溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 相機袋有咩好介紹? [打印本頁]

作者: sky 時間: 2011-8-17 10:05 標題: 相機袋有咩好介紹?

想買個相機袋for body and 3 lenses,有咩好介紹? thanks

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-8-17 10:06

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-8-17 10:07 編輯

回復 1# sky

Backpack or sling bag or shoulder bag?

Lowepro is the most popular with a proper interior arrangement, good extension and pretty good building quality.

作者: sky 時間: 2011-8-17 10:11

回復 sky

Backpack or sling bag or shoulder bag?

Lowepro is the most popular with a proper interi ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-8-17 10:06

thank you, i think sling is better,型d,hahaha

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-8-17 10:14

回復 3# sky

For slingbag, make sure you've got a strong shoulder to hold a cams + 3 lenses + other accessories... It could be quite heavy if you are thinking of carrying monopod/tripod as well...

BTW, it depends on the size of the lens also...

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2011-8-17 10:32

I use a sling bag

I think this is the one:
http://products.lowepro.com/product/SlingShot-200-AW,2035,4.htm

I usually carry my 400D with fully loaded battery grip, 50 1.8 (which is weight-less), 17-40, 70-200 F4 non-IS, 430exII flash all together in this bag

occasionally may also carry a tripod that weighs about 1.4kg on the other shoulder

so far I found this ok for a girl like me
if you are a guy you probably can carry heavier gears with no problem

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-8-17 10:46

Domke

作者: FiChai 時間: 2011-8-17 14:17

Lowepro might has the most variety to choose from, prices are also more reasonable.
Sling shot style might be too small to hold 1 body + 3 lenses and accessories.
Domke has very easy access but least protection. Design and style is more for professional reporters/photo journalists.

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-17 15:04

貪靚嘅話可以睇吓 Crumpler。佢地啲款（個樣）一向都靚過 Lowepro好多，但樣靚嘅野，價錢就一定唔平。你覺得值嘅話咪 ok 囉。

-力

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-8-17 15:29

Domke has very easy access but least protectionFiChai 發表於 2011/8/17 14:17

I have over $12,000 of gears inside that bag

作者: FiChai 時間: 2011-8-17 17:00

I have over $12,000 of gears inside that bag
快樂牛郎發表於 2011-8-17 15:29

Your valuable gear won't make it more protective, would it?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-8-17 18:47

Your valuable gear won't make it more protective, would it?
FiChai 發表於 2011/8/17 17:00

I just don't know what needs to be protected, and against what.

作者: FiChai 時間: 2011-8-17 18:59

Generally it's not a padded system, velcro cover is also less protection than zippers against dust and sand etc. Once the rain/water resistant coating aged, the resisting power reduced.

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-17 22:43

Your valuable gear won't make it more protective, would it?
FiChai 發表於 2011-8-17 17:00

睇完笑咗～

（因為真係一矢中的...）

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-17 22:45

Generally it's not a padded system, velcro cover is also less protection than zippers against dust a ...
FiChai 發表於 2011-8-17 18:59

人地大把貨，啲玩具玩爛咗咪再買過囉？反正過多三兩年都出新野嘅時候都又會再買過晒㗎喇，咁又有乜所謂？

-力

作者: chobit 時間: 2011-8-17 22:48

Check out the Tamrac Velocity Sling Bag. That's what I use, and I like the fact that it open fromt he top, so you would never need to take the bag off your shoulder. They have diff. sizes, so check out which fits you the best.

http://www.google.com/products/c ... s_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&biw=1920&bih=1001&wrapid=tljp131365004794920&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=shop&cid=8955437403108346614&sa=X&ei=hrVMTtGyG-_SiALN_tRt&sqi=2&ved=0CH4Q8gIwBg#

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-8-17 22:58

if you want to protect your camera so much
might as well wrap them in bubbles

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-8-17 23:10

對對對，萬二蚊，應該俾車撞都要冇事~~

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-8-17 23:17

似乎某人一直都係係啲舒服又乾淨既環景snap shot~

作者: FiChai 時間: 2011-8-17 23:40

I'm just stating out some facts, nothing personal. Why do people need a camera bag but not just their more expensive LV? Different camera bags have different design and style thus to fit for different purpose and need. I was comparing which one has more padded compartment and which one hasn't. People think padded protection is not needed is their personal choice, but the fact is there.

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-8-17 23:49

就咁，如果影緊相撞爛機就冇野好講，之但係係個袋裡面撞爛撞花就係出師未捷身先死，長使龍友狂dup春囉～～～

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-8-18 06:34

回復 20# MoiRhapsody

"出師未捷身先死，長使龍友狂dup春...

MJJ - Another quote of the day...

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2011-8-18 08:54

I use crumpler

what 3 lenses are you bringing with you?
if they are 70200 2470 kinda lens, I don't think you'll want a sling.

btw, why do you need to bring 3 lenses with you?

作者: pkphilip 時間: 2011-8-18 10:40

LowePro la... at work, we know the owner very well!!

Their products... just good.

Philip

作者: sky 時間: 2011-8-18 11:04

I use crumpler

what 3 lenses are you bringing with you?
if they are 70200 2470 kinda lens, I don't ...
siumaibb 發表於 2011-8-18 08:54

i have 50mm, 17-85mm, 70-200mm

作者: sky 時間: 2011-8-18 11:04

LowePro la... at work, we know the owner very well!!

Their products... just good.

Philip
pkphilip 發表於 2011-8-18 10:40

can u get good deal at your work?

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2011-8-18 11:48

Domke not padded meh? Padded enough for my cheapo gears I guess...

I am using Domke F-3XZ for light gear (1 body with 3 lenses, or 2 lenses + flash, can even fit a small white unattached).
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/pr ... r_Shoulder_Bag.html

For carry all, I am using a Billingham 305 Presstop. Was selling in Tin Cheung @ HK for only $1700 HKD 4 years back. I think it sells close to $400 USD on BH.

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2011-8-18 11:52

本帖最後由 BiscottiGelato 於 2011-8-18 11:53 編輯

Adding a bit more on the Domke

I find it to have sufficient padding. It's perfectly sized (smallest size you can fit 2 short lenses + a long lens). It's so well sized that it feels like a normal messenger bag. I have used Crumpler before. The outer shell material is very hard, making it very bulky even if empty. Also, like LowePros, Crumpler is no longer an inconspicuous camera bag brand anymore, making it an easy theft target.

The major downside of the F-3XZ is that it have virtually no useful pockets aside from the main compartment. The main compartment is zipper protected tho however if anyone is interested. There's also no additional features (velcro silencer, etc) on the Domke.

A recent bag that I am interested in is the ThinkTank Retrospective line. That said I tried it at Broadway Camera and it seems to be slightly on the bulky side. Not really a perfect fit like the Domke. Give that a try if you don't mind a little bit of bulkiness.

http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/retrospective-20-pinestone-shoulder-bag.aspx

作者: pkphilip 時間: 2011-8-18 13:19

For LowePro, I have to check with the right person to get the good deals...

Philip

作者: sky 時間: 2011-8-18 13:33

For LowePro, I have to check with the right person to get the good deals...

Philip
pkphilip 發表於 2011-8-18 13:19

just kidding Philip, don't bother to ask to save $5-10 bucks, thanks

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-8-18 15:47

回復 29# sky

If you are sitting a 70-200 inside the lowepro 200 slingbag it may be a bit tight, go for a Lowepro slingshot 302...

作者: sky 時間: 2011-8-18 16:02

回復 sky

If you are sitting a 70-200 inside the lowepro 200 slingbag it may be a bit tight, go fo ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-8-18 15:47

thanks

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-8-18 16:57

Domke not padded meh? Padded enough for my cheapo gears I guess...

I am using Domke F-3XZ for light ...
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2011/8/18 11:48

I got my Domke for $30 US and it should be able to last a long time. For me there are enough pockets. Two for filters/caps and two for batteries and clothes. Sometimes I even put a lens in one of the tiny side pockets.

作者: FiChai 時間: 2011-8-18 22:54

I used Billingham and Tenba before. And I used to be a big fan of Domke. When I used the F-2 I found it only has a removable padded compartment inside the main space, but the bag itself is not padded. When I used the F-3X, the whole bag is not padded at all. I'm still keeping my F-5XB and some F-901 pouches though.
For maximum protection, I like Pelican and Lightware when travel on air.
I personally think Crumpler is somehow more stylish but sometimes not too practical.
Depends on different needs and purposes, I think Lowepro is over average in reasonable price and quality and is practical to use.

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2011-8-18 23:37

i have 50mm, 17-85mm, 70-200mm
sky 發表於 2011-8-18 11:04

which 70-200mm is yours?

F4 should be doable, but a bit tight
F2.8......probably need a bigger bag
\

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-8-18 23:41

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-8-18 23:46 編輯

回復 34# 嘉嘉

2.8 may be a bit heavy for T2i body (60D/7D will be better with mag bodies), I think sky is using f4 (normally...)

Even having f4, it's still tight when you pull out the camera & lens at the same time, it's just marginally fit (actually the bag is almost deforming, I'm using the slingshot 200 too...

, after I upgraded my body to 1D3, it's a nightmare to have telephoto lens mounted)

作者: sky 時間: 2011-8-19 07:28

which 70-200mm is yours?

F4 should be doable, but a bit tight
F2.8......probably need a bigger ba ...
嘉嘉發表於 2011-8-18 23:37

yes f4

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2011-8-19 08:47

the bag definitely deforms if body is mounted with the 70-200
I always have the body mounted with my 17-40 when putting in the bag

but so far my stuff fit ok only because mine is a little 400D

I think I will need a bigger bag when I upgrade to a new body

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2011-8-19 16:54

回復 33# FiChai

no padding? Just thinner padding ba? F-5XZ have padding, just not that thick compared to those insane 3/4" padding the Crumper have. I know the Crumpler will help your gear survive drops a lil better... but really, you don't want to drop anything at all to begin with. I think a padding that helps me with bumps and scratches is good enough. The extra bulkiness is not worth it otherwise.

F-5XB is just the shorter version of F-5XC. And the F-5XC have the same form factor as the F-5XZ that I got. How do you find the F-5XB?

Nice Korean blog on the F-5XC. Just nice pictures, I don't know Korean.
http://blog.naver.com/PostView.n ... widgetTypeCall=true

作者: FiChai 時間: 2011-8-19 18:44

回復 38# BiscottiGelato

Depends on different models. Nope, my previous F-2 and F-3X were not padded at all, as described above. The F-5XB I'm still keeping is lightly padded and I'm happy with it. I think it's similar to the newer F-5XC and even your F-5XZ, which are also "lightly padded". I got my F-5XB in HK many years ago though.

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2011-8-20 16:39

was carrying my sling bag again today
I want to say.........I think my shoulder is starting to hurt ^_^;;;

it was ok when I didn't have the grip

作者: elan7e 時間: 2011-8-21 07:40

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwUDrAlKk88

Swiss Army sling camera bag looks good. You can find it in Costco , costs less than $40.

作者: sky 時間: 2011-8-21 08:42

Swiss Army sling camera bag looks good. You can find it in Costco , costs less than $40.
elan7e 發表於 2011-8-21 07:40

very nice

作者: sky 時間: 2011-8-21 09:05

was carrying my sling bag again today
I want to say.........I think my shoulder is starting to hurt ...
嘉嘉發表於 2011-8-20 16:39

你對影相好認真!!!!

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)