why? me? should be pricky rose ja ma 作者: godavid 時間: 2010-8-7 08:17
love what? ass?
samsung 發表於 2010-8-6 22:27
you got it, boy~!!!!!!!!!!!作者: godavid 時間: 2010-8-7 08:18
why? me? should be pricky rose ja ma
samsung 發表於 2010-8-7 00:55
why bother, both are the same作者: lo_pak 時間: 2010-8-11 01:04
It must be illusion...作者: samsung 時間: 2010-8-11 01:20
why bother, both are the same
godavid 發表於 2010-8-7 08:18
do you mean I am pricky rose? 作者: godavid 時間: 2010-8-11 07:53
do you mean I am pricky rose?
samsung 發表於 2010-8-11 01:20
everyone could be pricly rose
i'm not sure who is who作者: ACC-HE 時間: 2010-8-20 15:04
本帖最後由 ACC-HE 於 2010-8-20 15:06 編輯
[attach]9992[/attach]
Facebook representatives responded: “We do not allow photos that contain nudity, drug use or violence.”作者: ACC-HE 時間: 2010-8-23 09:22
作者: godavid 時間: 2010-8-23 19:53
second one is photoshopped?作者: ACC-HE 時間: 2010-8-23 20:38
second one? no, don't think so.作者: godavid 時間: 2010-8-23 21:31