溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 陶傑 - The War At Home [打印本頁]

作者: canuckboy 時間: 2009-3-30 17:03 標題: 陶傑 - The War At Home

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-3-30 17:47

多謝分享

作者: canuckboy 時間: 2009-3-30 18:32

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: ricrick 時間: 2009-3-30 20:26

菲律賓上議院要求陶傑道歉press release
March 29, 2009

Pia slams Chip Tsao, HK Magazine

Senator Pia S. Cayetano today joinedcalls to demand a public apology from a top Hong Kong publication andone of its columnists over a recent opinion article that made a racialslur against Filipinos over the country's right to claim the SpratlyIslands.

Cayetano, chair of the Senate committeeon social justice, said Filipinos deserve no less than a formal publicapology for the opinion piece entitled "The War At Home" written byChip Tsao which appeared on the March 27 edition of thewidely-circulated "HK Magazine."

Tsao's column depicted the Philippinesas a "nation of servants" not worthy of claiming the Spratys fromChina, as the latter employs hundreds of thousands of Filipino domestichelpers on very low wages.

"Instead of contributing to intelligentdiscussions on ways to resolve the Spratlys dispute, Tsao onlysucceeded in eliciting hatred and sowing more confusion not only amongFilipinos but maybe even among his fellow Chinese who are not aware ofthe intricacies of the issue."

"Let's not dignify Tsao's views by notstooping down to his level. We shouldn't allow ourselves to be bulliedby people with narrow minds like him. HK Magazine and Tsao mustapologize for insulting Filipinos, and they should pledge not to committhis mistake again."

"Our being a poor nation does notdiminish the validity of our historical and legal claim to theSpratlys. In the proper forum, this dispute will eventually be threshedout and resolved. Ignorance, hatred and racial bias are the last thingswe need in approaching this long-standing controversy."

"Our claim to the Spratlys is as validas the other claims being pushed by other nations. It does not meanthat we're disregarding the claims of others. We respect their claiminasmuch as they should acknowledge ours."

Cayetano added that should Tsao makegood on his whimsical threat to fire her Filipino househelp over theSpratlys dispute, then she's confident that other employers in HongKong, including foreign expatriates and fellow Filipinos, would be morethan willing to take her in.

"I'll personally appeal on my Filipinoand foreigner friends based in Hong Kong to hire her. I'm sure thereare many more enlightened minds out there willing to take her in.Filipino domestic helpers are very much in demand in Hong Kongprecisely because of their efficiency and positive ethic at work."

"We should be proud that millions ofOFWs are able to serve the world, whether as managers, laborers,caregivers or medical prefessionals. There's nothing to be ashamed ofas long as we're earning an honest living without having to step on thedignity of others."

http://www.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2009/0329_cayetano1.asp

作者: MyOMy 時間: 2009-3-30 23:12

It's so typical Tsao. That Cayetano fell for it. Good entertainment.

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-3-31 10:21

陶傑觸怒菲律賓遭禁止入境 (20:20)
作家陶傑撰文形容菲律賓是「僕人國家」，引來菲國朝野炮轟後，菲國政府宣布禁止他入境，陶傑則作出道歉。

菲律賓入境部門今天發出聲明，指摘曹捷(陶傑原名)「態度傲慢、不尊重菲律賓及菲律賓人民」，決定將他列入「不受歡迎外國人黑名單」，「以表達我們對曹先生種族藐視和侮辱菲律賓人的不滿」。

陶傑接受香港電台專訪時表示，如果文章令菲律賓人感到冒犯，他願意作出道歉。但他強調，文章屬「怪論風格」，原意是諷刺香港的菲傭僱主，並非想侮辱菲律賓人。

事緣陶傑在免費雜誌《HK magazine》撰文，形容菲律賓是「僕人國家」(nation of servants)。

他以「The War At Home」題目撰文稱，菲律賓聲稱擁有南沙群島主權，作為愛國者的他萬萬不能忍，因本港就有超過13萬名菲律賓傭工，「作為僕人國家，不能對主人還擊」。

他又寫道，他給自己的菲傭上了嚴厲的一課，警告她如果想要在來年加薪，就得告知菲律賓同胞，南沙群島的主權屬中國擁有。

陶傑的文章引起菲律賓組織和政界的強烈不滿。《HK magazine》亦已向菲律賓方面道歉。

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-3-31 10:52

The Filipinos have no sense of humor.

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2009-3-31 14:05

陶傑 ................

作者: SiuBLoDau 時間: 2009-4-1 12:12

本帖最後由 SiuBLoDau 於 2009-4-1 13:13 編輯

陶傑只是一個嘩眾取寵, 用文字抓飯吃的小人而已。倪震為才子, 陶先生又被稱才子, 可見今時今日的「才子」品格德行如何(差)。哈哈。

作者: zoids 時間: 2009-4-1 14:07

7# 快樂牛郎

More like Chip Tsao himself failed as whatever the fuck he tried to be.....amiright?

作者: fishbelly 時間: 2009-4-2 05:42

陶傑只是一個嘩眾取寵, 用文字抓飯吃的小人而已。倪震為才子, 陶先生又被稱才子, 可見今時今日的「才子」品格德行如何(差)。哈哈。
SiuBLoDau 發表於 2009-4-1 13:12

比隻手指你.....唔好誤會, 唔係中指, 係大拇指......

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-4-2 06:39

嘩眾取寵係去做D 人地啱聽啱睇既野
而家係人地喜歡睇佢寫D野
唔係佢寫D 人地想睇既野
才子自然風流自唐伯虎到而家都係
只要唔好下流
好似偽震咁

作者: fishbelly 時間: 2009-4-2 07:39

大多數人誤解 "風流" 之所謂. 當然風流可以解作男女之情, 但更大的含義是 "杰出, 意氣風發" 等一抒所長的意思. 請參考以下正解:

http://www.chinabaike.com/dir/cd/F/226570.html

http://www.zdic.net/cd/ci/9/ZdicE9ZdicA2ZdicA8349720.htm

尤其第二個 link 解釋得頗詳細, 看來港式解釋跟 "正解" 分別太大了, 所以風流常被誤用誤解, 以為 "人不風流枉少年" 是暗指少年人 (或陶杰般中年人?) 理應拈花惹草, 其實是極度貶低女性地位的一個說法.

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)