Board logo

標題: 閉關鎖國：中國開始審查電話通話內容 [打印本頁]
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-23 09:32     標題: 閉關鎖國：中國開始審查電話通話內容

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/world/asia/22china.html?_r=4

China Tightens Censorship of Electronic Communications
By SHARON LaFRANIERE and DAVID BARBOZA
Published: March 21, 2011

BEIJING — If anyone wonders whether the Chinese government has tightened its grip on electronic communications since protests began engulfing the Arab world, Shakespeare may prove instructive.

A Beijing entrepreneur, discussing restaurant choices with his fiancée over their cellphones last week, quoted Queen Gertrude’s response to Hamlet: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.” The second time he said the word “protest,” her phone cut off.

He spoke English, but another caller, repeating the same phrase on Monday in Chinese over a different phone, was also cut off in midsentence.

A host of evidence over the past several weeks shows that Chinese authorities are more determined than ever to police cellphone calls, electronic messages, e-mail and access to the Internet in order to smother any hint of antigovernment sentiment. In the cat-and-mouse game that characterizes electronic communications here, analysts suggest that the cat is getting bigger, especially since revolts began to ricochet through the Middle East and North Africa, and homegrown efforts to organize protests in China began to circulate on the Internet about a month ago.

“The hard-liners have won the field, and now we are seeing exactly how they want to run the place,” said Russell Leigh Moses, a Beijing analyst of China’s leadership. “I think the gloves are coming off.”

On Sunday, Google accused the Chinese government of disrupting its Gmail service in the country and making it appear as if technical problems at Google — not government intervention — were to blame.

Several popular virtual private-network services, or V.P.N.’s, designed to evade the government’s computerized censors, have been crippled. This has prompted an outcry from users as young as ninth graders with school research projects and sent them on a frustrating search for replacements that can pierce the so-called Great Firewall, a menu of direct censorship and “opinion guidance” that restricts what Internet users can read or write online. V.P.N.’s are popular with China’s huge expatriate community and Chinese entrepreneurs, researchers and scholars who expect to use the Internet freely.

In an apology to customers in China for interrupted service, WiTopia, a V.P.N. provider, cited “increased blocking attempts.” No perpetrator was identified.

Beyond these problems, anecdotal evidence suggests that the government’s computers, which intercept incoming data and compare it with an ever-changing list of banned keywords or Web sites, are shutting out more information. The motive is often obvious: For six months or more, the censors have prevented Google searches of the English word “freedom.”

But other terms or Web sites are suddenly or sporadically blocked for reasons no ordinary user can fathom. One Beijing technology consultant, who asked not to be identified for fear of retribution against his company, said that for several days last week he could not visit the Web site for the Hong Kong Stock Exchange without a proxy. LinkedIn, a networking platform, was blocked for a day during the height of government concerns over Internet-based calls for protests in Chinese cities a few weeks ago, he said.

Hu Yong, a media professor at Peking University, said government censors were constantly spotting and reacting to new perceived threats. “The technology is improving and the range of sensitive terms is expanding because the depth and breadth of things they must manage just keeps on growing,” Mr. Hu said.

China’s censorship machine has been operating ever more efficiently since mid-2008, and restrictions once viewed as temporary — like bans on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter — are now considered permanent. Government-friendly alternatives have sprung and developed a following.

Few analysts believe that the government will loosen controls any time soon, with events it considers politically sensitive swamping the calendar, including a turnover in the Communist Party’s top leadership next year.

“It has been double the guard, and double the guard, and you never hear proclamations about things being relaxed,” said Duncan Clark, chairman of BDA China, an investment and strategy consultancy based in Beijing, and a 17-year resident of China. “We have never seen this level of control in the time I have been here, and I have been here since the beginning of the Internet.”

How far China will clamp down on electronic communications is unclear. “There’s a lot more they can do, but they’ve been holding back,” said Bill Bishop, a Internet expert based in Beijing. Some analysts suggest that officials are exploring just how much inconvenience the Chinese are willing to tolerate. While sentiment is hard to gauge, a certain segment of society rejects censorship.

[complete article at above link]
作者: boss2007    時間: 2011-3-23 11:09

回復 1# Lik


    its imply proves that CCCP is so damn fear they will be next - after Eygpt,Lybia etc
作者: 聖德納撒    時間: 2011-3-23 11:48

類似FACEBOOK的工具不是已經存在於中國了嗎﹖
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-23 13:23

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc. have already been permanently blocked off by the Great Firewall of China. My understanding is that Gmail had been accessible prior to this, but recently, Gmail has seen a lot of disruption in services as well, and Google has verified that there are not technical errors on their end, and the disruptions are most likely coming from China's censorship technologies.

The thing that surprised me a little bit was how phone conversations are now monitored as well when nothing special seems to be happening. I know that in last few years at least, the CPC government would heavily monitor / censor / shut down telephone calls from the western world into sensitive areas when important events (eg. 兩會、人大, 新疆動亂 etc.) are taking place. Is Grandfather really that afraid of the Jasmine Revolutions?

-Lik
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-23 15:38

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2011-3-23 15:44

Aiya ..  Lik gor .. becareful la..   Grandpa knows what you are doing here!!
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-3-23 17:36

Aiya ..  Lik gor .. becareful la..   Grandpa knows what you are doing here!!
Catpiano 發表於 2011-3-24 07:44

d 公安無處不在, 話唔定會o係凌晨三四點爆門入屋! 小心小心~
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-23 22:18

Aiya ..  Lik gor .. becareful la..   Grandpa knows what you are doing here!!
Catpiano 發表於 2011-3-23 15:44

Peter、fy仔、Rocky呢幾條賤人早就日日 mon 住我點樣數臭阿爺啦啦？但阿爺做埋咁多陰質事，憎佢嘅又何只我區區一個咁少？如果阿爺連我啲咁嘅魚毛蝦仔都要攪嘅話，咁佢就算有13億糞青、五毛都唔夠用啦～

-力
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-23 22:28

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-23 22:33

所以話你條盲丙係文盲真係無鬧錯你。唔識字、唔識上文下理、零閱讀同理解能力嘅話就返去阿爺果度讀多幾年屎片先出來行啦？

-力
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-23 23:19

回復  Lik

But that is what your article tries to convey to us:

China is monitoring every move of  ...
fy789 發表於 2011-3-23 22:28

It should be Mr Lik, hahaha,

這些盲目祟日祟洋仲滿口中文的人, 你們的臉不知要丟在哪裡!
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-23 23:23

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-3-23 23:30 編輯

Phone conversations in North America are also monitored, as they claim to prevent terrorists.
Some people even claim that, a big US search engine company has a deal with the American secret service agency. This is nothing new, it happens in every country.

China is doing the right thing on the internet, to prevent people from spreading lies, like the effect of iodine and salt etc.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-23 23:44

咁老美又有無一聽見人地講 "protest" 就 cut 人線呀？又有無話你騰訊、360、百度等等係顛覆大美利堅嘅機構而 block 晒佢呀？如果阿爺啲網上搜索真係有用嘅話，咁點解又一樣會有咁多同你一樣全無常識嘅人走去盲搶鹽？

我唔該你條低能仔契弟，要講，都唔好講啲水準咁低嘅野來等我一出口就踢爆你啲廢話啦？

-力
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-3-24 00:18

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-3-24 00:20 編輯
Peter、fy仔、Rocky呢幾條賤人早就日日 mon 住我點樣數臭阿爺啦啦？但阿爺做埋咁多陰質事，憎佢嘅又何只我 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-3-23 22:18


中文係唔係有句 － “先撩ｘｘｘ者賤”？ 要講賤，力仔敢認第二，我估其他人都唔敢認第一。

Lik, don't run away like a dog again. Dare to answer my questions directly?

First, can you tell me the reasons why I can still look up articles using the key wards like "示威遊行“、”茉莉花革命“、“protest" on Baidu?

Second, do you dare to confirm that you are using the same standard when you criticize China if you would criticize a western country or Japan?
   
Be a man instead of a dog, Lik.  Get you gut out and face me. Don't be a coward again.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-24 09:05

賤種，

你試吓響中國大陸裡面搜索任何一個敏感詞呀？講埋咁多廢話...

而且，你估我好似你咁撚賤，淨係一日出 post 舔阿爺屎眼、對日本今次嘅三重災難幸災樂禍呀？我尋日先啱啱出完個 post 來diu美軍濫殺無辜。我又從來唔見你條仆街夠薑出過一個 post 來 diu 阿爺半句？！加拿大如果爆單類似大陸咁賤嘅事，你又睇吓我會唔會 diu 佢？

講賤嘅話，你條死剷認咗第二，絕對無人敢認第一。

去仆街死啦你～

-力
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-3-24 09:36

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-3-24 10:02 編輯
你試吓響中國大陸裡面搜索任何一個敏感詞呀？講埋咁多廢話...

而且，你估我好似你咁撚賤，淨係一日出 post 舔阿爺屎眼、對日本今次嘅三重災難幸災樂禍呀？我尋日先啱啱出完個 post 來diu美軍濫殺無辜。我又從來唔見你條仆街夠薑出過一個 post 來 diu 阿爺半句？！加拿大如果爆單類似大陸咁賤嘅事，你又睇吓我會唔會 diu 佢？
Lik 發表於 2011-3-24 09:05


First, why don't you do a search and show us the result - 響中國大陸裡面搜索任何一個敏感詞. Don't tell me you do not know how to do it since you are a computer science graduate.

Second, show the evidence to support your claim against me - "對日本今次嘅三重災難幸災樂禍". If you cannot show the evidence, it is just  a solid proof of yourself being the - 厚顏無恥捏造事實的賤狗。

Third, why are you being a coward again and have no gut to answer my question directly - "are you using the same standard when you criticize China as if you would criticize a western country or Japan"?

Be a man instead of a dog, Lik. Get you gut out and answer my questions directly.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-24 10:09

Second, show the evidence to support your claim against me - "對日本今次嘅三重災難幸災樂禍". If you cannot show the evidence, it is just  a solid proof of yourself being the - 厚顏無恥捏造事實的賤狗。
rockypath 發表於 2011-3-24 09:36

呢句我又真係搞錯咗。啲幸災樂禍post係你個五毛兄弟FY仔出嘅，我同你 say sorry 又如何？

其他果啲，我都費撚事徙我時間同你條契弟坳。

-力
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-3-24 10:13

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-3-24 10:15 編輯
其他果啲，我都費撚事徙我時間同你條契弟坳。 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-3-24 10:09


It once again proves you are just a shameless coward and have no gut to face the reality.

You don't even have the gut to show the facts to support yourself?

In front of me, you are just a gutless coward and brainless idiot.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-24 10:50

Diu，我之前咁多N次都踢爆晒你啲大話啦？你咪又係照樣繼續鳩up？我先無你咁得閒慢慢同你坳。

快啲返去繼續舔阿爺屎眼啦？你唔幫佢手自我感覺良好，因住佢刪你水喉呀～

-力
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-24 17:29

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-24 17:52

If you continue this double standard, you are just setting yourself up for
harsh critics.
fy789 發表於 2011-3-24 17:29

真係好笑。你要選擇性發雞盲嘅話，等我再 quote 多一次我 post #15裡面所講嘅野俾你睇：
而且，你估我好似你咁撚賤，淨係一日出 post 舔阿爺屎眼、對日本今次嘅三重災難幸災樂禍呀？我尋日先啱啱出完個 post 來diu美軍濫殺無辜。我又從來唔見你條仆街夠薑出過一個 post 來 diu 阿爺半句？！加拿大如果爆單類似大陸咁賤嘅事，你又睇吓我會唔會 diu 佢？

講賤嘅話，你條死剷認咗第二，絕對無人敢認第一。

去仆街死啦你～

-力

加拿大、老美、中、港、台我都會插，但我卻從來唔見你條仆街有講過阿爺半句壞話！

真係唔知邊個先至係雙重標準嘅賤精！

-力
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-24 18:08

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-3-24 18:09

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-3-24 18:16 編輯
我之前咁多N次都踢爆晒你啲大話啦？ ...
Lik 發表於 2011-3-24 10:50


Lik, don't run away like a dog again. Get your gut out and face me.

First, it is you who admit that you are 鳩up.

Second, can you show the evidence that you had ever been able to 踢爆晒我啲“大話”? Just show it to people on LYK and me which part of what I said is 大話. If you cannot show the evidence, it is just a solid proof of you are just a 厚顏無恥到處亂吠亂咬的無賴癲狗!

Be a man, don' t be a dog, Lik.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-24 18:17

I think China's image is BAD already without "出過一個 post 來 diu 阿爺半句",
but it's improving.

I don't see how "diu 阿爺半句" will help to improve China's situation.

If one really cares about China, "diu 阿爺半句" is not enough; but one
should volunteer his/her time to go back to China to influence the
younger generation to the right direction, as they are going to succeed the
country lor!

BTW, you are still avoid my question:
Why single China out if similar mishaps happened in
other countries?
fy789 發表於 2011-3-24 18:08

仆街，

我淨係見你依然徊避我嘅問題：我從來未見你diu果阿爺半句、講過佢半句不是。點解你從來唔譴責中國大陸嘅不平事？！然後你仲夠膽死話我雙重表準？

去仆街啦，你條撚樣！

-力
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-24 18:45

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-24 19:10

枉你仲夠膽死話自己讀過下書。我話你讀完書都依然係是非不分、麻木不人，簡直仲衰過讀屎片，直情徙晒老竇老母啲錢！

而且，我又有咩能力去河蟹你或者任何一個網友呢？我極其量所能做到嘅就係指出你呢廷賤人點樣賤法，然後毫無保留咁去因此而羞辱同譴責你。到你終於知到樣衰喇，咁你咪或者會改囉？全世界每一個出來做野嘅人、每一個有返多少承擔嘅政府都係要面對呢樣野㗎啦？你係細路仔嘅話我就會好好心機、循循善誘咁去教你。但你既然已經係一個成人，咁你自然要為自己嘅所作所為去承擔。而政府亦係一樣，係由一班成年人去掌舵。當佢領導國家無方嘅時候就要接受人民嘅指責同譴責，你估仲係細路仔玩泥沙呀？

咁簡單嘅道理都唔識，唔該你咪撚出來獻世啦～

-力
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-24 19:12

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-3-24 19:23

你一時又話我崇日，一時又話我係英國走狗，一時又話我係老美嘅內奸，但我英美日三方（特別係日本）都係我時常指責嘅對象喎？

反而你係阿爺隻媚共擦鞋狗，卻係鐵一般嘅事實。

快撚啲欄返去阿爺嘅腳邊，繼續吮佢腳趾啦，撚樣！

-力
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-3-24 19:52

作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-24 20:23

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-3-24 23:05

你一時又話我崇日，一時又話我係英國走狗，一時又話我係老美嘅內奸，但我英美日三方（特別係日本）都係我時常指責嘅對象喎？
Lik 發表於 2011-3-25 11:23

咁呢d 係唔係叫做牆頭草? 我終於都有人陪了! 哈哈~
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-3-25 01:12

回復  Lik


我最後同你條pk 講一次：

1. 我有我做事方式，你有你屌大陸嘅自由，但係唔可以因為人地唔屌 ...
fy789 發表於 2011-3-24 20:23


Do you think Mad Dog Lik will listen to what you said? Forget it la.

However, he has never had the gut to face me. He always keeps running away from me like a 喪家之犬 because 我識打狗十八式專打阿力呢Ｄ厚顏無恥的癲狗.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-3-25 06:42

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽



歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2