Board logo

標題: Canon new release [打印本頁]

作者: Look4chrisng    時間: 2011-11-4 08:59     標題: Canon new release

Go check out Canon rumors.  Canon is putting out whole new set of Cinema  Lens and Video Camera.  If you like shooting video, save up and move to Canon.
作者: pkny9394    時間: 2011-11-4 10:07

Kinda hoping a 7D FF.  $20K for a video camera, unless I'm a pro and use it every single day
作者: Look4chrisng    時間: 2011-11-4 10:13

pkny.  Same here.  I guess the 7D FF is called a D700.
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2011-11-4 10:22

The coming 1Dx is awesome! and too much, just hv to wait till next April ..
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-11-4 14:41

回復 3# Look4chrisng

7D by definition is not FF wow...
FF should be 1D/1Ds/1DX series... right?
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-11-4 15:21

and 5D series la, C Hing.

But until the camera really shows up, either as a real and available product, or as pre-production sample unit, I won't believe any of the Canon rumours law.

-Lik
作者: Mr.JPG    時間: 2011-11-4 15:21

1D 係 APS-H.
佢話如果你想要FF又要好focusing system,
唯一方法就係過擋。
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2011-11-4 18:18

1D 係 APS-H.
佢話如果你想要FF又要好focusing system,
唯一方法就係過擋。
Mr.JPG 發表於 2011-11-4 15:21



  1Ds/1Ds2/1Ds3/1DX ... all FF, and good AF system wor ..
作者: Look4chrisng    時間: 2011-11-4 22:02

回復 5# lo_pak


yes, we know 7D is crop sensor.  that's why our bro above wants a full frame with 7D focus system.
作者: Look4chrisng    時間: 2011-11-4 22:08

Among a ton of photographers at the Occupy Vancouver, I saw one old guy still shooting Manual focus cameras (one Nikon F, and one Leica M6).  Really count your blessing at least we all got AF.
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2011-11-5 07:44

回復  lo_pak


yes, we know 7D is crop sensor.  that's why our bro above wants a full frame with 7D ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011-11-4 22:02



    Coming ...  5D III

I wouldn't mind if Canon will do the same thing to the new 1DX, just call the next 5D series "3D" ... when the EOS 3 is still named the best AF film body .... ^_^
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-11-5 10:59

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-11-5 11:00 編輯

回復 11# Catpiano

It's another $$$ burning game...

I'm more curious about the performance of the 7D II releasing next year. Does it act much closer to a CAMcorder or whatsoever...

FF is good, but Canon is always short on the wide angle lens, having a 16-35 II I would rather go with the prime, having a prime I would rather go for a Zeiss instead of Canon... Buy hey, Zeiss is MF... Internal looping starts again...  

To me, Zeiss provides the best wide angle image (in terms of 3D feel and colour vividity)
作者: 快樂牛郎    時間: 2011-11-5 18:30

Among a ton of photographers at the Occupy Vancouver, I saw one old guy still shooting Manual focus  ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/11/4 22:08


blessing? or curse? either way it's just a matter of personal choice
作者: 快樂牛郎    時間: 2011-11-5 18:30

回復  Catpiano

It's another $$$ burning game...

I'm more curious about the performance of the 7D  ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011/11/5 10:59


at the wide end, you don't really need to focus at all.
作者: Look4chrisng    時間: 2011-11-5 22:00

回復 14# 快樂牛郎


    not if you are within 5 feet at f1.4
作者: Look4chrisng    時間: 2011-11-5 22:02

回復 11# Catpiano


    5D mark III should be a water down version of 1DX.  Canon doesn't make whole lot of money of the Pro camera.  But sell tons of $2-3k camera.
作者: 快樂牛郎    時間: 2011-11-7 10:25

回復  快樂牛郎


    not if you are within 5 feet at f1.4
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011/11/5 22:00


you still have a wiggle room of about 1.5 - 2 feet
that's more than sufficient
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2011-11-7 14:20

回復  Catpiano

Canon is always short on the wide angle lens

lo_pak 發表於 2011-11-5 10:59



    Ha?  14mm, 8-15, 20mm, 16-35, 17-40, 15mm, 20-35 ... quite a bit wor ..  

Plus third party ...
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2011-11-7 14:50

回復 18# Catpiano

Cuz I'm talking about quality lol...

It seems that Canon brand wide angle lens are a bit over-priced...
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2011-11-7 15:15

Their quality is not good wor .. (depends what you compare)

Price ..  again ... depends what to compare ..  Nikon 14-24 is great quality and decent price, (a bit too much distortion) but their 16-35 F4 is high price .. compare to Canon 17-40 F4L ..

I do agree the Canon 14L is a bit over price .. since no other choice, so Canon can ask more  (vs Nikon 13mm .. not bad! LOL) It is about as sharp as Nikon 14-24 (and that is zoom for less $$) but better control on distortion (well, prime)

I don't have much Pentax or Minolta/Sony etc wide angle ... so .. dont hv experience to give any comment ... And I don't have the 8-15 yet, not sure how good it is, from the spec/price, seems like a great lens!
作者: Look4chrisng    時間: 2011-11-7 15:54

you still have a wiggle room of about 1.5 - 2 feet
that's more than sufficient
快樂牛郎 發表於 2011-11-7 10:25


more like 0.52 ft.




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2