Board logo

標題: Olympic faking: Sydney orchestra mimed entire opening ceremony performance [打印本頁]
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-8-29 14:44     標題: Olympic faking: Sydney orchestra mimed entire opening ceremony performance

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/2631416/Olympic-faking-Sydney-orchestra-mimed-entire-opening-ceremony-performance.html

The orchestra that played at the Sydney Olympics opening ceremony has admitted miming its entire performance, in a faking confession that dwarfs the Beijing lip-synching scandal.


By Matthew Moore
Last Updated: 11:58PM BST 27 Aug 2008

The musicians of the Sydney Symphony were going through the motions as pre-recorded music was pumped out of speakers during the celebrations at Stadium Australia to mark the start of the 2000 Games, orchestra directors have confirmed.

Parts of the backing track - reportedly including the seven-minute Tin Symphony, one of the centrepieces of the show - were even recorded by a rival institution, the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra (MSO).

"It's correct that we were basically miming to a pre-recording,” said Libby Christie, Sydney Symphony's managing director, after reports of the deception emerged this week.

"It was all pre-recorded and the MSO did record a minority of the music that was performed," she told the Sydney Morning Herald.

She said that the decision was made because the organisers "wanted to leave nothing to chance", and that the recording was shared between two orchestras because of the "mountainous workload" involved.

Ms Christie said that she could only recall one other occasion on which the Sydney Symphony had mimed – the opening ceremony of the Rugby Union World Cup in 2003.

Trevor Green of the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra said he thought the decision to mime was "perfectly normal".

"There are millions of people watching and if something goes wrong you'd be snookered," he said.

The Sydney Symphony’s confession undermines those who have seen the Beijing faking scandals as evidence of a peculiarly Chinese quest for perfection.

Lin Miaoke, a photogenic nine-year-old girl who “sang” as the Chinese flag entered the stadium during the opening ceremony was later revealed to have been miming. The real singer was a seven-year-old girl with buck teeth.

Chinese officials also admitted that the pictures of giant firework footprints which marched across Beijing towards the stadium were prerecorded, digitally enhanced and inserted into footage beamed across the world.
作者: notgoddy    時間: 2008-8-29 18:45

goes to show the lip-sync were not an issue, expect for westerners to go crazy about...

作者: sheep    時間: 2008-8-29 19:29

In the beginning of all discussion on the opening ceremony of the Olympics, it was not about lip-sync is right or wrong.
You should know that lip-sync are people mime their own voice, not mime others voice.
Can you lip-sync Eddie Lau's song in the public and claimed that was your performance?
It was a fake performance. If the girl was lip-syncing her own voice, there is no issue to talk about it.
Do you see anyone saying that 郎朗 playing piano is a fake performance?
We just say he was playing simultaneously with the pre-recorded to ensure a perfect performance. No argue, right?

[ 本帖最後由 sheep 於 2008-8-29 20:36 編輯 ]
作者: notgoddy    時間: 2008-8-29 21:00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lip_sync

Your definition of lip sync is wrong. Of course you can lip sync someone else, but obliviously not someone that is famous unless as a joke or something. Anyway, this is not the case for the little girls in the opening ceremony, they were both relatively unknown, furthermore, the lip sync is done for performance sake and such a move is widely accepted in the entertainment industry.
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-8-29 21:40

原帖由 sheep 於 2008-8-29 20:29 發表
In the beginning of all discussion on the opening ceremony of the Olympics, it was not about lip-sync is right or wrong.
You should know that lip-sync are people mime their own voice, not mime others  ...


Did you read the article carefully? The Sydney orchestra was lip-syncing to recordings that was done by both the Sydney orchestra and the Melbourne orchestra.
So Sydney orchestra was actually lip-syncing to another orchestra's recordings. We are talking about famous orchestras here, not only little girls.
I just cannot believe you cannot read properly.

[ 本帖最後由 peter236 於 2008-8-29 22:46 編輯 ]
作者: notgoddy    時間: 2008-8-29 21:53

I believe you can read properly, but your thinking could be a little off.
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-8-29 22:01

原帖由 notgoddy 於 2008-8-29 22:53 發表
I believe you can read properly, but your thinking could be a little off.


Do you mean Mr. sheep?
作者: notgoddy    時間: 2008-8-29 22:30

I am just practicing my gibberish.

I guess everyone could be a little off. (see I am still practicing my gibberish.)
作者: sheep    時間: 2008-8-30 20:04

So these are your so call thinking are exactly like most of the mainland Chinese are thinking.
I don't blame you. You are all at the same level.
作者: notgoddy    時間: 2008-8-30 20:55

We call that thinking sympathy, and it is not exclusive to the mainland Chinese.
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-8-30 23:12

原帖由 sheep 於 2008-8-30 21:04 發表
So these are your so call thinking are exactly like most of the mainland Chinese are thinking.
I don't blame you. You are all at the same level.


The Sydney orchestra was actually lip-syncing to Melbourne orchestra's recordings in the Sydney 2000 opening ceremonies. Do you understand this? Lip-syncing is common all over the world in big shows. Do you understand this in English?

We know you hate Fairchild, and you hate China. We know you have some problems with your thinking.

[ 本帖最後由 peter236 於 2008-8-31 00:16 編輯 ]
作者: sheep    時間: 2008-8-31 09:18

偷就係偷 係唔係名牌係冇關係 唔理你系勞斯萊斯定係紅旗牌
Just as what you quote, Melbourne Orchestra had only a minority in the whole performance. They are only the second fiddle. Just like someone singing with a chorus, what's wrong?
But now, the girl is a sole performer. I guess you don't see where the question mark is.
原帖由 peter236 於 2008-8-29 22:40 發表


Did you read the article carefully? The Sydney orchestra was lip-syncing to recordings that was done by both the Sydney orchestra and the Melbourne orchestra.
So Sydney orchestra was actually lip-sy ...
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-9-1 15:37

原帖由 sheep 於 2008-8-31 10:18 發表
偷就係偷 係唔係名牌係冇關係 唔理你系勞斯萊斯定係紅旗牌
Just as what you quote, Melbourne Orchestra had only a minority in the whole performance. They are only the second fiddle. Just like someone sing ...


Even the Australians themselves feel it was somewhat an embarrassment and it was a bigger blunder than China's. The performance of Sydney orchestra was pre-recorded, and some parts was done by Melbourne orchestra. But this was a big show, so it really was not a problem at all as it was common.
The point is that whether it is Australia or China, it is not a big deal. So your China-bashing looks even more stupid.
作者: notgoddy    時間: 2008-9-1 16:19

dude, I don't like China a whole lot either but I think it is extremely asinine to houndishly mock them about this lip sync thing.

Sheep you still don't understand what lip sync is, and for you information solo singers uses lip sync too. I know you are thinking that authenticity should be the moral standard, but to achieve this is hard in many situations. This is entertainment we are talking about, and unless you are told otherwise anything that happens on stage is "real".

作者: sheep    時間: 2008-9-2 19:35

先要瞞天過海
後想文過飾非
作者: notgoddy    時間: 2008-9-2 20:37

sounds like a good plan to me.
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-9-2 22:03

原帖由 notgoddy 於 2008-9-2 21:37 發表
sounds like a good plan to me.


sheep looks very stupid again, haha.
作者: sheep    時間: 2008-9-10 08:28

啊欠!!!!!!!!!!
作者: 老友四號    時間: 2008-9-10 19:40

吾老矣！唔明現今D所謂新人類嘅【是非觀】，以錯為對，黑白不分。

將今次 咪咀 事件同二千年雪梨奧運 假奏 事件混為一談認為閒事一宗。

潛台詞就係： SEE 你哋澳洲都係咁囉！我哋中國又有乜唔得啫！？

情况就好似 小強 係 七仔 撻嘢俾人捉到，佢不單唔知錯，仲大條道理曰：

噚日 小明 攞咗支汽水冇俾錢，我Ｅ家攞包香口膠之嘛！點算係撻嘢喎！

或曰：咪咀 又點可以同 撻嘢 比哩？好！又試問吓如果你哋中意嘅歌星，

事先張揚開一個演唱會但係全程 咪咀 咁你哋會唔會買飛去睇呢？就算

真係咪咀佢哋一定唔會認，更加唔會事先張揚；點解？因為佢哋都知咁係錯，

係唔啱！冇人會中意睇一個咪咀演唱會。

記得讀小學嘅時候，先生 已教我哋人哋D好嘢先學！D衰嘢就唔好學！

Ｅ家我哋唔单只學 錯 嘅嘢仲企圖將 錯 嘅講成 啱 咁先令人失望得人驚！

嗚呼！觀乎此真令人為我哋嘅將來担心！！
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2008-9-10 20:09

四號老兄, 小弟覺得於大型活動既表現中咪咀演出乃一件好事, 此舉可確保演出之質素呢~
而大家亦唔係講緊咪咀既問題, 而係A君上台咪咀但用B君的聲線也.
但此舉有問題嗎? 小弟亦不覺得任何問題.
為何? 是因為A君跟B君也清楚自己的角色, 並不是在不知情的情況之下被人利用!

澳洲和中國我兩個cases, 分別是中國的表演者是兩名小朋友. 人們可能覺得小朋友被利用了.
但大家不覺得這兩位小朋友也有父母嗎? 小弟不相信她們的父母是不知情的, 他們應該非常清楚這個安排, 亦覺得他們可以為北京奧運出力是一個榮幸~

四號竟將此榮幸跟小偷相比, 咁先真正令人失望, 得人驚!
作者: mui122    時間: 2008-9-11 02:21

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2008-9-10 21:09 發表
四號老兄, 小弟覺得於大型活動既表現中咪咀演出乃一件好事, 此舉可確保演出之質素呢~
而大家亦唔係講緊咪咀既問題, 而係A君上台咪咀但用B君的聲線也.
但此舉有問題嗎? 小弟亦不覺得任何問題.
為何? 是因為A君跟B君也 ...


Exactly what I was going to say before I read your post
Can't agree more
作者: SmellyTofu    時間: 2008-9-11 06:09

原帖由 peter236 於 2008-9-1 16:37 發表


Even the Australians themselves feel it was somewhat an embarrassment and it was a bigger blunder than China's. The performance of Sydney orchestra was pre-recorded, and some parts was done by Melbo ...


Really? didn't even rate a mention here... embarassed? not really... I was there at the opening and it ok to me.

Oh, and Sydney > Melbourne for orchestras...
作者: sheep    時間: 2008-9-11 06:34

請各位為我解開迷團
話說我去申請凍奧做司儀
自問 有流華既身型 日出0甘靚仔 重有係物理学博士添
點解會冇回音0旡?
面試果日 主辦單位說我真叻 係物理学搏士
英文重洛洛聲添
心諗 你都有病
我考博士時 係請我個亞叔陣羚羊去考
諾貝爾去考 手到拿來啦
重有香港出名英文老師流Sir同我讀果篇Show and Tell
佢D口音 重牛津過牛津添
我只係咪嘴
好在佢地係呢道人 唔知流Sir係邊個
但係 點解會冇回音0旡?點解......................
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-9-11 15:00

原帖由 mui122 於 2008-9-11 03:21 發表


Exactly what I was going to say before I read your post
Can't agree more


Yeah, some people do not have the intelligence to comprehend the point.
Lip-synching is acceptable in big shows.
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2008-9-11 17:32

原帖由 sheep 於 2008-9-11 22:34 發表
請各位為我解開迷團
話說我去申請凍奧做司儀
自問 有流華既身型 日出0甘靚仔 重有係物理学博士添
點解會冇回音0旡?
面試果日 主辦單位說我真叻 係物理学搏士
英文重洛洛聲添
心諗 你都有病
我考博士時 係請我個亞叔陣羚羊去考
諾貝爾去考 手到拿來啦
重有香港出名英文老師流Sir同我讀果篇Show and Tell
佢D口音 重牛津過牛津添
我只係咪嘴
好在佢地係呢道人 唔知流Sir係邊個
但係 點解會冇回音0旡?點解......................


小弟覺得閣下真係超低能, 勁搞笑~
1. 請問物理学搏士同凍奧做司儀有乜關係? E=mc2 or F=ma?
2. "有流華既身型 日出0甘靚仔", 呢點可以加分. 但係而家係做司儀, 係要現場收音, 要有交流架! 請問點樣可以咪咀咪到啱口型呢?

sheep兄, 恕小弟大言不慚勸一勸你, 獻丑就不如藏拙啦.
(令小弟懷念lancer兄有point既反調討論. )
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2008-9-11 17:33

原帖由 peter236 於 2008-9-12 07:00 發表


Yeah, some people do not have the intelligence to comprehend the point.
Lip-synching is acceptable in big shows.


小弟相信每人都有intelligence, 只不過可能有d 人既intelligence 並唔係呢一方面而已~
作者: sheep    時間: 2008-9-12 07:55

冥頑不靈
作者: 老友四號    時間: 2008-9-13 14:35

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2008-9-10 21:09 發表
四號老兄, 小弟覺得於大型活動既表現中咪咀演出乃一件好事, 此舉可確保演出之質素呢~
而大家亦唔係講緊咪咀既問題, 而係A君上台咪咀但用B君的聲線也.
但此舉有問題嗎? 小弟亦不覺得任何問題.
為何? 是因為A君跟B君也 ...

麦JOHN 老弟此亦即 老夫 所謂的思維及理念問题所在也，若照此理念即使在大型考試中為確保考試的成績優異，

即可用A君名字卻B君應試亦無妨矣！

此番中国舉辦奧運其目的之一，為向世界展示中國。但在開幕仪式中卻即有此 弄虛作假 的演出！

正正讓有部分不想中国強大的人有口實豈非授人以柄！

再說即使兩位演出的小朋友父母親反对，你相信他們可以改變現實嗎？阁下 認為 弄虛作假 是榮幸！

這正正反影出你我之間價值觀的分歧。

再說 咪咀 亦即是 榮幸 的話，為何香港间有歌星傳出有咪咀演出其經理人或本人即誓神劈願死都話冇！

豈非他她們要同榮幸劃清界线乎？

十年了！不单只是地理、政治的回歸。現在看來思維、理念及價值觀也重回祖國的懷抱了。

[ 本帖最後由 老友四號 於 2008-9-13 15:37 編輯 ]
作者: rockypath    時間: 2008-9-13 16:41

Does anyone there is one performance called "雙簧" in China? One performs on the stage and the other one speaks and sings in the background? People can hardly tell there are actually two people performing. It is a popular show at many places.

I watched once when I travlled to Beijing.
作者: sheep    時間: 2008-9-13 21:08

四哥又何須希噓 這正好說明
李安同張藝謀既分別
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-9-13 21:40

原帖由 老友四號 於 2008-9-13 15:35 發表

麦JOHN 老弟此亦即 老夫 所謂的思維及理念問题所在也，若照此理念即使在大型考試中為確保考試的成績優異，

即可用A君名字卻B君應試亦無妨矣！

此番中国舉辦奧運其目的之一，為向世界展示中國。但在開幕仪式中卻即有此 弄 ...


Why are you so stupid? Lip-synching is common in big shows. This is not a problem at all. It happened in previous Olympics before. Those foreign people who picked on China are just jealous of China's success.
作者: rockypath    時間: 2008-9-14 03:04

Even DJs on am1470 said Lip-synching are almost always used in big shows around the world and they are openly known and accepted.
作者: rockypath    時間: 2008-9-14 03:06

By the way, those DJs said this on radio shows. Not privately.
作者: Austin    時間: 2008-9-14 05:37

If lip-synching is wrong, how about actors using stunt double in movies?
作者: 老友四號    時間: 2008-9-14 17:08

原帖由 peter236 於 2008-9-13 22:40 發表


Why are you so stupid? Lip-synching is common in big shows. This is not a problem at all. It happened in previous Olympics before. Those foreign people who picked on China are just jealous of China' ...

【「COMMON」：普遍存在】，並不等同「是對的」，如隨地吐痰、不排隊、腳踏廁板都普遍存在，請問以上行為是對的嗎？

又開口即說人是 STUITD ！這種狗口長不出象牙的行為也非常普遍的存在，但 老夫 相信除了 狗口一族 之外其他有教養的

人是不會認同這 是對的 。再者現今用 臀部 而不用 腦部 思考問題的現象也非常 COMMON ，相信你不會認同這 是對的 吧！？
作者: 老友四號    時間: 2008-9-14 17:31

原帖由 Austin 於 2008-9-14 06:37 發表
If lip-synching is wrong, how about actors using stunt double in movies?

演員 只是付出演技並沒有接受過危險動作的專業訓練，而 STUNTMAN 剛好相反。

但如果 演員 做出危險動作，則可能會做成受傷什至死亡。所以並不存在 弄虛作假 的問题。

但 老夫 從未听過有歌星，因為没有 咪咀 而唱到受傷或身亡的事發生！

但如果你知道曾經有歌星因為冇 咪咀 而唱到受傷什至死鬼埋！請告知為盼！
作者: Austin    時間: 2008-9-14 18:11

原帖由 老友四號 於 2008-9-14 18:31 發表

演員 只是付出演技並沒有接受過危險動作的專業訓練，而 STUNTMAN 剛好相反。

但如果 演員 做出危險動作，則可能會做成受傷什至死亡。所以並不存在 弄虛作假 的問题。

但 老夫 從未听過有歌星，因為没有 咪咀 而唱到受傷 ...


How about body double then?  Body double (not stunt related) is also very common.

But you did bring up a point here.  Actor and stuntman both playing a their role based on their expertise for the same character.
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-9-14 21:26

Why are some people so stupid? These people don't have logic whatsoever. We are talking about miming which is an internationally acceptable standards for big shows. Whoever does it is acceptable. It was done in previous Olympics before.

Commonly done things: sometimes it is wrong but sometime it is right.
Spitting on the street is common and it is wrong to do so.
But miming in big shows is common and right, totally acceptable.
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2008-9-15 17:29

原帖由 老友四號 於 2008-9-15 09:08 發表
【「COMMON」：普遍存在】，並不等同「是對的」，如隨地吐痰、不排隊、腳踏廁板都普遍存在，請問以上行為是對的嗎？
又開口即說人是 STUITD ！這種狗口長不出象牙的行為也非常普遍的存在，但 老夫 相信除了 狗口一族 之外其他有教養的
人是不會認同這 是對的 。再者現今用 臀部 而不用 腦部 思考問題的現象也非常 COMMON ，相信你不會認同這 是對的 吧！？


四號老兄, 首先想講小弟絕對同意開口埋口即說人是 STUPID是沒有教養的行為~
奧運咪咀又豈能同隨地吐痰、不排隊、腳踏廁板比較? 後者乃關乎公眾衛生及秩序問題呢.
奧運咪咀, 是想令表演更暢順, 觀眾睇得更開心!
咪咀, 如果在一個聲明係live band既音樂會咪咀, 就會有少少騙人既感覺.
但奧運開幕並唔係演唱會, 又冇事先聲明一定唔會咪咀, 小弟真係唔覺得有何不對.

如果真的不對, 請問有何不對? 請指教.
作者: 老友四號    時間: 2008-9-16 18:51

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2008-9-15 18:29 發表


四號老兄, 首先想講小弟絕對同意開口埋口即說人是 STUPID是沒有教養的行為~
奧運咪咀又豈能同隨地吐痰、不排隊、腳踏廁板比較? 後者乃關乎公眾衛生及秩序問題呢.
奧運咪咀, 是想令表演更暢順, 觀眾睇得更開心!
咪 ...

麦JOHN老弟 咪咀 是 弄虛作假 的其中一個具体表現，從49年建國以來已经有太多太多的弄虛作假了。

今次奧運 咪咀 會令中国亡國滅種嗎！？绝對不會！但当一个社会民族國家对弄虛作假習以為常以錯為對，

就不免令人為這个国家的前途憂慮！

也許是你我之間價值觀分歧，老夫 覺得演唱會咪咀就绝不會是少少欺騙而是不可原諒的行為，

因為這是事前精心策劃的，老夫 可以体諒演出者臨場表現失準，但决不接受虛假的完美現場演出。

說回 奧運 他们事前也沒有說明將會 咪咀 吧！
作者: 老友四號    時間: 2008-9-16 19:36

原帖由 peter236 於 2008-9-14 22:26 發表
Why are some people so stupid? These people don't have logic whatsoever. We are talking about miming which is an internationally acceptable standards for big shows. Whoever does it is acceptable. It w ...

你 雖然滿纸英文但措辭用字文理，同中国大陸網上的暴民如出一轍，所以你只是一个英文版的中国網上暴民而已。

老夫 非常肯定你是一個三十五岁以下和來自中国，出生於開放改革之後，可能家中颇有几文從未捱過，

和大部分那時期出生的富有中国人一樣，只知有己不知有人，听到稱讚時不論真假滿心歡喜照单全收；相反聽到批評時

同樣不理真假立即青筯暴現破口大駡醜態畢現。大有讚我昌批我者亡的 霸王氣概！

老夫 庆幸只是同你網上抬槓，如果不幸是面对面的話，当你一張開口時一定会 奇香撲鼻！恐怕走都來不及矣！
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2008-9-16 19:37

原帖由 老友四號 於 2008-9-17 10:51 發表

麦JOHN老弟 咪咀 是 弄虛作假 的其中一個具体表現，從49年建國以來已经有太多太多的弄虛作假了。
今次奧運 咪咀 會令中国亡國滅種嗎！？绝對不會！但当一个社会民族國家对弄虛作假習以為常以錯為對，
就不免令人為這个国家的前途憂慮！
也許是你我之間價值觀分歧，老夫 覺得演唱會咪咀就绝不會是少少欺騙而是不可原諒的行為，
因為這是事前精心策劃的，老夫 可以体諒演出者臨場表現失準，但决不接受虛假的完美現場演出。
說回 奧運 他们事前也沒有說明將會 咪咀 吧！

四號老兄, 為左控制表演既質素, 主辦當局有權決定唔同既演譯方式.
這是弄虛作假嗎? 如果主辦當局話到明係現場演唱, 咁就係弄虛作假. 但係, 而家係人人都知道呢一個演譯方式, 從來冇人打算隱瞞啦.
就好似拍戲咁, 演員用替身做危險動作, 咁係唔係弄虛作假呢?

話時話, 好似六四咁, 明明死左好多人, 中共話一個都冇死, 呢d 就係弄虛作假喇.
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2008-9-16 19:39

原帖由 老友四號 於 2008-9-17 11:36 發表
你 雖然滿纸英文但措辭用字文理，同中国大陸網上的暴民如出一轍，所以你只是一个英文版的中国網上暴民而已。
老夫 非常肯定你是一個三十五岁以下和來自中国，出生於開放改革之後，可能家中颇有几文從未捱過，
和大部分那時期出生的富有中国人一樣，只知有己不知有人，听到稱讚時不論真假滿心歡喜照单全收；相反聽到批評時
同樣不理真假立即青筯暴現破口大駡醜態畢現。大有讚我昌批我者亡的 霸王氣概！
老夫 庆幸只是同你網上抬槓，如果不幸是面对面的話，当你一張開口時一定会 奇香撲鼻！恐怕走都來不及矣！


擺到明呢個peter仔就係地球暴民啦, 唔駛理佢woh~
笑下就算啦~
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-9-16 19:47

原帖由 老友四號 於 2008-9-16 20:36 發表

你 雖然滿纸英文但措辭用字文理，同中国大陸網上的暴民如出一轍，所以你只是一个英文版的中国網上暴民而已。

老夫 非常肯定你是一個三十五岁以下和來自中国，出生於開放改革之後，可能家中颇有几文從未捱過，

和大部分那時 ...


You just lost your argument with me and now you are saying I am from Mainland China? Not that people from China are all bad.
But what kind of ridiculous logic it that? I am from British Hong Kong just like you are.

Again let me tell you why your logic is flawed.
Commonly done things: You said it may not be right, but do not forget it may not be wrong.

For example:
Throwing garbage on the street is common and it is wrong to do so.
On the other hand, throwing garbage into the bin is common, but it is right.

Now, miming in big shows is common and right, totally acceptable. It was done in many Olympics before.
Will you ever get it?
If you personally think it is wrong to mime in a big show, then some of the previous Olympics were also wrong. But of course, you dare not criticise foreign people, as you only bash the Chinese.

[ 本帖最後由 peter236 於 2008-9-16 20:52 編輯 ]
作者: sheep    時間: 2008-9-17 08:44

而家 問題唔係咪咀係0岩定錯
係 咪完咀之後 張藝謀同唱歌果個女仔果場戲
完全想強調 小女孩歌聲同樣貌都一樣甜美
呢場戲 先至係我0地討論焦點所在
被人踢爆之後 先至話係幕後有另外一把聲
如果冇被人踢爆既話
幕後果個代唱既 就真係無名英雄勒
作者: Austin    時間: 2008-9-17 10:47

原帖由 sheep 於 2008-9-17 09:44 發表
而家 問題唔係咪咀係0岩定錯
係 咪完咀之後 張藝謀同唱歌果個女仔果場戲
完全想強調 小女孩歌聲同樣貌都一樣甜美
呢場戲 先至係我0地討論焦點所在
被人踢爆之後 先至話係幕後有另外一把聲
如果冇被人踢爆既話
幕後 ...


And what woudl be the problem if the singer didn't have a problem with being behind the scene?
作者: sheep    時間: 2008-9-17 15:12

There is no problem with that part.
The problem is with director Zhang and the little girl.
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2008-9-17 18:28

原帖由 sheep 於 2008-9-18 07:12 發表
There is no problem with that part.
The problem is with director Zhang and the little girl.


So, it is not a problem on the miming, right?
Game, set, match! Finally finished~
作者: peter236    時間: 2008-9-17 20:01

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2008-9-17 19:28 發表


So, it is not a problem on the miming, right?
Game, set, match! Finally finished~


Hahaha, our amicable 老友四號 still has a problem with miming.
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2008-9-17 21:48

原帖由 peter236 於 2008-9-18 12:01 發表


Hahaha, our amicable 老友四號 still has a problem with miming.


每個人都有唔同意見, 對事情都有唔同睇法, 和而不同, 大家理性去討論咪幾好.
要尊重別人既意見, 唔一定係自己arm晒架~

老實講, 小弟都覺得如果可以唔駛miming應該會好d, 起碼唔駛比人話北京奧運歧視一d 冇咁靚既小朋友啦.
作者: sheep    時間: 2008-9-18 10:58

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2008-9-17 19:28 發表


So, it is not a problem on the miming, right?
Game, set, match! Finally finished~

Congratulation



歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2