溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 李一哲魏京生劉曉波 [打印本頁]

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-12-23 08:12 標題: 李一哲魏京生劉曉波

李一哲魏京生劉曉波 - 中國人的良知
中共一脈相承無法無天

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-12-23 08:21

莫須有
傾覆國家? 數篇文章足以傾覆國家?

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-12-23 11:05

最頂癮係有陣時果啲所謂被洩露嘅國家機密，其實本身已經響報紙刊登過。又有時其實果啲明明係人所共知嘅事（例如四川豆腐渣工程），只不過係中共有咗定斷，所以就要禁制言論。

堂堂崛起嘅大國真係文明！

-力

作者: kipposhi 時間: 2009-12-23 14:30

There is "rule by law" in China only.

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-12-23 14:52

sigh...

作者: soli 時間: 2009-12-24 20:01

劉曉波遭判11年剝奪政治權2年

新華社表示，法院是嚴格依照法律規定公開審理了劉曉波案，並充份保障他的訴訟權利，審判過程中劉曉波也行使了辯護權，他的律師也都發表辯護意見。

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-12-24 21:28

劉曉波遭判11年剝奪政治權2年

新華社表示，法院是嚴格依照法律規定公開審理了劉曉波案，並充份保障他的訴訟權利，審判過程中劉曉波也行使了辯護權，他的律師也都發表辯護意見。 ...
soli 發表於 2009-12-24 20:01

A typical joke, the CCP just made another big fool of themselves

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-12-24 21:31

The CCP is way behind than the African countries they fund.

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-12-24 22:18

The CCP is not much different from the North Korea and Myamar

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-12-25 00:40

劉曉波遭判11年剝奪政治權2年

新華社表示，法院是嚴格依照法律規定公開審理了劉曉波案，並充份保障他的訴訟權利，審判過程中劉曉波也行使了辯護權，他的律師也都發表辯護意見。 ...
soli 發表於 2009-12-24 20:01

共狗，收皮啦你！

http://news.mingpao.com/20091224/gaa3.htm

禁律師透露案情學者指違法

【明報專訊】劉曉波案昨日開審後，兩名代表律師在庭審結束後表示當局不准其透露案情，有研究中國法律的本港學者表示，「煽動顛覆國家政權罪」並不涉及國家機密，當局向律師施壓「禁聲」，是違反法律規定。

審訊保密免重複公開敏感內容

中國政法大學客座教授、本港學者王友金表示，根據中國法例，只有涉及國家機密的案件，律師才不可以透露庭審情況，「顛覆罪事實上是一個公開的行為，這次法院指控劉曉波是因為他發表文章，根本不是什麼秘密」。

王友金說，法院這次不公開審理劉曉波案，原因可能是劉曉波的文章言論較為激烈、敏感，當局不希望在法庭上重複公開，禁止律師透露庭審情況，則是不想律師再重複向外界提起相關內容。另外，由於指控的理據不足，當局亦不想更詳細指出文章哪裏涉及顛覆，故採用此「秘密」審訊的方式，「嚴格而言，不准律師透露庭審情 ，並不符合法律規定，這也證明了中國的審訊程序長期存在不清晰的地方」。

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-12-25 06:20

There is no justice in China, the so called justice system is merely the CCP's  tool
to  control common citizens.
The trial is illegal and not acceptable in any civilized country,  even Chinese
cities as Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore.
One thing for sure is that it would shatter the CCP's dream to become
the  RISING POWER, the most it would become would be another Attila

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-12-25 14:00

As a side story to 劉曉波's sentencing, here is yet more evidence that everyone should be concerned:

報道劉曉波案　有線記者遭恐嚇

【蘋果日報訊】中央政府對《○八憲章》起草人劉曉波的秘密審訊，在本港傳媒如實報道下遭鞭撻。一直跟進事件的有線電視台中國組記者昨日突然收到由內地發出、語帶恐嚇及粗口字眼的手機短訊（ SMS），字裏行間要求該台別高調報道劉曉波審訊。有線電視已將此事知會內地有關部門，強調會如常報道。有立法會議員稱「靠嚇」是內地政府慣常伎倆，直斥做法「極度卑劣」。

據了解，多名身在本港的有線電視台中國組記者昨晨先後收到由廣州手機號碼發出、沒有署名的恐嚇性短訊，內容為「你們昨天弄得挺大，最好收斂一下，不然會給些教訓那兔崽子，別等我們出手，不然有他好看，把他給鷄奸（姦）還是把他給閹了！放聰明些！」

雖然逾 50字的短訊隻字不提劉曉波事件，但劈頭首句明顯針對劉曉波被審訊的報道，更以「雞姦」及「閹」等恐嚇字眼阻止記者再跟進。離奇的是身在內地的該台中國組記者反而未有收到以上短訊。

已知會內地相關部門

有線電視中國新聞採訪主任司徒元證實，該台在港的中國組記者昨天先後收到針對有關劉曉波審訊、語帶恐嚇的短訊，他在早上 10時許接連收到兩個。由於該電話號碼由內地發出，有線電視已經知會內地相關部門，他強調不清楚發短訊電話來源及動機。他已向記者表明應按既有程序採訪事件，毋須特殊處理。

雖然無綫電視、亞洲電視、 now新聞台、香港電台及商業電台等本港多間電子傳媒機構，日前均以顯著篇幅報道劉曉波被審訊案，亦有採訪劉曉波太太劉霞，卻惟獨有線電視台記者收到相關短訊。據了解，此舉或因有線電視一直高度關注事件。除了駐京記者，該台更特別派遣其他記者到北京採訪，因此惹怒當局。

一直聲援內地維權人士的民主黨主席何俊仁斥「內地全部嘢都靠嚇，意在製造白色恐怖」，要求特區政府跟進。他呼籲新聞工作者「千祈唔好驚」，繼續維護新聞自由，「要話畀嗰啲人知道，香港呢個地方唔係咁容易俾人威嚇到！」

「同黑社會有乜分別」

當局以恐嚇方式阻止採訪，身兼支聯會副主席的李卓人直斥「咁同黑社會有乜分別？」他指內地秘密審訊劉曉波已是卑劣，其後更要出動恐嚇手段，「真係比卑劣更卑劣」。他指記者採訪是天職，內地必須保障新聞自由。

曾任記者的民主黨副主席劉慧卿更諷指「你恐嚇得幾多個？」她形容事件備受全世界關注，「除非放番劉曉波出嚟，否則做乜都係徒然，大家一定會跟進。」

拆局十．一後　言論箝制不鬆反緊

有線電視記者收到恐嚇手機短訊，對本港一些關注內地維權情況的人士來說，絕對不感意外，因為自 10月 1日中共建政 60周年活動結束後，內地對異見人士的箝制不但未有放鬆，反而收得更緊，北京表面上不害怕國內外反對聲音，實際上卻極之懼怕社會不滿擴散，動搖管治，特別是對互聯網監控，更是不斷升級。

「驚民眾抗爭蔓延」

有關注內地人士指出，原本他們以為在十．一後，中共會稍為放鬆對維權及異見人士的打壓，但事實剛剛相反。「北京表面上好似對自己權力充滿信心，實際上相當擔心，驚有任何民眾抗爭一旦擴大同蔓延，後果會好嚴重，所以絕對唔會放鬆打壓。」有線電視已不只一次報道內地民眾的抗爭事件，自然成為北京眼中釘。

該人士又說，北京對互聯網上的言論更是高度關注，已下旨全力打壓，「互聯網影響面太廣，動員力太大，以我哋所知，北京正全力打壓網上反對聲音，就算唔係政治性言論，只要係對中共管治不利、批評政府施政，一律第一時間刪除，甚至追究網絡商責任。」

http://www.mingpaonews.com/20091225/chb1.htm

香港有線記者收恐嚇短訊

【明報專訊】香港有線電視新聞部5名中國組記者，昨晨10時左右分別收到針對該台前日報道劉曉波案、疑似從內地發出的來歷不明「恐嚇」電話短訊。有線已向政府相關部門反映，並強調會繼續以正常方法去處理劉曉波的新聞。

針對劉曉波案報道

有線新聞中國組採訪主任司徒元表示，短訊的內容針對劉曉波近日受審的報道，語句夾雜粗言穢語，短訊均是來自內地同一個電話號碼，同事即時打回該號碼則沒有接通，他們不知道是誰，亦不知道對方的動機。而收到恐嚇短訊的同事昨日均在香港，包括他本人，昨日駐內地的同事則收不到有關短訊。

他表示，他們已通知了國務院港澳辦，事件不影響他們處理新聞的方法，會按正常方法報道。有線新聞部職員估計，有關短訊或是意圖透過恐嚇香港的記者，間接向內地施壓。有線電視前日就劉曉波案件開審作詳細報道，包括報道法院附近守衛嚴密、訪問旁聽的劉曉波弟弟劉曉暄等。

香港記者協會主席麥燕庭表示強烈譴責有關事件，認為香港是法治之區，絕對不容許任何人意圖影響新聞採訪及自由。她認為香港政府及內地公安有必要介入事件，不應讓有關行為蔓延。

新聞行政人員協會極度關注有線電視新聞部中國組在港記者收到恐嚇手機短訊事件，協會譴責一切以威嚇手段干預記者採訪的行為，並希望內地與香港當局重視事件，嚴肅處理，以及保障在內地的香港記者採訪自由與人身安全。

港傳媒組織盼保障記者安全

支聯會常委張文光批評，此行為這是「下三流」的無恥手段，而劉曉波已因莫須有罪名等待宣判，現時連報道事件的記者也受恐嚇，他指雖然未知發出短訊的是什麼人，但「有幾多人可以擁有香港同一機構，數名記者的手機號碼？」民主黨副主席劉慧卿亦稱，事件是極大恥辱，民主黨將在立法會提出有關劉曉波的動議辯論。

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-12-25 22:18

中國D判決書經常都有剝奪政治權利呢項
但係我想知究竟有D咩政治權利呢

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-12-25 22:26

受刑人在被剝奪政治權利其間，不得享有下列權利：
選舉權和被選舉權；
言論、出版、集會、結社、遊行、示威自由的權利；
擔任國家機關職務的權利；
擔任國有公司、企業、事業單位和人民團體領導職務的權利。

即是不算是個人。

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-12-25 22:46

受刑人在被剝奪政治權利其間，不得享有下列權利：
選舉權和被選舉權；
言論、出版、集會、結社、遊行、示威自由的權利；
擔任國家機關職務的權利；
擔任國有公司、企業、事業單位和人民團體領導職務的權利。

即是不 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2009/12/25 22:26

但係10幾億人本身都冇呢D機會
咁有權利同冇權利咪即係冇分別

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-12-25 22:50

唔係，普通人可以選濕鳩人大。

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-12-26 09:09

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2009-12-26 09:10 編輯

受刑人在被剝奪政治權利其間，不得享有下列權利：
選舉權和被選舉權；
言論、出版、集會、結社、遊行、示威自由的權利；
擔任國家機關職務的權利；
擔任國有公司、企業、事業單位和人民團體領導職務的權利。

即是不 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2009-12-25 22:26

How can a person exercise these rights when he/she is in jail?
Again, the CCP's constitution is just a display merchandise in the shop, " For Your Eyes Only",
they are not appoachable.

作者: zoids 時間: 2009-12-27 05:20

Seeking justice in PRC = seeking a rabbit on the moon. I laugh at people still surprise by these outcomes.

I guess some people just never learn.

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-12-27 05:44

君子不立危牆之下，
那反抗危牆的君子，卻成了英雄。

學精而左閃右避苟且偷生，同知其兇險而為之身陷囹圄，係兩回事，兩個層次。
劉曉波明知後果，都要發表文章擒動中國民主政治，是"never learn"?
我驚訝的是人們將不公平不公義的事看待成理所當然，還要恥笑抗爭者。
大丈夫有所為有所不為，如因惡政而明哲保身噤若寒蟬，
真的是枉讀聖賢書了。

作者: zoids 時間: 2009-12-27 05:54

君子不立危牆之下，
那反抗危牆的君子，卻成了英雄。

學精而左閃右避苟且偷生，同知其兇險而為之身陷囹圄，係兩回事，兩個層次。
劉曉波明知後果，都要發表文章擒動中國民主政治，是"never learn"?
我驚訝的是人們 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2009-12-27 06:44

Failed comprehension tests many times back in HK? LOL.

Too bad I am not good typing Chinese anymore...

I never laugh at those people who took action, I laugh at people who took this kind of news by shock/surprise after all these year... e.g. your truly.

Speaking of action, what have you done lately except barking here and there trying to stir **** up? Hahaha... isn't it so ironic after what you have posted? Criticizing others is so easy I know... LOL...

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-12-27 06:05

咁你又做過D乜野呢？？
指住我鬧我搞屎既同時，你自己咪又係坐係度。
劉曉波都冇做過D乜野嫁，都係好似你同我咁，網上面搞下屎吠下，寫D野叫人簽吓咋~
我都唔surprise佢判，我只係憤怒啫~年期多少已經唔重要----政治審判，閉門審訊，聖誕節快刀斬亂麻唔俾外國記者旁聽，又要心虛大大聲話公平公平~我屌佢老母正仆街。

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-12-27 06:09

我諗，話人得個講字唔做野仲容易。

作者: zoids 時間: 2009-12-27 06:17

咁你又做過D乜野呢？？
指住我鬧我搞屎既同時，你自己咪又係坐係度。
劉曉波都冇做過D乜野嫁，都係好似你同我咁，網上面搞下屎吠下，寫D野叫人簽吓咋~
我都唔surprise佢判，我只係憤怒啫~年期多少已經唔重要----政治 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2009-12-27 07:05

Why do I need to do something? Isn't this why we all here in Canada instead of HK now? ROFL

I am not a political activist wannabe like you guys. I just want to point you guys out for the laugh because you all think you are higher than other people because you support this support that, being angry at something happens all the time but do nothing in personal about it.

Let me quote one of the Einstein famous saying for you.

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again (e.g. being angry on the internet) and expecting different results (hoping PRC will have democracy).

Hope you and lik will GET IT one day.

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-12-27 06:20

仲有，話我點點點扣我乜野牛鬼蛇神帽子都好，劉曉波呢件事依然係咁仆街，冇變過。

作者: zoids 時間: 2009-12-27 06:25

仲有，話我點點點扣我乜野牛鬼蛇神帽子都好，劉曉波呢件事依然係咁仆街，冇變過。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2009-12-27 07:20

You didn't realize that until now? LOL

I never said 劉曉波呢件事 not 仆街，冇變過。 wor...

Maybe you were just too angry to think otherwise?

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-12-27 06:31

所以你咪繼續扣囉，唔繼續講我，你都唔會有第二D野講。

作者: zoids 時間: 2009-12-27 06:35

Sigh... you still don't get my point after all these replies.

Come on, I even Bolded it and give example to you... but you still just don't get it because you think I 扣你帽子... I was not!

please re-read this whole thing again.

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-12-27 06:39

又講我了，又係我有問題

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-12-27 06:47

【明報專訊】《零八憲章》起草人劉曉波被重判入獄11年的前夕是平安夜，那天，在東京有一名《零八憲章》的首批聯署人，亦在等待命運的宣判。他叫馮正虎，是內地知名維權人士，自4月離開中國到日本後，八度回國被拒，一怒之下決定死守成田機場禁區抗爭，拒絕入境日本或接受聯合國的難民身分，只靠旅客與朋友接濟，至今撐了54天，為的是爭取返回國家的公民權利。

劉曉波被重判後，未有改變馮正虎捍衛維權的心，「從前判刑哪有這麼多人出來支持？現在人民不怕死，一個劉曉波倒了，街上還有千千萬萬個劉曉波；只要我能回國，要坐牢就坐，我也不怕！」

故事要由馮正虎到北京探望其他維權人士說起。今年2月15日他在北京街頭，突然給人抓上一輛貨車，送到上海海軍招待所關了40天，「三個警察和我住一間房，每天你盯著我，我盯著你，都成朋友了，就是不放我，說領導說不行。」

零八憲章首批聯署人 8次回國失敗

3月底，當局同意釋放他，但勸他離國避開六四 20周年，4月1日他到日本投靠在當地生活的妹妹，6月7日嘗試乘中國國航回國，但抵達浦東機場後被拒入境，第二天被強迫送上回程航班。

第二次嘗試時，他被國航拒載；第三次他學精了，改乘美國西北航空成功抵上海，但也避不過遣返命運；第四次，美國西北航空要求他購買回程機票才搭載，他拒絕，結果又被拒上機；第五、第六次買了來回機票，美國西北航空一樣不載；第七次與第八次，他改乘全日空，成功到達上海，但仍被拒入境。

「第八次是11月3日到上海，第二天被押上飛機，因為機艙很窄，我頂住兩邊拚命掙扎，警察很難用力，拉扯了兩個小時。」被拒入境8次，馮怒火中燒，不肯入境日本，躺在入境大堂的長椅上以示抗議。

11月4日抗議第一天，有機場官員給他買了飯糰充飢，但之後就不肯幫忙，他身處的南翼大樓第一候機樓入境大堂沒有商舖，喝廁所裏的水喉水捱了4天後，有民運人士及朋友乘搭飛機帶來物資，他才暫時脫困。

空姐同情送物資 51天首洗頭

日本傳媒不久後就有報道，令整個機場都知道他的故事，其中《朝日新聞》以「中國人權運動家」形容他。成田機場晚上關閉，但職員有心通融，連日來沒有強行把他弄走，讓他睡在禁區，看到他使用充電插頭，也隻眼開隻眼閉。

平安夜機場關閉前，有職員走過來，拍拍馮正虎的膊頭，沒說什麼，但給他一個紙袋，一打開，原來是一個蛋糕。不少空姐路過亦會捎些食物及用品給他；12月24日晚，他51天以來第一次洗頭，用的酒店裝洗頭水就來自一個美國空姐。

高官舊同學巧遇不答理

傾蓋如故，白首也可如新。11月初某天馮在長椅上打瞌睡，突然一行人走過，他喊道﹕「王家瑞！」王是當年他在復旦大學的研究生同學，現在已是中共中央對外聯絡部長，剛好率團訪日。馮說，當年兩人均在復旦師承內地著名財經學者蘇東水，只是年級不同。

「應該很久沒有人直呼其名吧，他（王）呆了一呆，停下看著我。」馮上前，指著抗議標語說﹕「你看，我被拒絕回國，你回去跟大使館說說吧。」王沒回答，轉身步入外交人員通道離開。

馮正虎用各種方法在禁區內建立了一個「家」，位於入境櫃位旁邊，椅子下方是「儲物櫃」，周圍放滿寫著「支持馮正虎回國」等抗議標語、各種報道及小冊子，吸引不少人注意，尤其是華人。

「是法輪功嗎？」「不是。」在美國留學的中國學生Victor過境成田，好奇發問﹕「不讓你回國，是護照沒了嗎？」「不是啊，就沒理由。」Victor搖搖頭說﹕「那沒道理。」有同胞默不作聲注視，馮遞上小冊子，對方接了，邊走邊看。

採訪問候電話應接不暇

西方傳媒也大幅報道事件，「英國廣播公司（BBC）、洛杉磯時報、英國衛報、路透社……來的傳媒多得不得了，日本朝日新聞也有報道，前前後後幾十家」。

「聖誕快樂，你身體沒事吧」、「沒事，很好，謝謝你……」記者在平安夜陪伴他6個多小時期間，他收到15個電話，其中3個是海外傳媒訪問，4個內地來電問候，8個來自國外。訪問完成後，他手上的未接來電多達20個，鼓勵短訊50多個。

拒接受庇護拒入境日本

馮正虎滯留機場已經54天，55歲的他擁有日本工作簽證，聯合國難民公署亦曾表示可以提供難民庇護，但均被他拒絕，「我有自己的國家，不打算做難民，現在生活得也挺習慣的」。

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-12-27 11:56

君子不立危牆之下，
那反抗危牆的君子，卻成了英雄。

學精而左閃右避苟且偷生，同知其兇險而為之身陷囹圄，係兩回事，兩個層次。
劉曉波明知後果，都要發表文章擒動中國民主政治，是"never learn"?
我驚訝的是人們將不公平不公義的事看待成理所當然，還要恥笑抗爭者。
大丈夫有所為有所不為，如因惡政而明哲保身噤若寒蟬，
真的是枉讀聖賢書了。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2009-12-27 05:44

呢個回覆真係講得太好！

阿力拜服。 Orz

-力

作者: zoids 時間: 2009-12-27 14:35

Oh pluez... don't equal yourself to 抗爭者, you are NOT. What have you done except posting all these political news that is well published everywhere... if ppl care, they already know it. If people didn't care, they'll skip this thread anyways.

What I was laughing is people like yours truly pretend to be something you are not on the internet. Enough of your complain, have you done something to change the course? NO.

Fail.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-2-11 20:58

中國人的悲哀
劉曉波上訴失敗
佢太太見完佢之後
要求一個擁抱
批准
訪問時由心笑出來
一個擁抱都是
恩賜

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-11 21:06

Watch out for the 3 Amigos S.P.R.,
they are going to bark and bite

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-2-11 21:08

33# somewhereintime

welcome, I'm here waiting

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-11 21:59

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-11 22:02 編輯

歌德三人組,吃共產黨奶水成長 34# sheep

作者: soli 時間: 2010-2-11 22:55

32# sheep

求仁得仁啦~

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-12 01:30

Watch out for the 3 Amigos S.P.R.,
they are going to bark and bite
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-11 22:06

Haven't been on LYK for a while. However, just found that you finally got your chance to RAISE YOUR VOICE.
Congratulation after keeping your mouth shut for such a long time.

First, are your really surprised by this? Isn't it expected? Someone had already told you not to pretend you are a defender of freedom because you have done nothing to make a contribution other than barking on cyberspace with no effort.

Second, could you tell us about what had happened during the McCarthy era? What is happening to people detained by US in its prisons on foreign soils and why they have to be kept on foreign soils?

Third, I am respecting 劉曉波, but the words from a hypocrite like you just make me throw up.

作者: ricrick 時間: 2010-2-12 01:48

Oh pluez... don't equal yourself to 抗爭者, you are NOT. What have you done except posting all these political news that is well published everywhere... if ppl care, they already know it. If people ...
zoids 發表於 2009-12-27 15:35

甘搞笑既？上黎forum吾係吹水上黎做乜？
吾係要有軍隊，有能力改變事實的人先有權講野ah ma？

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-2-12 11:37

36# soli

你好珍惜你而家有嘅野喇
係恩賜唔係必然

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-2-12 11:40

37# rockypath

用屎塞咗你把口咁耐
以為你會識諗
點知你食哂啲屎就即刻上泥
肚餓咩？屎好食咩？

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-12 12:31

37# rockypath

用屎塞咗你把口咁耐
以為你會識諗
點知你食哂啲屎就即刻上泥
肚餓咩？屎好食咩？
sheep 發表於 2010-2-12 12:40

That is all you have to say? I told you before. It just makes you look stupid when you just try to say something when you have nothing to say.

It just shows you are ignorant and lack of knowledge. What you said has no 深度. Other than telling things that we already know and yelling out loud to pretend you are a true fighter. What meaningful points had you made?

Sorry. You only look like a clown to me.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-2-12 14:27

41# rockypath

吹呀
好嬲呀
我好開心喎
俾個蠢仔激親呀
你咁低EQ嘅？

作者: soli 時間: 2010-2-13 01:42

41# rockypath

吹呀
好嬲呀
我好開心喎
俾個蠢仔激親呀
你咁低EQ嘅？
sheep 發表於 2010-2-12 15:27

係呀﹐rockypath係俾個蠢仔激親﹐個蠢仔咪係你lor~

人地係EQ低﹐但係你IQ低﹐咪打成平手lor﹐蠢仔~

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 10:39

Go and lick your CCP MASTER'S feet

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-13 15:30

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-2-13 16:31 編輯

Go and lick your CCP MASTER'S feet
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-13 11:39

Do you have the gut to answer my questions other than hiding up your fear? Be strong, don't be a coward.

Can you just answer my two simple questions? These two questions have nothing to do with CCP, but it can show how ignorant you are.

1) What had happened during the McCarthy era?

2) What is happening to people detained by US in its prisons on foreign soils and why do they have to be kept on foreign soils?

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-2-13 15:45

Eat your BS la, Rocky dude.

1) Which is worse? The McCarthy era, or the Cultural revolution?
2) What is happening *NOW* to 劉曉波, 黃琦, 譚作人, and to a lesser degree 馮正虎?

-Lik

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-13 16:14

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-2-13 17:16 編輯

Eat your BS la, Rocky dude.

1) Which is worse? The McCarthy era, or the Cultural revolution?
2) What is happening *NOW* to 劉曉波, 黃琦, 譚作人, and to a lesser degree 馮正虎?

-Lik
Lik 發表於 2010-2-13 16:45

I am not defending for CCP. However, I just hate to see you guys being the 走狗 of western countries and don’t have the pride and 骨氣 of being a Chinese.

What ever the western countries did is great and holly. Eat shxt, you guys.

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-2-13 18:27

You know, Rocky dude, funny you should write that because the exact same words can be turned around and applied even more harshly on the Chinese government:

I am not defending the US. However, I just hate to see you guys being the 走狗 of CPC and don’t have the pride and 骨氣 of simply being a human being.

What ever the Chinese government did is great and holy. Eat shxt, you guys.

-Lik

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-2-13 20:19

You know, Rocky dude, funny you should write that because the exact same words can be turned around and applied even more harshly on the Chinese government:

-Lik
Lik 發表於 2010-2-13 19:27

The difference is that, you are a Chinese that is racist against the Chinese. You are just jealous that the Chinese are doing better and better.

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 20:56

I'M CHINESE AGAINST THE COMMUNIST REGIME, I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH
THE BRITISH OR AMERICAN. I SPEAK OF THE GENERALLY ACCEPTED HUMAN RIGHT
AS DECLARED IN CANADIAN and UN CONSTISTUTION OF HUMAN RIGHT .
I'M A CANADIAN WITH CANADIAN VALUE.
為虎作賊，搖旗吶喊, 是非不分，何以自稱愛國

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 21:02

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-13 21:06 編輯

McCarthy is from the 50's , The Great Cultural Revolution is from 1967.
The Yankee has learned from their mistake while the CCP still insisted
that '"THERE IS NO CHINESE CIVILIAN WITH DIFFERENT POLITICAL VIEW"
Quoted from the Spokesperson from the Ministry of Foreign Affair.
TELL ME THAT IT IS TRUTH, YOU CCP ADVOCATES, tell me that the conviction
is acceptable other than communist.
I get payroll from Federal and Provincial government, yet I constantly speak
against the Canadian government, shall I be charged for treason?

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 21:11

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-13 21:18 編輯

李一哲魏京生劉曉波 -  中國人的良知
中共一脈相承無法無天
That was what I posted in the beginning,
they are the students  bought up in the Communist education system,
not the spy from US;  every word they quoted were directly from
the Consistitution written by the CCP, which they failed the comply and
actually defy, what else can I say?
Yes, I may work for the CSIS too.
Before you  point finger to someone, please think for a second. Just figure
how many LYK would buy you patriotism to CCP?  only 3 of you.  Even the
girls are brave enough to despise you thought.
I do not bother to comment to the praising and worship posting, they are none
of my business, what I want to point out is李一哲魏京生劉曉波 -  中國人的良知
.

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 21:32

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-13 21:33 編輯

What is the crime disclosing the "INTOXICATED BABY FORMULA"
AND " THE SUB-STANDARD BUILDING MATERIAL for Elementary School" ?  would they
be sentenced  to 11-14 years if they were in Hong Kong, Macau
or Taiwan? What if you were the parent of the victims,  the law in China itself is
a laughing stock.  Now bite me please

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 21:41

Would you dare to convince your Non-Mainlander friends,
not just Caucasians, try Taiwanese, Malaysian, Singaporean,
Korean, Hispanic etc than there is a FAIR JUSTICE SYSTEM IN China,
see how they response.
If you really believe in yourself, then you better move back to China
since majority in this country do not agree with you

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 21:45

I can tell you the true story:
Everyone who want to be friendly to Chinese is simply because
they try to get advantages or benefits from China. From Japan, US,
European etc.
To Africans and North Koreans, China is the biggest sucker ever

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 21:50

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-13 21:54 編輯

Deng said, let a small group prosper first,
now the small group (related to the CCP leaders) are super rich,
while the poor are even worse than Mao's regime.
The whole country is corrupted.
Dr. Thomas Liang said on the radio today,
In China, you have to GO THE BACK DOOR
in order to get anything done, even for charity work
ask anyone who listened to the morning talkshow at 0830 am

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 22:22

This thread is about
中國人的良知 [url=http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=164568&ptid=12259
This is a solemn topic, only people with 中國人的良知 needed to join, for those lost soul,
find your own comrade
作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-2-13 22:23

又扣帽子。國不等於黨，愛國不愛黨!
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 22:27

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-13 22:36 編輯

58# MoiRhapsody

I love China, I adore Chinese culture, art  and  history,
but I want to have nothing to do with CCP.

Some people never understand, no matter how much education they have.
Do they ever talk to non-mainlanders at all?
The CCP overthrown the KMT regime by war,  any average Chinese citizen has
elected their  leaders? What exactly is democracy in China? any Official Opposition allowed?
I am Chinese Canadian, I have been voting in every election since 1980, I may made
wrong choice, but I also have the right to vote them out.
It is definitely impossible in China.
How the average Hong Kong residents think of the justice and election system in China? Would they be
willing to adopt the system in Hong Kong?
Well, maybe most of the Hong Kongers are traitors and US spies.
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-13 22:34

59# somewhereintime

Very lengthy but not very good speech.

You still DID NOT answer my question – “what is happening to the people detained by US on foreign soils and why do they have to be kept there?”

Did I deny what is happening in China? Did I defend for CCP?

I repeat what I said again – “I hate to see you guys don’t have the pride and 骨氣 of being a Chinese.”

Telling me to GO BACK to China? I was expecting you to say that and you actually did. So it just confirms what I said about you.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 22:41

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-13 22:58 編輯

What the US has done overseas is their own crime.
There were masked  thugs attacking the shops, banks  and police
Downtown today.
so you might as well do it too.
I'm a proud Chinese Canadian, but I despise those
who sucks the CCP.
The current regime in China is not necessary represents
all Chinese oversea.
See #59
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 22:44

Dr. Leung is an Enlightened Scholar who tries to build bridge with CCP,
he admits all the red tapes exist in China. Well, tell us you are superior to him
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 22:48

I enjoy the Human Right in Canada, which does not exist in China.
I criticize US, Canada and China, while someone only see the
downside of the realm outside China.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 22:56

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-13 23:03 編輯

It is the duty of the government to serve its people, it is not pity.
Just why do all the leaders family and affiliates got super rich?
Why is Li Pang's daughter controls most of the electricity power
supply in China? What kind of financial background did she has
other than relationship? was there any fair competition in doing
business in China other than family tie with the high officials?
This thread is about the un-justice prisoning in China, any opinion
pertained to the topic are welcomed. If you want
personal attack, please start a new thread of your own.
P.S. It is time to recruit more comrades, lonely fighters
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-13 23:07

There is no justice in China, the so called justice system is merely the CCP's  tool
to  control common citizens.
The trial is illegal and not acceptable in any civilized country,  even Chinese
cities as Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore.
...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-12-25 07:20

So, is this what you said?

Is US a civilized country? Where is the justices system for the people detained by US?

I am respecting 劉曉波, but not people like you – a hypocrite. You are just using their name to 抽水.
作者: sheep 時間: 2010-2-13 23:17

So, is this what you said?

Is US a civilized country? Where is the justices system for the people detained by US?

I am respecting 劉曉波, but not people like you – a hypocrite. You are just usin ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-2-14 00:07
又如何？
總比嚮國內早以經人間蒸發好丫
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 23:21

I condemned US  when they sent serveillance plane to Chinese territories,
How the Yankee treat their POW  is not my greatest concern,
I said UNITED NATION Charter OF Human Right, endorsed by all nations except
a small handful.  US. has always be a bully.
I have nothing to do with China or Hong Kong, so I have no conflict of interest.
It is someone who fails to admit the Poor Human Right situation in China( not if they do
not know)
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-13 23:24

又如何？
總比嚮國內早以經人間蒸發好丫
sheep 發表於 2010-2-14 00:17

Thank You! You just once again confirm what I said about you guys - "You guys are the 走狗 of western countries and don’t have the pride and 骨氣 of being a Chinese. What ever the western countries did is great and holly."
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 23:30

李一哲魏京生劉曉波
are 骨氣 of being a proud Chinese against tyrant.
They know the consequences before they spoke out.
The are the true hero in Chinese history.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 23:32

Ever read the正氣歌
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-13 23:33

李一哲魏京生劉曉波
are 骨氣 of being a proud Chinese against tyrant.
They know the consequences before they spoke out.
The are the true hero in Chinese history.
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 00:30

Yes, they are! But not you guys!!!
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-13 23:49

I'm not ready to die for the CCP's crimes yet.
I respect them but not willing to be the next prisoner.
I'm protected by Canadian Constitution and content with that.
Western are not always holy, but the CCP  is definitely shameful.
Please do not try to put an equal sign between Chinese Civilization
and CCP, Communism is a deadly  Virus  from the EVIL WEST,
I think I have read more about Chinese culture and history to despise communism.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 00:05

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-14 00:08 編輯

天地有正氣，雜然賦流形。下則為河岳，上則為日星。於人曰浩然，沛乎塞蒼冥。
皇路當清夷，含和吐明庭。時窮節乃見，一一垂丹青。在齊太史簡，在晉董狐筆。
在秦張良椎，在漢蘇武節。為嚴將軍頭，為嵇侍中血。為張睢陽齒，為顏常山舌。
或為遼東帽，清操厲冰雪。或為出師表，鬼神泣壯烈。或為渡江楫，慷慨吞胡羯。
或為擊賊笏，逆豎頭破裂。是氣所磅礡，凜烈萬古存。當其貫日月，生死安足論。
地維賴以立，天柱賴以尊。三綱實系命，道義為之根。嗟予遘陽九，隸也實不力。
楚囚纓其冠，傳車送窮北。鼎鑊甘如飴，求之不可得。陰房闐鬼火，春院閟天黑。
牛驥同一皂，雞棲鳳凰食。一朝蒙霧露，分作溝中瘠。如此再寒暑，百沴自闢易。
嗟哉沮洳場，為我安樂國。豈有他繆巧，陰陽不能賊。顧此耿耿在，仰視浮雲白。
悠悠我心悲，蒼天曷有極。哲人日已遠，典刑在夙昔。風檐展書讀，古道照顏色。

Dedicated to the true heroes!! Shame on the CCP
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 00:20

余囚北庭，坐一土室，室廣八尺，深可四尋，單扉低小，白間短窄，污下而幽
暗。當此夏日，諸氣萃然﹕雨潦四集，浮動床幾，時則為水氣；涂泥半朝，蒸漚歷
瀾，時則為土氣；乍晴暴熱，風道四塞，時則為日氣；檐陰薪爨，助長炎虐，時則
為火氣；倉腐寄頓，陳陳逼人，時則為米氣；駢肩雜遝，腥臊汗垢，時則為人氣；
或圊溷、或毀尸、或腐鼠，惡氣雜出，時則為穢氣。疊是數氣，當之者鮮不為厲。
而予以孱弱，俯仰其間，於茲二年矣，幸而無恙，是殆有養致然爾。然亦安知所養
何哉？孟子曰：「吾善養吾浩然之氣。」彼氣有七，吾氣有一，以一敵七，吾何患
焉！況浩然者，乃天地之正氣也，作正氣歌一首。

天地有正氣，雜然賦流形。下則為河岳，上則為日星。於人曰浩然，沛乎塞蒼冥。
皇路當清夷，含和吐明庭。時窮節乃見，一一垂丹青。在齊太史簡，在晉董狐筆。
在秦張良椎，在漢蘇武節。為嚴將軍頭，為嵇侍中血。為張睢陽齒，為顏常山舌。
或為遼東帽，清操厲冰雪。或為出師表，鬼神泣壯烈。或為渡江楫，慷慨吞胡羯。
或為擊賊笏，逆豎頭破裂。是氣所磅礡，凜烈萬古存。當其貫日月，生死安足論。
地維賴以立，天柱賴以尊。三綱實系命，道義為之根。嗟予遘陽九，隸也實不力。
楚囚纓其冠，傳車送窮北。鼎鑊甘如飴，求之不可得。陰房闐鬼火，春院閟天黑。
牛驥同一皂，雞棲鳳凰食。一朝蒙霧露，分作溝中瘠。如此再寒暑，百沴自闢易。
嗟哉沮洳場，為我安樂國。豈有他繆巧，陰陽不能賊。顧此耿耿在，仰視浮雲白。
悠悠我心悲，蒼天曷有極。哲人日已遠，典刑在夙昔。風檐展書讀，古道照顏色。

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-14 02:49

余囚北庭，坐一土室，室廣八尺，深可四尋，單扉低小，白間短窄，污下而幽
暗。當此夏日，諸氣萃然﹕雨潦四集，浮動床幾，時則為水氣；涂泥半朝，蒸漚歷
瀾，時則為土氣；乍晴暴熱，風道四塞，時則為日氣；檐陰薪 ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 01:20

Posting 正氣歌 to show you have 正氣? Why don't you post 滿江紅 as well?
作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-2-14 02:51

you are 走狗 of your own weakness, rat.
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-14 02:59

you are 走狗 of your own weakness, rat.
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-2-14 03:51

Hey, Little boy. Long time no see.

Please make your point clear. If you have gut, face me directly.
作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-2-14 03:14

we do our part to support them online,
what did you do?
rat.
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-14 03:19

we do our part to support them online,
what did you do?
rat.
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-2-14 04:14

Did I not make my point clear? You guys just use their name to 抽水.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 08:11

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-14 08:40 編輯

That would be the fat Red Cat, getting benefits from the
CCP while  the poor become more poor.
I studied the poem when I was 10 and  have been chanting and practicing
Chinese calligraphy on it thousands of time since.
The Fat Cats will never understand.  The know only  向錢看
抽水??? I do not deal with CCP,  only dealing with CCP could  抽水, since they
have so much money and resources.
I'm a Chinese Canadian from Hong Kong.
I speak the same tone as majority people in HK, I read Ming Pao, Sing Tao,
Oriental Daily and Sina,  Millions of HK citizens believe  that 李一哲魏京生劉曉波
are wrongfully convicted, Only you are loyal to China?
why don't you  advocate HK SAR government put them all in jail  for treason or
spying for  the US.?
Well, be you are too naive, I have studied the CCP history, some 5000 volumes,
some were translated from Russian,
from the formation of Chinese Soviet to 1989, there is one very interesting fact I found:
The  CCP has been constantly  rewriting their own history,  changing information every
time they  change the leadership circle.  Take a look at the CCP documentary, even the
picture of the leaders got white-out and re-entered from time to time according to whoever
in power. That is something you do find  in other formal history books. Why? the history is
" CREATED" merely  to please the leader other than telling the truth.
I possess a formal certificate signed by Mao himself " The Recognition of A  Revolution Martyr 's Family"
which was searched  by the Red Guard during the Great Period but survive. Now displaying on the counter.
If I want to 抽水, that would be a great asset to deal with the CCP, why bother  arguing with their guard dogs.
作者: sheep 時間: 2010-2-14 09:40

Did I not make my point clear? You guys just use their name to 抽水.
rockypath 發表於 2010-2-14 04:19
就係要抽你呢啲敗類出泥
抽水嗰個係你
等你收多斗零人民幣啦
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 10:07

81# sheep

$0.005 RMB x 1.3 Billion people = $6.5 Millions RMB, no wonder so many
people sold their souls
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-14 10:48

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-2-14 11:59 編輯

82# somewhereintime

I never laugh at those people who took action, I laugh at people who took this kind of news by shock/surprise after all these year... e.g. your truly.

Speaking of action, what have you done lately except barking here and there trying to stir **** up?  Hahaha... isn't it so ironic after what you have posted?  Criticizing others is so easy I know... LOL...zoids 發表於 2009-12-27 06:54

I believe I am not the only one believe you are using their name to 抽水.

You just try to use their name to posture that you are a defender of freedom and figther of democracy. People like me are the pastrio to CCP (your own term) and tell me to GO BACK TO CHINA.

Did I say a word to deny anthing happening in China? Did I say a word to defend CCP?

So, don't use their name for your own benefits. It is shameful on you.
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-14 10:53

就係要抽你呢啲敗類出泥
抽水嗰個係你
等你收多斗零人民幣啦
sheep 發表於 2010-2-14 10:40

I feel pity for you since you only have the capability to spit out garbage like this.

I always have a doubt whether you are truly an old cake as you clamed since you are naïve, do not have much knowledge and can hardly make any thoughtful comment.
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-14 11:11

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-2-14 12:13 編輯

I have studied the CCP history, some 5000 volumes,
some were translated from Russian,from the formation of Chinese Soviet to 1989...
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 09:11

WOW.. that is so ..... impressive.

Just a few months back you said you had read 2000 volumes about communism. Within a few months and you make another claim of reading 5000 volumes of CCP history.

hmmmm... instead of questioning from where you find 7000 volume about CCP, I just want to do a simple math.

Assume you can finish one volume in every 2 days (it would take me at least 3-4 weeks to finish a book), 7000 volume will take 14,00 days which translate to 40 years. Wow, you have truly dedicated yourself to CCP. You should be called the true patriot to CCP instead. LOL.

However, you failed to answer my simple question about communism -- "what is communism and why it was once popular". How ironic. LOL.
作者: 阿朱 時間: 2010-2-14 12:03

Wow, you have truly dedicated yourself to CCP. You should be called the true patriot to CCP instead. ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-2-14 12:11

我唔出聲好耐，但見你呢個傻仔總蒙惺惺，好心點下你。你唔知 Some叔叔是CCP的無間道咩？

新年講蝦笑，大家新年快樂。恭喜發財。
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 16:40

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-14 16:55 編輯

I have read some 50,000 books since 1967,  possessed over 10,000 Chinese
books before I left Hong Kong. I won Literature Awards in 70's while working
in Chinese restaurants.
I still go through 15-20 Kilo of books by weight every  week.
Thank you for reminding that I do not have high education, I never deny that
I have only grade 8 Formal education back in 60's, yet I manage to pass
14 exams in Canada with Honour (92-96% score), and started teaching colleges  in 1981.
I know the twin brother is going to show up whenever someone has problem
losing the battle, it happened at the Cheesecake ,  Saffron, Dessert House,
Congee and Hot Pot Rice  threads, otherwise  he never surface,  What a coincident.
Yes, I have my family root in CCP  and still have some relatives at provincial
level, and I studied quite a bit on CCP  history, the more I read, the more
I despise it.  Congratulation, you've just got yourself a new comrade, Entering  Tiger.
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-14 17:13

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-2-14 18:23 編輯

I have read some 50,000 books since 1967,  possessed over 10,000 Chinese
books before I left Hong Kong.
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 17:40

WOW... 50,000 books!!!...  Very....... impressive.  You are over qualified to be my 偶像.

Hmmmmm.... let's do a simple math again.

Let's say you can maintain a superb reading efficiency of 2 books a day. 50,000 books will take 25,000 days and it translates to 70 years!!! WOW... that is called - "The Impressive". You must began to read before your mom gave birth to you or even before your parents met each other since they must be little child that time.  If you can only go through 1 book a day, then you need to live 140 years to finish the 50,00 books. I am not sure whether you can live that long.... LOL..

You should be a university professor instead....

So will you say 500,000 book instead in next post? You are such a joke maker.... maybe you can join the Little Sheep to be clown as well.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 17:25

I can read up to 8 books a day, what is wrong with that?
Nobody would expect a grade 8 cook can teach College
curriculum, but I have doing it since 1981 --  Pacific Vocational
Institute, B.C.I.T. , Langara College, VVI , VCC, and SUCCESS
Training Institute. All documented.
When I applied for the  Credentialed Foodservice Executive
designation, I scored  2200 Points vs the required 200 points.
Now I'm doing contracted works for Harper College and
University of Chicago.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 17:29

I had 3000 plus good Chinese documentary and history books at
my friend's hotel ,  unfortunately they got water damaged after
a fire.  Any one know me longer knew that.
Sorry, it is another generation, too much for  young kid to understand.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 17:30

I had 3000 plus good Chinese documentary and history books at
my friend's hotel ,  unfortunately they got water damaged after
a fire.  Any one know me longer knew that.
Sorry, it is another generation, too much for  young kid to understand.
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-14 17:31

I can read up to 8 books a day, what is wrong with that?
..
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 18:25

NO. There is nothing wrong with that! You should say you can read up 80 books a day so that you can claim that you read up 500,000 books... Professor M.

However, you always had difficulties to answer my simple questions. That makes me wondering what had you read. Are they  屎片?  哈哈。。 You can certainly go through 800 pieces a day.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 17:36

I do not have any problem with people from all over the world.
I do training assignments  with Elections Canada and Elections BC.
HACCP, Starservice, Safeserve  etc.
I will do my job regardless who they are, I have a lot of Korean, Phillipino
and Vietnamese students too.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 17:42

Anyone  reside in Canada legally are not my problem,
I'm just educator, not politician or police
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 17:50

Sorry for kids educated in Canada,
if you have the desire to learn, it is  always possible.
Who set the rule that it takes 2 days to read a book?
No wonder someone said he hang out with straight A
students but only managed to get 60%.
All my self studied subjects got 92-96% with honour, I
did not even spending a day in Canadian school.
My son got 95% average, graduated high school with Honour,
attained 8 scholarship for 1st year. what is not possible?
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 17:58

I tried to enroll into the Culinary Management  Program at VCC in 1978,
the admin told me that I need to attain Grade 11 English to be admitted.
Then, I was hired as Culinary Art Instructor by BCIT in 1981.
Speaking of impossible.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 18:27

93# Tiger

Really? but it is not on my stat report  from Ottawa.
I know most of the new Chinese immigrants are from Mainland China,
but not nearly that much.
Businessmen from China have problem placing ads in the traditional China way,
(i.e. written in Simplified Chinese and Chinese phrases from China)
but seems it would scare away the Chinese consumers from HK, Taiwan and
Old cakes like me. Not to mention Caucasians.
作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-2-14 19:13

Who set the rule that it takes 2 days to read a book?
...
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 18:50

No one set the rule to take 2 days to read a book. If it takes 2 days to read a book, then you will need to live 280 years to finish your 50,000 books.

You just made yourself look foolish in front of everybody on LYK.
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 19:42

夏蟲不可語冰，非無冰也，以其未見冰也
作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-2-14 19:44

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2010-2-14 19:56 編輯

It sound impossible to score 2,200 points, and I managed to attain that.
CFE is  equivalent  to MBA in Hospitality and Foodservice circle,  no one
I know could attain that score.

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2