溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: February 2011 [打印本頁]

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-10 15:10 標題: February 2011

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-10 15:11

作者: fibbi 時間: 2011-2-10 15:59

Thanks for sharing.

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-10 16:33

[attach]10863[/attach][attach]10866[/attach][attach]10864[/attach][attach]10865[/attach][attach]10867[/attach][attach]10868[/attach][attach]10869[/attach][attach]10870[/attach][attach]10871[/attach][attach]10872[/attach][attach]10873[/attach][attach]10874[/attach][attach]10875[/attach][attach]10876[/attach][attach]10877[/attach][attach]10878[/attach][attach]10879[/attach][attach]10880[/attach][attach]10881[/attach][attach]10882[/attach][attach]10883[/attach][attach]10884[/attach]

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-10 17:02

I think b&w would be more suitable for a lot of the architecture shots. Color is such a distraction.

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-10 17:05

I am trying to post HTML code from flickr to here. Can you do a tutorial cowboy?

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-10 17:08

i mean when I try to post html code in here. It is just coding appear, instead of photo.

which one in b/w. the lvy looks really good today.

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-2-10 17:11

回復 6# 快樂牛郎

Color distraction, usually came from those unrelated stuff.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-10 17:35

i mean when I try to post html code in here. It is just coding appear, instead of photo.

which one ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/2/10 17:08

2nd one or 4th one would look better in b&w

did you attach a flickr jpg or a flickr link

click the jpg button in lyk and make sure you paste a jpg link

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-10 17:35

回復快樂牛郎

Color distraction, usually came from those unrelated stuff.
sheep 發表於 2011/2/10 17:11

right

作者: yayaya 時間: 2011-2-10 17:40

aw... 我觉得look4chrisng d街拍比牛哥好

作者: biggie 時間: 2011-2-10 17:51

回復 5# Look4chrisng

Your third shot is the best. The rest of the photos are not worthy of sharing.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-10 18:00

回復 Look4chrisng

Your third shot is the best. The rest of the photos are not worthy of sharing. ...
biggie 發表於 2011/2/10 17:51

I don't think there's any problem with sharing, although it's good to be selective so you don't overload your readers' minds.

作者: ricrick 時間: 2011-2-11 16:50

February 2011

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-12 01:09

Testing my new lens today

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-12 01:09

Definitely not the Leica look, but the tonality and sharpness is awesome

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-13 13:43

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-14 00:24

still enjoying my 50mm

作者: fibbi 時間: 2011-2-14 01:53

本帖最後由 fibbi 於 2011-2-14 01:55 編輯

From Lunar Fest

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-14 02:27

Love the last one....so dreamy and funny at the same time

GREAT stuff

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2011-2-15 01:10

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2011-2-15 01:10

回復 16# 快樂牛郎

what lens?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-15 01:55

回復快樂牛郎

what lens?
siumaibb 發表於 2011/2/15 01:10

Zeiss 50mm f1.5 C Sonnar

I regret not getting it sooner. I should've got it at the same time as the 35mm.

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2011-2-15 09:54

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2011-2-15 09:55

回復 24# 快樂牛郎

nice, for which camera

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2011-2-15 10:55

nothing special~ just a shot taken inside the car on my way back from kelowna~

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-15 11:03

回復快樂牛郎

nice, for which camera
siumaibb 發表於 2011/2/15 09:55

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-15 12:06

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2011-2-15 12:13

本帖最後由 siumaibb 於 2011-2-15 12:15 編輯

回復 28# 快樂牛郎

SWEEET!!! How do you like it?

How does the Zeiss compare to the Leica 50 .4?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-15 13:22

回復快樂牛郎

SWEEET!!! How do you like it?

How does the Zeiss compare to the Leica 50 .4? ...
siumaibb 發表於 2011/2/15 12:13

I dunno about the Lux. I saw one for $2400 a few days ago but it was snatched up in minutes by someone elese. One of my contacts has the version II and the image looks quite stunning. I think in terms of rendering it's probably similar to my 75mm Summicron. I saw a lot of great images taken with the 35mm 'cron, but my friend said my C biogon is much better.

As far as the camera goes, it's the best experience you can possibly have today and I can't even imagine shooting a DSLR again.

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2011-2-15 16:33

回復 31# 快樂牛郎

but you need $10k to buy that experience

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-15 16:49

回復快樂牛郎

but you need $10k to buy that experience
siumaibb 發表於 2011/2/15 16:33

Depends on how serious you are about your hobby and how far you want to take it to. Some people pay $100K for an MBA degree. Many people have $50-$60K cars.

I've pretty much reserved enough funds for all future generations of M bodies. LOL.

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-15 21:37

If there is no budget issue. Why not just shoot medium format on film. As far as I know digital still can't get the highlight details of film.

Shoot 120 film. :-)

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-15 22:07

If there is no budget issue. Why not just shoot medium format on film. As far as I know digital st ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/2/15 21:37

Because you don't have to finish the entire roll within a couple days and you don't have to bring it to a lab.

Most good film has been discontinued.  It's a myth that film has higher DR than digital.  If you go out and buy a $2-$3 roll of film, you are not gonna get the range of a full frame sensor.  If you bring your film to some cheap places, they might scratch your film or somehow damage your negatives.

When it comes to storage, you can make 10 different copies of your raw files and store in many different places.  When there's only one copy of negatives, you really need to think about where to store them safely.

Now about the scanning part.  Most scanners have very low res.  I see many scanned film shots on flickr and they just look flat and washed out.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-15 22:09

Actually, you shoot film when budget IS an issue. It's inevitable that you will be able to buy M9 for $4500 at some point in the next couple of years. With $1500-$2000, you can shoot a lot of film.

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2011-2-15 23:16

siumaibb 發表於 2011-2-15 01:10

is this taken from Byrne road?

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2011-2-17 13:00

回復 37# 嘉嘉

yes, it is

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2011-2-17 13:36

回復嘉嘉

yes, it is
siumaibb 發表於 2011-2-17 13:00

oh, no wonder why it looks so familiar~
do you work in that area?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-18 09:54

The fortune wheel

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-18 18:59

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-20 05:54

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-20 09:25

本帖最後由 librazhy 於 2011-2-20 09:44 編輯

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-20 10:24

本帖最後由 librazhy 於 2011-2-20 10:45 編輯

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-20 12:42

Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/2/20 05:54

pretty good light
although I can't tell what they are doing

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-20 12:43

librazhy 發表於 2011/2/20 09:25

what are these about?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-20 12:44

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-20 12:51

doing what? just random shot.

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-20 12:56

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-20 13:10

本帖最後由 librazhy 於 2011-2-20 13:24 編輯

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-20 13:14

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-20 13:28

之前陰天好耐

﹐呢兩三日好天仲唔喪影﹖

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-20 13:32

pretty good light
although I can't tell what they are doing
快樂牛郎發表於 2011-2-20 12:42

doesn't the pencil tell you anything?

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-20 15:07

pretty good light
although I can't tell what they are doing
快樂牛郎發表於 2011-2-20 12:42

oh, that. They are in a Library. too young to go to bars.

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-20 15:08

快樂牛郎發表於 2011-2-20 12:44

good. like the color. you always go to club?

作者: satil 時間: 2011-2-20 15:22

襯熱鬧

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-20 15:29

satil, upload more 靚相 la, pic 2 , i like

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-20 22:08

good. like the color. you always go to club?
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/2/20 15:08

ya
whenever there are good bands

maybe 20-25 times a year?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-20 22:09

satil, upload more 靚相 la, pic 2 , i like
librazhy 發表於 2011/2/20 15:29

D水咁黃
係咪溝左石油

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-20 22:10

之前陰天好耐﹐呢兩三日好天仲唔喪影﹖
librazhy 發表於 2011/2/20 13:28

陰天有陰天既影法

作者: satil 時間: 2011-2-20 22:19

溝咗石油就黑啦, 點係黃.
是一個幼沙淺灘, 浪不斷翻加上陽光的位置, 形成黃色.

這相是在夏威夷最北的地方影. 水十分清, 但浪不停.

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-20 22:23

回復 58# 快樂牛郎

used to go to Railway Club. Music is only so so in Vancouver. I use to go to chicgo.

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-20 22:41

本帖最後由 librazhy 於 2011-2-20 22:42 編輯

陰天有陰天既影法
快樂牛郎發表於 2011-2-20 22:10

講多無謂﹐UPLOAD最實際﹐睇下有幾耍家﹖

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-20 22:59

回復快樂牛郎

used to go to Railway Club. Music is only so so in Vancouver. I use to go to ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/2/20 22:23

it's the same bands though
they go to Chicago then go to Vancouver

railway club is tiny
there are bigger ones out there

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-20 23:00

講多無謂﹐UPLOAD最實際﹐睇下有幾耍家﹖
librazhy 發表於 2011/2/20 22:41

well
on a cloudy day you can still use f2.8 at 1/80

no big deal

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-20 23:21

well
on a cloudy day you can still use f2.8 at 1/80

no big deal
快樂牛郎發表於 2011-2-20 23:00

that's why the cloud is brown out. And you should 120 Fuji 400H you can over expose it by 4 stops and still have details.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-20 23:33

that's why the cloud is brown out. And you should 120 Fuji 400H you can over expose it by 4 ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/2/20 23:21

I don't really care about the sky though

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-21 01:35

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-21 01:49

作者: satil 時間: 2011-2-21 10:49

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-21 17:14

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-21 20:14

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-21 20:27

what's that about?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-21 21:11

Elvis Presley lamps

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-21 21:13

oh, that part in red

i dunno...can't tell...looks like a guy

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-21 21:37

Ghosts

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-21 22:03

D倒影講真都幾多﹐又四驅車又建築物﹐又有手有腳, 多且亂﹐喧賓奪主﹐比著我就寧願DELETE左佢。

but, hey, it's your picture. 不如你教下我點去欣賞, put $in my pocket

作者: librazhy 時間: 2011-2-21 22:06

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-21 22:11

D倒影講真都幾多﹐又四驅車又建築物﹐又有手有腳, 多且亂﹐喧賓奪主﹐比著我就寧願DELETE左佢。

but, hey, ...
librazhy 發表於 2011/2/21 22:03

好難講邊個係賓邊個係主
好多時你想影一樣野
但係結果出黎有另外一樣野更有趣

唔好講film
就算你影digital有時都要翻到屋企先發現一D你當時根本冇留意既野

Watch this movie and you will know what I am saying

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-22 09:43

快樂牛郎發表於 2011-2-21 17:14

Very good this one. good eye. Did he do something funny? did you stay and watch him?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-22 10:35

Very good this one. good eye. Did he do something funny? did you stay and watch him?
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/2/22 09:43

nothing funny
he's just resting
then he stood up and moved on

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-22 14:55

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-22 14:59

you really like architecture shots

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-22 15:06

Sunny day Citytscape. I was going for the warehouses on terminal street, but it is too far to walk there.

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-22 15:12

should corp like this. better?

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-22 15:13

回復 84# Look4chrisng

No, I like shooting people. But I have no one to shoot.

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-22 15:23

I shoot when I see pretty light. It really doesn't matter what the subject is, but it is more fun to shoot people.

The no. 6. Now I am looking at my crappy screen, it almost looks like watercolor. It must be the combination of out of focus and overexposure.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-22 15:27

should corp like this. better?
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/2/22 15:12

not really
i always prefer original dimensions

作者: satil 時間: 2011-2-22 20:24

[attach]10942[/attach]

[attach]10943[/attach]

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-22 21:51

The tone of this one is quite beautiful. You can do more b&ws now.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-23 00:40

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-23 10:32

The tone of this one is quite beautiful. You can do more b&ws now.
快樂牛郎發表於 2011-2-22 21:51

thanks, it is just lightroom. no special juice.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-23 11:15

thanks, it is just lightroom. no special juice.
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/2/23 10:32

yep
just the light condition was good
but the composition was off

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-23 11:25

how so?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-23 12:05

how so?
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/2/23 11:25

looks too tight to me

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-2-23 13:26

good, could be too tight.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-23 22:15

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-2-24 00:46

The truly Leica spirit

作者: satil 時間: 2011-2-24 09:58

[attach]10945[/attach]

作者: satil 時間: 2011-2-24 09:59

[attach]10946[/attach]

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)