Board logo

標題: 7D vs 60D vs T4i [打印本頁]

作者: elan7e    時間: 2012-9-9 15:52     標題: 7D vs 60D vs T4i

Everybody said that they have more or less the same IQ.

I checked photography-on-the-net and flickr. I feel 7D > 60D > T4i in terms of IQ.

Is it because the owners of 7D invest more in the lens so the outcome is better? Or the technique of them is higher level. Or I have something wrong in the judgement or I have 偏見?
作者: 嘉嘉    時間: 2012-9-9 17:45

to make the comparison actually comparable

you should look at images from these body with the same lens
作者: elan7e    時間: 2012-9-9 18:16

回復 2# 嘉嘉


It is impossible for me to carry out this experiment.
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2012-9-9 18:49

回復 3# elan7e

7D is a more versatile body than the other 2 bodies... Better focusing, micro adjustment, quicker response, etc...

Depends on what type of photography you are shooting. For still non-moving target, results should be the same or super close; whereas, for moving target,  the results can vary by quite a bit...
作者: imvitasoy    時間: 2012-9-10 00:03

7D 好重...
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2012-9-10 06:04

回復 5# imvitasoy

Heavy body is more ideal if you are pairing with a heavier lens. The center of gravity is more balance at your wrist. Light body with heavier lens can hurt your wrist easily.
作者: Look4chrisng    時間: 2012-9-10 08:23

I think  the sensors are pretty much the same.   The different is the controls/focus speed of the camera.  Unless, you speed is very important.  I wouldn't invest money on corp sensors.
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2012-9-10 08:48

回復 7# Look4chrisng

Yes and no, depends on how many upgrades you are proposing in the future...
作者: Look4chrisng    時間: 2012-9-10 09:54

It is in fact cheaper to buy full frame cameras depending on what kind of look you want.

Say, if you want the look of 50mm F1.4 look in 35mm format.  It is cheaper to buy a 5D and a 50mm, than a T4i and 35mm f1.4.

Unless you shoot birds or are a pervert, then corp cameras make sense.
作者: Look4chrisng    時間: 2012-9-10 10:27

i mean not make sense.
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2012-9-10 13:10

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2012-9-10 13:13 編輯

回復 9# Look4chrisng

The other concern is people are likely to have many EF-S (or other cropped) lens in their gear. It stops people (for amateur purpose) from moving into full frame.

In your example, people using crop bodies tend to pair with the Sigma 30mm f1.4 instead of the 35mm F1.4L. The result is just so close for output...

In my opinion, short to medium range zoom lens made by Canon is performing so bad (compared to the price tag). There are so many lemons for the L series. Surprisingly in my experience, the best zoom lens I can recommend in the Canon lineup is the 17-55mm F2.8IS. You won't even get a "level" upgrade even if you are using 5D2/16-35f2.8II or 24-70 f2.8 combo.
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2012-9-10 13:14

Yes, the 17-55 F2.8 is a good lens, but it is not cheap..  sigma 30 is quite sweet too ..  hv to say it is nicer then the Canon 35 F2.. (similar price)

Soon ... people dont know what is FF ga la...
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2012-9-10 13:25

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2012-9-10 13:32 編輯

回復 12# Catpiano

Last week I picked up a Zeiss ZE 21mm f2.8. It's the best wide angle lens (I would call it a beast) I've seen so far, result is just amazing and pleasing...
作者: lo_pak    時間: 2012-9-10 13:36

回復 12# Catpiano

17-55mm f2.8IS worth that price in terms of the photo output and workability...
作者: xelloss    時間: 2012-10-17 22:50

Go for 6D .... !




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2