溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: toyota...一天都光晒﹖ [打印本頁]

作者: spoonek4 時間: 2010-7-14 23:56 標題: toyota...一天都光晒﹖

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/ ... -misapplication-in/

作者: Prelude 時間: 2010-7-15 02:10

Too late, the damage has been done already.

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-7-15 06:56

本帖最後由 Catpiano 於 2010-7-15 06:57 編輯

"driver error was actually at fault..."

Make sense ar .. I trust Toyota machine more then C 9 la..

"they have reason to believe that drivers were mistakenly stomping on the accelerator rather than slamming the brakes in an attempt to avoid these crashes"

Yeah .. remember the video from crashing the LEXUS into the dealership? the C 9 thought the gas padel=brake.

作者: ACC-HE 時間: 2010-7-15 09:22

everything so soft, lack of feedback, driver too comfee and couldn't deal with the reality that the road and driving is dangerous.

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-7-15 09:54

Their image is gonna take a long time to rebuild. And the thing is, there really was a problem with the sticky floormats and the sticky/slow to return throttle, and those have the potential to cause accidents as well.

-Lik

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-7-15 10:37

Put it this way .. straight forward .. who drives Toyota/lexus and who will buy toyota/lexus?

Buddy of mine, her mom smashed to the light pole twice in front of their house in their camry .. within the first month after picked up the car ..

Accelator problem? na .. Brake problem? na ..

作者: Arlui 時間: 2010-7-15 11:07

ha ha i think even with the damaged reputation i'll still go for a toyota....

作者: shutterbug 時間: 2010-7-15 11:26

If it's true that it was the driver's fault, then I don't think all this can hurt Toyota that much.

作者: daimo 時間: 2010-7-15 11:35

well then, still the million $ question is, which brand is still the lowest on TCO?

My priority has changed. I'll rather invest the $ (stock, house, children's education) instead of having a flashy high TCO car.

作者: elan7e 時間: 2010-7-15 21:06

回復 1# spoonek4

想買 toyota 就快D買, 遲D優惠無咁多。

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-7-15 21:08

Go Hydunai go!

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-7-15 22:03

wow, how come Honda, Nissan etc did have this problem? Different people buy Honda, Nissan? Those C9s also buy BMW and Mercedes la.
Must be Japan government and US government made a secret deal.
We better buy some high quality Chinese cars, rather than crappy Toyota.

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-7-15 22:15

We better buy some high quality Chinese cars, rather than crappy Toyota....
peter236 發表於 2010-7-15 22:03

Wah .. u really have 1 hand wor .. lol

I think you cheer for Hydunai??

作者: godavid 時間: 2010-7-15 22:35

are they done yet?

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-7-15 22:54

Wah .. u really have 1 hand wor .. lol

I think you cheer for Hydunai??
Catpiano 發表於 2010-7-15 22:15

wow, how come Honda, Nissan etc didn't have this problem? Different people buy Honda, Nissan? Those C9s also buy BMW and Mercedes la.
Must be Japan government and US government made a secret deal and say Toyota has no problem, but in fact still has many problems.
We better buy some high quality Chinese cars, rather than crappy Toyota.

作者: pocamei 時間: 2010-7-30 00:48

我之前也是考慮買CX9~但因為業務的關係，後來轉而買Toyota的Highlander~
最近雖然被撞到了！((才買一個月的新車....))車體外部受傷嚴重，但車內卻完全保護！
人幾乎都沒受傷~((有沒有內傷還不清楚~^^"))但，以這樣的撞擊力，其他車種
肯定是無法承受的！
個人經驗，供您參考嚕~^^

作者: habitrailspace 時間: 2010-7-30 07:03

wow, how come Honda, Nissan etc didn't have this problem? Different people buy Honda, Nissan? Thos ...
peter236 發表於 2010-7-15 22:54

we're all buying chinese car already
all the parts are mic

作者: shutterbug 時間: 2010-7-30 11:54

我之前也是考慮買CX9~但因為業務的關係，後來轉而買Toyota的Highlander~
最近雖然被撞到了！((才買一個月的 ...
pocamei 發表於 2010-7-30 00:48

Not to challenge you or anything but looking at your statement from a logical stand point, how do you know other vehicles cannot withstand the crash like the Highlander? You tested them all?

作者: fibbi 時間: 2010-7-30 16:12

就算Ford（美國車）我都見過撞到total loss但係個人一啲都無受傷嘅例子啦。所以好難講嘅，睇吓點撞啦。

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-7-30 21:27

Not to challenge you or anything but looking at your statement from a logical stand point, how do ...
shutterbug 發表於 2010-7-30 11:54

SB, that is not the point ..

The point is, typical C9, they buy Toyota SUV to crash ....

作者: martintin 時間: 2010-7-30 22:03

回復 20# Catpiano

agree

講返個論點:
如果Toyota  都信唔過咁街上咪好多白癡?
n 咁多人用toyota 講到咁差  咁就唔好出街啦
週街都係toyota
咁出街俾toyota 車撞倒的機會咪一定大過你自己開架toyota 發生意外囉  ???

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-7-30 22:17

Yeah ... for sure more Accident by Toyota then Ferrari ... which one is safer? lol

But at least, I dont buy a car to crash ..... but to drive and enjoy .. ^_^

作者: zoids 時間: 2010-7-30 23:47

We all know most new Taxi are Camrys when the new model came out, and most taxi got used daily and these should be worn out the fastest or break down the fastest....

How come no even one taxi got that problem all over North America? If it is that serious, shouldn't all the taxi drivers be concerned in the first place? Hmm...... I wonder why no taxi driver come out to complain so far....

Doesn't compute to me man...

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2010-7-31 00:29

Every brand has its own problems. Toyota is still one of the best...

作者: pocamei 時間: 2010-7-31 02:44

無意引發口水戰爭~^^"~
我沒有也不希望有那樣的機會去測試每一個車款是不是都一樣耐撞，
基本上也只是因為在路邊等拖車的時候，有不少人來跟我門這樣說而已~^^"
畢竟這款車子在他們的印象中，算是安全性滿高的一款車型。
今年美國做的翻轉撞擊測試，此款車是第二名的車，輸給Jeep~
而新車就被撞，我想，任誰也不願意的~只是意外來的就是那麼突然....
現在也是心如刀割....一個頭兩個大哩~^^"

作者: martintin 時間: 2010-7-31 10:17

回復 23# zoids
商用車點可以同私人車比
睇下政府對商用車的要求先講 check 車都要check得密D啦老細

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-7-31 10:53

Well.. diff buyers .. diff things they want ..

To me, safety is very important as well, since I have a little 1 yr old ..

But "safety" to me is a car with good handling/feedback/control/acceleration/braking .. to PREVENT accident happen... even if accident happens .. can reduce the damage ..

NOT to buy a car to have accident ..

作者: daimo 時間: 2010-7-31 11:03

well, CP, how often do you switch car? if you don't mind to share?

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-8-1 08:24

well, CP, how often do you switch car? if you don't mind to share?
daimo 發表於 2010-7-31 11:03

Way way .. Daimo ... put me on table again?

I have kid now ... I am a family man with family car la...

^_^

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)