Board logo

標題: 沈安麟在「大城小聚」 [打印本頁]
作者: katchukat    時間: 2009-1-14 09:58     標題: 沈安麟在「大城小聚」

有無噚晚「大城小聚」？沈安麟嘅新CD好靚，噚晚唱嗰首歌好好聽，你吔有無聽？
作者: shutterbug    時間: 2009-1-14 11:15

OK OK I know you're his super fans...but how many threads will you create for this guy?  LOL

if you really want to sell us that he is THAT good, then you should post some youtube or something...
作者: masterbear    時間: 2009-1-14 11:17

原帖由 katchukat 於 2009-1-14 10:58 發表
有無噚晚「大城小聚」？沈安麟嘅新CD好靚，噚晚唱嗰首歌好好聽，你吔有無聽？

U related to him? So hard sell
作者: katamari    時間: 2009-1-14 11:28

物極必反係bible冇教，好多基督徒唔識有咩出奇
作者: shutterbug    時間: 2009-1-14 11:42

原帖由 katamari 於 2009-1-14 12:28 發表
物極必反係bible冇教，好多基督徒唔識有咩出奇

so you're giving your every effort to attack?  

siu dee dee..."物極必反" came from 易經 ah

I don't believe it is a true statement anyway...who cares...LOL
作者: rockypath    時間: 2009-1-14 12:00

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-14 12:42 發表

so you're giving your every effort to attack?  

siu dee dee..."物極必反" came from 易經 ah

I don't believe it is a true statement anyway...who cares...LOL


1st half of 易經 is not bad and I enjoy reading it. But the 2nd half, I think it is a bit none sense.
作者: rockypath    時間: 2009-1-14 12:07

原帖由 katamari 於 2009-1-14 12:28 發表
物極必反係bible冇教，好多基督徒唔識有咩出奇


I also think he/she is a bit hard sell. But I also don't think you should keep attacking.

Christianity is one of three largest and longest religions in the world. There must be reasons. Not just ordinary people like you and me are faithful believers, but also many great scientists, artists and politicians are also faithful believers and scarified their lives for what they believe in.

We should have respect to those people.
作者: chunsh    時間: 2009-1-14 12:54

原帖由 rockypath 於 2009-1-14 13:07 發表
but also many great scientists, artists and politicians are also faithful believers and scarified their lives for what they believe in.

We should have respect to those people.

scarified?
about artist? I dont know, about scientist? I don't know
but about politicans?
u mean scarified OTHER people's lives?
yes I do know! think about Crusade

go back to about 沈安麟, I only like his song "in the wind", and the show that he did with a female DJ way back to 96
作者: rockypath    時間: 2009-1-14 13:06

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-14 13:54 發表

scarified?
about artist? I dont know, about scientist? I don't know
but about politicans?
u mean scarified OTHER people's lives?
yes I do know! think about Crusade

go back to about 沈安麟, I only li ...


I have to say you are IGNORANT about Christianity and just open you mouth attacking Christians here. You do not worth my time to explain to you. Before you fire another round of attack, I would like to suggest you to google some information about Christianity first (I don't think you would spend the effort to borrow books from liabery or buy books from bookstore to study the subjects first before opening your mouth).
作者: Ultraman    時間: 2009-1-14 13:16

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-14 11:42 發表

so you're giving your every effort to attack?  

siu dee dee..."物極必反" came from 易經 ah

I don't believe it is a true statement anyway...who cares...LOL

So, you think "to love others" only apply to Christians but not non-believers? No matter where did "to love others" and "物極必反" come from, they are somehow true to all, no matter what kind of believe you are.
作者: chunsh    時間: 2009-1-14 13:21

原帖由 rockypath 於 2009-1-14 14:06 發表


I have to say you are IGNORANT about Christianity and just open you mouth attacking Christians here. You do not worth my time to explain to you. Before you fire another round of attack, I would like ...



I am talking about political people using religions, and christianity is one of them, Tao was one of them to satisfy their own desires. Thats all

if u read my post carefully, u should find out I just disagree with their teachings and some of the personality of its followers (and thanks for another example), but I never ignorant about chirstianity. I do admire those churches who help drug abusers to quit taking drugs/gangs or get rid of extreme emotional problem.

before u got pissed off and yell, think and read clear, ok? remember, most of the policians in history just use religions to invade and rob

[ 本帖最後由 chunsh 於 2009-1-14 14:23 編輯 ]
作者: shutterbug    時間: 2009-1-14 14:11

So, you think "to love others" only apply to Christians but not non-believers?

never said that, and don't know where you got it from

No matter where did "to love others" and "物極必反" come from, they are somehow true to all, no matter what kind of believe you are.

There are tons of examples to prove this 物極必反 statement to be false.  If there exists just one false example, it is sufficient to say that this statement to be false.  So you can't say "they are somehow true to all".  Learn your logic before you debate with me again la...anyway, don't feel like putting money in your pocket anymore...
作者: Ultraman    時間: 2009-1-14 14:33

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-14 14:11 發表

never said that, and don't know where you got it from

You sounded like "物極必反" not applicable to Christians, so according to your logic, "to love others" shouldn't apply to non-Christians. Is that what you mean?



There are tons of examples to prove this 物極必反 statement to be false.  If there exists just one false example, it is sufficient to say that  ...

Then how about:
物以類聚
人言可畏
近朱者赤.......

So, in your theory and logic, even there is one opposite case happens in another of these situations, all these statements are false?

(edited: Please have a better Chinese language knowledge background before debating.)

[ 本帖最後由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-14 14:39 編輯 ]
作者: shutterbug    時間: 2009-1-14 14:56

Yup, I'd say they're not true statements by themselves.  They're just generalization that has been true to certain circumstances only.

It has nothing to do with Chinese or anything.
作者: rockypath    時間: 2009-1-14 15:30

Shutterbug & Ultraman,

物極必反 has a different meaning in the content of 易經. It is nothing to do with logic. It is to do with "隂陽" and nature phenomenas.  Cannot explain the concept here within just a few sentences.
作者: rockypath    時間: 2009-1-14 15:39

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-14 14:21 發表



I am talking about political people using religions, and christianity is one of them, Tao was one of them to satisfy their own desires. Thats all

if u read my post carefully, u should find out I j ...


I guess your underline meaning is that religions are created and controlled by people in power to serve their own needs and to rule nations/people. Christianity should be the one to be gone for the sake of humanity.

The example of people in power use religions to serve their own purposes is just a solid example confirming the statement in the Bible – “every single person is a sinner, no one is perfect”. Most of people do not understand why Bible states everyone is a sinner. Definition of “sin” in Bible is not “breaking laws” (an action would violate laws in on country, but would be perfectly acceptable in another). It means no one can live up to the standard of God and no one is perfect. We disgrace the glory of God. It also means no one can save himself/herself because no one can be perfect and sinless. No one will be able to see the face of the Lord. Therefore, the only way to be saved is God forgiving our sins.

You don’t even have a fundamental understanding of Christianity and keep attacking it just show you are truly ignorant.
作者: chunsh    時間: 2009-1-14 15:46

原帖由 rockypath 於 2009-1-14 16:39 發表


I guess your underline meaning is that religions are created and controlled by people in power to serve their own needs and to rule nations/people. Christianity should be the one to be gone for the  ...


first of all, I didnt say and mean "Christianity should be the one to be gone for the sake of humanity. "

I respect other people's religions as long as they respect mine AND without stepping on me. Don't put words to my mouth, ok?

whatever
u got pissed off like that for just a few topics of fire in forum
can u imagine the fires have created in the teachings that u believe which are about saying other religions are faked and other people just worshiping idols?

[ 本帖最後由 chunsh 於 2009-1-14 16:48 編輯 ]
作者: shutterbug    時間: 2009-1-14 15:56

原帖由 rockypath 於 2009-1-14 16:30 發表
Shutterbug & Ultraman,

物極必反 has a different meaning in the content of 易經. It is nothing to do with logic. It is to do with "隂陽" and nature phenomenas.  Cannot explain the concept here within  ...

Yeah, as I understand, 物極必反 in 易經 refers to the balance of 金、木、水、火 土.  Thanks.  But I guess we're not realy into 易經

[ 本帖最後由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-14 16:58 編輯 ]
作者: chunsh    時間: 2009-1-14 15:59

原帖由 katchukat 於 2009-1-14 10:58 發表
有無噚晚「大城小聚」？沈安麟嘅新CD好靚，噚晚唱嗰首歌好好聽，你吔有無聽？


so is he going back to 1470?



歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2