Board logo

標題: 哲古華拉學不到:月薪逾六萬 長毛續住公屋六年 [打印本頁]

作者: fy789    時間: 2011-9-13 14:55     標題: 哲古華拉學不到:月薪逾六萬 長毛續住公屋六年

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-9-13 15:07

每月都捐出四萬元成立基金支持社運活動,基金由友人管理。
fy789 發表於 2011-9-13 14:55

之前我都講過啦?毛哥人工5皮幾,捐咗4皮幾,實際即係自己得1皮來用。而且呢件一直都係廣為人知嘅事,而佢又唔係無交、唔肯交雙倍租,咁又有乜野咁大問題?

-力
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-9-13 15:47

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-9-13 17:02

之前我都講過啦?毛哥人工5皮幾,捐咗4皮幾,實際即係自己得1皮來用。而且呢件一直都係廣為人知嘅事,而佢 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-9-13 15:07


How much he donates is irrelevant. Based on his income, he is abusing public housing.

Just look at the brand name clothing he wears everyday, it looks like he is corrupted and receives funding from western sources, otherwise with only $10,000 per month that is not enough for his spending.
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-9-13 17:49

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: ricrick    時間: 2011-9-13 17:55

How much he donates is irrelevant. Based on his income, he is abusing public housing.

Just look a ...
peter236 發表於 2011-9-13 17:02



you mean those limited 哲古華拉 t-shirts?

你都話有十多萬名公屋輪候,要解決問題,是要政府興建更多公屋
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-9-13 17:59

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: zoids    時間: 2011-9-13 20:18

基金由友人管理.....

Hahahaha... Lik is totally blinded by his own righteousness.
作者: raffaello    時間: 2011-9-13 21:26

If he is making $60K a month then he should move out la, regardless of how much money he is donating. Plus, he already 當選六年 lor bor, not the first couple of years, so he should be well prepared financially.
作者: chunsh    時間: 2011-9-13 21:27

ok 呀
Lik o既comment貫徹佢一貫double standard o既作風
換轉角色﹐如果個位係保皇黨議員﹐大家估下Lik呢位自由民主(但容不下異見)鬥士
會點講野
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-9-13 22:51

ok 呀
Lik o既comment貫徹佢一貫double standard o既作風
換轉角色﹐如果個位係保皇黨議員﹐大家估下Lik呢位自由民主(但容不下異見)鬥士
會點講野
chunsh 發表於 2011-9-13 21:27

咪又係講返同樣嘅呢番說話囉~

不過,保皇黨又邊度有人會好似:

1)毛哥咁窮
2)5皮幾人工捐咗8成出來搞社運?

-力
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-9-13 23:19

咪又係講返同樣嘅呢番說話囉~

不過,保皇黨又邊度有人會好似:

1)毛哥咁窮
2)5皮幾人工捐咗8成 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-9-13 22:51


Don't continue to BS lar idiot Lik.

Just tell us what the requirements for public housing are and tell us how your 毛哥 would be qualified according to those requirements.

Tell us the reasons why those requiremetns are applicable to other ordinary citizens but not your dearest 毛哥?

I will wait for your answers.  Don't give us the shxt such as donating his income unless you can find a rule saying he would be qualified if he donates XXX amount or percentage of his income. Otherwise, just STFU.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-9-13 23:33

本帖最後由 Lik 於 2011-9-13 23:35 編輯

Fxxking Moron,

The rule is -- if you earn more than the threshold income, you pay double the rent. 毛哥's LegCo salary exceed that threshold, so he is paying double the rent. Has he ever been unwilling to pay? If he is unwilling to pay, then by all means, he needs to be kicked out.

Shut the fxxk up la.

-Lik
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-9-14 00:12

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-9-14 00:23 編輯
咪又係講返同樣嘅呢番說話囉~

不過,保皇黨又邊度有人會好似:

1)毛哥咁窮
2)5皮幾人工捐咗8成出來搞社運?
Lik 發表於 2011-9-13 22:51


條長毛搞社運? 搞垃圾就有份.
Who the fuk is this 毛哥?

WTF is 搞社運? It must be something destroying HK's social order.
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-9-14 00:17

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-9-14 00:18 編輯
Fxxking Moron,

The rule is -- if you earn more than the threshold income, you pay double the rent.  ...
Lik 發表於 2011-9-13 23:33


You moron, you should STFU.
Long hair is abusing public housing, the whole of HK knows about his abuse.
He should move out and stop barking like a mad dog on the streets.

Mr Lik you just stop your nonsense and STFU, how embarrassing you are barking here?
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-9-14 00:44

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-9-14 01:10 編輯
Fxxking Moron,

The rule is -- if you earn more than the threshold income, you pay double the rent.  ...
Lik 發表於 2011-9-13 23:33


Pretend I am making more than $100,000 USD a year.

According to your rule, as long as I am willing to pay double or triple of the rent, then I can live in a public housing?

Can you see your stupidity now?  

根據香港房屋委員會的規定,個人申請公屋的月最高入息是8,740元。請問長毛的月入息是多少?(你知道什麼是月入息嗎?)
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-9-14 09:34

如果你真係年薪USD$10萬嘅話,但又捐咗八成出去註冊慈善/非謀利團體嘅話,咁你只係一年得返USD$2萬銀。兌換返成港紙,即係萬二、三蚊一個月,絕對唔能夠過啲乜野奢華生活。所以我一樣唔會嘈你霸住公屋。

不過,你條仆街會捐兩成人工出來做善事,講我都唔信啦~捐8成?天大笑話~

-力
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-9-14 09:38

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-9-14 09:58 編輯
兌換返成港紙,即係萬二、三蚊一個月,絕對唔能夠過啲乜野奢華生活。所以我一樣唔會嘈你霸住公屋
Lik 發表於 2011-9-14 09:34


Coward Lik. Just answer my question directly.

What is the definition of monthly income and how much is the monthly income of 長毛?

I bet you coward will not dare to answer my question. STFU la if you have no gut.

原來你可以支持我霸住公屋,可憐其他每個月拿不到八千的市民就抵死pk睡街因為公屋是可以被人霸占的只要搏得阿力歡心。那些保障真正有需要的市民的政府規定有何用? 直接向阿力你走後門申請就好了。

阿力的社會公義是完完全全 DOUBLE STANDARD. 社會公義在阿力的嘴裏是由他自己所定,定罪比其他人也是由他自己做法官。

明曬 ~ !  阿力才是比共產黨獨裁更徹底的獨裁者。
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-9-14 10:30

月薪得果萬二三蚊嘅人住公屋,我又真係唔覺得有咩太唔妥。無錯,佢係過咗入息上限,咁咪按例俾貴租囉?得果萬二三蚊嘅月薪,居屋早做無晒,私樓就下一世投胎先至有得諗,咁唔住公屋嘅話,佢又走去瞓街呀?

講來講去講到尾,其實都係呢個垃圾特衰政府管理不善。政府要做嘅就係製造一個最基本嘅環境,等市民可以滿足最基本衣食住行嘅需要。連呢個最基本嘅住屋問題都處理唔好,然後就將責任歸咎晒落市民身上,咁嘅垃圾政府要唔要都罷啦?

而你呢條粉腸,講來講去都只不過係想搵位入我嗟。去仆街啦你~

-力
作者: chunsh    時間: 2011-9-14 10:42

Coward Lik. Just answer my question directly.

What is the definition of monthly income and how m ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-9-14 09:38



how dare you to challenge our freedom and democracy (yet dictative and  almighty) warrior Lik
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-9-14 11:52

月薪得果萬二三蚊嘅人住公屋,我又真係唔覺得有咩太唔妥。無錯,佢係過咗入息上限,咁咪按例俾貴租囉?得果 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-9-14 10:30


PK Lik, you are such a coward.

Give you one more chance and just answer my question directly.

What is the definition of monthly income and how much is the monthly income of 長毛?

STFU if you have no gut to admit the fact and reality.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-9-14 12:11

毛哥嘅實際收入就係等果萬零蚊。得果皮零野住公屋,我唔覺得有咩大問題。

講來講去,你都唔撚肯承認問題嘅源頭係在於特衰政府嘅無能。賤到好似你咁,除咗阿爺嘅走狗之外,都真係幾難搵。

-力
作者: chunsh    時間: 2011-9-14 12:21

毛哥嘅實際收入就係等果萬零蚊。得果皮零野住公屋,我唔覺得有咩大問題。

講來講去,你都唔撚肯承認問題嘅 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-9-14 12:11


捐出四萬元成立基金支持社運活動???
it is just an excuse
why not donate to help the poor people (remember, no matter how good is the government, there are people who fall below the poverty line)
作者: ricrick    時間: 2011-9-14 12:55

至少可減少poverty
政府政策多向大財團,記得利益者搞靠攏,導致貧富懸殊加大
社運目的就是為了弱勢,目的是特顯政府不義
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-9-14 14:24

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-9-14 14:27 編輯
毛哥嘅實際收入就係等果萬零蚊。得果皮零野住公屋,我唔覺得有咩大問題。

講來講去,你都唔撚肯承認問題嘅 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-9-14 12:11


What a PK coward you are, Lik.

Just get you gut out if you are a man not a dog and answer my question directly - what is the definition of monthly income and how much is the monthly income of 長毛?

Let say you earned $100,000 USD and donated $80,000 USD. When you file your tax return, how much will you report as your income? Will you report $100,000 USD or $20,000 USD?

Where will your stupidity stand?
   
You are just a loser and shameless mad dog.
作者: soli    時間: 2011-9-14 16:11

畢竟長毛怪也曾經窮過﹐長毛怪是有權繼續住公屋(交富戶租金)﹐但唔道德嗟。
作者: fy789    時間: 2011-9-14 19:44

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2