溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [中餐館] 鼎泰豐 coming to Vancouver!! [打印本頁]

作者: Helissio 時間: 2012-3-6 10:10 標題: 鼎泰豐 coming to Vancouver!!

[attach]12225[/attach]

saw this yesteday walking in Downtown, on Richards near Dunsmuirs

作者: yuusaku 時間: 2012-3-6 10:30

I've only been to DTF in Bellevue, it was good, but I still like 小籠記 on Main the most.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2012-3-6 10:39

Is this fake? The sign looks like homemade.

You know how there were fake little sheep until the real arrived at Lansdowne.

作者: 吳孟達 時間: 2012-3-6 10:53

Heard that the one at Bellevue is a joke.

作者: Helissio 時間: 2012-3-6 11:15

Dunno if it is fake, it look legit to me but who knows. The food is good at the Bellevue one, I just dont like all the kitchen stuff is Mexican and all server are white, not trying to be rasict but thats weird when a white server tell you to mix how much Vinegar with soy sauce to eat their 小籠包 probably. anyway, looking forward to the Vancouver store if thats legit.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2012-3-6 11:34

not trying to be rasict but thats weird when a white server tell you to mix how much Vinegar with soy sauce to eat their 小籠包 probably. anyway, looking forward to the Vancouver store if thats legit.

their target customer base is not chinese

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2012-3-6 11:35

Heard that the one at Bellevue is a joke.
吳孟達發表於 2012/3/6 10:53

it's definitely not a joke as a business
it makes tons of money

作者: 吳孟達 時間: 2012-3-6 12:04

本帖最後由吳孟達於 2012-3-6 13:12 編輯

鼎泰豐降臨溫哥華
http://airsama.blogspot.com/2012/02/blog-post_24.html

作者: 吳孟達 時間: 2012-3-6 12:09

本帖最後由吳孟達於 2012-3-6 13:12 編輯

Just found this article. http://airsama.blogspot.com/2012/02/blog-post_28.html

This one is a 山寨貨..HAHAHAHA

空氣先前寫了一篇鼎泰豐降臨溫哥華，似乎引來不少議論。空氣身邊一名強者朋友「型男亞瑟」，便義務出馬查證，結果發現 …

果然是山寨貨。囧

鼎泰豐台北總部已經鄭重否認這件事，然後他們似乎會跟進。大概也是不了了之啦，他們也沒進加拿大，不知道可以做些什麼。

據說多倫多那間也是個山寨貨，是台灣○家小館過來開的。

所以要提醒各位，加拿大這些上海師傅包出來的鼎泰豐小籠包，都是未經認可的山寨貨。米國那些墨西哥人捏出來的鼎泰豐小籠包，才是台灣授權的正貨喔。

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-6 12:20

回復 9# 吳孟達

Your efficiency is SO high...

作者: rainbow-davie 時間: 2012-3-6 12:24

The one in Bellevue is ok. the one in taipei is still the best.

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-3-6 12:29

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-3-6 12:38 編輯

Those 小籠包 from Taiwan companies are not authentic.
小籠包 are originally from the regions near Shanghai. Those from Taiwanese companies or chefs are fake.
I would prefer 小籠包 made by Shanghai chefs.

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-6 12:47

回復 12# peter236

Seeing you living in Canada is what a pain for you...

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-3-6 13:13

回復 peter236

Seeing you living in Canada is what a pain for you...
lo_pak 發表於 2012-3-6 12:47

I don't quite understand what you mean.
Locally, there are some Shanghai restaurants with Shanghai chefs who make authentic 小籠包.

作者: Helissio 時間: 2012-3-6 13:28

****, I got faked..

作者: FiChai 時間: 2012-3-6 13:40

本帖最後由 FiChai 於 2012-3-6 13:42 編輯

Those 小籠包 from Taiwan companies are not authentic.
小籠包 are originally from the regions near Sh ...
peter236 發表於 2012-3-6 12:29

I think we are not talking about whether the 小籠包 is authentic or not, it's whether the brand name DTF is authentic or not.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2012-3-6 13:54

Just found this article.

This one is a 山寨貨..HAHAHAHA
吳孟達發表於 2012/3/6 12:09

You could clearly tell by the sign and the size of the place

takes no intelligence

作者: librazhy 時間: 2012-3-6 13:57

genuine name is Din Tai Fung

this fake one's name is Shanghai Ding Tai Fung

作者: sunmoon 時間: 2012-3-6 15:44

We don't really like the one in Bellevue. We tried the one in Hong Kong and they were not as impressive either. And they are expensive!

We like our local restaurants here better.

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2012-3-6 17:27

Doesn't matter real or fake .. as long as good ...

I think the fake one in Toronto is still there, and for sure better (food taste, not talking profit) then the one in Bellevue...

For taste, the one in LA is better then Bellevue too .. but the Bellevue one is nicer layout and bigger ..

作者: 吳孟達 時間: 2012-3-6 17:38

Emailed their head office and received this reply.

Thank you for your email and your interest in Din Tai Fung.
We are sorry that 【Shanghai Ding Tai Fung】 is not our branch.
We have no branches in CANADA.

If you need, Please link this website
http://www.dintaifung.com.tw/en/area_a_list.asp?AreaCountryNO=1

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-3-6 18:51

鼎泰豐 also have stores in Shanghai. Maybe they can hire good Shanghai chefs there.

作者: rockypath 時間: 2012-3-6 20:16

我唔係好鍾意鼎泰豐的小籠包。皮薄肉多，咬落去感覺係食緊塊肉。因皮薄得似紙，所以食唔到有什麽味道和感覺。可能很多人會喜歡，但我覺得真正的上海路邊的小籠包更好食。

作者: rockypath 時間: 2012-3-6 20:19

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2012-3-6 20:21 編輯

but I still like 小籠記 on Main the most.
yuusaku 發表於 2012-3-6 10:30

That is 上海小籠包. I like it better than 正宗的鼎泰豐小籠包.

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-6 20:42

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2012-3-6 20:48 編輯

回復 24# rockypath

你知上海人幾咀Diu架啦…鼎秦豐十六摺，係手工一流，但係，就小左一份麵粉俾到人家既感覺…

北方小點，食唔到半分麵粉味統統都係"廣東版""改"

作者: rockypath 時間: 2012-3-6 20:45

回復 rockypath

鼎秦豐十六摺，係手工一流，但係，就小左一份麵粉俾到人家既感 ...
lo_pak 發表於 2012-3-6 20:42

Agree

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-6 21:07

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2012-3-6 21:17 編輯

回復 26# rockypath

暫時響溫哥華我覺得稱得上有水準既有"一隻鼎"，"滬江"，"旺"，foodcourt 黎講coquitlam 恒基廣場個間最有驚喜…

Lansdowne mall, crystal mall 個兩間還有一段距離

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-6 21:23

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2012-3-6 21:35 編輯

回復 14# peter236

如果你講緊"老上海"風味，我相信我會明，但係近來黎呢度既搞緊新派滬風，請恕我不能茍同…你睇下"聚"，"上海人家"晚晚都咁多人，我真係唔知D新師博學到D乜? 創新不足，風味不足，不倫不類。

作者: rockypath 時間: 2012-3-6 21:38

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2012-3-6 21:49 編輯

回復 rockypath

暫時響溫哥華我覺得稱得上有水準既有"一隻鼎"，"滬江"，"旺"，foodcourt 黎講coquitlam ...
lo_pak 發表於 2012-3-6 21:07

我淨係試過滬江的小龍包，其他兩家沒試過。滬江的小龍包對我來說可以接受，但沒有什麽驚喜。

上海有些路邊看似破爛的小店但小龍包卻一流。只需在早上看邊一家門前排晒隊，一定不會令你失望。

上海城隍廟個家最出名的南翔小籠包是外地人一定會慕名而來嘗試的飯店。如果有朋友或客人一起去上海，我都迫不得已要帶他們去嘗試。但我個人覺得他們的小籠包是垃圾(特別是與他們的名聲相比)，每次去吃對我來說都是受罪。如果他們不是靠著他們的老招牌（他們的招牌已經變成上海城隍廟歷史的一部分），一早就已經關門大吉。

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-6 21:52

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2012-3-6 22:10 編輯

回復 29# rockypath

排名，當然有先後…

一隻鼎，排先…

小籠包，生煎包，醉雞，溫哥華一絕，(只限點心，小菜，異常失色)
但係，服務其差。無計，價錢相宜… 小籠包，生煎包，醉雞，窩貼，上海粗抄，兩丁友都只不過三十幾蚊落樓…

作者: rockypath 時間: 2012-3-6 22:11

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2012-3-6 22:17 編輯

回復 rockypath

排名，當然有先後…

一隻鼎，排先…

小籠包，生煎包，醉雞，溫哥華一絕，(只限點心 ...
lo_pak 發表於 2012-3-6 21:52

可能因為在上海食過好多好野（出名的飯店酒樓和路邊小吃），因此對這裏的上海餐館不是很有興趣也不抱太高的期望。

雖然知道一隻鼎在溫哥華最出名，但我也提不起興趣去試一試。不過聽你介紹，都可能找機會試一試。

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-6 22:23

回復 31# rockypath

無期望無失望...錄自本論檀仲黑哂幅相，黑白雙煞既黑煞…

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-3-6 22:32

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-3-6 22:34 編輯

回復 peter236

如果你講緊"老上海"風味，我相信我會明，但係近來黎呢度既搞緊新派滬風，請恕我不能茍同…你睇下"聚"，"上海人家"晚晚都咁多人，我真係唔知D新師博學到D乜? 創新不足，風味不足，不倫不類。
lo_pak 發表於 2012-3-6 21:23

I suspect 聚 has Taiwanese background. That is why they have 鹽酥雞 on the menu, and their 小籠包 is not that authentic.

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-6 22:51

回復 33# peter236

你有乜好介紹?

作者: spoonek4 時間: 2012-3-6 23:01

可能因為在上海食過好多好野（出名的飯店酒樓和路邊小吃），因此對這裏的上海餐館不是很有興趣也不抱太高 ...
rockypath 發表於 2012-3-6 22:11

有次同我個台灣人同事去bellevue鼎泰豐度試，佢話食完果隻味道覺得好感動喎，我覺得OK啦，portion真係幾細，始終覺得溫哥華既可能都唔差得過果度，去shopping開試下無妨，千其唔好特登去試。

如果local想食上海式既小籠包，試一只鼎倒不如去試小龍記/滬上(o係aberdeen隔離果間)，我覺得D 包同小菜仲好食，我gf係土生土長上海人都只係肯食滬上，叫我唔使帶佢去其他地方食上海野。但係約半年前次同佢去同滬上果度食飯，佢同D 上海姐姐傾計(我聽唔明)，原來佢話佢地老細轉左北方人，之後我地只係去過一兩次，水準都仲係咁上下，唔算太好食，同正宗上海野比係冇得比架啦....

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-6 23:32

回復 35# spoonek4

滬上個parking好恐怖，下次有機會可以一試。

作者: rockypath 時間: 2012-3-6 23:50

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2012-3-6 23:52 編輯

回復 35# spoonek4

我有親戚從三藩市開車到 LA 就為食鼎泰豐的小籠包。鼎泰豐的小籠包對她來講已經是頂級了。但這不能怪她，因爲她是在美國出生，也沒有試過其他小籠包（比如說上海的小龍包或中國南方和北方不同地方風味的小籠包）。其實北京的小龍包也不錯。更粗豪D，麵粉分量更重些。南方的更精緻和細膩D。

在溫哥華我淨係試過滬江一家上海菜，因爲有人約食飯。

話開我又記起一單野。我曾在上海食過好好味的蘿蔔絲卷(或都可以稱為餅)，一直念念不忘。當第一次嘗試時代坊洪師傅的牛肉面時，發現餐牌上有呢道菜。即刻點來試一下。一試就想吐出來，真是差天共地。味道沒得比不用說，連蘿蔔絲都沒完全熟。

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-7 00:00

回復 37# rockypath

你夠膽幫親馮老板D樣板食肆?

作者: rockypath 時間: 2012-3-7 00:37

回復 rockypath

你夠膽幫親馮老板D樣板食肆?
lo_pak 發表於 2012-3-7 00:00

你知當時的宣傳攻勢有幾勁個啦。唔俾面試下都唔得。當時我都係等左一排沒那麽多人排隊先去試。但味道卻是令我失望。可能是期待越大失望越深。之後都沒再幫襯。

馮老板次次都是靠宣傳攻勢。如果建立唔到口碑，再強的宣傳也沒用。當大家都被騙來試一次之後，就再也沒有人繼續上當。結果唯有換畫，同樣故事再上演一次。

作者: librazhy 時間: 2012-3-7 11:35

I've only been to 上海人家 once, and they served us with "Medium Rare"小籠包， the captain took a look at it, replaced it right away - because the pork is not cooked!

一隻鼎's 小籠包not too impressing

旺, feels fatty

一品怪廚's 小籠包, below average

aberdeen 客滿亭, the food gets cold so soon and chop-sticks stop moving

聚, I like their renovation, 小籠包 only taste good on certain days, depends on the chef

滬江, 可以食得好清

麗晶 food court 小籠包, poor

looks like the waitress from滬江 now works 蘇浙, food not bad

京園's 小籠包, it's a joke

台北SOGO復興鼎泰豐, 可能旅行時心情愉快﹐覺得特別好食

Seattle鼎泰豐, tried their 什麼松庸/松露小籠包, taste like soil. outstanding noodles texture though

yet haven't tried 滬上

作者: pkphilip 時間: 2012-3-7 18:11

鼎泰豐 is so good in TW... I miss it.

Philip

作者: Bullshark 時間: 2012-3-7 19:31

a fake, too bad

作者: chunsh 時間: 2012-3-8 12:11

唔出奇呀
溫哥華都有美心呀，大班呀，早幾年我重係Aberdeen見到APM添

作者: 吳孟達 時間: 2012-3-9 10:52

仲有米蘭站，羅馬站，水車屋同友和

作者: kwan1024 時間: 2012-3-20 21:50

呢間假嫁WO.......

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-21 05:40

回復 45# kwan1024

拜托，睇完整個post再講…

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2012-3-21 12:12

回復 kwan1024

拜托，睇完整個post再講…
lo_pak 發表於 2012-3-21 05:40

I thought people sent email to the headquater and verified there was no new branch planned for vancouver?

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2012-3-21 13:31

回復 47# 嘉嘉

That's what I said, kwan seems doesn't know we all know about it...

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-3-21 15:35

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-3-21 15:38 編輯

回復嘉嘉

That's what I said, kwan seems doesn't know we all know about it...
lo_pak 發表於 2012-3-21 13:31

It seems your logic is reverse here. You, not kwan, should read this thread again.

kwan said this store is a fake, exactly what this thread has been talking about.

作者: librazhy 時間: 2012-7-24 10:24

any update on this one?

作者: librazhy 時間: 2012-7-24 10:27

so surprised if taiwan dtf didn't sue them

作者: truesome 時間: 2012-7-25 12:30

They are open now!

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)