Board logo

標題: 牛奶,會致癌? [打印本頁]

作者: raffaello    時間: 2012-1-3 13:41     標題: 牛奶,會致癌?

牛奶,會致癌?



  當我病發入院時,護士送了各式各樣的營養奶粉試用裝過來。那時我在想,奶粉廠真懂得做生意,小小的試用裝,目的也是希望病人變成長期客戶。的確,在電療或化療期間,由於身體的營養不夠,加上胃口變差,營養奶粉就可以起到補充不足之處,所以喝營養奶粉成為了許多病人的上佳選擇。但治療完成後,還需不需要繼續喝營養奶粉則見仁見智。



  在我出院後,在網上瀏覽不少資料,才知道牛奶還是少喝為妙,而由於營養奶粉、嬰兒奶粉的主要成分也是從牛奶中提取,因此性質根本是一樣。近期,蒙牛(02319)旗下產品被驗出含致癌黃曲霉素,又一次的打擊消費者的信心。


  一般而言,在現代牧場中,一頭奶牛在生下小牛後,會被千方百計擠出一頭小牛所需的十倍以上的奶量,所以超過三分之一的奶牛都患有乳腺炎。試想想,為什麼奶牛可以被擠出過量的牛奶,背後的原因當然是人為因素。根據美國國家癌症研究所研究發現,雌性激素、雄性激素和胰島素的增長因數就是牛奶內的主要致癌物質。


  患有乳腺癌並復發過五次的英國地質化學家簡‧普蘭特,最後在戒掉每天必吃的兩盒優酪乳後,奇蹟的發現腫瘤逐漸的縮小並消失了。後來她研究發現,牛奶中的IGF-1(類胰島素一號增長因數)導致女性容易患乳腺癌,男性容易患前列腺癌。IGF-1是牛奶中本身含有的致癌激素,但是在以前自然產出的牛奶中含量較低。自從人們用激素催發母牛大量產奶,牛奶中的IGF1含量就增加了數倍至數十倍,牛奶致癌的危險當然就很厲害。


  另外,在奶粉廠洗腦式的廣告催眠下,許多人認為牛奶能補鈣。但不說不知,原來許多蔬菜的鈣含量比牛奶高得多。100克牛奶之中含鈣110毫克,而 100克海帶鈣含高達1177毫克,鈣含量比牛奶高出11倍。芝麻的含鈣量比牛奶高過9倍,豆腐、大頭菜、小白菜、油萊、莧菜的含鈣量比牛奶高1.5至3倍。因此,只要吃蔬菜就不會缺鈣。


  還記得老婆在兩次懷孕時,也因為錯誤的觀念,明明極討厭喝牛奶,卻仍逼自己每天喝一杯鮮奶。當我把這些信息告訴她時,她立刻大呼「My God」。最近有朋友懷孕,我已勸說她不用天天喝牛奶,甚至可以不喝。


  或許你會懷疑,網上的信息到底可不可信?這時候我會想起,當我向岑醫生詢問我需不需要喝營養奶粉時,他回答我說︰「外國人向中國總理說,中國的小孩最好每天喝一杯牛奶。」他停頓一下接著語重心長地說︰「以後,這些人患癌的機會就大了。」我想,作為一位名氣響噹噹的腫瘤科醫生,斷不會無矢放的的說出這麼一番說話。
作者: fibbi    時間: 2012-1-3 14:49

Hopefully organic milk would be better.
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2012-1-3 17:12

Hopefully organic milk would be better.
fibbi 發表於 2012-1-3 14:49


That is what we use for our little guy ..

However, expect BIG price jump for organic milk this yr .. due to high demanding wor ..  (news said .. could be up to 40% more!!)

I just don't get it .. organic milk in Canada is already ~ 3 time more then US .. and more now??  why can't we get milk from US?
作者: fibbi    時間: 2012-1-3 23:50

回復 3# Catpiano


    不過有時諗,美國啲牛奶平咁多,會唔會都好有問題?

yeah...organic milk is almost double regular milk. I was hesitate to buy it when I was pregnant...but in the end..it's just $3 difference for every 1 or 2 weeks? Even less than the cost of a starbuck drink? I guess I should not care...
作者: Quest    時間: 2012-1-4 06:44

Most of these links are filled with half-truths, mixed with lies and unsubstaintiated claims/facts.

First off: human beings have been consuming domesticated mammal's milk (cow, goat, horse, lamma, or sometimes even donkey's milk (in the case of Chile) for milleniums and we suddenly die off during this century?! (now that doesn't make sense)

2nd: yes, cow's milk spiked with growth hormone is not good for humans, but that's not the sole reason for humans developing cancers of all kinds. Environmental factors, toxins (all sorts of chemicals, plasticizers, pesticides, DDT, etc.) used during the turn of this century is what's leading us to developing cancer. Growth hormone is an accelerant in this case, not the sole contributing factor.


"...一般而言,在現代牧場中,一頭奶牛在生下小牛後,會被千方百計擠出一頭小牛所需的十倍以上的奶量,所以超過三分之一的奶牛都患有乳腺炎。試想想,為什麼奶牛可以被擠出過量的牛奶,背後的原因當然是人為因素。根據美國國家癌症研究所研究發現,雌性激素、雄性激素和胰島素的增長因數就是牛奶內的主要致癌物質"

This part is 1/2 filled with bunks for you ever tried squeezing milk out of an already emptied udder of a dairy cow, you get nothing (simple answer!). Similar to what it used to be a many centuries ago: in ancient Chinese society where you are a rich family, you can hire a "nai-ma" (milk mom) to feed your child(ren) even though she hasn't have kids for some time, so does that mean that she's spiked with hormones or basically squeezed to death ?


Sorry, this link is bunk (unless OP provides proofs with relevant medical research papers to prove it).

Also: thank goodness we live in Canada where Canadian govt prohibits the use of growth hormones in dairy cows. Last time we had this news documentary a couple of years ago (W5?), Dairyland's milk tested negative with growth hormones.

I'd rather feed my kids (am doing it right now) with DAiryland milk than listening to these bunks.

Q.
作者: 快樂牛郎    時間: 2012-1-4 11:25

XX會致癌

you can fill in anything you want
everything you touch everyday 會致癌




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2