溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 男人喜歡女人外剛內柔，還是外柔內剛多一點? [打印本頁]

作者: utopia 時間: 2008-3-6 09:52 標題: 男人喜歡女人外剛內柔，還是外柔內剛多一點?

深雪

　　表面上看來，似乎是外柔內剛的贏了，始終，有哪一個男人不渴望找到一個溫柔體貼，外表可人的女朋友。

另一方面，女人都好像約定俗成一樣大多喜歡以一個弱者形象出現，這應是受傳統標準所影響吧，很多人都覺得，身為女兒家不應逞強、豪爽，應保持一點所謂的矜持雲雲。

然而，男人亦可算是貪心的動物，當尋找女朋友時是以上的想法，但當只想純友誼朋友關係的時候，卻又對外柔內剛的女人避之則吉，因為覺得外表柔弱的女人大多不夠爽朗，大多諸多扭擰，失卻了一般男人的朋友義氣肝膽相照感覺。

此時，外剛內柔的女人便大受歡迎，所以這些女人每多男仔朋友，但卻反而少了女性密友，因為連她們都會覺得女人婆媽好難頂!

其實這個問題，是幫女人說話，因為無論外柔內剛或外剛內柔的女人都是剛柔並濟，哪有不得人歡心之理!

作者: SAZABI 時間: 2008-3-6 10:22

外柔內柔

作者: utopia 時間: 2008-3-6 10:35

I like 外剛內柔, guess I'm attract to the same type of people like me ? hehehe, that's why I'm so in love with my twin

Nothing wrong with 柔 but I'm hate guessing what people real meaning. I rather to be with people are more straightforward. That's the main reason 90% of my friends are male.

作者: Traum 時間: 2008-3-6 10:42

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Alcoholic 時間: 2008-3-6 11:17

guys like 外剛內柔，外柔內剛 depending on their mood & situation.
so asking guys this question is a waste of women's time Twin.

however, i am myself 外剛內柔. bring it on, i can collide like men or even be stronger than you, but you cannot live without my 內柔

作者: fortunecolor 時間: 2008-3-6 21:24

外柔內柔！

作者: Alcoholic 時間: 2008-3-7 08:40

所有大男人會揀外柔內柔

作者: Traum 時間: 2008-3-7 09:14

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Alcoholic 時間: 2008-3-7 10:05

有邊個女人唔想做小女人如果個男人有資格做大男人丫?

作者: myversa 時間: 2008-3-7 10:29

I love my wife the way she is. She is actually 外柔內(剛/柔) type of girl and it all depends on her mood.

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2008-3-7 20:57

原帖由 Alcoholic 於 2008-3-7 10:05 發表
有邊個女人唔想做小女人如果個男人有資格做大男人丫?

講得好好

作者: e0131 時間: 2008-3-8 05:25

原帖由 utopia 於 2008-3-6 10:35 發表
I like 外剛內柔, guess I'm attract to the same type of people like me ? hehehe, that's why I'm so in love with my twin

Nothing wrong with 柔 but I'm hate guessing what people real meaning. I r ...

same here. my bf n i r in love with each other because our personalities/way of thinking are SO alike.
i make guy friends easily too.
on one hand they feel totally comfortable joking around/hanging out with me as if i am a guy.
yet on the other hand they still talk to me a lot for ''girl's advice'' lol.

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2008-3-8 11:45

補充﹐女人不是不想做弱女人﹐只是很多情況係必需要強唧﹐無奈中。

作者: cndv3996 時間: 2008-3-11 20:47

最好对我外柔内柔，对其他男人外刚内刚~~嘿嘿~~

作者: rs1985 時間: 2008-3-26 16:34

外剛內柔 for sure la
outside looks like she dun need u much or u dun need to spend a lot of time on her
when just u guys together
she needs u
hahaha

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2008-3-26 17:36

"有邊個女人唔想做小女人如果個男人有資格做大男人丫?"
Once the women have such a thought, imply the judgment of whether their men are qualified to be 大男人 or not is on the women themselves la! Thus they can never be a real 小女人!
A true 小女人 is somehow in born, no matter the man besides her is 大男人 or not.

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2008-3-26 17:46

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2008-3-26 17:36 發表
"有邊個女人唔想做小女人如果個男人有資格做大男人丫?"
Once the women have such a thought, imply the judgment of whether their men are qualified to be 大男人 or not is on the women themselves la! Thus th ...

A true 小女人 is somehow in born, no matter the man besides her is 大男人 or not.

這只是假設﹐有待查證。。。個人認為﹐遺傳﹐家庭教育同埋環境因素係佔左好大的原因。。。如果有人能列出 RESEARCH 證明小女人係 BONR WITH﹐才能心服口服。。。

我識左無數的女性﹐最少也有幾千至一萬﹐因為細個讀女校﹐憑經驗就覺得以上各項原因係造就一個女人的性格﹐多於係 BORN WITH。

作者: Alcoholic 時間: 2008-3-26 20:51

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2008-3-26 05:36 PM 發表
"有邊個女人唔想做小女人如果個男人有資格做大男人丫?"
Once the women have such a thought, imply the judgment of whether their men are qualified to be 大男人 or not is on the women themselves la! Thus th ...

if the man is not qualified to be a 大男人, 唔通個女人繼續做小女人，lam住一齊死咩? no matter how equal man VS woman, there will be need of one party to be stronger. let's not use the word "stronger"...it's more like 1 person needs to take LEADERSHIP. if the man cannot do that, then it's up to the woman to "back up" for that role if they want the relationship to go anywhere. if the man has no goal/direction, no capable of bringing home sufficient $, not able to make rational decisions... then the woman will have to do it, if she wants the relationship to move forward & last.

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)