Board logo

標題: 中国骄傲 - PLA First Person Shooter: Glorious Mission - 光荣使命 [打印本頁]

作者: peter236    時間: 2011-5-20 23:06     標題: 中国骄傲 - PLA First Person Shooter: Glorious Mission - 光荣使命

[youtube]KLY7GyxDmR4[/youtube]
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-5-21 00:20

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-5-21 00:24 編輯

Chinese army's first video game takes aim at America

http://www.cnngo.com/shanghai/life/chinese-military-develops-its-first-video-game-224497

The PLA's debut shoot-'em-up game casts U.S soldiers as the enemy, but it's actually a pretty good game besides

War games have become increasingly high-tech over the years, but the Chinese military has always lagged a bit behind -- at least, until now.

State media reports that China's Nanjing Military Region has recently finished their video game titled "Glorious Mission" (also translated as "Mission of Honor").

“Although foreign military games have been used in some Chinese armies' daily training,” writes Wang Hanlu of People’s Daily, “they may not suit Chinese soldiers and even mislead them due to the different concepts of values and military thoughts.”

The completely Chinese-made "Glorious Mission" brings China up to speed on military game development.
The game itself looks pretty well-made. Graphics definitely on par with at least the [Call of Duty] series
— China Defense Blog


“The game, with a soldier’s personal story in the military camp as the background and participating in a large-scale actual-troop confrontation drill code-named ‘Glorious Mission’ is the main storyline," explains the PLA Daily.

"It is divided into three parts including basic training, individual soldier’s tasks and squad/team confrontation. In the squad/team confrontation part, 32 soldiers can log on at the same time to start combat according to the rules in selected scenes.”

Although the game has received limited coverage in China, it has generated waves in the United States, reports BehindTheWall, not for its graphics or the fact that it brings the Chinese army up to speed, but for the fact that American soldiers are the main adversary.

“[Many people's] concern is that the game, which was ostensibly developed as a training tool for the PLA, makes American soldiers and equipment the enemy combatant and could lead young, impressionable trainees to believe that the United States is the enemy,” writes Ed Flanagan.

Although political commentators now have new fodder for the news cycle, the tech world is also chattering about the game, but what is exciting comment is the smoothness of the game’s graphics and game play.

“The game itself looks pretty well made,” one blogger posted. “Graphics definitely on par with at least the [Call of Duty] series.”


Created by a Chinese tech firm, Giant Interactive Group, Inc., Glorious Mission shows just how far the Chinese gaming industry has progressed. Once reliant on international firms for high-quality graphics and design, this military exercise also shows how domestic firms are now also flexing their muscles.

The improvement reflects the sheer size of what is at stake -- in 2010, China's online gaming market, with 76 million online game players, raked in RMB 32.37 billion, a 26.3 percent increase over 2009.
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-5-21 00:25

Yet another area where Chinese indigenous technology has reached world class standards.
作者: MoiRhapsody    時間: 2011-5-21 02:55

“Although foreign military games have been used in some Chinese armies' daily training,” writes Wang Hanlu of People’s Daily, “they may not suit Chinese soldiers and even mislead them due to the different concepts of values and military thoughts.”


i wish this is a joke...........
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-21 04:53

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: blue20ae    時間: 2011-5-21 11:29

PLA = 中国骄傲 ?!?!

毋忘六四
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-5-21 22:07

PLA = 中国骄傲 ?!?!

毋忘六四
blue20ae 發表於 2011-5-21 11:29


Please do not divert attention.

We are just talking about Chinese video game technology and Chinese national security.
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-5-21 22:08

Chinese army war engagement strategy emphasizes on using the minimal
firepower in a highly organize ...
fy789 發表於 2011-5-21 04:53


As for this Chinese video game technology, if they are able to commercialize this technology properly, they can make a lot of money.
作者: ricrick    時間: 2011-5-21 22:28

遊戲都政治化
先看看中國的"創意產業"中的創意是由政府控制
作者: blue20ae    時間: 2011-5-22 06:53

Please do not divert attention.

We are just talking about Chinese video game technology and Chin ...
peter236 發表於 2011-5-21 22:07


OK. Back to video game then.....do they have a "student edition", as killing unarmed civilian is PLA's specialty and well known for?
.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-22 07:09

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: blue20ae    時間: 2011-5-22 07:22

The different is PLA kills their fellow countrymen and the people that they suppose to protect.  Army's gun should be pointed out, not in.

The tragedy is since 6-4, the killing continue in Tibet and around the country.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-22 08:43

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-5-22 15:07

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-5-22 15:22 編輯
OK. Back to video game then.....do they have a "student edition", as killing unarmed civilian is P ...
blue20ae 發表於 2011-5-22 06:53


That is nonsense and childish. If you want to talk about other things, just open a new thread.

We are talking about Chinese video game technology here.
We are talking about the engine behind the game, that has reached world class standards.
The commercialization of this game can make a lot of money.
作者: blue20ae    時間: 2011-5-22 20:18

Thank you for letting us know that killing other races are acceptable!
So  you do support genocide,  ...
fy789 發表於 2011-5-22 08:43



    I never said it is acceptable.  It is just bad vs worst.

This is a forum.  I can express my view just like you can express yours.
作者: blue20ae    時間: 2011-5-22 20:21

That is nonsense and childish. If you want to talk about other things, just open a new thread.

We ...
peter236 發表於 2011-5-22 15:07



It is just a fair question how many variation they are producing with this software.

As the software is being used to train PLA as well as for selling to the public.
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-5-22 21:41

It is just a fair question how many variation they are producing with this software.

As the soft ...
blue20ae 發表於 2011-5-22 20:21


That is nonsense. The Chinese technology company developed this war game. It just happens that the PLA uses this game for national defense training against foreign aggression.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-5-22 22:31

As far as killing civilians is concerned, PLA has a lot to learn from
the Japs Imperial army in WWII ...
fy789 發表於 2011-5-22 07:09

仆街啦你~虎毒都不吃兒,如果你他日做咗老竇,你走去剎咗自己個仔賤啲,定係你走去剎咗人地個仔賤啲?

我敢肯定,法官判嘅時候,一定會判殺自己個仔果條仆街重好多!

所以話你係賤人即係賤人。為咗為阿爺護航,你條撚樣真係乜撚野都講打出口!

-力
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-22 22:34

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-22 22:46

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-5-22 22:56

唔知隻game 可唔可以改到d 坦克車o係天安門附近碌過d 學生呢?
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-22 23:03

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-5-22 23:03

>仆街啦你~虎毒都不吃兒,如果你他日做咗老竇,你走去剎咗自己個仔賤啲,定係你走去剎咗人地個仔賤啲?
個仔鬥到佢老豆要攞鎗殺佢,好明顯除咗個老豆有問題外,個仔本身都要自我檢討呀!
fy789 發表於 2011-5-22 22:46

仆街!照你咁講,八九六四當年,啲學子又做過啲咩呀?響天安門靜坐、抗議、示威!然後阿爺就出坦克碌死啲學生!你仲話要啲學子去自我檢討?!

我仆你嘅街!講埋啲咁無人性嘅說話,去撚死啦你!

人渣!

-力
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-22 23:14

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-5-22 23:48

希哥扮失億?你無病呀化?前年六四廿周年記念嘅時候,希哥先至試過搭飛機返中國投案,結果係點呀?老共樣衰到連連飛機都唔俾人地上呀!

而且,王丹都係學運領導,點解你又咁 conveniently 唔提起呀丹哥呢?

賤人!同埋你幾個 friend 一切去仆街嵌家剷啦~

-力
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-5-23 00:54

回復  mcjohnjohn


移椅,麥莊莊仲在生喎,咁耐冇蒲頭仲以為你中咗六合彩唔識人!

不如隻games 加個o ...
fy789 發表於 2011-5-23 15:03

小弟家中增添新成員, 亦又成員離開, 所以比較忙~

暴民搶坦克? 點樣搶先搶到? 隻game 會唔會有d 特殊武器比d 暴民用? 如摺椅... 又或者隻game 入面既暴民可以用小便去lar 爆架坦克都有gimmic woh~

不如咁, 如果隻game 可以加埋李鵬入去做終極boss 應該會增加銷路的!
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-5-23 00:57

我仆你嘅街!講埋啲咁無人性嘅說話,去撚死啦你!
Lik 發表於 2011-5-23 15:03

你仲乜好地地去仆人個街? 人地仆街你仲乜咁好走去幫佢仆呀?
仲有乜野係"去撚死啦你"? "去撚廚啦你"我就明law.

-- 搞爛gag MJJ
作者: MoiRhapsody    時間: 2011-5-23 03:11

嘩~~如果PLA學足段片0:27-0:30秒咁做,就真係多多training都唔夠~~~
係打機支95先可以係左邊射
作者: blue20ae    時間: 2011-5-23 06:13

本帖最後由 blue20ae 於 2011-5-23 06:15 編輯
That is nonsense. The Chinese technology company developed this war game. It just happens that the PLA uses this game for national defense training against foreign aggression.
peter236 發表於 2011-5-22 21:41



You obviously have no idea what you are talking about.  Get your facts right before posting to forum.

Here is the official line from PLA daily via the red China's official news channel..."China's PLA develops own military game"...

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/usa ... ontent_12507419.htm
作者: blue20ae    時間: 2011-5-23 06:16

In this forum disagree with the PLA's actions is anti-China.  Neither PLA nor CCP is China, China belongs to all Chinese people, not the CCP or its dog.

In Canada you can vote Conservative, Liberal, NDP, or (if you really want) Marxist-Leninist, you are still Canadian, and won't be 屈 as anti-Canada.

I reset my case.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-23 07:27

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-23 07:33

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: sheep    時間: 2011-5-23 07:37

各位網友注意:
本主題只邀請正面回應
如有不同意見者
敬請移玉步或另開題目
作者: MoiRhapsody    時間: 2011-5-23 07:49

基本上呢~~game黎講都好似叫做過得去咁~~
不過用黎做training就搞笑左啲囉~~
出去drill多啲好過啦~~
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-23 07:53

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: sheep    時間: 2011-5-23 07:55

鑒於本人所開之討論主題
經常被惡意搔擾
未能達到唱好之效
現誠邀志同道合者
先向本人登記說明立場
待本人驗明其正身後發予特許回應密碼
方可發表
以收全民唱好之效
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-23 08:00

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: sheep    時間: 2011-5-23 08:05

回復 37# fy789


    sheep236?
作者: sheep    時間: 2011-5-23 08:33

出去drill多啲好過啦.
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-5-23 07:49



    本來預算有預埋
不過落咗另外啲袋
唯有做少啲演習
改為模擬電腦遊戲就算啦
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-5-23 11:45

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-5-23 11:47 編輯
各位網友注意:
本主題只邀請正面回應
如有不同意見者
敬請移玉步或另開題目 ...
sheep 發表於 2011-5-23 07:37

Please take your irrelevant crap to another thread.
作者: sheep    時間: 2011-5-23 11:59

回復 40# peter236


   
回復  blue20ae

You can do anything anti-China within Canada law, but please
respect other forum users. OPEN YOUR OWN THREAD TO DO WHATEVER
YOU WANT.
fy789 發表於 2011-5-23 07:27

作者: news    時間: 2011-5-24 10:31

if you are talking about the concept...our friends south of the border already started someting similar 9 years ago

if you are talking about the graphic and gameplay...they look pretty much the same as many other similar games that are already available in the market

so...i dont see why this is so exciting
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-5-24 12:09

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-5-24 12:13 編輯
if you are talking about the concept...our friends south of the border already started someting simi ...
news 發表於 2011-5-24 10:31


The Chinese probably started using this many years ago.
They don't normally reveal their latest technology until many years afterwards.
作者: B2L2    時間: 2011-5-24 13:00

“The game itself looks pretty well made,” one blogger posted. “Graphics definitely on par with at least the [Call of Duty] series.”


Compare yourself, 2 years "old" game technologies:

[youtube]AzwBeDV5IAY[/youtube]
[youtube]K36sYJsW7rA[/youtube]

2011 game tech:
[youtube]2zw8SmsovJc[/youtube]
[youtube]ZrV_LFXff4w[/youtube]
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-5-24 19:43

可以整幾個超能人物,好似力大俠可以用美國戰斧斬開坦克精鋼,霉大俠用731
d 毒氣毒q死哂坦克裏面嘅解 ...
fy789 發表於 2011-5-23 23:53

我只係諗住o係坦克既透氣孔放一個屁去焗死佢.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-24 22:36

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-5-24 22:51

咁不如直接掟/痾你督新鮮小雲軟雪糕入去當做biological weapon
未更加直接!    ...
fy789 發表於 2011-5-25 14:36

我冇諗過當街除褲咁丑怪的...
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-5-24 22:55

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-5-25 00:13

我冇諗過睇你個大pat pat喎,我驚以後食唔落飯。
fy789 發表於 2011-5-25 14:55

呢招都幾絕架woh~
只係需要露出個大pat pat 就可以令敵方眾將領因食唔落飯而慢慢餓死. 打持久戰work!




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2