係若我同時登三版深雪黎洗版﹐你又會覺得點﹖

本身我唔介意看陶生的東西﹐雖然唔同意他某D觀點﹐但每人都可以有自己觀點﹐一個凡中必反胡亂托外國大腳的所謂爛仔才子﹐你 ...
Littleprince 發表於 2009-10-20 09:38

I buy someone's idea about suggesting Mr/Ms K to keep those in one post. I just found its kinda terrible that people asking for banning another member because he keeps posting something they dont like. I asked again, if u guys dont like those posts, why dont u guys post more interesting things (images, videos, articles, etc)

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-10-20 09:35

I buy someone's idea about suggesting Mr/Ms K to keep those in one post. I just found its kinda terrible that people asking for banning another member because he keeps posting something they dont l ...
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-20 10:01

I didn't see anyone told admin to ban him.... did you or was it you?

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-20 10:03

I buy someone's idea about suggesting Mr/Ms K to keep those in one post. I just found its kinda terrible that people asking for banning another member because he keeps posting something they dont l ...
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-20 09:01

Yeah, I wanna know who's asking admin to ban that member?

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-10-20 10:12

本帖最後由 Littleprince 於 2009-10-20 11:18 編輯

Agree x2!

I do appreciated Kipposhi sharing 陶傑 writing...
May be I'm getting old now, I prefer reading meaningful writing.
Nam 發表於 2009-10-19 19:30

你覺得陶傑 writing 係 meaningful ﹖﹖﹖ 唔係下話﹖而你的意思是﹐LYK 其他 topics 都係 meaningless??? OMG... 唔係話你錯﹐只係他的觀點 BIAS 得離了譜﹐這樣都叫 meaningful﹖ 我覺得只係廢 UP﹐笑下就算﹐不可認真。。。看清楚他所寫的﹐凡中必反﹐外國人的屁都是香的。。。講真﹐起初我幾佩服他的文采﹐不然我不會花錢買了一本他的書來看 (好多人寫的書我都只會去圖書館借﹐不會買)。。。只是﹐你多看他所寫的﹐就覺得他是別有用心﹐一係收左人錢要盡力踩中國﹐所有中國的人和事﹐所有都是差的﹐衰到貼地。。。而外國的﹐無論甚麼都是好的﹐越看我就越反感﹐你多看就會發覺。。。

也許我才是真正的老了﹐看不過眼這樣 BIAS 的作者 (對不起﹐他稱不上作“家”﹐因為未成一家)﹐越看越火起。。。只是﹐我還是有看﹐重申一點﹐我並不是反對 K 生 COPY & PASTE﹐多謝他我才知最近這“才”子又在發甚麼謬論﹐發甚麼 UP 風。。。可是﹐請不要洗版﹐我還是很想看飲食 REVIEW﹐免費 COUPONS﹐B 仔扮靚 TIPS﹐靚靚 CRAFTS﹐好圖片與及其他野。。。拜託喔~~~

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-20 10:30

I emphasize the problem is about "flooding" (洗版) but not about the whatever content is. Since whether the content is good/bad or interesting/boring is subjective. I can quote many verses from the bible to flood the forum too. Is that good?

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-20 10:50

I didn't see anyone told admin to ban him.... did you or was it you?
Littleprince 發表於 2009-10-20 10:35

I think some people have this propose in 老友聊天 earlier

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-20 10:51

你覺得陶傑 writing 係 meaningful ﹖﹖﹖ 唔係下話﹖而你的意思是﹐LYK 其他 topics 都係 meaningless??? OMG... 唔係話你錯﹐只係他的觀點 BIAS 得離了譜﹐這樣都叫 meaningful﹖ 我覺得只係廢 UP﹐笑下就算﹐ ...
Littleprince 發表於 2009-10-20 11:12

I dont thin he/she mean other LYK posts are meaningless
but about陶傑 writings are meaningless or not, is just person's points of view

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-10-20 10:55

I dont thin he/she mean other LYK posts are meaningless
but about陶傑 writings are meaningless or not, is just person's points of view
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-20 11:51

but why are you speaking on behalf of him/her?

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-10-20 10:56

I think some people have this propose in 老友聊天 earlier
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-20 11:50

oh really? where?

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-10-20 11:36

41# Littleprince

http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/vi ... &extra=page%3D1

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-10-20 11:45

41# Littleprince

http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/vi ... &extra=page%3D1
fibbi 發表於 2009-10-20 12:36

where is the word "ban"? sorry I didn't see that... who told admin to ban him/her?

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-20 11:59

where is the word "ban"? sorry I didn't see that... who told admin to ban him/her?
Littleprince 發表於 2009-10-20 12:45

It was Tiffiant, but I think he/she was just kidding. My bad my bad

a solution that can solve the problem
step one, suggest Mr.K to group all Mr. Tou's articles in one posts (and then updates and make new post in same thread)
step two, have someone to post something interesting instead of just complaining and whining (if you guys have something interesting enough, your posts will not be flooded by those Mr Tao's articles) Mr /Ms K didnt post Mr. Tao's articles for every mins, every hour (24 times a day)

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-20 12:03

One more thing, I actually found out that some other members have posted something here during Oct, its CWong who is flooding this place for few pages

be fair

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-10-20 12:05

本帖最後由 Littleprince 於 2009-10-20 13:06 編輯

It was Tiffiant, but I think he/she was just kidding. My bad my bad

a solution that can solve the problem
step one, suggest Mr.K to group all Mr. Tou's articles in one posts (and then updates and ma ...
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-20 12:59

oic.. I never take tiffiant's word serious, s/he loves kidding...

you proposed to post something meaningful, I suggest to start from you... I think I am one of the top posters already and I have opened enough threads to discuss, maybe somebody also think my posts is pointless and meaningless, that I can't help, sorry... so I suggest YOU to post something meaningful so that we don't need to see only To's posts, thanks a lot....

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-20 12:16

oic.. I never take tiffiant's word serious, s/he loves kidding...

you proposed to post something meaningful, I suggest to start from you... I think I am one of the top posters already and I have ope ...
Littleprince 發表於 2009-10-20 13:05

I am not the one who complained about Mr.Tao's articles. In fact, I enjoy reading those during my lunch time

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-20 16:37

I am not the one who complained about Mr.Tao's articles. In fact, I enjoy reading those during my lunch time
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-20 12:16

You never read other people's words clearly. It's not about the article content, it's the fuc....flooding attitude, man!

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-20 16:40

One more thing, I actually found out that some other members have posted something here during Oct, its CWong who is flooding this place for few pages

be fair
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-20 12:03

They might be so bored at home or at work, and yes they maybe flooding the forum in another way, but at least they are replying "in person".

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-10-20 16:43

Like brother 4, he is doing cut and paste to the posts

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-20 19:32

They might be so bored at home or at work, and yes they maybe flooding the forum in another way, but at least they are replying "in person".
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-20 17:40

flooding is flooding
copy and pastes article is called no heart
then flooding with EMPTY SPACE doesn't count?
where is your logic?

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-10-20 19:46

flooding is flooding
copy and pastes article is called no heart
then flooding with EMPTY SPACE doesn't count?
where is your logic?
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-21 11:32

其他人o係度"報復"啊!!!
如果呢個世界, 人人都以德報怨就好了~

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-10-20 19:53

I'm not human, I'm a sheep

其他人o係度"報復"啊!!!
如果呢個世界, 人人都以德報怨就好了~
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-10-20 20:46

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-20 20:20

flooding is flooding
copy and pastes article is called no heart
then flooding with EMPTY SPACE doesn't count?
where is your logic?
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-20 19:32

I'm not God, who thinks stealing one dollar is the same as stealing one million. Flooding is flooding, however it could be in different levels and thus different levels of annoying and tolerance. Isn't that simple?
And as I said, there is a "one eye open one eye close" theory in many usual situations. But now that flooding frequency is way too often that to force my closed eye to open wide!

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-10-20 20:25

I'm not human, I'm a sheep
sheep 發表於 2009-10-21 11:53

如果你真係覺得自己唔係人, 小弟真係無話可說了...

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-10-20 20:37

I'm not human, I'm a sheep
sheep 發表於 2009-10-20 19:53

A sheep that plays guitar well

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-10-20 20:52

A sheep that plays guitar well
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-10-20 21:37

A sheep that likes those whoplay guitar well

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-20 21:19

I'm not God, who thinks stealing one dollar is the same as stealing one million. Flooding is flooding, however it could be in different levels and thus different levels of annoying and tolerance. Isn ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-20 21:20

yeah, right
its ok, its your point of view

作者: Nam 時間: 2009-10-20 22:18

老實講句，我已經好少上網，最多係百忙裡偷空無意識咁開吓老友記，睇吓新聞，讀吓散文，再唔係八吓有咩化妝品！

可能係咁我真係唔多覺有咩問體，但若然某人要對號入座，覺得我話所有post 都係meaningless 嘅話，咁我都無辦法！若然一定要我俾意見，我會prefer 陶傑多過啲 poll and toppy!

作者: Nam 時間: 2009-10-20 22:20

同埋trigger 我依個 half CDROM 出聲，係睇唔過眼大家用啲鞭策性嘅語氣者，或者佢會annoy 部份人，但put it in other shoes, 好心轉載反而被人群插，我覺得有啲唔 fair！

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-20 22:25

同埋trigger 我依個 half CDROM 出聲，係睇唔過眼大家用啲鞭策性嘅語氣者，或者佢會annoy 部份人，但put it in other shoes, 好心轉載反而被人群插，我覺得有啲唔 fair！ ...
Nam 發表於 2009-10-20 23:20

咪係
好多forums的貼圖呀﹐笑話﹐短片sections都係的人係都Copy and Paste 架啦
頁頁都係添呀。Content唔o岩睇﹐對作者唔順眼就係都WeeWah鬼叫﹐又話版權﹐又
話無意義.....無限上崗。甘有意義唔好上forum lor

作者: Nam 時間: 2009-10-20 22:30

你覺得陶傑 writing 係 meaningful ﹖﹖﹖ 唔係下話﹖而你的意思是﹐LYK 其他 topics 都係 meaningless??? OMG... 唔係話你錯﹐只係他的觀點 BIAS 得離了譜﹐這樣都叫 meaningful﹖ 我覺得只係廢 UP﹐笑下就算﹐ ...
Littleprince 發表於 2009-10-20 11:12

我從來無話過陶生啲野篇篇係好野，亦無話過其他posts係廢噏，請唔好put words in my mouth! 我亦都唔係佢嘅 fans！

講多次，我無覺得你哋要求佢放同一版係唔合理！
只不過，將 copy right link 入依個 topic ，我覺得好 double standard, 如果佢 copy and paste 係錯，咁新聞，娛樂區個啲 posts 又點計?

BTW, 係話一個作者廢噏之前，請檢討自己自己所寫嘅野係咪高水平！

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-10-20 23:01

BTW, 係話一個作者廢噏之前，請檢討自己自己所寫嘅野係咪高水平！

Nam 發表於 2009-10-20 23:30

共勉之喇

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-21 00:38

咪係
好多forums的貼圖呀﹐笑話﹐短片sections都係的人係都Copy and Paste 架啦
頁頁都係添呀。Content唔o岩睇﹐對作者唔順眼就係都WeeWah鬼叫﹐又話版權﹐又
話無意義.....無限上崗。甘有意義唔好上forum lor ...
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-20 22:25

You have reading disorder or something?
I say it one more time, "copy & paste" is different to "flooding" (which flooding not necessary to copy & paste). I can post "hi", "hi hi", "hello", "hey", "yo", "you stupid", "you jerk"......... in many different threads all at once without copying & pasting to flood the whole forum. It's called "flooding".
Copy & paste in huge volume frequently is annoying, no matter how good the content is. It's like, lobster is good, can you eat 100 of them all at once?

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-10-21 01:18

You have reading disorder or something?
I say it one more time, "copy & paste" is different to "flooding" (which flooding not necessary to copy & paste). I can post "hi", "hi hi", "hello", "hey", "yo ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-21 16:38

Ultraman ,

唉, flood 係好難define 既. 有人覺得10個就係flood, 有人覺得over 1000個先係flood, 亦有人覺得唔arm 聽就一個都係flood...
算把啦, 真係講多都o徙藥費, 留返d energy 好過啦, 冇哂energy 就要飛番去故鄉叉電架喇.

由佢post law, 反正admin 都唔理, 我地呢d 平民又叫做反映過, 仲可以做d 乜? 唔通又掟蕉咩?...

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-21 01:34

Ultraman ,

唉, flood 係好難define 既. 有人覺得10個就係flood, 有人覺得over 1000個先係flood, 亦有人覺得唔arm 聽就一個都係flood...
算把啦, 真係講多都o徙藥費, 留返d energy 好過啦, 冇哂energy 就要飛番去 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-10-21 01:18

You're right. Even I am the most powerful super hero in the universe, I have no way to stop him/her! I'll rather save my gas to warm my stomach!

作者: CWong 時間: 2009-10-21 01:57

本帖最後由 CWong 於 2009-10-21 02:00 編輯

Ｅ个世界係咁啦，有人喜歡做眾矢之的﹐或許因為性格喜愛“死雞撐飯蓋”，以凸出自己與別不同吧﹖ 明明唔夠 POINTS 都唔肯認低威﹐死頂，仲揾帮手助陣！

超人，算把啦！

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-21 06:28

Copy & paste in huge volume frequently is annoying
Ultraman 發表於 2009-10-21 01:38

this is your and some LYK members point of views
I, and some others like those post
if u dont like, u can share huge amount of some other interesting things in this board, but not FLOODING with empty space...

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-10-21 07:50

64# Ultraman

超人﹐算吧喇﹐反正“講極都唔明”已經唔係第一次﹐我早就放棄這場 DEBATE 了

作者: chunsh 時間: 2009-10-21 09:50

64# Ultraman

超人﹐算吧喇﹐反正“講極都唔明”已經唔係第一次﹐我早就放棄這場 DEBATE 了
Littleprince 發表於 2009-10-21 08:50

"講極都唔明”已經唔係第一次" yeah

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-10-21 10:53

this is your and some LYK members point of views
I, and some others like those post
if u dont like, u can share huge amount of some other interesting things in this board, but not FLOODING with empty ...
chunsh 發表於 2009-10-21 06:28

So in other words, flooding with "interesting" content is not flooding but flooding with "empty" content is? Can I say whether "interesting" and "empty" or not is also very subjective? Then what is the definition of "flooding"?

作者: RayRay 時間: 2009-10-25 18:19

Interesting interesting

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)