溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 寬諒黃毓民 [打印本頁]

作者: soli 時間: 2010-6-13 22:06 標題: 寬諒黃毓民

寬諒黃毓民

梁燕城

我在專欄多次批判激進的狂躁民主派，不過從來無直接批判黃毓民和陳偉業，因我心底尊敬他們是誠懇的人。我不同意社民連的作為，因看透其政治操作的虛偽性和謊言性，是對民主的破壞，但對這兩位領導有基本敬佩，幾年前也曾在本專欄稱許過黃毓民。

最近有人告訴我，黃毓民用極惡毒和粗暴的語言罵我，真有點奇怪，我一向都是單槍匹馬，笑傲江湖，黃泉道上獨來獨往。從不屬建制派中人，對中國亦是不卑不亢地對話，從沒有組織自己的支持群眾，去建立勢力。只不過一個月在《信報》寫兩三篇文章，拒絕認同庸俗的政治觀點。而黃議員及其嘍囉竟要大張旗鼓攻擊，難道他們不能容許一個獨立思考的異見者嗎？在排山倒海的支持泛民專欄中，我只是一個微弱的異見聲音，社民連組織的政治勢力正日漸加強，竟然懼怕本人一支不肯屈服的筆，令我感到這政黨原來是如此虛怯和無自信。

細思其原因，只因社民連自以為是正義代表，其他人都代表邪惡，故此最懼怕理性、懼怕清醒的頭腦、懼怕人從真正的民主精神去揭破其偽民主的騙局。他們害怕有獨立思考而有不同意見的人，故要用戴帽子、上綱上線的方法去打壓。不能以理取勝，就只能用權力去壓迫，用語言暴力去嚇怕對方。然而本人從不會被威武所屈，亦不會在暴力下就範。

不過我寬恕黃毓民的污穢言詞，雖然他的口狠毒，也教育一批毒口的青年，但我相信他的動機仍是有善意，心底仍有激情和理想，希望中國和香港變得更公平、正義和民主。他雖然激烈反共，但對中國大地，仍有深刻的愛。他之所以不斷違背民主應有的理性和尊重，來自他心靈的一種傷害和痛楚，因他生長於一個扭曲的時代。

我們這代戰後嬰兒潮的人，父母從大陸逃香港，歷盡艱辛，成長中見到的中國連場悲劇，大躍進、三年飢荒、文化大革命，因此對共產中國有怨憤。在港英時代的扭曲時空，入不了主流大學，成長期間常被蔑視和邊緣化，形成心靈深藏的創傷。受傷使人常有不正常表現，故我對毓民的狂躁，十分諒解。

由於毓民有創傷後遺症，故失去了仁愛，只充滿怨憤，也缺乏寬容的胸襟，只去數算他人的罪過。他以為自己全都對，異見者若非錯誤，就是走狗。並且喜歡虐待異見者，又常以為別人打壓自己，因此他具有虐待和被虐的心理，且强烈希望他人視自己是英雄。但他仍是肯追求真理的人，他接受基督教，且以基督教之公義觀為做人原則，是真誠的抉擇。可惜仍未有深度的靈性開啟和經歷，故還未有自省悔改，醫治其內在創痛，少了一點基督教中的慈愛、寬諒及欣賞不同人價值之心。我不同意其所作所為，因其仇恨是摧毀民主本質的。但我仍敬佩他是有血性的人，也原諒他的粗野。我相信他有知識、才華和智慧，終有一日能走出苦毒的內心牢籠，而有更高領悟，以慈愛寬和去貢獻國家民族。
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
呢度都有好幾只顛狗追隨者﹑跟尾狗﹐症狀亦同顛狗類似。

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-13 22:57

haha... you have so many 分身

作者: ricrick 時間: 2010-6-14 01:54

本帖最後由 ricrick 於 2010-6-14 01:56 編輯

你都on dog dog ，吾夠顛，點咬斷你條子孫根？
吾激進，點叫激進派？立場清晰，旗幟鮮明，敢作敢言
d閹人娘娘腔點會明？看到那個不像閹人

作者: Guy 時間: 2010-6-14 01:57

I felt embarrass to see hk politicians swear and 用極惡毒和粗暴的語言

they represent hongkongers.. and they and other gov'nt official should protect hkers dignity.

Every time i see them swear on TV, I got a new fresh impression that hongkonger majority (refer as the voters who voted them) are all slums and rats

作者: ricrick 時間: 2010-6-14 02:14

社民連的market是草根低下楷層，貨車私機，地盤佬，垃圾佬，性工作者...
as what you said, they are all slums and rats，粗口就是佢地生活的一部份
過d飲紅酒，拉頭馬的上等人點明？

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-14 07:01

社民連的market?... 唔會只係草根低下楷層，貨車私機，地盤佬，垃圾佬，性工作者卦...
你講到好似好膚淺咁. 我覺得佢地係代表香港一班對民主進程忍無可忍既人既心態啦~

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-6-14 09:19

梁燕城呢啲投共嘅可憐蟲，憑乜野去寬諒毓民？佢自己嘅所作所為對得住香港人？對得住上帝咩？

-力

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-14 09:25

涼薄屎
搞咩咩題驗團番大陸
搵唔少啦重做埋六十周年國慶座上客
呢個飄然嘅感覺係要出賣些良知嘅

口口聲聲話人點賤點衰我好寬大原諒佢？
唔好講野啦涼薄屎
搞多啲所謂體驗學習團繼續你改善咗嘅生活啦

作者: chunsh 時間: 2010-6-14 09:38

梁燕城呢啲投共嘅可憐蟲，憑乜野去寬諒毓民？佢自己嘅所作所為對得住香港人？對得住上帝咩？

-力 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-14 09:19

對得住上帝 or not
only God knows and only God can approve

Based on what I know about bible, there is no such thing/idea named "democracy" mentioned/hinted in Bible. There is only one KING------God

so I found its quite interesting when some people talk about democracy

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-14 09:40

最醜惡的
莫過於口是心非佛口蛇心

作者: chunsh 時間: 2010-6-14 10:08

只因社民連自以為是正義代表，其他人都代表邪惡，故此最懼怕理性、懼怕清醒的頭腦、懼怕人從真正的民主精神去揭破其偽民主的騙局

After I heard how mad dog wong mad at Seto Wah about he is doing "oldman politic", I agree with this statement

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-6-14 10:16

With Szeto Wah's flip flopping stance on the de facto referendum, does he have any credibility left as far as his democratic pursues are concerned? And had you been paying attention to his "reasons" for turning against the de facto referendum, you'd know those reasons are absolutely absurd.

Martin Lee said that he puts democracy first and the Democratic Party second. Unfortunately, Szeto Wah has put the interests of the Democratic Party ahead of democracy.

-Lik

作者: ricrick 時間: 2010-6-14 11:40

之前華叔怕民主黨參加共投會失去立法會的否決權，但睇來現在民主黨政改是會投贊成的，搞笑

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-14 12:16

點解係寬諒唔係寬恕？
係原諒你不過冇寬恕你你在佢心中
仍然係梗梗於懷

作者: chunsh 時間: 2010-6-14 14:22

With Szeto Wah's flip flopping stance on the de facto referendum, does he have any credibility left ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-14 10:16

without "power", using what to fight for the justice?

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-14 15:12

他以為自己全都對，異見者若非錯誤，就是走狗。並且喜歡虐待異見者，又常以為別人打壓自己，

sounds very like somebody here

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-6-15 20:19

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-6-15 20:23 編輯

After watching this clip, I can only have one word to say to 黃毓民－賤格。完全沒有人格和風度。

The entire talk was just 惡毒無恥的人身攻擊。How can this kind of talk 出街？ It is 18+ rating!

真是香港人的悲哀。Is this the politician they trust and rely on to govern Hong Kong?

[youtube]EGGAVxF8Isc[/youtube]

[youtube]IZpv6JrO90k[/youtube]

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-15 21:48

黃毓民 is weelli weelli 賤格 after I watched these clips, he sucks!!! No content at all, only dirty words, he's cheap cheap cheap guy!!!!!!!

作者: Prelude 時間: 2010-6-15 23:46

黃毓民 himself is much more worthless than anyone.
He keeps saying the other person study a lot to do crap, but his own talk is less than gangster on the street. I hope no morons in hong kong learn anything from him.

Feel bad for his young son too.

作者: chunsh 時間: 2010-6-15 23:58

黃毓民 himself is much more worthless than anyone.
He keeps saying the other person study a lot to d ...
Prelude 發表於 2010-6-15 23:46

如果香港立法會create多一個功能組別﹐ mad dog應該係代表"幫會界別"

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-16 00:27

梁燕城呢條廢狗，已經俾呀爺統戰左～～聽佢鳩噏真係火都黎

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-6-16 00:37

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-6-16 00:41 編輯

梁燕城呢條廢狗，已經俾呀爺統戰左～～聽佢鳩噏真係火都黎
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-16 00:27

You can say whatever you want. You don't have to agree with Mr. Leung. But who are you anyways?
That mad dog wong yuk man is just crap, a rude piece of garbage.

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-16 00:40

who are you too????

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-6-16 00:42

who are you too????
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-16 00:40

You moron, who are you??

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-16 00:43

i am your moron!

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-6-16 00:51

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-6-16 00:53 編輯

梁燕城呢條廢狗，已經俾呀爺統戰左～～聽佢鳩噏真係火都黎
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-16 00:27

Do you have the gut to tell us whether you agree and support what 黃毓民 said about 梁燕城 in the clips?

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-16 01:04

yes i agree~~~~
梁博屎鬼上身ing

中共落order~加上佢同毓民有牙齒印咁～
舔得乾乾淨淨～～

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-6-16 01:09

yes i agree~~~~
梁博屎鬼上身ing
中共落order~加上佢同毓民有牙齒印咁～
舔得乾乾淨淨～～ ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-16 01:04

One word to you -- 賤格.

Do you know you just disgrace yourself as a person? I never called anyone a 畜生 before, but I will call you and 黃毓民 - 畜生 here. You don't have a basic respect to other people!

作者: ricrick 時間: 2010-6-16 03:52

有時候，你想舔都無得你舔阿該燴

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-16 06:15

陰公!！！
我賤賤格格都唔係第一日!！！
你唔係唔知吓嘩？？？

作者: soli 時間: 2010-6-16 07:12

陰公!！！
我賤賤格格都唔係第一日!！！
你唔係唔知吓嘩？？？
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-16 06:15

既然閣下自認賤格﹐如此不知廉恥﹐o甘大家以後就稱呼閣下為“恥毛”君啦。
恥毛君﹐早晨呀~

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-16 07:48

i LIKE IT!!!
BRAVO!

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-16 08:22

本帖最後由 samsung 於 2010-6-16 08:25 編輯

Do you have the gut to tell us whether you agree and support what 黃毓民 said about 梁燕城 in the ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-6-16 00:51

there is no valid point in those clips at all... esp when he said "Vancouver Chinese doesn't like Dr Leung", what data does he has to back this up? did he do a survey at China town and asked those c9? or just asked whoever he bumped into at the street? or just anyone around him?? no sample size and no back up data, so he has no right to say that, no right to say anything to represent Vancouver Chinese, what an idiot is Wong 毓民

he's a complete coward and idiot

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-6-16 08:31

Do you know you just disgrace yourself as a person? I never called anyone a 畜生 before, but I will call you and 黃毓民 - 畜生 here. You don't have a basic respect to other people!
rockypath 發表於 2010-6-16 01:09

為錢而出賣自己人格就係賤，而梁燕成就正正係做緊呢件事。所以話佢賤、係畜牲又有咩咁出奇？而話佢舔老共屎眼亦只係用一個稍為唔同嘅講法來講同一樣野。

你以前無話過其他人係畜牲？我就唔係好信囉～

當然，是非顛倒果啲人亦絕對係畜牲，而媚共嘅你（同埋你令外果兩位朋友）就正正係做緊呢件事。換句話講，我鬧緊你係畜牲呀，死蠢！

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-6-16 09:11

你以前無話過其他人係畜牲？我就唔係好信囉～

當然，是非顛倒果啲人亦絕對係畜牲，而媚共嘅你（同埋你令外果兩位朋友）就正正係做緊呢件事。換句話講，我鬧緊你係畜牲呀，死蠢！...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-16 08:31

You just a 只敢躲在主人身後亂吠的狗 (this is my first time call anyone a 狗 and you have the honour to be the first).

How many time have your run away from me like a 夾住條尾逃走的喪家之犬?

If you have gut, just stand up like a man instead of a dog and challenge me.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-16 09:57

今日涼薄屎又借北愛共和軍同英軍嘅衝突
經三十多年後得到互諒來兜圈鬧巔狗
正正係巔狗響2009年除夕講嘅
這証明巔狗所言不非

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-16 11:37

為錢而出賣自己人格就係賤，而梁燕成就正正係做緊呢件事。所以話佢賤、係畜牲又有咩咁出奇？而話佢舔老共 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-16 08:31

how do you know he did this for money? did he tell you in person?

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-16 11:39

I am not talking about Dr Leung being good or bad, but Wong Yuk Man is definitely a jerk!!! cheap jerk, uneducated maddog, even a dog is much much better than him, he's just a piece of ****, so deserved to be lai by somebody!!!!!

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-6-16 12:13

You don't have to like Yuk Man, but I will tell you that he was the far and away ballot king in the Kowloon west election.

-Lik

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-16 13:06

You don't have to like Yuk Man, but I will tell you that he was the far and away ballot king in the ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-16 12:13

it doesn't count.. Lik perhaps you don't know anythng about politics or what so-called election

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-16 13:14

如果香港立法會create多一個功能組別﹐ mad dog應該係代表"幫會界別"
chunsh 發表於 2010-6-15 23:58

mad dog is jin jing 界別

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-16 13:16

寬因其仇恨是摧毀民主本質的。但我仍敬佩他是有血性的人，也原諒他的粗野。我相信他有知識、才華和智慧，終有一日能走出苦毒的內心牢籠，而有更高領悟，以慈愛寬和去貢獻國家民族。
soli 發表於 2010-6-13 22:06

因其仇恨是摧毀民主本質的。但我仍敬佩他是有血性的人，也原諒他的粗野。我相信 if 他有知識、才華和智慧，終有一日能走出苦毒的內心牢籠，而有更高領悟，以慈愛寬和去貢獻國家民族。

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-16 13:18

to echo what he said, I can also say the whole Vancouver community, including Chinese & non-Chinese hates mad dog in great deal, talking is cheap... where is the survey and data? dumb axx

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-6-16 13:27

毓民八月應該會過來美加酬期。你夠薑嘅話咪去踩場來當面同佢老人家講囉～

-力

作者: Guy 時間: 2010-6-16 13:34

Continue from my post...

if 梁燕城 swear and 用極惡毒和粗暴的語言罵黃毓民.. I do not have a problem with that. simply because he is not a hk politician and not representing hk people

hk politicians should be polite and well manner

other wise it will become an international joke

[youtube]Uy_B4v-SEE0[/youtube]
from 梁國雄Youtube網站

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-16 13:40

毓民八月應該會過來美加酬期。你夠薑嘅話咪去踩場來當面同佢老人家講囉～

-力 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-16 13:27

so are you going to lai his toes? if so I will go with you

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 17:49

點解係寬諒唔係寬恕？
係原諒你不過冇寬恕你你在佢心中
仍然係梗梗於懷 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-6-15 04:16

寬諒應該係寬恕+原諒啦...
如果係only 原諒而冇寬恕, 咁應該要用原諒而唔係寬諒~

-- 正音與正字麥老師

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 17:54

為錢而出賣自己人格就係賤，而梁燕成就正正係做緊呢件事。所以話佢賤、係畜牲又有咩咁出奇？而話佢舔老共 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-17 00:31

死啦... 我睇左毓民講既野, 真係覺得佢幫唔落, 點可以咁話人架? 咁都可以支持? 唔係卦.

做人要明辯是非先好, 就算係你偶像, 做錯左架係應該點醒佢, 而唔係附和佢, 因為咁樣只會令佢泥足深陷.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 17:56

You don't have to like Yuk Man, but I will tell you that he was the far and away ballot king in the ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-17 04:13

... 票王大哂咩... 做錯事既票王都係錯! 唔會因為佢係票王就講乜都得law.
唉, 天下烏鴉一樣黑.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 17:59

毓民八月應該會過來美加酬期。你夠薑嘅話咪去踩場來當面同佢老人家講囉～

-力 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-17 05:27

d 人唔會敢o係佢面前亂講野, 正如內地人都唔敢o係天安門廣場入面燒國旗, 因為 -- 後果自負.
小市民邊夠薑o係毓民面前亂講野woh, 比蕉扔到係會痛架. 哈哈~

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-16 18:01

回復 49# mcjohnjohn

有咩錯錯在講粗口？
係人都講粗口喇
話佢係畜牲又如何
俾我我會話佢連畜牲都不如

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-6-16 18:12

回復 mcjohnjohn
有咩錯錯在講粗口？
係人都講粗口喇
話佢係畜牲又如何
俾我我會話佢連畜牲都 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-6-16 18:01

你就係一只連畜牲都不如的畜牲。

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 18:16

回復 mcjohnjohn

有咩錯錯在講粗口？
係人都講粗口喇
話佢係畜牲又如何
俾我我會話佢連畜牲都 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-6-17 10:01

錯係錯在對人人身攻擊.
可能我比較和平主意, 我一定唔會亂咁開口鬧人, 佢仲要係講哂粗口tim.
如果咁都覺得冇錯, 我真係冇野講.

我唔知點形容我既心態比你聽, 我唔係覺得毓民講既野有問題 (佢講緊果個人未必係好人), 但我覺得咁鬧人係錯law. 仲要o係公眾地方咁鬧人, 天啊! 咁都冇錯?

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 18:19

你就係一只連畜牲都不如的畜牲。
rockypath 發表於 2010-6-17 10:12

天啊! 你仲乜o係度人身攻擊人啊... 怨怨相報何時了呢?
你地要話, 話我就算啦! 大家係LYK, 唔應該咁話人的.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-16 18:26

回復 53# mcjohnjohn

咁同我哋去睇脫衣舞咁
你唔鐘意咪唔好睇
睇完就唔好鬧人哋做咩去睇脫衣舞？

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-16 18:29

回復 52# rockypath

你就係一只連畜牲都不如的畜牲

邏輯上呢句話好有問題

作者: soli 時間: 2010-6-16 18:31

係人都講粗口喇

呢D就係以己度人﹐自己爛口就以為人地都係。

copycat, 見你抄我抄得o甘開心﹐再教你一句。

講粗口並不是罪﹐真正的罪是以講粗口為榮。

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-6-16 18:40

回復 rockypath

你就係一只連畜牲都不如的畜牲

邏輯上呢句話好有問題 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-6-16 18:29

Haha, you just not only do not understand English, but also are unproficient in Chinese.

Ok, let me tell you what it means - it means you are a 畜牲, but you 還賤格過畜牲. Got it?

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-16 18:40

回復 57# soli

狗口長不出象牙

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-16 18:43

回復 58# rockypath

咁樣會令你開心嘅話
我今日已行一善

作者: soli 時間: 2010-6-16 18:45

回復 soli

狗口長不出象牙
sheep 發表於 2010-6-16 18:40

哈哈﹐你話緊你自己? 個個有眼睇﹐你地呢幾隻顛狗跟班﹐響LYK係出名爛口﹐洗唔洗我quote出黎呀? lol

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-16 18:48

回復 61# soli

你真係幼稚
而家細路仔玩呀
你鬧咩我反彈

作者: soli 時間: 2010-6-16 18:49

回復 soli

你真係幼稚
而家細路仔玩呀
你鬧咩我反彈
sheep 發表於 2010-6-16 18:48

不如又開個poll, 睇下LYK認為最爛口係邊個?

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 18:56

回復 mcjohnjohn

咁同我哋去睇脫衣舞咁
你唔鐘意咪唔好睇
睇完就唔好鬧人哋做咩去睇脫衣舞？ ...
sheep 發表於 2010-6-17 10:26

你既比喻唔係咁恰當. 應該係:
你去放火燒人地間屋
雖然唔係燒我果間
但我都會覺得咁樣做係錯, 錯, 錯!

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 18:58

回復 rockypath

咁樣會令你開心嘅話
我今日已行一善
sheep 發表於 2010-6-17 10:43

小弟非常欣賞先生呢一次既表現!
十個贊! 人地跳樓, 你唔需要跟住佢跳, 因為你唔係傻的.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 18:59

不如又開個poll, 睇下LYK認為最爛口係邊個?
soli 發表於 2010-6-17 10:49

唔好搞d 咁既野喇! 最爛口一定係我! 冇人夠我爭!
-- 完 --

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-16 19:42

回復 63# soli

你兩個對自己做嘅野都冇信心
要人認同
冇野好講

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-16 19:45

最撚爛口。非我莫屬。

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-16 19:49

回復 68# MoiRhapsody

好似嗰啲假道學咁
你唔撚好講粗口阿
你一講就有好撚多人 DIU 你0架

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 19:52

回復 MoiRhapsody

好似嗰啲假道學咁
你唔撚好講粗口阿
你一講就有好撚多人 DIU 你0架 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-6-17 11:49

呢度小圈子, 朋友喂喂喂講粗口有幾閒丫.
不過大庭廣眾講粗口, 仲要咒人咁就唔好law.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 19:53

最撚爛口。非我莫屬。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-17 11:45

冇可能! 天外有天, 人外有人, 我覺得一定唔係你 law~

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-16 20:07

本帖最後由 MoiRhapsody 於 2010-6-16 20:08 編輯

回復 MoiRhapsody

好似嗰啲假道學咁
你唔撚好講粗口阿
你一講就有好撚多人 DIU 你0架 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-6-16 19:49

我屌你!！
我講唔撚講粗口洗唔撚洗你批準呀？？？

我鐘撚意講呀!你吹得我碌鳩漲呀？？？

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-16 20:10

冇可能! 天外有天, 人外有人, 我覺得一定唔係你 law~
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-6-16 19:53

各下，請自重。
老夫一出口，係會有BB嫁!！

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-16 21:17

各下，請自重。
老夫一出口，係會有BB嫁!！
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-17 12:10

用口已經可以有BB? 果然真人不露相.

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-16 22:15

用口已經可以有BB? 果然真人不露相.
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-6-16 21:17

唔係你估

作者: Davidcopperfeel 時間: 2010-6-18 01:54

你都on dog dog ，吾夠顛，點咬斷你條子孫根？
吾激進，點叫激進派？立場清晰，旗幟鮮明，敢作敢言
d閹人娘 ...
ricrick 發表於 2010-6-14 01:54

吾夠顛，點咬斷你條子孫根？aight have fun bite your own dick

作者: Davidcopperfeel 時間: 2010-6-18 01:58

我屌你!！
我講唔撚講粗口洗唔撚洗你批準呀？？？

我鐘撚意講呀!你吹得我碌鳩漲呀？？？
...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-16 20:07

bet you won't talk **** in real life and thats pretty much all you could do lmfao

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-6-18 02:05

????哈～～你可以黎搵我試下

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 09:16

叫人唔好聽佢啲激進言論
不如聽吓余若微嘅理性分釋

香港人係好相信中國嘅
知佢係永遠唔會兌現承諾嘅

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 13:31

本帖最後由 sheep 於 2010-6-24 13:32 編輯

涼薄屎
做人公平啲由其是你以學者自居
長毛口臭低比人鬧
你又唔好抹黑人哋冇交稅
唔夠收入就唔使交稅
做咗議員就冇可能唔報稅唔交稅

你受大陸荼毒上腦喇

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-6-24 13:42

涼薄屎
做人公平啲由其是你以學者自居
長毛口臭低比人鬧
你又唔好抹黑人哋冇交稅
唔夠收入就唔使交稅
...
sheep 發表於 2010-6-24 13:31

did he step your toes or he is in love with your wife? why do you hate him so much?

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 13:47

本帖最後由 sheep 於 2010-6-24 13:49 編輯

回復 81# samsung

佢無咁嘅榮幸
此偽君子真小人

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 13:55

一句講哂
路遙知馬力
日久見人心

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-6-24 13:58

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-6-24 13:59 編輯

一句講哂
路遙知馬力
日久見人心
sheep 發表於 2010-6-24 13:55

That is right and that is what 民主黨 said when they responded to 社民連的惡毒攻擊.

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-6-24 14:05

回復 samsung

佢無咁嘅榮幸
此偽君子真小人
sheep 發表於 2010-6-24 13:47

You yourself is the person who is unethical.

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-6-24 14:07

叫人唔好聽佢啲激進言論
不如聽吓余若微嘅理性分釋

香港人係好相信中國嘅
知佢係永遠唔會兌現承諾嘅 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-6-24 09:16

That long hair is still abusing public housing in Hong Kong.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 14:49

That long hair is still abusing public housing in Hong Kong.
peter236 發表於 2010-6-24 14:07

he is living with his mother, if I'm not wrong, and the register home owner might be his mother also, what's wrong with it?

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 14:51

回復 85# peter236

only if you can prove

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 14:52

That is right and that is what 民主黨 said when they responded to 社民連的惡毒攻擊.
rockypath 發表於 2010-6-24 13:58

same to everybody

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-24 17:42

回復 peter236

only if you can prove
sheep 發表於 2010-6-25 06:51

呢d 野邊有得prove 架... 係個人感覺only.
正如你都prove 唔到我係一條牆頭草啦.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 19:53

回復 90# mcjohnjohn

一個人話就可能係偏見
但係。。。。。
嗰啲眯就係 PROOF 囉

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-24 20:03

回復 91# sheep
我覺得每人都有唔同既感受.
好難prove 自己感受到既野係必定正確.
正如我感到羊羊你真係好熱心咁愛香港, 愛民主, 但叫我prove 我又真係prove 唔到.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 20:39

回復 92# mcjohnjohn

PROVE 唔倒就唔好信

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-24 20:54

回復 93# sheep
prove 唔到就唔信, 咁人生都幾慘架woh.
做人要有信念先得架woh.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 21:09

回復 sheep
prove 唔到就唔信, 咁人生都幾慘架woh.
做人要有信念先得架woh.
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-6-24 20:54

咁就容易俾人擺佈同利用

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-24 21:21

咁就容易俾人擺佈同利用
sheep 發表於 2010-6-25 13:09

你可以咁講既...
不過, 我寧願容易俾人擺佈同利用, 都好過活在一個沒有信任既國度.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 21:24

回復 96# mcjohnjohn

SIT

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-24 21:26

回復 97# sheep
點解好似聽到狗吠既? 我係唔係有幻聽?

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-6-24 21:32

回復 sheep
點解好似聽到狗吠既? 我係唔係有幻聽?
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-6-24 21:26

你冇幻聽。。。。。
你坐低伸隻手出來
我俾舊骨你咬

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2010-6-24 21:46

你冇幻聽。。。。。
你坐低伸隻手出來
我俾舊骨你咬
sheep 發表於 2010-6-25 13:32

原來冇幻聽, 真係有狗吠!
好彩我o係LYK 咁耐, 都見識過唔少種類既狗, d 狗通常都識少少人話, 仲要模仿人類對自己所做既事. 如:
1. 學叫人SIT - 佢成閶聽人叫佢sit, 佢自己都學埋一份
2. 學比舊骨人咬 - 狗狗, 你知唔知人類係唔食骨架, 留比自己食啦

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)