Board logo

標題: British Columbia Nurses Salary information [打印本頁]
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-6 20:37     標題: British Columbia Nurses Salary information

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: RayRay    時間: 2009-2-6 22:34

Every profession/trade get their "pay" according to their charactrestic. When they make the money, they "paid" something out on the other side.
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2009-2-6 23:59

we all know POLICE/RCMP is over paid .. and UNDER work ..  ( oh ..  and they get DISCOUNT from Tim horton / BP )

Even u will see them in tim horton more  ..   

I think Police/RCMP give out $30million ticket to us ..  so .. by taking small % from there ..  of cours,e good income la..

That is why .. my co worker is trying very hard to be RCMP ..  

PLUS .. after u retire .. still get $$$$$$$$$  

$100K is thier average income la..  otherwise, how can they drive BENZ/BMW .. and go BP all the time !!!
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-7 00:14

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: 快樂牛郎    時間: 2009-2-7 00:34

I just read that a jail guard in California brings home 300,000 a year.

A police commander can retire at 40 and receives 65,000 in pension every year.
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2009-2-7 10:56

Jail guard in CA is diff ...   may be that $300K is tips from Paris Hilton ??
作者: ricrick    時間: 2009-2-7 11:07

你緊係成日比差佬豆，又比差佬抦，之後得到護士的照顧，慢慢康複中
所以甘歧視d差佬？
作者: starbug    時間: 2009-2-7 11:42

其實冇得唔抵得人, 有D乜事佢哋都要企响最前, 養兵就梗係貴架啦, 唔啱你做吖.
有人打刦銀行响陣, 我offer 你佢份糧叫你出去圍班賊吖.
唉, 你條仆街又响度搞抹黑, 搞分化, 真係鱼肥果熟麻撚煩.
你講下加拿大社會点招呼同容忍你絛死廢柴, 然後感下恩好過喇.
作者: starbug    時間: 2009-2-7 11:50

人哋揸BENZ/BMW 關你撚事咩?
憎人富貴厭人貧就係你呢D撚樣嘞.
你落嚟Richmond行一轉係咪要自殺? 呢度成街都係BENZ/BMW架.
作者: 布小熊    時間: 2009-2-7 12:19

i think it's unfair to judge the salary of police officers. they do have to face danger situations. they also had to go thro lots of trainings. you don't see as many cops foot patrolling on the streets like in hk. cos that's just not efficient in such large area.

well, part of their jobs also involve paper/computer work. that's why some times you see cop's cars parked on the side of a street and u thought for no real reason. and the cop was just typing up his/her reports.

btw you can't judge how important a person's job is just by how much they get paid.
作者: jake123    時間: 2009-2-7 13:42

Police will be corrupt if they're paid little.
作者: Littleprince    時間: 2009-2-7 15:50

原帖由 jake123 於 2009-2-7 14:42 發表
Police will be corrupt if they're paid little.

呢個理由好正

銀行職員話﹕比我錢少我會打劫銀行

護士話﹕比我錢少我會謀財害命

地產商話﹕比我錢少我會起D爛尾樓

作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-7 17:39

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Ultraman    時間: 2009-2-7 17:55

Sitting at home and bark make no changes, just be one of them and you'll have no complaints.

[ 本帖最後由 Ultraman 於 2009-2-7 17:56 編輯 ]
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-7 18:07

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: starbug    時間: 2009-2-7 18:21

原帖由 Littleprince 於 2009-2-7 16:50 發表

呢個理由好正

銀行職員話﹕比我錢少我會打劫銀行

護士話﹕比我錢少我會謀財害命

地產商話﹕比我錢少我會起D爛尾樓


吳鎮宇金句: 我哋畀多D錢佢駛, 咁就差佬都會變古惑仔.
作者: starbug    時間: 2009-2-7 18:43

原帖由 Toppy 於 2009-2-7 19:07 發表




Speak English.  Talk to White people about it.

See if they give a damn about you.


D洋人就梗係唔會damn我哋, 佢哋凈係會damn你嘅啫. 仲要係 3P,4P 咁damn你,顏射你.
啫magnet 你當之無愧.
作者: 布小熊    時間: 2009-2-7 18:49

原帖由 Toppy 於 2009-2-7 05:39 PM 發表

Not street patrolling is one thing, but why are they drinking coffee at Tim Horton's wearing uniforms?

BTW, they work 4 days and get 4 days off.

Danger situation?  This isn't the USA.  You don't  ...

yes but they have long hours....
what i want to point out is normally, you only see cops when they are not working...and unless you are/related to a criminal or victim ...you won't be involved w/ their work. so you think criminology is a joke? investigation can be done by high school grads????

try to apply to be one yourself, i am sure you won't get in nor able to stand thro the training.

danger situations -> yes. i heard lots but not going to share w/ you.
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-7 18:56

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-7 18:59

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: 布小熊    時間: 2009-2-7 19:02     標題: 回復 19# 的帖子

i am not going to go on and on any more this is my last reply to you.
btw i said long HOURS! 4 days can be long hours!!!!
作者: gianttama    時間: 2009-2-7 19:04

they work 11 (or 12) hour shifts buddy. even with 4 days work 4 days off, within 8 days, they still work about 44-48 hours.

if u have a regular job, you work 7.5-8 hrs a day, within 8 days, you work 6 days, so that means within 8 days u work about 45-48 days.

so if  you think they work short hours or "not-long" hours, think again.
作者: gianttama    時間: 2009-2-7 19:05

btw, if you think getting into vancouver police is easy, why don't you give it a try?
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-7 19:10

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-7 19:12

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-7 19:13

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: starbug    時間: 2009-2-7 20:13

你咁唔抵得嘅你咪去考警察囉.
你過到心理測試先算喇.
我諗佢哋唔會歧視精神病患者啩.
作者: salad_bread    時間: 2009-2-8 14:45

原帖由 Toppy 於 2009-2-7 20:12 發表


Whether getting into vancouver police is easy or not has nothing to do with their actual work and pay scale.


井底之蛙
作者: ricrick    時間: 2009-2-8 16:06

呢D米叫做憎人富貴厭人貪law
作者: BiscottiGelato    時間: 2009-2-8 16:37

I don't know. I agree to a certain degree that police here, in relative to HK, even compensated for cost of living, etc, that they are over-paid, underwork, faces relatively less risks and stress, but have very poor service quality/attitude/discipline, and for those yet faces very little consequences.

Police here faces no heavy arms (HK do, aka. Jewelry store robbery, bank robbery with automatic weapons). Police here have poor attitude and have a huge ego to carry, leading to tons of police beatings of innocents, which averages to a case a week if you listen to News 1130 everyday like me. The airport taser incident, which led to the death of an innocent tourist, was being brushed off with 0 consequences for the officers involved even though there were plenty of witness and testimonies pointing to the fact that what they did was totally uncalled for and unjust. Yet they didn't get any internal consequences, nor any legal penalties against them... Imagine somethign like this happnening in HK, the police would've been fired before any legal proceeding started.

Heck, I finished watching a movie from Silvercity Riverport Friday night. My gf was driving north on No.6 Rd and a police tailed us at a little distance. It then suddenly flashed it's light. We slowed down to begin to stop. Keep in mind that there's no shoulders on No.6 road where a car can stop without blocking the only 1 lane. The police then took the OPPOSITE lane going at what I'd say about 100km/hr? (We were going 50/60 and that thing just screamed by us). Then after the police passed he just turned the lights off... I don't know what the exact policy here is, but if he's trying to get to a scene, wouldn't he let the lights on continuous? It looks to me it's a case of needing that caffine/donut fix so badly that he abused the lights again. Furthermore, no matter how urgent the case is, driving 100km/hr in residential area, opposite lane and a place as narrow as No.6 is totally uncalled for. There are houses on both sides and ditches in between.... This contrasted with when I was driving on Lougheed highway the same night heading back into Coquitlam. An ambulence had it's lights on probably 2 km behind me. I was driving 70 and it took like 2/3 minutes to get close enough that I pulled over for it to pass. I think it was driving at max 80/90km/hr. And that is on Lougheed highway which people averages 100km/hr usually. With it's lights on constantly, I am sure it was actually trying to arrive to an emergency. Overpaid police driving 100 in a narrow 50km zone for probably getting donuts vs relatively underpaid medical staff driving 90 in a 70km zone for actually arriving at an emergency.... I maybe wrong about this, but it just feels that something is not right here...

Don't get me wrong. I am not saying every cop on our street is bad and abusive. I am saying that not only do we overpay them, but our system here does not facilitate a reaonsably paid and disciplined police force. The lack of check and balance in our system and the little consequences people in power faces when wrong doing is done is ridiculous. If anything, with power comes more responsiblity and if they do mess up they are supposed to face Greater, not less consequences if anything. It's just one facet of this otherwise wonderful city that is very badly managed IMO.

[ 本帖最後由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-8 16:48 編輯 ]
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-8 20:20

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-8 20:22

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: tripixel    時間: 2009-2-8 23:35

to Toppy, first, I have to tell you that there is nothing personal at all.

I don't understand you. You told us before that you came to Canada in the 90's and been here for a long time. You cannot to go back to Hong Kong because you are poor, and that's why you are still here in Canada. Am I right so far? If not, pls correct me. No hard-feelings. If, I say if, you can afford it, would you go back to Hong Kong?  Then if you really want to go back to Hong Kong, is there a way you can earn more and save enough your hard working money and go back?

In one of the topic you started, "回流 back to Hong Kong?" (sorry I had to copy and paste), at very last, you said, "Before we continue the discussion.  I need to know how long you have been in Canada, how long you have lived in Hong Kong, your age and your work experience.  It seems to me that you don't have much "Canadian Experience", if you know what I mean." (sorry copy and paste again).

Then why don't you tell us about yourself? Maybe we all will understand why you dislike "white" people, especially "white cops". It seems to me the message that you are giving us here.(to me, at least) "All white people are assholes."

For myself, I know there is "racism". But I disagree racism is as bad as what you've been telling us.

I just have to asy it again, no offends at all.
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-8 23:46

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: news    時間: 2009-2-9 07:37

原帖由 Toppy 於 2009-2-8 23:46 發表


You should start a new thread.

I love discussion, nonetheless.

First of all, I dealt with white people in Hong Kong.  Look at my avatar.  I love British Hong Kong.
I also know many "so-called" whi ...


i love your answers...pratically not answering sht all
作者: BiscottiGelato    時間: 2009-2-9 09:21

原帖由 news 於 2009-2-9 07:37 發表


i love your answers...pratically not answering sht all



I am definately not a fan of Toppy, especially on his other posts concerning racial discriminations, etc.

Just being merely objective, tripixel is totally off topic in this case. This topic is dicussing Polices' compensation vs Nurses' compensation in Vancouver/BC. Whether Toppy is an a_hole does not changes the facts on the table which we can use to discuss. If one cannot be objective and stay on topic, I think there's even less ground for that person to attack another individual regardless of how lacking that other person is in terms of moral grounds.
作者: pepsis2    時間: 2009-2-9 09:35

who's overpaid???  lots of ppl think their boss (or supervisors ) are overpaid too!!
gum so what???
i do think the CEO & executives of those useless inverstment groups & banks in USA should go to hell & donate all their fortune... so what????

compared them the nurses & polices are just nothing...
作者: tripixel    時間: 2009-2-9 15:11

原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-9 10:21 發表



I am definately not a fan of Toppy, especially on his other posts concerning racial discriminations, etc.

Just being merely objective, tripixel is totally off topic in this case. This topic is dic ...




sorry my bad, should start a new thread.
作者: B仔    時間: 2009-2-9 15:41

原帖由 tripixel 於 2009-2-9 16:11 發表




sorry my bad, should start a new thread.

算啦兄台，我地唔怪你。條友係加拿大住，就歧視白人，華人。轉頭就話識UK白人等等。自己就話要人講英文，同時又自己COPY＆PASTE中文。英文都搞唔點，叫人講英文，自己就用NIGGA又唔見佢識用CRACKER。我地話我地鍾意住係度，佢就叫我地返大陸，佢自己咁唔LIKE嚟度同LYK，佢反而瀨死唔走。好喇，佢開個POST話係亞爺比飯港人食，轉頭開多個POST歧視大陸同胞。

你話係咪思覺失調係FRASWERVIEW走出嚟丫？唔好勞氣吧。
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-9 15:50

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-9 15:52

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: habitrailspace    時間: 2009-2-9 16:00

toppy, time to take your pills la...good boy, good boy...
作者: starbug    時間: 2009-2-9 16:05

我諗佢又係收五亳子個post 嗰隻.
作者: starbug    時間: 2009-2-9 16:12

原帖由 tripixel 於 2009-2-9 00:35 發表
to Toppy, first, I have to tell you that there is nothing personal at all.

I don't understand you. You told us before that you came to Canada in the 90's and been here for a long time. You cannot to  ...


你可能冇睇過Toppy 嘅可憐身世, 等我同ricrick 介紹吓啦:

佢話佢93年來到加拿大, 落機就已經欏柚插住碌棍, 然後畀D洋腸插足咁多年.
但係佢好想回流返香港.
但係就冇錢走又唔捨得D洋腸, 唯有繼續賣欏柚揾錢.
跟住就話加拿大唔好, 想試下D黑柴都冇.
白人有歧視佢個屎窟窿太鬆弛.

By ricrick
之後係hastings行下行
千辛萬苦，終於行到去main街
嘩！佢發現原來果到甘多中國人老友記
佢好開心，走入去同D老友記講
你知吾知加拿大多危險架
好多西人拮欏柚架，拮到我個屎窟窿鬆哂
e家d屎自動流出，要用塞塞住先得
真係好危險唔係講笑架
你地快d游水返大陸啦!

D中國人老友記見佢有D思覺失調就勸佢睇醫生.
点知 toppy 病情惡化, 不斷重複D中國人老友記講嘅嘢.
有老友記開始問侯佢肛門
点知佢一聽完就好興奮
主動要求D中國人老友記輪姦佢

By ricrick
toppy: 噢~好high啊，噢.. yeah.. come on baby.. oh.. ah.. eh...uh...  ya...... 唔好停！
多D黎密D手..oh yeah...
當toppy正比人輪姦之際，發覺比老友記屌，好過比西人屌
為左令更多老友屌佢，佢唯有出絕招 - on鳩柒招
第一招，西人西語
第二招，複制貼上
第三招，自我歧視
第四招，唔識中文
第五招，狗嗡辯論
第六招，思覺失調
第七招，游水返歸
on鳩柒招，前無古人，後無來者，招招攞命，足以令佢比人屌上天花，跌落黎又屌返上去
真係染到冇朋友
作者: B仔    時間: 2009-2-9 16:17

原帖由 habitrailspace 於 2009-2-9 17:00 發表
toppy, time to take your pills la...good boy, good boy...

就嚟情人節，佢HIGH到食錯偉哥當振定劑，想比人o係籮度插多兩條棍。你由佢啦。
作者: starbug    時間: 2009-2-9 16:17

一句講晒, 佢其實佢就係縭九線嘅, 各位無須認真回佢.
衹須同佢九唔搭八同插佢就得架啦, 佢會24小時除定褲等各位.
作者: BiscottiGelato    時間: 2009-2-9 19:50

原帖由 pepsis2 於 2009-2-9 09:35 發表
who's overpaid???  lots of ppl think their boss (or supervisors ) are overpaid too!!
gum so what???
i do think the CEO & executives of those useless inverstment groups & banks in USA should go to hel ...


The thing is, this is OUR government, this is OUR police force, which i pay hell of a lot of tax to feed the politician's trap and to the police to buy their little taser toys. That's why i have the right to complain, whether these complaints affect policies is a whole other problem related to the effectiveness of our democratic process and how effective our gov't is making changes according to the voices of the people.

In regards to CEOs and executive, yes a lot of them are useless and overpaid. Unless you are employees being whipped daily by them, or shareholders who contributed to buying that 50k fancy chair that their fat ass is sitting on every morning when they are not on the yatch... then yes, it's exactly as you've said, a useless rant. Even that tho, I don't see why people can't vent on forums, because I see people doing that here everyday...
作者: B仔    時間: 2009-2-10 09:02

原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-9 20:50 發表


The thing is, this is OUR government, this is OUR police force, which i pay hell of a lot of tax to feed the politician's trap and to the police to buy their little taser toys. That's why i have the ...

佢意思係：咁又可以點？
而唔係唔VENT得。
作者: pepsis2    時間: 2009-2-10 13:40

thx for B仔 clearing for my view...
作者: BiscottiGelato    時間: 2009-2-10 23:52

原帖由 B仔 於 2009-2-10 09:02 發表

佢意思係：咁又可以點？
而唔係唔VENT得。


Acknowledgement and spreading awareness is the most crucial step in sparkling change.
唔通 staying ignorant, remain silent and 認命 will get you what you want? 係又唔錯呀~
作者: B仔    時間: 2009-2-11 08:43

我地唔係唔知，我地唔係冇UP過。我地UP完嘆氣話一句：咁可以點，好明顯係無奈，同你話我地咩 "staying ignorant, remain silent" 係9唔搭8。

你又有咩高見可以早D咩嚟減個D廢柴CEO薪水呢？落DT去私人公司度發爛渣投訴？
作者: BiscottiGelato    時間: 2009-2-11 18:11

原帖由 B仔 於 2009-2-11 08:43 發表
我地唔係唔知，我地唔係冇UP過。我地UP完嘆氣話一句：咁可以點，好明顯係無奈，同你話我地咩 "staying ignorant, remain silent" 係9唔搭8。

你又有咩高見可以早D咩嚟減個D廢柴CEO薪水呢？落DT去私人公司度發爛渣投訴？ ...


Relook at his post, the tone does not seem like it's 嘆氣, more like saying complaint is useless 多 D... Of course I can take it wrong, in fact, pretend I'm wrong, or heck, okay i'm wrong, no point dwelling on this. There's better use of time.

And r u pepsis2's wife? his spokesman? "我地"? j/k~

[ 本帖最後由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-11 18:21 編輯 ]
作者: B仔    時間: 2009-2-11 22:31

Well, if you complain, vented, and there's nothing you can really do to take out useless CEOs in private sector....that pretty much = useless. You vent too, you have your point, everyone had a good point & pretty much on same grounds too. But you haven't told us how your venting is not "settling down & sucking it up in silence". At least, I don't see how you took action... while interpreting other's as 認命.

Sometimes I don't understand you guys. You say some people are pointless & stupid. ok. you can be subjective. but i don't see how our healthy discussion in a respectful manner makes you feel that it's "dwelling".  of course i can take it wrong, in fact, pretend i'm wrong, or heck, ok i'm wrong.
作者: BiscottiGelato    時間: 2009-2-12 13:08

原帖由 B仔 於 2009-2-11 22:31 發表
Well, if you complain, vented, and there's nothing you can really do to take out useless CEOs in private sector....that pretty much = useless. You vent too, you have your point, everyone had a good po ...


If you think a certain company's CEO is useless, which would imply that the company is badly governed impacting profit and bottom line, just don't invest in it. I think that's a very strong action. Or if you think the CEO is useless and wasting money, cutting into the bottom line of a company you already invested, pull ur investment. Otherwise, why do I really care whether another company have a useless CEO? I never talked about CEOs anyways, I am talking about the very government that is impacting your daily life, and that you've paid 10s of Ks, if not 100s of Ks every year to.

Venting, or in much more accurate and better terms, acknowledgement and spreading awareness, is not useless. Encouraging other to shut up about issues, by telling people that acknowledgement and spreading awareness is 'useless', is not only as simple as 'suffering in silence', but to promote the act of 'suffering in silence'.

There's no point to further discuss if you don't even agree that acknowledging issues and promoting awareness is a vital start in address any issues. I think this is especially vital when a lot of people don't even view this (Canadian authorities' compensation and efficiency) as an issue, as can be seen by a lot of LYKs that were defending the compensation level and effectiveness of the Canadian police force in this very post.

Our tax money is being spent very foolishly on our ineffective government, especially when compared to other places in the world, that there's still much room for improvement that we as tax-payer should demand. Moreover, there's still much room for improvement on how much we as tax-payer have been demanding in getting more efficiency on the return on our tax-money. I don't need half my bonus to go to buying tasers which are going to be used on innocent victims anymore, doesn't this alone justify the cause (of spreading awareness, etc)?

[ 本帖最後由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-12 13:09 編輯 ]
作者: B仔    時間: 2009-2-12 13:59

原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-12 14:08 發表
If you think a certain company's CEO is useless, which would imply that the company is badly governed impacting profit and bottom line, just don't invest in it. I think that's a very strong action. Or if you think the CEO is useless and wasting money, cutting into the bottom line of a company you already invested, pull ur investment. Otherwise, why do I really care whether another company have a useless CEO? I never talked about CEOs anyways, I am talking about the very government that is impacting your daily life, and that you've paid 10s of Ks, if not 100s of Ks every year to.

人地拿一拿CEO例子，冇咩問題。我冇INVEST。就算知到好多高層係廢柴咁又點？個個都知FC廢，有幾多個會真係UNSUBSCRIBE？同樣，你覺得政府廢，你炒佢咩。唔係翹埋隻手乜都唔做。熱血青年係好，但係社會就係有LEVEL。


原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-12 14:08 發表
Venting, or in much more accurate and better terms, acknowledgement and spreading awareness, is not useless. Encouraging other to shut up about issues, by telling people that acknowledgement and spreading awareness is 'useless', is not only as simple as 'suffering in silence', but to promote the act of 'suffering in silence'.

同你講左好多次，我地UP得，好明顯我地ACKNOWLEDGE & SPREADING AWARENESS啦。霽UP係冇用架BOR。做嘅有限，咪繼續UP＆SPREAD AWARENESS囉。冇CONFLICT架。嚟度邊個叫人SHUT UP？我唔覺，除左你拿出嚟討論。

原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-12 14:08 發表
There's no point to further discuss if you don't even agree that acknowledging issues and promoting awareness is a vital start in address any issues. I think this is especially vital when a lot of people don't even view this (Canadian authorities' compensation and efficiency) as an issue, as can be seen by a lot of LYKs that were defending the compensation level and effectiveness of the Canadian police force in this very post.

如上題。



原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-12 14:08 發表
Our tax money is being spent very foolishly on our ineffective government, especially when compared to other places in the world, that there's still much room for improvement that we as tax-payer should demand. Moreover, there's still much room for improvement on how much we as tax-payer have been demanding in getting more efficiency on the return on our tax-money. I don't need half my bonus to go to buying tasers which are going to be used on innocent victims anymore, doesn't this alone justify the cause (of spreading awareness, etc)?

想請教，你各自認為邊度政府係EFFICIENT？錯唔錯係TASER嘅發明，亦都唔係POLICE嘅宗旨，係個人操守同科技技術出錯嘅問題。

[ 本帖最後由 B仔 於 2009-2-12 15:00 編輯 ]
作者: BiscottiGelato    時間: 2009-2-12 20:32

原帖由 B仔 於 2009-2-12 13:59 發表

人地拿一拿CEO例子，冇咩問題。我冇INVEST。就算知到好多高層係廢柴咁又點？個個都知FC廢，有幾多個會真係UNSUBSCRIBE？同樣，你覺得政府廢，你炒佢咩。唔係翹埋隻手乜都唔做。熱血青年係好，但係社會就係有LEVEL。



同你講左好 ...


The problem is, CEO is a ridiculous example for issues concerning the government. I was pointing out that CEO and our government are totally diff stuff thus it was a totally irrelevant and stupid example. Those CEO have nth to do with me, why do I want to complain or try to invoke change? Besides, I think some of those CEOs are properly compensated anyways, especially when people paying their salary is perfectly happy, why should I say anything? If the board and investors are not happy they would've voted those CEOs out... On the flip side, the government have A LOT to do with me, I am paying them and a lot of people including me are not happy. That is night and day difference. If majority of the shareholder and the board think a CEO is overpaid and useless, it's trivial to kick him/her out. If majority of the citizen think a particular policy is bad, it's much more difficult to attack that particular policy through regular voting, etc. This is even more true because the general public is very easy to be moved/biased through political tactics. That is why exposing the deficiency is even more important.

In short: People paying CEOs are happy and people paying the Government are not happy. It's easy to kick out CEOs but hard to change the government, Applees and Oranges, get it?

You said just 'spreading awareness' is not useful. I think otherwise. Go back to page 2/3 and see how many people are still in their little dream thinking our police force is well trained, and fairly compensated (5 times+ pay of HK police which have to face AK) for invoking racism (beating by off duty police last week) and tasering innocent toursit.

My replies here were solely aiming at pepsis2's reply, where he gave a negative tone, putting down post which tries to spread awareness to people who were still defending our crappy police system/government. It is pepsis2 that was hinting that any voices trying to expose more aspects of our inefficient government as useless, hence my responses.

Besides, I think it's very apparent that pepsis2, and a lot of other people, including you, are not really criticising the content of this post, but merely criticising this post because it was posted by Toppy.

I dun give a damn about Toppy, but 見 Toppy D post 就反, perhaps 比 Toppy D post 更無聊 ...
作者: B仔    時間: 2009-2-13 09:05

CEO is a ridiculous example for concerning government...? As objective as you stated before, this post is actually about nurses vs police salary and whether or not it's worth their monetary value. And also, where can you find a happy tax payer? nobody's happy about paying anything unless it's going into their own pockets you know. & how can you summarize that people paying CEO's are happy? so, you can save your apples & oranges for your snack today.

one thing you still don't understand up to now is, i did not say "spreading awareness is useless" i said "spreading awareness but with limited or no solutions is still worthless and the only way is to continue to spread awareness".

tasering an innocent as i said in chinese (incase you did not read it well) is not to blame the integrity of police...it is the fault of an individual officer's judgement & conduct. so it is not justified to say that "you pay tax $ to get innocent people tasered & beatened". & of course, it's not fair to compare salary of RCMP to HK police because they are in 2 different countries & countries operate differently. Its just like saying we have better medical benefits compared to down in the States...am I not correct?

criticising this post because of Toppy? no. i don't think so. just like toppy, you probably don't understand that aside from many flaws (which is everywhere around the world), overall, alot of Canadians are satisfied with their standard of living here.
作者: jake123    時間: 2009-2-13 15:04

原帖由 Littleprince 於 2009-2-7 16:50 發表

呢個理由好正

銀行職員話﹕比我錢少我會打劫銀行

護士話﹕比我錢少我會謀財害命

地產商話﹕比我錢少我會起D爛尾樓



At least that was the reason they gave for raising police salary back in the 90's to pull wayyyy ahead of US salaries.

There's something I don't feel good w/ the police here. Those people back in my high school who wanted to be police officers were pretty trashy.
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-13 22:17

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Toppy    時間: 2009-2-13 22:18

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽



歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2