Board logo

標題: LYK is getting WORSE [打印本頁]
作者: siumaibb    時間: 2010-3-8 14:22     標題: LYK is getting WORSE

Admin, please do something, please IP ban people like Tiffiant and Toppy. You can't just say "I don't check LYK posts that much" and leave people like them to ruin the forum. C'mon, you own the site and you are the ONLY one who got power to handle these problems. So, please check the posts more often or delicate someone to do those dirty work for you.

*OR* you can simply say "I don't care" and we (at least me) will quit coming to LYK like many other people has already done.
作者: Admin    時間: 2010-3-8 14:36

I kept banning IPs almost once per week.
They keep changing their IPs when they come back.
What can I do?
Yes, I DO care my forum very much.
作者: fibbi    時間: 2010-3-8 14:57

Full respect to Admin...he's the one 出＄出力。
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2010-3-8 14:59

Thx Admin ..   no worry, it is your forum, it is a free forum, and I know how busy you are ..  and will be more and more busy for the neat ~ 20 yr ..

I myself don't mind Tiff, Toppy, muk that much, however, I hate those stupid scam reply ..  (ads)
作者: siumaibb    時間: 2010-3-8 14:59

Full respect to Admin...he's the one 出＄出力。
fibbi 發表於 2010-3-8 14:57


I know but the situation is getting worse.........
作者: habitrailspace    時間: 2010-3-8 15:00

i support admin. banning ip is useless becoz they can use anonymous proxy.
作者: siumaibb    時間: 2010-3-8 15:01

I kept banning IPs almost once per week.
They keep changing their IPs when they come back.
What can ...
Admin 發表於 2010-3-8 14:36


cool and thanks for your effort, but is there an effective or permanent way to keep those tiffiant, toppy people from coming back?
作者: fibbi    時間: 2010-3-8 15:08

回復 5# siumaibb


    I know...I feel so annoying watching those Tiff/Mukmuk dialogue. And I feel upset every time seeing big arguement/fight. But compare to Toppy (who spread racism/hate here) or someone constantly swearing targeting particular member, Tiff/Mukmuk are not as bad. Sometimes I feel so bad asking admin to do this or that. Not everyone can "snake king" during work to logon LYK. Especially, Admin has a little baby as well. People here (I don't mean you and me) can just say whatever and then leave and be silence. What will you do if you were Admin? If I were admin, I will just shut this board up (but I certainly hope NOT).

As a member, I just hope to have a place to "blow water"...to share info...so the most I can contribute is to open some "healthful" topic... I don't know what else I can do.

And yeah..I hate those stupid simplified chinese ad too..
作者: ACC-HE    時間: 2010-3-8 15:09

lock up LYK, no new members... the only solution. :S
作者: habitrailspace    時間: 2010-3-8 15:23

admin,
is it ok to limit the number of post per day for new members?
so they cant flood the forum
作者: 快樂牛郎    時間: 2010-3-8 15:25

回復  siumaibb


    I know...I feel so annoying watching those Tiff/Mukmuk dialogue. And I feel up ...
fibbi 發表於 2010/3/8 15:08


Tiff/Mukmuk are worse to me because at least Toppy shared news with us with very funny comments.

Tiff/Mukmuk are nothing but garbage.
作者: fibbi    時間: 2010-3-8 15:29

回復 11# 快樂牛郎


正所謂各花入各眼，最好就一人少句，就耳根清靜。不過無火花啲人又話悶，真係左右做人難。
作者: samsung    時間: 2010-3-8 15:33

Tiff/Mukmuk are worse to me because at least Toppy shared news with us with very funny comments.

...
快樂牛郎 發表於 2010-3-8 15:25


I second this
作者: cplau    時間: 2010-3-8 15:36

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: cplau    時間: 2010-3-8 15:37

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: habitrailspace    時間: 2010-3-8 15:39

cplau = toppy
作者: cplau    時間: 2010-3-8 15:40

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: fibbi    時間: 2010-3-8 15:44

回復 15# cplau


    Yes there are Ad but I doubt it will cover the cost of the board. Even if it does, still admin need to monitor the site, hear you guys complain/rant and then clean up the shxx (e.g. the spam ad)
作者: cplau    時間: 2010-3-8 15:46

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: 布小熊    時間: 2010-3-8 15:48

i don't know. I try to mentally filter out some of the post and replies. I may end up missing some interesting topic... but well.
作者: siumaibb    時間: 2010-3-8 15:49

admin,
is it ok to limit the number of post per day for new members?
so they cant flood the forum
habitrailspace 發表於 2010-3-8 15:23


that's a good idea
作者: cplau    時間: 2010-3-8 15:53

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: cplau    時間: 2010-3-8 15:56

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: cplau    時間: 2010-3-8 16:04

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: daimo    時間: 2010-3-8 16:10

本帖最後由 daimo 於 2010-3-8 16:12 編輯

回復 2# Admin

some forums in HK refuse registration from webmail like Gmail, live, hotmail and such.  People will be forced to register from their shaw,telus or email from work.  we all know that there is a limited # of email accounts available from the ISPs.

it weeds out all the repeat offenders.
作者: cplau    時間: 2010-3-8 16:13

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: cplau    時間: 2010-3-8 16:25

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: cplau    時間: 2010-3-8 17:11

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: tofu    時間: 2010-3-8 17:14

"""refuse registration from webmail like Gmail, live, hotmail and such."""
oh, then it won't work for me, i don't have a shaw or telus account ar.
作者: Admin    時間: 2010-3-8 17:15

I did some update on it.
只開放邀請註冊

cplau banned.

Thanks for all comments.
作者: Admin    時間: 2010-3-8 17:27

More serious actions taken to protect the board.
We expect to see less new member sign up due to this restriction.
作者: Prelude    時間: 2010-3-8 17:36

Thanks man.   But we definitely need to 1 or 2 good mod to only ban these repeat spammers.
This is the only way to grow a forum.
Spammers, trolls, off topics can only hurt a forum.

How about if a member post like 5 or 10 messages in a hour, he is opened to be banned by a mod?  That way, a mod cannot do funny stuff to non spammers, and spammers can't really spam.    It's a nice system.
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2010-3-8 17:39

[color=#admin,
is it ok to limit the number of post per day for new members?
so they cant flood the forum
999999]siumaibb 發表於 2010-3-8 15:49



    I think LYK is like that now .. I did open few accounts, however, can't reply for few days .. something like that ..
作者: fibbi    時間: 2010-3-8 17:44

回復 32# Prelude


    5 msg per hour is definitely too low... I think I did more than that sometimes..
作者: myversa    時間: 2010-3-8 19:11

I like to post and I think many of my posts are okay... (except in the last few days...).

I just have to say admin has been doing a good job.  I know how hard it is to take care a forum because I had one before.

Thank you.
作者: habitrailspace    時間: 2010-3-8 19:54

回復 33# Catpiano
that's weird. cplau kept posting 4 the past 2 days!?
作者: maanmo    時間: 2010-3-8 20:24

i did not know this board needs protection ,

  we should make it as easy as possible for new members to sign up

   if there are problem members ,  one way to deal with it
  is to create a special subforum
   a good name for it is   " member rehabilatation center "
   problem members can be commited to the center
   that means  , special moderators can create a discussion thread for a  certain
   problem member

  for example,  i can volunteer  to be committed to the center
   as a charter member  , inmate no 1
     that means there is a thread   named something like   " inmate  maanmo "
  then people can  posts their opinions on that thread
  about maanmo's  problems, and recommend tgreatments

banning members is not the answer
creagting a treatment center for them is the solution
after all,  they come to this board , for help ,  and we can give help
作者: samsung    時間: 2010-3-8 20:34

本帖最後由 samsung 於 2010-3-8 20:36 編輯
admin,
is it ok to limit the number of post per day for new members?
so they cant flood the forum
habitrailspace 發表於 2010-3-8 15:23

I disagreed with this idea, as sometimes people posts good replies and can type very fast, not all frequent replies are bad replies.

fibbi, this is diff fr sparkles, spearkles means ppl can have diff ideas or opinions like in earlier stages, I appreciate those ppl have diff opinion and can voice out. the one from tiff is call annoying, not sparkles, she is talking to herself, flood the forum with meaningless posts, purpose is to ruin and flood the forum and draw everyone away. purpose of toppy is to spread hatred, also want everyone go away.
作者: samsung    時間: 2010-3-8 20:35

limit number of reply will make lyk more boring, it doesn't solve the problem.
作者: myversa    時間: 2010-3-8 20:45

I do not like the idea of limiting number of reply neither.  Sometimes if I am lucky, I could find many things to post and I hope I can post them all.  Since it's all the old members, it does not really matter how many posts each posts.
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2010-3-8 21:19

I dont know, since as new member, every reply, need to type in a "confirmation" code first ..  

So, I dont know how those "NEW" member can make hundred posts within hour ..
作者: habitrailspace    時間: 2010-3-8 21:41

本帖最後由 habitrailspace 於 2010-3-8 21:57 編輯

take a look who's 本周之星
it's tifoxing = tiffiant
he created a NEW account on 註冊日期: 2010-3-5
already 發帖 124 篇
today is 2010-3-8

tifoxing is a good example 4 flooding
im not against tiffiant; he just annoying

BUT i dun like racist/nudity/attacking post from toppy
作者: siumaibb    時間: 2010-3-9 10:24

tiffiant was ok in the beginning, but after he tasted some kinda attention, he went crazy and flooded every single post out there.

1 or 2 mods won't hurt, if mods don't work, you can always take their power away.
作者: myversa    時間: 2010-3-9 11:10

I even talked to Tiffiant couple of times in Redflagdeal and he seems fine.  Just someone needs to find job.  I tried to help him then.

I really do not know what drives crazy like that...
作者: mukmuk2    時間: 2010-5-17 22:49

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽



歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2