Board logo

標題: 程翔：問心無愧 [打印本頁]
作者: Traum    時間: 2008-2-21 01:38     標題: 程翔：問心無愧

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Traum    時間: 2008-2-21 01:39

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-2-21 02:33

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-21 01:39 發表
On so many levels, this piece of news should be far more important than the sex photo scandals. But of course, the level of interest in these matters doesn't even compare...

-Lik


You are so high-class. All the other people are of "lower talent" than you are and therefore are not interested in these things.
作者: Ultraman    時間: 2008-2-21 02:37

Many people may ask: "Who is 程翔?"
作者: Traum    時間: 2008-2-21 10:50

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-2-21 11:09

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-21 10:50 發表

Your mockery is not working, Peter-John. Go back to grade school and learn how to inch people properly.

And while we're at it, I'd like to ask why you don't actually have anything to say to defend t ...


You little anti-China kid, many people said the guy was not a spy at all and therefore should have been released long time ago.
作者: chunsh    時間: 2008-2-21 12:12

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-21 10:50 發表

Your mockery is not working, Peter-John. Go back to grade school and learn how to inch people properly.

And while we're at it, I'd like to ask why you don't actually have anything to say to defend t ...



u think 程翔 is totally innocent in this event, not even have any suspectful actions?
作者: SAZABI    時間: 2008-2-21 12:19

I heard on the radio this morning saying sth interesting.

Saying that he was too 愛國, so he tried to do sth in the China-Taiwan thing.  As a result, put himself in a very "dangerous" situation.

I kinda agree that if he didn't do sth that the Chinese government doesn't like, or just sth suspicious, he wouldn't be sent to jail neh...
作者: Traum    時間: 2008-2-21 14:30

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-2-21 15:34

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-21 14:30 發表

Given his background, it is ludicruous to consider that he would do anything remotely related to treason. Now, would he do something that might piss off the Communist Government? That's an entirely d ...


But he did receive some money from some Taiwanese organizations.
作者: Traum    時間: 2008-2-21 15:59

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: chunsh    時間: 2008-2-21 16:11

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-21 15:59 發表

Oh? Just since when did receiving money from Taiwanese organizations became a crime? I am totally not aware of that!

Using your logic, all Taiwanese-fund work in China would provide enough grounds f ...


did u read SAZABI's comment?
I agree with that
one thing, if China government really can find some solid evidences to prove him do anything harmful to china government, he is a dead meat; so we can say, there is no SOLID evidence; however, one thing we can sure, he MUST have done something very suspicious. Otherwise, u think the chinese government is too bored so they catch someone who they don't like to put into jail? remember, chinese government has been trying to hard to tell hk people that they will not ruin HK since 1997 (and still going on). So I don't tihnk they would put a hk people to jail for no reason.

no one can really prove that he is innocent or guilty (even himself)
you may say prosecuting a peson who can't be proven to be guilty/innocent is wrong, but u shouldnt just blame the communist government, CIA just do the same sh*t all the time

[ 本帖最後由 chunsh 於 2008-2-21 16:30 編輯 ]
作者: Traum    時間: 2008-2-21 18:39

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: chunsh    時間: 2008-2-21 18:43

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-21 18:39 發表

Come on, Chunsh. I thought you're smarter than that. How is HK not ruined after the 1997 handover? First the economy turned into a big pile of shxt. And now the political system has turned into an ev ...



the one who ruined hk is Dong's government, not Chinese government
but that is out of topic, I just want to point out that chinese governemnt do whatever they can to make us believe that they will not harass us, the hk people; so they will not put that 程翔 for ABSOLUTELY no reason
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-2-21 23:55

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-21 18:39 發表

Come on, Chunsh. I thought you're smarter than that. How is HK not ruined after the 1997 handover? First the economy turned into a big pile of shxt. And now the political system has turned into an ev ...


Traum, you stupidty has disappointed me again. With all your talent, I expected a lot more from you. HK went into economic problems after 1997 because of the Asian financial crisis and the bubble economy that your British masters created before the handover. Now the British themselves have another banking problem involving the nationalization of Northern Rock which is a bank in bankruptcy.  It seems that the British are good at creating financial crap. After all you are just a silly pro-British clown.
作者: Traum    時間: 2008-2-22 01:22

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: chunsh    時間: 2008-2-22 01:37

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-22 01:22 發表
The AFC affected the entire Asia-Pacific region, but HK remained dead last in recovering from it because of its steadfast refusal to drop the US exchange rate monetary policy. And guess who was pullin ...


"destroy HK's political and legal system"
destroy?
in what way?
香港人現在在水深火熱之間嗎?
sigh....
有時候我懷疑﹐你是不是受過文化大革命的洗禮呢?
otherwise﹐點解你比美國人更憎chinese government
作者: Traum    時間: 2008-2-22 01:53

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-2-22 03:10

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-22 01:22 發表
The AFC affected the entire Asia-Pacific region, but HK remained dead last in recovering from it because of its steadfast refusal to drop the US exchange rate monetary policy. And guess who was pullin ...


That's total crap, you little pro-British idiot. Maybe you should take a few more courses like Economics 101 and Finance 101. Many other Asian countries had a much more diversified economy than HK. South Korea had car industry and ship building. Taiwan, South Korea and Singapore had a lot more high-tech industries, electronics, and computer-related industries than HK. Therefore they recovered faster than HK. You should be able to see that your British masters did little to develop HK's economy and to maintain the stability of the economy before 1997, besides a bubble in the stock market.

[ 本帖最後由 peter236 於 2008-2-22 03:12 編輯 ]
作者: Traum    時間: 2008-2-22 09:15

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-2-22 12:10

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-22 09:15 發表

LOL~ Your argument is so irrational that it's funny. I wasn't expecting HK to be the first in the region to recover from the AFC. But when EVERY OTHER CITY / COUNTRY IN THE REGION made their recoveri ...


You little pro-British moron. HK just did not have the high-tech exports that the other Asian countries had. These countries exported a lot of tech products to the world right before the Y2K rush. The British did nothing to develop HK's high-tech industry and created some very large bubbles in the stock market and land prices, way larger than what the other Asian countries had. When HK people could no longer flip real estate for profit, that was why HK took longer to grow again. The British did a crappy job in developing HK's modern economy.

Today, with the support of China, HK is now one of the fastest growing economy in Asia.
作者: puZZle    時間: 2008-2-22 16:07

無懼受折磨
也不管對錯
程翔是赤裸
錯誤走過也總親吻過

-Stephy



歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2