Board logo

標題: 日傳媒指西方炮製六四謊言 [打印本頁]
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-7-12 08:54     標題: 日傳媒指西方炮製六四謊言

http://inews.mingpao.com/htm/inews/20110712/ca21911c.htm

日傳媒指西方炮製六四謊言 (19:11)

日本日本時報網站7月1日刊登前澳洲中國事務外交官克拉克撰寫的文章說，所謂天安門大屠殺是西方炮製的謊言。

文章提到謊言的經過，以及英國多年來一直出於戰略目的散佈謊言和虛假謠言的黑色宣傳。

這篇題為《黑色信息與媒體欺騙——天安門謊言的炮製》的文章說，維基解秘網最近公布的美國駐京使館電報文件有助於最終拆穿所謂1989年6月3日至4日在北京天安門廣場發生了大屠殺的謊言。同樣，一些當年在廣場現場的公正的西方觀察人士，包括一名路透社記者和一個西班牙電視攝製組，也一直堅稱——甚至撰文指出——沒有看到所謂大屠殺的任何象。

文章說，那麼天安門廣場大屠殺之說是怎麼出籠的呢？當時英國廣播公司的一則聳人聽聞的報道是一個重要來源。而其他記者也許覺得不得不對這一報道加以附和，儘管他們中沒有人親身在廣場上，包括英國廣播公司記者。

（新華社）
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-7-12 08:55

新華社 quote 得嘅，可信性又有幾高呢？

-力
作者: daimo    時間: 2011-7-12 09:49

is it what you are referring to?

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/eo20110701gc.html

japantimes.co.jp isn't operated by  新華社.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-7-12 10:09

講到口水都乾埋，重要嘅並唔係有無人響天安門廣場被殺，而係中共有無武力血腥鎮壓殺學生。用埋啲言語上咁樣嘅 technicality 來話「響天安門廣場上無殺人」根本就係混淆視聽、轉移目標同焦點。講到尾，根本就係賤。

-力
作者: daimo    時間: 2011-7-12 10:19

japantimes.co.jp 係混淆視聽、轉移目標同焦點。講到尾，根本就係賤。

Wikileaks 係混淆視聽、轉移目標同焦點。講到尾，根本就係賤。

ATV 係混淆視聽、轉移目標同焦點。講到尾，根本就係賤。

Columbia University School of Journalism 係混淆視聽、轉移目標同焦點。講到尾，根本就係賤。

of course, 新華社 is automatically 講到尾，根本就係賤.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-7-12 10:34

地茂兄，

本來我都唔想指責你㗎喇，但係你夾硬要咁樣無限上綱，咁又算係點呢？

-力
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-7-12 10:36

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-7-12 10:38 編輯
新華社 quote 得嘅，可信性又有幾高呢？

-力
Lik 發表於 2011-7-12 08:55


Well, should be very high. At least higher than what you quote.

First, we got some new information from wikileaks, now from the Japanese. We are slowly exposing western lies.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-7-12 10:38

Well, should be very high. At least higher than what you quote.
peter236 發表於 2011-7-12 10:36

契弟，

去仆街啦你～新華社出嘅新聞稿，用意係出預洗腦嘅可信性就非常高～

-力
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-7-12 10:40

契弟，

去仆街啦你～新華社出嘅新聞稿，用意係出預洗腦嘅可信性就非常高～

-力 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-7-12 10:38


Mr dirty mouth Lik,

First, we got some new information from wikileaks, now from the Japanese. We are slowly exposing the western lies. Maybe you should verify the source of your western information.
作者: news    時間: 2011-7-12 11:28

how 新華社 can wash your brain when they are just referring to the article from japantimes and info from wikileak...maybe you should stop barking for once and look at something objectively
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-7-12 12:45

低能仔，

好明顯就係，新華社只會公報同轉載對中共有利嘅消息同新聞。出邊有咁多指責中共響六四屠城嘅報導，又唔見佢轉載？大陸自己有解放軍走出來承認武力鎮壓，但點解我又唔見新華社出來報？

佢（新華社）咁做，唔係想洗人腦又係乜野？你咁都信佢嘅話，唔係被洗腦又係乜野？

-力
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-7-12 12:47

how 新華社 can wash your brain when they are just referring to the article from japantimes and info from wikileak...maybe you should stop barking for once and look at something objectively
news 發表於 2011-7-12 11:28


We don't expect Mr Lik to be objective to new information. He believes what he wants to believe.
作者: news    時間: 2011-7-12 14:02

回復 11# Lik

    so according to your logic...the source of the article is also trying to brain wash their readers the chinese army didn't allegedly kill the students during the black out?
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-7-12 14:05

so according to your logic...the source of the article is also trying to brain wash their readers the chinese army didn't allegedly kill the students during the black out?
news 發表於 2011-7-12 14:02

I'm saying, Xinhua "news" agency only publishes and/or quotes news that are favourable to CCP, so they are doing exactly what brain-washing machines do.

-Lik
作者: soli    時間: 2011-7-12 16:22

六四點解會叫六四﹐係用黎屈中共屠殺廣場學生。
如果係講咩木犀地軍民衝突﹐應該叫做六三事件。
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-7-12 17:34

I'm saying, Xinhua "news" agency only publishes and/or quotes news that are favourable to CCP, so t ...
Lik 發表於 2011-7-12 14:05


Do you have the gut to answer my question directly?

Can it possibly be true that there is NO gun fire and NO student got killed WITHIN Tiananmen Square that night?

Don't BS anything else, just answer me - YES or NO.

I will wait for you coward.
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2011-7-12 18:43

想起一首歌

[youtube]DanftDEb2J4[/youtube]

真也許會害怕　假也許更好吧
真與假有何用　應該睇化
真真　假假　只要相信它



歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2