Board logo

標題: 在這裡賣淫 [打印本頁]

作者: CWong    時間: 2009-10-9 03:30     標題: 在這裡賣淫

【僑報網訊】賣淫活動困擾溫哥華市多年,情況一直未有改善。最近,警方更曾拘捕年齡達100歲的“人瑞嫖客 ”。據統計,被捕嫖客12%為華裔,平均年收入4.56萬元以上。鑒於冬奧臨近,為免溫哥華成為“國際嫖客”的“旅遊性地”,警方決意加強打擊賣淫活動,特派出警花冒充妓女主動誘引嫖客上鉤,加以拘捕。
  在溫哥華,妓女賣淫沒事,倒是出錢買 春的嫖客會被捕,還要接受警方安排上嫖客學校。溫哥華在這點上與英國相比既相似又有明顯不同。根據BBC的報導,英國內政部長史密斯說,在英格蘭與威爾 士,用金錢與受拉皮條者操控的妓女進行性交易將會定為刑事罪行。向明知是被非法偷運入境的婦女買性服務將會被控強姦罪。當局還將公佈嫖客的姓名,或者提出 檢控。警方也將獲得權力關閉妓院。
  在英國,買賣性服務並不違法,但 是很多與妓女有關的活動,例如唆使及拉皮條則屬於違法。史密斯說,英國政府曾經考慮取締賣淫和嫖娼,但是由於不獲公眾支持而作罷。取而代之的是,政府集中 力量減少對偷運入境婦女的需求。她說,他們“事實上被當成奴隸”,當局還針對召妓的男性推動宣傳攻勢。“我的建議是男性買春前應該三思,因為大部分女性都 是被迫賣淫的。”
  據明報報導,溫哥華市警風化組探員桑德斯(Brian Sanders)透露,數年前警方曾進行過一次嫖客統計,顯示溫哥華嫖客年齡介乎18歲至83歲之間。但最近警方派出警花師姐扮妓女“放蛇”時,拘捕的嫖客最年輕的只有16歲,最年長者則是100歲的人瑞。負責該統計及統籌訓練課程的米切爾(Ian Mitchell)補充說,數字顯示,被捕嫖客50%是白人,18%是印裔、近12%是華裔、其他東南亞裔和其他族裔各分別有不足10%。
  嫖客中50%已婚,另外不足10%有穩定女伴,68%操流利第二語言。83%嫖客具中學教育程度或以上,不足10%具大學程度。被捕嫖客平均每年收入4.56萬元,2成年薪超過6萬元,每年賺取薪酬10萬元以上的則不足10%。80%被捕嫖客有全職工作。
  嫖客被捕時有64%自稱是第一次到街 上尋春,但其實他們平均在街上嫖妓已達16次。至於為何到街上尋春?普遍答案都是好奇、孤獨、獲取性滿足感和沒有女朋友等。有50%嫖客要求口交,逾 20%嫖客要求口交和性交“雙料服務”,逾20%嫖客只要求性交,15%和14%嫖客分別透過伴遊和按摩院進行性交易,還有不足10%嫖客,需要其他性服 務。
  警方拘捕嫖客後,會安排嫖客出庭應訊,以收阻嚇作用,也會即時派發課程單張勸喻嫖客上課。若嫖客接受上課,便不需要出庭。警方認為“嫖客課程”可能更加有效。統籌員米切爾(Ian Mitchell)表示,完成該課程的嫖客,90%改變態度,只有10%嫖客再次出外尋春。 “嫖客課程”除了宣示召妓違法外,並會告訴嫖客很容易染上性病。卑詩疾病控制中心傳染病外展男護士克蘭(Derek Kline)說,不少嫖客有一個錯誤觀念,以為要求妓女提供口交服務,就不會引致性病。其實不然,因為性病可以透過唾液傳播。嫖客和妓女最普遍染上的性病包括梅毒、泡疹和生殖泌尿道感染細菌等。一旦染病應即時求診,醫生尊重個人私隱,不會將病情告訴任何人。
  此外,“嫖客課程”還會從法律和社會角度探討妓女問題,嫖客個人責任及嫖妓對其家庭的影響等。
  而另一方面,溫哥華市警風化組探員桑 德斯(Brian Sanders)透露,在溫哥華市內“企街”賣淫的妓女,最年輕的只有13歲,年紀最大者逾50歲。妓女平均每日“接客”5至6次,部分每天“接客”十多 次。年輕貌美的妓女“肉金”較為昂貴,每次可賺取數百元不等。年老色衰並染上毒癖的妓女,“肉金”低至10元至20元。至於年輕應召高級妓女,“肉金”則 以千元計。
  溫哥華市內“企街”從事賣淫妓 女,保守估計約有150人,但實際賣淫妓女數目可能更多。大部分妓女受“皮條客”操縱,或在毒品影響下賣淫。妓女的收入許多時候被“皮條客”強行取去,個 人無積蓄,也不能應付日後生活開支。因此,若有妓女期望離開這個行業,需要下很大決心。
作者: starbug    時間: 2009-10-9 08:29

托屁好可憐啊...
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2009-10-9 09:57

100歲的“人瑞嫖客 ”  

WOW !!
平均年收入4.56萬 ? mean those 嫖客 or hooker??
作者: shutterbug    時間: 2009-10-9 11:29

100歲的“人瑞嫖客 ”  

WOW !!
平均年收入4.56萬 ? mean those 嫖客 or hooker??
Catpiano 發表於 2009-10-9 10:57

45k is talking about 嫖客 la
作者: myversa    時間: 2009-10-9 12:55

100歲的“人瑞嫖客 ”  

Catpiano 發表於 2009-10-9 10:57


at least it's not 100歲的妓女...
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2009-10-9 13:15

at least it's not 100歲的妓女...
myversa 發表於 2009-10-9 12:55

Gross in either way
作者: siumaibb    時間: 2009-10-9 13:30

100歲嫖客,可以做d乜?
作者: sheep    時間: 2009-10-9 13:42

100歲嫖客,可以做d乜?
siumaibb 發表於 2009-10-9 14:30

Same to the hooker's thinking
作者: myversa    時間: 2009-10-9 14:48

when I looked at the title, my first thought was 在"loyaukee"賣淫...
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2009-10-9 15:29

when I looked at the title, my first thought was 在"loyaukee"賣淫...
myversa 發表於 2009-10-9 15:48


May be ..  may be ..  coming !!
作者: soli    時間: 2009-10-9 15:29

本帖最後由 soli 於 2009-10-9 16:36 編輯

Throw out 'bizarre' prostitution laws, court told

Last Updated: Tuesday, October 6, 2009 | 9:29 PM ET
CBC News

Canada's prostitution laws are puzzling, ill-conceived and contribute to horrific violence against sex workers, a Toronto court heard Tuesday.

Lawyers for dominatrix Terri-Jean Bedford and prostitutes Valerie Scott and Amy Lebovitch are arguing for Canada's current prostitution laws to be thrown out.

"This is not about a right to sell sex — you can sell sex," Alan Young, a lawyer for the women, told Ontario Superior Court on Tuesday.

"It's about a right to liberty and security."

While prostitution is technically legal, virtually every activity associated with it is not.

The Criminal Code of Canada prohibits communication for the purpose of prostitution. It also prohibits keeping a common bawdy house for the purpose of prostitution.

Those laws enacted in 1985 were an attempt to deal with the public nuisance created by street walkers. They failed to recognize the alternative — allowing women to work more safely indoors — was prohibited, he said.

Young called it "bizarre" that the ban on bawdy houses is an indictable offence that carries stiffer sanctions, including jail time and potential forfeiture of a woman's home, when the ban on communication for prostitution purposes is usually a summary offence that at most leads to fines.

The provisions prevent hookers from properly screening clients, hiring security or working in the comfort and safety of their own homes or brothels, he said.

Young cited statistics behind the "shocking and horrific" stories of women who work the streets along with research that was not available when the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the communication ban in 1990.
Decriminalization, not legalization

The three women involved in the case are calling for prostitution to be decriminalized.

Scott told CBC News in interview there's a distinction between legalization and decriminalization.

"Legalization views prostitution as a vice that needs to be heavily contained and controlled whereas decriminalization sees prostitution as a legitimate and necessary business," she said.

Places where prostitution has been decriminalized — like the Australian state of New South Wales and New Zealand — have seen a drop in related violence without an increase in sex workers, said Scott.

"Well, sex is a valuable thing, like food and medicine. And of course it's going to automatically be a commodity," she said.

"If Canada brought in an official death penalty for sex work there would still be sex workers. Instead ... I think that it's better for Canada to adopt a mature attitude and ditch these laws."

The attorneys general for Canada and Ontario, as well as some conservative groups such as Real Women of Canada, are intervening in the case.
'Not a Canadian value'

Diane Watts, a spokeswoman for Real Women, told CBC News that decriminalizing prostitution may make Canada a haven for human trafficking. She argued prostitution is harmful to the women involved in it.

"There will always be crime but we must try to diminish it, and no mother or father or grandparent wants their daughter or granddaughter or grandson to be a prostitute," she said.

"So it's not really a Canadian core value and this is what we're arguing in the courts, this is not a Canadian value."

Young said upholding the current laws on grounds of morality is "a good argument for [the] last century. It's not a great argument this century."

"Criminal law can support what are called core moral values, but it doesn't support moral preferences," he said. "And basically right now, the objective behind these laws are all secular, which is to prevent exploitation and to prevent nuisance."
作者: Purpleheart    時間: 2009-10-9 15:30

托屁好可憐啊...
starbug 發表於 2009-10-9 09:29



對, 托屁以男客為主, 價錢方面低於年老色衰並染上毒癖的妓女
作者: soli    時間: 2009-10-9 15:36

女人最鍾意欺負女人﹐真係千載不變既定律 lol
作者: ricrick    時間: 2009-10-9 22:32

女人最鍾意欺負女人﹐真係千載不變既定律 lol
soli 發表於 2009-10-9 16:36

你講乜seven
作者: ricrick    時間: 2009-10-9 22:34

對, 托屁以男客為主, 價錢方面低於年老色衰並染上毒癖的妓女
Purpleheart 發表於 2009-10-9 16:30

托屁係倒貼人插佢架
作者: ricrick    時間: 2009-10-9 22:39

by the way, 我岩岩開了雞竇,得閑參觀
http://loyaukee.ning.com/group/chicken
作者: CWong    時間: 2009-10-10 02:10

你講乜seven
ricrick 發表於 9/10/2009 22:32

佢寸緊我哋條女,话佢脾視啲年老色衰並染上毒癖嘅妓女!
作者: CWong    時間: 2009-10-10 02:11

托屁係倒貼人插佢架
ricrick 發表於 9/10/2009 22:34

边个平啲?托生定titifaint?
作者: Littleprince    時間: 2009-10-10 09:57

17# CWong


寸心心妹﹖ 未死過啊﹖
作者: CWong    時間: 2009-10-10 13:52

17# CWong


寸心心妹﹖ 未死過啊﹖
Littleprince 發表於 10/10/2009 09:57

唔係我啊!




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2