溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: Apple 美國員工攻擊香港抗議人仕 [打印本頁]

作者: peter236 時間: 2011-9-25 22:35 標題: Apple 美國員工攻擊香港抗議人仕

[youtube]QP1vZgADOJc[/youtube]

作者: peter236 時間: 2011-9-25 22:36

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-9-25 22:38 編輯

Just look at 2:56 of the video, Apple US staff prevented reporters from doing their work.
They are Americans, they should support freedom of protests.

作者: Surreal 時間: 2011-9-25 22:57

真係好似邪教唔係講笑開間鋪都咁High?

作者: peter236 時間: 2011-9-25 23:24

真係好似邪教唔係講笑開間鋪都咁High?
Surreal 發表於 2011-9-25 22:57

The trend is that the cult is gaining more members than ever.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-9-26 00:28

someone needs to bomb this place

作者: peter236 時間: 2011-9-26 02:59

The Apple American staff got irritated by the protestors.

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-9-26 08:13

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-9-26 08:38

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-9-26 09:37

你同Peter呢兩條仆街要diu佢啲Apple staff唔俾／唔歡迎人地做負面報導咪diu囉？但請你記住以下幾點：

1）人地只不過係 Apple staff，而並唔係好似特區公安局嘅前線鷹犬。特區公安局嘅前線鷹犬係出香港市民俾嘅糧，佢地理應係人民公僕，係應該服務同保護市民，而唔係打壓佢地同妨礙新聞自由。如果你連呢個咁大嘅分別都睇唔撚到嘅話，咁你根本就無資格出聲來講啲乜野。如果你心裡面明知道呢個重要分別，但依然照講你之前講嘅果番說話，咁就只係再一次證明你係一個賤到無倫嘅賤種。

2)老美同老共都唔likey俾人唱佢啲衰野，但老美點樣唔鍾意都唔會做得太難睇，更加唔會動用政府機器、政策等等來阻止報導出街。但阿爺又如何？金盾防火牆、網路審查、五毛黨幫莊、內部行政命令話到明可以報導啲乜，唔可以報導啲乜。同一道理，如果你連呢個咁大嘅分別都睇唔撚到嘅話，咁你根本就無資格出聲來講啲乜野。如果你心裡面明知道呢個重要分別，但依然照講你之前講嘅果番說話，咁就只係再一次證明你係一個賤到無倫嘅賤種。

3）從來無話過老美唔賤，但阿爺卻比佢更賤、更無恥唔知幾多N倍。

去食屎啦，賤種～

-力

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-9-26 09:53

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-9-26 09:57

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: ricrick 時間: 2011-9-26 10:20

i like iSLAVE. now i can call every apple die hard fan iSlave

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2011-9-26 17:49

Another example that US doesn't like any negative publicity, as much as, if more
than CCP. They ...
fy789 發表於 2011-9-26 08:38

US use propaganda, patriotism and media influence.
CCP uses police and firewalls.

Same effect, just US much more clever.

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-9-26 20:35

US use propaganda, patriotism and media influence.
CCP uses police and firewalls.

Same effect, just US much more clever.
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2011-9-26 17:49

Entirely correct. But when you do it the way China attempts to, that isn't just know as "less clever". It's known as "bun 7".

-Lik

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-9-26 23:11

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: peter236 時間: 2011-9-27 11:43

作者: peter236 時間: 2011-9-27 11:46

It is interesting to see Apple American employees getting pissed by freedom of speech.
They even tried to tell Hong Kong police to do something about the protest.

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-9-27 11:57

Peter，

其實你咁撚憎老美，點解又會一直以來都不停咁吹捧 Apple 嘅呢？當然，阿爺手下嘅廢柴五毛個個都有人格分裂呢樣野，我地就大家都知。就正如你一邊鬧加拿大唔好，但又一邊賴死唔肯走呢樣，就足以證明你呢條廢物係幾咁自相矛盾。

-力

作者: peter236 時間: 2011-9-27 12:04

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-9-27 12:05 編輯

Peter，

其實你咁撚憎老美，點解又會一直以來都不停咁吹捧 Apple 嘅呢？當然，阿爺手下嘅廢柴五毛個個都有 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-9-27 11:57

If you think about it, these Apple staff from the US should be freedom loving people and now they are contradicting themselves by trying to stop the protest.

I would not be surprised if Mr Lik or other people from western democracies are as contradictory as these Apple staff.

作者: Ovaltine 時間: 2011-9-27 13:26

本帖最後由 Ovaltine 於 2011-9-27 13:27 編輯

Americans are the examples for the Chinese, these so-called American Patriots are living in constant fear of been attacked by other countries. Their unjust foreign policy had been the very cause of this current state.

To US: We don't hate you because of your freedom and prosperity, for us Canadians, we are actually living better lives than you gun-holding bastards. We are peace-living people, your economy is based on attacking other countries and rebuilding them for profit. Freedom in disguise, Militarism in the effect.

To China: We don't hate your wealth, but your lack of equal distribution of wealth using Communist propaganda to impose police state towards it's citizens

作者: peter236 時間: 2011-9-27 22:55

Americans are the examples for the Chinese, these so-called American Patriots are living in constant ...
Ovaltine 發表於 2011-9-27 13:26

The lack of equal distribution of wealth is the result of western capitalism. The way to equally distribute wealth is by Marxism and socialism.

作者: Ovaltine 時間: 2011-9-27 23:03

Exactly, then why is the PRC using Marxism and socialism ideologies as decoy? Today China is more capitalistic than traditional western capitalism. We don't think we can be better than them, so we just imitate them?

作者: peter236 時間: 2011-9-27 23:06

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-9-27 23:07 編輯

Exactly, then why is the PRC using Marxism and socialism ideologies as decoy? Today China is more c ...
Ovaltine 發表於 2011-9-27 23:03

According to Marxism, capitalism will collapse by itself eventually due to inequality and bankruptcy (look at Greece, US and Japan).

That is why China is modifying and improving on Marxism to suit it needs. China is still rapidly developing and more measures will be made to reduce inequality.

作者: Ovaltine 時間: 2011-9-28 01:52

Your rhetoric are baseless, it is like saying American will reduce it's debt in the next 10 years. Seriously, do you believe everything the PRC says, you mindless internet drone!

作者: peter236 時間: 2011-9-28 03:23

Your rhetoric are baseless, it is like saying American will reduce it's debt in the next 10 years. S ...
Ovaltine 發表於 2011-9-28 01:52

Just look at what the Chinese are doing for the past 30 years. They have liberalized their economy resulting in a rapidly developing economy. A lot more needs to be done especially in education, health care and environment protection.
However, all these require a lot of money. Doing all these without big deficits or bankruptcy is a challenge for any country.

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)