Board logo

標題: 中國撤僑 [打印本頁]

作者: daimo    時間: 2011-3-14 23:25     標題: 中國撤僑

http://www.china-embassy.or.jp/chn/sgxxs/t806578.htm
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-3-14 23:52

會唔會真係有大鑊野發生?
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-14 23:56

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 00:00

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: daimo    時間: 2011-3-15 00:06

會唔會真係有大鑊野發生?
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-3-14 23:52



already 大鑊野 la.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 00:09

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-3-15 00:14

回復  mcjohnjohn


呀麥莊莊我係你住喺香港就快d去超市搶購大量食水同乾糧,罐頭同即食麵喇!

呢d野等得 ...
fy789 發表於 2011-3-15 16:00

生死有命, 富貴由天~
希望我福大命大死唔去啦! 我會定期上黎同大家say hi, 如果大家有一排見唔到我上黎, 咁應該代表真係好大鑊了.
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-3-15 00:16

already 大鑊野 la.
daimo 發表於 2011-3-15 16:06

影響一個地區都唔算好大鑊, 影響成個地球就...
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 00:27

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-3-15 00:44

回復  mcjohnjohn


你d仔女仲想大,未必有你咁括達!

你咁同佢地做決定係味自私咗d呀!

另外我地呢邊順 ...
fy789 發表於 2011-3-15 16:27

做得我d 仔女, 就預左同老豆老母一齊xx 架啦! o係佢地未有能力做決定既時候, 為人父母就要幫佢地決定一d 事. 唔通叫佢地去決定自己幾時食奶同換片咩?

邊個西先都未知, 不過我諗起一副對聯 - 今日吾軀歸故土, 他朝君體也相同.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 00:52

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: rainbow-davie    時間: 2011-3-15 02:38

Eat more seaweed now.
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 08:23

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-3-15 08:37 編輯

回復 4# fy789

Cheez...

People have to prepare, people have to be warned of the importance, but certainly not to scare people in the first hand.

The nuclear outbreak is serious, but still, hope you know what you are doing and what is actually happening...

Spread unnecessary horror won't help people to act correctly, but rather, worsen...

As long as the core is not "totally" melted, things can still be under control...

And, I see the event is shifting more to the positive way...
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 08:44

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-3-15 08:46 編輯

回復 12# rainbow-davie

Having over dosage iodide in the body will make your emotion unstable...

And, I can't see the importance of having seaweed "NOW"... Don't act like a fool...
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 08:49

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 08:54

回復 15# fy789

Like you, I don't trust what the Japs Gov told us, I just based on what they are actually working on...
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 09:17

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 09:28

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-3-15 09:44 編輯

回復 17# fy789

Apparently they are cheating, at least, for 2 days... Mostly because of Tokyo Power management...

They will have to "Seppuku" if that was happened in the old days...
作者: daimo    時間: 2011-3-15 09:50

Tokyo electric tried to downplay the situation and made the government to do the same.

The government wanted to clam the people and at the same time, maintain the national pride, so they downplayed it as well.

If they plead for help earlier and accepted US and other nations' help earlier then the situation wouldn't be as bad.
作者: fibbi    時間: 2011-3-15 10:03

I don't see what's the point to be panic in BC because of the Japanese radiation incident. If the radioactive material does spread to BC where can we go? If it makes this far to BC it already spread to other Asian countries too.
Stocking up supplies in prepare of earthquakes makes more sense here.
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-3-15 10:08

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-3-15 10:12 編輯

Even though I am in BC, I am very worried for family members and friends who are living in Hong Kong, China, Japan, Taiwan and Malaysia and Singapore.

I do panic for their situation.
I found people that I know in Japan are safe from the quake. However, the radiation is at the door step. I do not know whether they have any plan to move out or what will be coming to them.
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 10:08

回復 19# daimo

x2 Agree.

But history doesn't have "what if"...
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 10:12

Even though I am in BC, I am very worried for family members and friends who are living in Hong Kong ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-3-15 10:08


Still, situation is not as bad even living in Tokyo.

Future is still uncertain, yes, but it's getting more clear... , at least, not worsening...
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-3-15 10:15

Future is still uncertain, yes, but it's getting more clear...  , at least, not worsening...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-3-15 10:12


How do you know it is not worsening? What I heard is that it is getting worse (I hope it is an outdated news).
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 10:18

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 10:22

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-15 10:26

If Tokyo needs to be evacuated, where will the people go? Japan is a small country, there is not enough room for manoeuver.
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 10:30

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-3-15 10:32 編輯

回復 25# fy789

Don't be too hysteric...

旁觀者清, 當局者迷...

That's all I have to say...
作者: daimo    時間: 2011-3-15 10:36

回復  fy789

Don't be too hysteric...

旁觀者清, 當局者迷...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-3-15 10:30


Even the nuclear experts are not totally in agreement.  some of them are "half empty", some of them are "half full".

I wouldn't panic cos I'm here in BC.  but if I were in Tokyo, I'll be kicking myself right now for not fleeing to Kansai over the weekend.

If the current nuclear plant is happening 240km from where I live (like from here to Seattle), I'll be long gone.  You can choose to stay ...
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 10:41

回復 25# fy789

If the situation is not worsening and they give me a 50% discount on Tokyo housing, I will...
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 10:43

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 10:45

If Tokyo needs to be evacuated, where will the people go? Japan is a small country, there is not eno ...
peter236 發表於 2011-3-15 10:26


Moving south, eg. Kagoshima
作者: daimo    時間: 2011-3-15 10:49

Moving south, eg. Kagoshima
lo_pak 發表於 2011-3-15 10:45


FYI.

http://www.ausbt.com.au/ash-clou ... -korea-china-taiwan

Business travellers with flights to Korea, China, Taiwan and Japan should check arrival and departure times with their airline following the eruption of Shinmoedake, a volcano on the southern Japanese island of Kyushu.
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 10:53

回復 29# daimo

If same thing happens here, I will stay until I receive the evaculation order from the government.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 10:54

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2011-3-15 10:55

回復 20# fibbi


    I'm not the first one to panic here in B.C.
    I'm not rich or young or single.
    If it is my fate, I'll accept it.
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-3-15 10:58

Heard from radio that the buses were filled right away. It is good that the Chinese government takes actions early to help its people.

However, because of the lack of buses and fuel. It will take longer to get all people out.
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 11:00

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-3-15 11:06 編輯

回復 35# fy789

Remember what you have asked... You ask me to "immigrate" to Tokyo...

First, if I'm a resident in Tokyo already, I will choose to stay without question because it's my homeland...

You don't even know what you are asking other than picking on words...

I can tell your head is overheated, like the reactor in Fukushima...
作者: fibbi    時間: 2011-3-15 11:04

本帖最後由 fibbi 於 2011-3-15 11:15 編輯

回復 26# fy789


    First I don't see why you have to add the title C9 for married loyaukee here.

Even if you start stocking up water and supplies, if radiation hits BC (if ever does), What does it help? If you are in such a deep panic mode why don't you flee out of BC and go somewhere else?

I had my earthquake kit in my place all the time w/ extra food supply already. There is no need for you to accuse people of caring their love ones or not.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 11:05

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 11:08

回復 40# fy789

Cheez...

I have never claimed Tokyo is safe, it's only potentially at risk...
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 11:14

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 11:20

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: fibbi    時間: 2011-3-15 11:21

回復 42# fy789


If you are so much in concern of earthquake and radiation, feel free to move out of BC and find a place free of nuclear plant and non earthquake zone.

As living in BC, stocking food or supplies in preparation of earthquake is always recommended. But for the sake of this Japanese incident, I would say no and that's my 0.0002 cent. Yes I do worry about my family in Hong Kong but I doubt what I can do for them now.
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 11:24

回復 43# fy789

I can't see there's a conflict with my comment...
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 11:34

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 11:36

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-15 11:38

回復  fy789


    First I don't see why you have to add the title C9 for married loyaukee here.

E ...
fibbi 發表於 2011-3-15 11:04

What type of food do you have?
作者: yuusaku    時間: 2011-3-15 11:44

My job and training as an engineer trained me to see potential problems
before they will happen.


as a java programmer, i do it by
try {
// do something that could potentially dangerous
} catch (Throwable t) {
// do something to handle the worst scenario
} finally {
// do something here regardless what had happened
}


作者: fibbi    時間: 2011-3-15 11:47

回復 46# fy789


    If you are not sure about the Chinese term you better not use the term.
http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E5%B8%AB%E5%A5%B6


I'm afraid of radio active pollution too but I'm not in concern as I'm in BC. There is nothing I can do unless I ran away.
作者: fibbi    時間: 2011-3-15 11:48

回復 48# peter236


    Get a earthquake survival kit from store. Store extra canned food (e.g. luncheon meat), cracker  and lots of water.
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2011-3-15 11:51

回復 44# fibbi


    Reminds me of Y2K panic,
    all I did was to stock 2 cases of drinking water.
    For food? I often have enough for 1 month supply  in my garage
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2011-3-15 11:52

回復 44# fibbi


    Oh, my baby sister in Hong Kong
作者: fibbi    時間: 2011-3-15 11:53

回復 52# somewhereintime


    I usually don't have that much food supply though.
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2011-3-15 11:55

回復 54# fibbi

And I have gasoline and propane so I do not have to worry about power outage
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 12:02

回復 55# somewhereintime

Don't put the propane and gasoline in the garage... Place it outside the yard cabinet where you can easily gain access and away from gas...
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-15 12:03

回復  fibbi

And I have gasoline and propane so I do not have to worry about power outage
somewhereintime 發表於 2011-3-15 11:55

If there is no electricity, all your frozen meat in the garage will be gone.
作者: 布小熊    時間: 2011-3-15 12:03

回復  daimo

If same thing happens here, I will stay until I receive the evaculation order from the ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-3-15 10:53 AM

And I think that's what MOST ppl in Japan are doing. They try to stay until there is a evacuation order...
I am really worry now... I don't think I can talk my sister to move.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 12:05

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2011-3-15 12:05

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2011-3-15 12:06 編輯

Dried staples.
With gasoline, you can power generator,just like RV truck
作者: daimo    時間: 2011-3-15 12:15

Whose advice to take?  the French? or the Japanese government?


--
6國發旅警 法促離東京
 【明報專訊】最少6國政府昨呼籲國民,避免到或離開東京及東北災區,東京成田機場內,昨幾乎每間航空公司櫃位都有人龍,其中國泰櫃位前,不少港人、外國人甚至日本人排隊購票,有居於日本4年半的港人不惜辭去在日本的兼職工作趕回香港。國泰航空為日本往香港的旅客提供一律5755港元的優惠票價…… [ 詳情 ] ((2011年3月15日)
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 12:22

回復 61# daimo

Think deeply and you will know.

Both governments are acting the way they are...

The Japs government cannot guarantee it's 100% safe in the place, there's no harm for the French government to flee the citizens...
作者: daimo    時間: 2011-3-15 12:40

回復 62# lo_pak

you should read today's mingpao

http://news.mingpao.com/20110316/gaa1.htm
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 12:41

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-3-15 12:52 編輯

回復 47# fy789

I still can't see the conflict. It's just like mentioning the health condition of a patient. Is s/he healthy/normal/sick/dying...

In my opinion, Tokyo is sick (potential at risk/not healthy/not safe), but certainly not dying (dangerous)...

Am I on the fence in your opinion?
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 12:49

回復 63# daimo

I read that this morning when it releaesd, it's quite a good summary of the news, but no other new information...
作者: daimo    時間: 2011-3-15 12:50

回復  daimo

I read that this morning when it releaesd, it's quite a good summary of the news, but  ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-3-15 12:49



    the list I posted was just available 15mins ago.  this is NOT the Vancouver mingpao of today.
作者: daimo    時間: 2011-3-15 12:53

日民信權威 傳媒「和諧」未提輻射

http://news.mingpao.com/20110316/gai2.htm
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 13:01

回復 66# daimo

Is it...? The content looks fairly the same as other articles being posted earlier... Still, no new information...
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 13:14

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 13:17

回復 69# fy789

Nope, I don't like their announcements either. I rely on data readings and the method to obtain data...
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-15 13:47

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-3-15 13:49 編輯
日民信權威 傳媒「和諧」未提輻射
daimo 發表於 2011-3-15 12:53


日本的傳媒傾向「和諧」報道

http://news.mingpao.com/20110316/gai2.htm

The Japanese are very much 和諧 by their government.
作者: 匿名    時間: 2011-3-15 14:08

中國撒嬌﹖﹖﹖
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2011-3-15 14:15

小小日本向偉大祖國學習


和諧萬歲!!!
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2011-3-15 14:18

回復 72# 匿名


撒嬌? that would be you
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 14:18

回復 73# somewhereintime

Harmony is good as long as the information provided is correct and unskewed...
作者: fibbi    時間: 2011-3-15 14:27

回復 59# fy789


    Yeah I have problem communicating with people lack of manner.
作者: fibbi    時間: 2011-3-15 14:31

Actually if I were in Tokyo I would try to leave. Japan is quite good in dealing with earthquake (at least the architecture is pretty safe) but radiation...I would be scared too (if I'm in Tokyo).
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-3-15 15:39

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-3-15 15:41 編輯

I think it is a good precaution to evacuate people orderly and early before the situation get out of hands and it is often already too late if the government is taking the situation responsibly.

Whether people will panic is much to do with whether they are still trusting the government and holding confidence in the ability of the government dealing with the situation.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 15:44

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-3-15 15:55

回復 78# rockypath

x2 .
作者: yayaya    時間: 2011-3-15 19:43

居然可以吹了8页

香港也是海边城市,不是今年有事以后难免有similar的情况

还是赶紧移民来多伦多吧哈哈
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-15 19:45

居然可以吹了8页

香港也是海边城市,不是今年有事以后难免有similar的情况

还是赶紧移民来多伦多吧哈哈 ...
yayaya 發表於 2011-3-15 19:43

You stupid moron. there are nuclear power plants near Toronto.
作者: yayaya    時間: 2011-3-15 19:48

You stupid moron. there are nuclear power plants near Toronto.
peter236 發表於 2011-3-15 19:45



    可是多伦多不是震源阿,更不接近海,所以不会有海潇

你才stupid呢。。
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-15 19:50

可是多伦多不是震源阿,更不接近海,所以不会有海潇

你才stupid呢。。 ...
yayaya 發表於 2011-3-15 19:48

There can still be accidents.
Hong Kong is not in earthquake zone.
作者: zoids    時間: 2011-3-15 22:25

回復 83# yayaya


Except human errors can happen... and don't forget the Pickering nuclear plant is just next to us...
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-15 23:08

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: yayaya    時間: 2011-3-16 06:19

回復  yayaya


啋過你,樣過你呢個神婆/神佬!

咁樣咒香港,口沒遮欄,因住收尾幾年呀   ! ...
fy789 發表於 2011-3-15 23:08


提醒你咋
日本本来就位于太平洋板块和亚欧板块的交界处,地震是很可能的只是时间问题,而且零零丁丁一个独立分离开来,这种地势发生自然灾害的情况下的缺陷还不凸现么?

而hk不在板块之间,可以香港岛也是面对着海洋,有这个隐患

我没有说其他地方没有危险,楼上说human error,我只是提到尽量减低在地理环境上的劣势,hk在地势比别人危险之外它也不排除有human error阿。
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-16 06:22

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-16 06:29

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: yayaya    時間: 2011-3-16 11:31

回復  yayaya


唔識就收聲喇!

你屋企夠有幾個厠所喇,不如你驚吓你痾完紙,抹完你個紙筆,按水掣冲水 ...
fy789 發表於 2011-3-16 06:29


低级趣味
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-16 11:33

低级趣味
yayaya 發表於 2011-3-16 11:31

You should be careful, Guangzhou is right up the river.
作者: yayaya    時間: 2011-3-16 11:50

You should be careful, Guangzhou is right up the river.
peter236 發表於 2011-3-16 11:33


im not in gz neither my family lol
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-16 11:51

im not in gz neither my family lol
yayaya 發表於 2011-3-16 11:50

Some day you will go back there.
作者: yayaya    時間: 2011-3-16 11:54

Some day you will go back there.
peter236 發表於 2011-3-16 11:51


那你不用说gz阿,你直接说hk行了,someday i will go to hk, and japan too
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-16 12:20

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: yayaya    時間: 2011-3-16 13:34

无得罪我
我也没有诅咒hk
不过你坦白d,自己或者家人居住在海边岛屿城市,看见日本这一劫,难道自己没有担心么?

如果有人在灾难前预言日本这次事件,对他们说你们的国家就处在两个板块之间,板块运动会造成地震甚至有可能引发海潇,到时候你地就很容易灭门,我相信日本人听到这种预言都会跟你一样反应或者不屑

这据说是千年一遇的灾难,证明了一件事,有些事实是存在的只是迟早发生的问题

日本人就像你现在这样觉得荒谬,觉得对方在诅咒,觉得1000年才发生一次怎么会轮到我,所以就依然在哪里居住,的确在海边的城市都比较发达,但是这次就证明了这样的地理位置也有弊端

我只是想说明这点,并不是诅咒香港




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2