溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 成龍再度失言中港台三地都得罪 [打印本頁]

作者: tofu 時間: 2009-4-18 15:34 標題: 成龍再度失言中港台三地都得罪

從小生長在自由香港的影星成龍，18日語出驚人表示，他認為太多自由是不好的，中國人還是需要被管的。

成龍18日出席博鰲亞洲論壇，被問到中國對電影的審查和限制相關問題時，竟然表示，台灣和香港都太自由了，所以變得很混亂。所以他覺得，中國人還是需要被管的。

成龍在評論完香港、台灣兩地後又說，中國製的電視機會爆炸，連奶粉也會被一些偷雞摸狗的人，加入許多對人體有害的成份。

成龍說，自己如果要買電視機，一定會買日本製的，因為中國製的電視機會爆炸。除此之外，成龍也批評去年的三聚氫胺事件。他說，一些偷雞摸狗的人，把不該加的東西添加到奶粉內。

成龍發表批評台灣政治的評論已經不是第一次，2004年總統大選時，成龍表示，總統大選靠著319槍擊案翻盤，是個大笑話。此話一出，引起綠營陣黨不滿，整整被封殺4年，直至去年國民黨執政後，成龍才又從新踏上台灣。如今這一番言論，一連批評了中國、香港、台灣三地，後續是否引發效應，還有待觀察。

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-4-18 16:48

[youtube]8hRxPzX-Wz0[/youtube]

作者: yoshi86 時間: 2009-4-18 18:17

佢做咩春，無野吓話

作者: ricrick 時間: 2009-4-18 18:20

對，講得好

作者: eeq20 時間: 2009-4-18 18:35

OMG 此位香港人雖然在演藝界創出名聲，但請三思其言行舉止，不要失禮香港人！體能雖 100 分，但智慧就不敢恭維！

作者: matt72178 時間: 2009-4-18 20:03

成龍D 國語係講得幾好。

作者: deluxepass 時間: 2009-4-18 20:37

我很喜歡成龍大哥！他真勁阿。

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-4-18 21:25

少說一點人家也不知道他的笨

作者: masterbear 時間: 2009-4-18 21:58

That's what we call nothing to hide! haha

作者: ecwkwok 時間: 2009-4-18 22:17

好一個狗奴才。

作者: yayaya 時間: 2009-4-18 22:41

得乜Q罪，讲既都系事实
个记者仲假啦，“你说台湾乱，请问台湾哪里乱”
台湾不乱么？
好Q废，个个怕人言可畏就不敢说实话而掉翻转讲假话，问d小学生先敢答既问题

作者: Purpleheart 時間: 2009-4-19 00:30

聽說大陸好多人仍然好唔妥日本.....今次佢表明 "如果要買電視機，一定會買日本製的".....後果不堪設想 !!

作者: yayaya 時間: 2009-4-19 01:08

我老实说我也一定买日本的，除非不够钱

作者: zoids 時間: 2009-4-19 04:12

I guess the truth really hurts......

作者: fishbelly 時間: 2009-4-19 06:38

原來特技做太多真的會影響腦部發展, 我只可以說, 對他的 "太多自由論" 感到羞恥, 好一個狗奴才. 我聽過一些評論, 說中國人是最樂於做奴才的奴才, 成龍又再證明此論.

獻丑不如藏拙, 如此簡單的說話, 真係估唔到拒一 D 都唔明. 仲要扮到好有權威一般.

作者: fishbelly 時間: 2009-4-19 06:45

得乜Q罪，讲既都系事实
个记者仲假啦，“你说台湾乱，请问台湾哪里乱”
台湾不乱么？
好Q废，个个怕人言可畏就不敢说实话而掉翻转讲假话，问d小学生先敢答既问题 ...
yayaya 發表於 2009-4-18 23:41

我同臺灣無甚關系, 但客觀宏觀的講, 中國人居住的地方不外乎幾個國家: 大陸, 臺灣, 香港, 新加坡, 勉強來說可以算上馬來西亞和泰國.

以上的國家, 中國大陸的言論自由不用講, 香港的言論自由新聞自由已經發展到 "自我監控" 的情形, 新加坡基本上是一言堂, 更不用講馬來西亞, 泰國.

結論是, 除了臺灣, 上述哪一個政府可以由國民真正的票選出來, 可以容納不同聲音, 而人民文化有可以得以保存呢? 你說臺灣亂, 到底是亂在哪裡? 誠希賜教.

作者: LOK 時間: 2009-4-19 10:42

I don't like 成龍. However, I agree with him, he was just telling the truth.

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-4-19 10:52

佢以為佢自己真係有江湖地位
可以得罪任何人
得罪個儍既佢都幾係野

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-4-19 11:14

家陣變埋國際笑話添～

http://www.mpinews.com/htm/inews/20090419/gb71401i.htm

美霍士網站指「成龍失控」 (14:01)
2009年4月19日

美國霍士電視台新聞網站以「成龍失控」為題，報道香港藝人成龍指「中國人是要管的」之言論。

中央社發自華盛頓的報道指，霍士的網頁foxnews.com以頭條位置登出了這篇報道。不過，明報即時新聞網記者在登入霍士網頁後，看見其頭條已換成其他新聞。

事緣成龍在海南博鰲論壇上，形容香港和台灣因為「太自由」而「很亂」，並明言「中國人是要管的」，否則便會「為所欲為」。

成龍的言論吸引國際媒體的關注。霍士電視新聞台的網頁，以「成龍失控」(Jackie Out of "Control")為題，描述成龍這番言論。報道說，成龍是在論壇上被要求評論中國當局審查及限制電影製作者的做法時，引伸到他對中國社會的看法。

報道說，成龍表示，他現在真的感到很困惑，到底有自由好，還是沒自由好。

霍士的報道最後特別指出，香港從1997年回歸中國至今，香港人民仍不被允許直選領導人；儘管香港民主派主張直選，但北京一再表示，香港還不具備直選的條件。

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-19 11:56

我老实说我也一定买日本的，除非不够钱
yayaya 發表於 2009-4-19 02:08

The people should spend more time on how to improve Chinese products rather than feeding those Japanese war criminals.

But then, the quality of Chinese products is quickly catching up. You know, the Japanese used to make crappy products.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-4-19 12:33

本帖最後由 Ultraman 於 2009-4-19 12:35 編輯

"Your nose is uglily big!"
Yeah, this might be the fact/truth, but gotta see if the situation is appropriate to say it.

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-4-19 13:05

But then, the quality of Chinese products is quickly catching up. You know, the Japanese used to make crappy products.
peter236 發表於 2009-4-19 12:56

[/quote]
support

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-4-19 13:50

The people should spend more time on how to improve Chinese products rather than feeding those Japanese war criminals.

But then, the quality of Chinese products is quickly catching up. You know, the Japanese used to make crappy products.peter236 發表於 2009-4-19 11:56

LOL~

As a consumer, I don't care what I can do to improve Chinese products. If a Japanese company makes a compelling product that suits my needs, I'll buy it. If a Chinese company makes a compelling product that suits my needs, I'll buy that. There is no way I'll buy an inferior Chinese product just because I want to support them and help them improve.

Case in point -- I have a 步步高 all-region DVD player. It's Chinese-made and I am happy to buy that because it allows me to play DVDs from any region.

If our dear Peter boy really wants to "stop feeding those Japanese war criminals" as he claims, I dare him to completely eliminate using any Japanese-made items or items with Japanese parts~ Wouldn't that be fun? XD

-Lik

p.s. Now watch Peter label and slam me using his typical accusations. I can almost write his reply up for him as well~ hahahaha

作者: yayaya 時間: 2009-4-19 16:32

我同臺灣無甚關系, 但客觀宏觀的講, 中國人居住的地方不外乎幾個國家: 大陸, 臺灣, 香港, 新加坡, 勉強來說可以算上馬來西亞和泰國.

以上的國家, 中國大陸的言論自由不用講, 香港的言論自由新聞自由已經發展到 " ...
fishbelly 發表於 2009-4-19 07:45

台湾的政治乱不乱？如果不乱，会闹出这么多笑话？会搞到阿扁要入狱？台湾贪污腐败严重，不亚于大陆，http://www.huaxia.com/xw/twxw/2009/04/1384255.html

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-4-19 16:55

亂唔亂係相對既, 同埋呢樣架都係各花入各眼.
又何必咁執著呢~

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2009-4-19 16:57

LOL~

As a consumer, I don't care what I can do to improve Chinese products. If a Japanese company makes a compelling product that suits my needs, I'll buy it. If a Chinese company makes a compelling ...
Lik 發表於 2009-4-19 14:50

LOL
我地o個步，用唔夠2-3年已經無啦啦死咗..............
仲要係我地無abuse過部機

而家就買返部pioneer~ 唔鬼再高啦

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-4-19 17:00

The people should spend more time on how to improve Chinese products rather than feeding those Japanese war criminals.

But then, the quality of Chinese products is quickly catching up. You know, th ...
peter236 發表於 2009-4-20 03:56

.... 我全屋唔係日本電器, 就係歐洲電器... 仲要係可以選擇既話都唔買made in China既model...
電視就買Sony X series, 買佢係日本製造...
notebook 就買fujitsu, 都係因為佢係日本製造...

唉, 我諗短時間內我都係改變唔到我唔買國產電器既習慣了.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-4-19 17:02

I don't like 成龍. However, I agree with him, he was just telling the truth.
LOK 發表於 2009-4-20 02:42

truth 都係咁話丫... 你會唔會開記者會同人講自己生痔瘡丫...

作者: yayaya 時間: 2009-4-19 17:58

亂唔亂係相對既, 同埋呢樣架都係各花入各眼.
又何必咁執著呢~
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-4-19 17:55

无错，不过我好憎d人虚伪

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-4-19 21:06

无错，不过我好憎d人虚伪
yayaya 發表於 2009-4-20 09:58

算啦~
呢個世界總有一d 人虛偽, 亦都有一d 人唔虛偽.
咁你唔鍾意虛偽既人, 咁就唔好同佢地做朋友law.

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2009-4-20 00:11

I don't like 成龍. However, I agree with him, he was just telling the truth.
LOK 發表於 2009-4-19 10:42

x 2

個理念岩，只係佢表達能力差

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-20 01:14

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2009-4-20 02:29 編輯

LOL~

As a consumer, I don't care what I can do to improve Chinese products. If a Japanese company makes a compelling product that suits my needs, I'll buy it. If a Chinese company makes a compelling ...
Lik 發表於 2009-4-19 14:50

Lik, you are making too many assumptions that you are embarrassing yourself here. You should learn from your Japanese friends since you are so fond of Japanese culture.

As you know, the Japanese used to make crappy cars decades ago, that went rusty just after a year of use. But the Japanese people still supported their own products by buying Japanese. They just refused to use foreign products as much as possible, even though they knew their own products were inferior. The same can be said of the nationalistic Koreans.

Lik, there is still a lot that you can from the Japanese.

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-20 01:26

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2009-4-20 02:28 編輯

.... 我全屋唔係日本電器, 就係歐洲電器... 仲要係可以選擇既話都唔買made in China既model...
電視就買Sony X series, 買佢係日本製造...
notebook 就買fujitsu, 都係因為佢係日本製造...

唉, 我諗短時間內我都係 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-4-19 18:00

I would try to buy made in China as much as possible, since many electronics products at Best Buy and Walmart are made in China or partly made in China anyway.
No one buys Fujitsu computers at all. The market leaders are HP, Dell, Acer, Lenovo and Apple etc, and many models are mostly made in China or partly made in China.

All the Apple Ipods, HP printers, and Samsung LCDs that I buy, are mostly made in China or partly made in China.

作者: Hyde 時間: 2009-4-20 02:38

made in china with international QC and china brand with no QC is 2 different things -__-

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-4-20 04:30

No one buys Fujitsu computers at all. The market leaders are HP, Dell, Acer, Lenovo and Apple etc, and many models are mostly made in China or partly made in China.

All the Apple Ipods, HP printers, and Samsung LCDs that I buy, are mostly made in China or partly made in China.
peter236 發表於 2009-4-20 17:26

Peter仔, 我同你就係唔同market 啦~
你話冇人會買Fujitsu notebook, 小弟就係其中一個人買了.
仲有, 我真係為左個made in Japan而買左個Sony X series 既LCD TV... 比唔比先?

作者: myversa 時間: 2009-4-20 09:00

The truth is for mostly Japanese products are better. For example:

For blank dvds, made in Japan ones are better than those made in Taiwan.

作者: ACooperFan 時間: 2009-4-20 18:06

本帖最後由 ACooperFan 於 2009-4-20 19:08 編輯

Mr. Chan, read more and talk less. Kung Fu is your forte, not politics.

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-20 19:38

Peter仔, 我同你就係唔同market 啦~
你話冇人會買Fujitsu notebook, 小弟就係其中一個人買了.
仲有, 我真係為左個made in Japan而買左個Sony X series 既LCD TV... 比唔比先? ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-4-20 05:30

In Hong Kong, most people buy HP, Dell, Acer, Lenovo and Apple computers. You have very weird taste. The Japanese don't know how to make a computer, that is why their market share is so small worldwide. Since the Taiwanese make most of the motherboards in the world, it is probable that your Fujitsu computer has a Taiwanese brand made in China mainboard.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-4-20 20:00

In Hong Kong, most people buy HP, Dell, Acer, Lenovo and Apple computers. You have very weird taste. The Japanese don't know how to make a computer, that is why their market share is so small worldwide. Since the Taiwanese make most of the motherboards in the world, it is probable that your Fujitsu computer has a Taiwanese brand made in China mainboard.
peter236 發表於 2009-4-21 11:38

咁小弟既taste 不嬲都係weird 少少既, 正如我喜歡同Peter仔你吹水一樣啦~
Fujitsu部notebook 幾好架, 13.1" 既frame, 就係有14" 既LCD, 小弟覺得幾好.

話時話, 小弟真係唔排除入面既零件係made in China架woh. 咁又點? 小弟從來都唔覺得China野係唔得, 只不過比較鍾意日本既之麻, 你咁都睇唔過眼?

作者: jh66 時間: 2009-4-20 21:15

台湾的政治乱不乱？如果不乱，会闹出这么多笑话？会搞到阿扁要入狱？台湾贪污腐败严重，不亚于大陆，http://www.huaxia.com/xw/twxw/2009/04/1384255.html
yayaya 發表於 2009-4-19 17:32

呢個只係民主過程的小風波,阻擋唔住民主ge步伐,現在國民黨不是重新执政了嗎?民主邊有一帆風順嫁?

作者: ricrick 時間: 2009-4-20 21:27

阿成哥吾記得佢套新片因有大陸管而禁播？
有自由當然亂，因為人人都可以有不同思想，可以掙取
莫非好似北韓甘，人人比人管，思想比人管，一D都吾亂，但好嗎？

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-4-20 22:14

Lik, you are making too many assumptions that you are embarrassing yourself here. You should learn from your Japanese friends since you are so fond of Japanese culture.

As you know, the Japanese used to make crappy cars decades ago, that went rusty just after a year of use. But the Japanese people still supported their own products by buying Japanese. They just refused to use foreign products as much as possible, even though they knew their own products were inferior. The same can be said of the nationalistic Koreans.

Lik, there is still a lot that you can from the Japanese.peter236 發表於 2009-4-20 01:14

笑咗～

你想同我吹車？唔該你慳啲啦。講車，我敢寫包單我熟過你N倍。

你又知唔知點解日本人即使係日本氣車業剛剛起步嘅時候都買日本車？唔知嘅話就唔該你去做吓功課先返來同我駁。

講開韓國人，佢地又真係有種㗎。起碼佢地對於獨島件事上面夠薑同日本企硬。但大陸呢？對於釣魚台，幾廿年來都係得把口。人地小馬哥最少都夠薑派隻戰艦過去宣示下主權啦～

-力

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-20 23:21

笑咗～

你想同我吹車？唔該你慳啲啦。講車，我敢寫包單我熟過你N倍。

你又知唔知點解日本人即使係日本氣車業剛剛起步嘅時候都買日本車？唔知嘅話就唔該你去做吓功課先返來同我駁。

講開韓國人，佢地又真係有 ...
Lik 發表於 2009-4-20 23:14

This is the reason why you are so annoying, you moron. I am not even trying to argue with you which cars are better. Why do you assume so? Since you are a car expert, that is why you are so condescending. I am just talking in general about the inferior quality of Japanese cars decades ago.

I am using cars as an example. The Japanese were just as supportive to their other industrial products as they were to their car industry, at a time when their quality was inferior. In this regard, the Japanese were way better than a coward like you.

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-4-20 23:51

This is the reason why you are so annoying, you moron. I am not even trying to argue with you which cars are better. Why do you assume so? Since you are a car expert, that is why you are so condescending. I am just talking in general about the inferior quality of Japanese cars decades ago.

I am using cars as an example. The Japanese were just as supportive to their other industrial products as they were to their car industry, at a time when their quality was inferior. In this regard, the Japanese were way better than a coward like you.
peter236 發表於 2009-4-20 23:21

話你無做功課都唔識去做功課，呢啲唔係死蠢仲係乜野？

日本人固然追捧日本貨，但追捧之餘，你估佢地真係淨係因為 "愛國" 先至買日本車？自己無料、唔識野就唔該去睇下日本對外國進口車嘅關稅、日本本土 Kei car 嘅稅務優惠、同其他限制。

咩國家嘅人就一定要追捧買返自己國家出產嘅野？你識得咁講就只係顯出你對經濟學裡面最基本嘅 competitive advantage 都毫無概念。有嘅就只係被麻木洗腦嘅愛國愛黨思想！

-力

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-20 23:56

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2009-4-21 00:58 編輯

話你無做功課都唔識去做功課，呢啲唔係死蠢仲係乜野？

日本人固然追捧日本貨，但追捧之餘，你估佢地真係淨係因為 "愛國" 先至買日本車？自己無料、唔識野就唔該去睇下日本對外國進口車嘅關稅、日本本土 Kei car 嘅 ...
Lik 發表於 2009-4-21 00:51

wahahahahahah, just relax, I am not trying to compete with you little kid. Please stop embarrassing yourself before the adults here. The Japanese not only bought their own cars, but also all the other Japanese products.

作者: ricrick 時間: 2009-4-21 02:30

[youtube]WTl_ZSaeDBo[/youtube]

作者: ricrick 時間: 2009-4-21 02:35

[youtube]C7Yjog-dFkQ[/youtube]

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-4-21 04:43

笑咗～

你想同我吹車？唔該你慳啲啦。講車，我敢寫包單我熟過你N倍。

你又知唔知點解日本人即使係日本氣車業剛剛起步嘅時候都買日本車？唔知嘅話就唔該你去做吓功課先返來同我駁。

講開韓國人，佢地又真係有種㗎。起碼佢地對於獨島件事上面夠薑同日本企硬。但大陸呢？對於釣魚台，幾廿年來都係得把口。人地小馬哥最少都夠薑派隻戰艦過去宣示下主權啦～

-力
Lik 發表於 2009-4-21 14:14

人外有人, 天外有天, 話唔定Peter仔係開車廠的, 仲要係國產果隻~
至於釣魚台, 不如射過核彈過去, 搞到當地輻射污染, 一拍兩散好唔好?

作者: rainbow-davie 時間: 2009-4-21 05:05

國產車廠而家諗住買平治.

(或主權基金)

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-21 11:30

人外有人, 天外有天, 話唔定Peter仔係開車廠的, 仲要係國產果隻~
至於釣魚台, 不如射過核彈過去, 搞到當地輻射污染, 一拍兩散好唔好?
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-4-21 05:43

The Diaoyu Islands is supposed to be under Taiwan control. So mainland China is not going to send any ships there. If the relationship between China and Taiwan gets better, it is possible that they will send some ships together to take back those islands from the invaders.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-4-21 17:35

The Diaoyu Islands is supposed to be under Taiwan control. So mainland China is not going to send any ships there. If the relationship between China and Taiwan gets better, it is possible that they ...
peter236 發表於 2009-4-22 03:30

都話扔個核桃彈過去就一了百了啦...

作者: 老友四號 時間: 2009-4-21 17:59

33# peter236
would try to buy made in China as much as possible, since many electronics products at Best Buy and Walmart are made in China or partly made in China anyway.
No one buys Fujitsu computers at all. The market leaders are HP, Dell, Acer, Lenovo and Apple etc, and many models are mostly made in China or partly made in China.

All the Apple Ipods, HP printers, and Samsung LCDs that I buy, are mostly made in China or partly made in China.
妖！咁多口水不如開始寫少Ｄ英文寫多D中文仲好喇！

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-21 21:46

33# peter236
would try to buy made in China as much as possible, since many electronics products at Best Buy and Walmart are made in China or partly made in China anyway.
No one buys Fujitsu compute ...
老友四號發表於 2009-4-21 18:59

You dumb fuc, just STFU.

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-4-21 23:17

The Diaoyu Islands is supposed to be under Taiwan control. So mainland China is not going to send any ships there. If the relationship between China and Taiwan gets better, it is possible that they will send some ships together to take back those islands from the invaders.peter236 發表於 2009-4-21 11:30

Eh? Last time I checked, PRC was still proclaiming that they have the sovereign rights to the Diaoyu Islands. Furthermore, PRC's formal stance on Taiwan is that it is merely a rebel province, and is therefore just a part of China. Logically combining these two facts together could only lead to the conclusion that PRC has every right and responsibility to send ships over to defend the Island's sovereign rights.

So Peter boy, are you trying to suggest that Taiwan is an independent country outside of PRC's control? Saying that would be completely against your Grandfather's wishes wor? Can you afford to say something against him like that at all?

hahahaha~

-Lik

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-21 23:39

Eh? Last time I checked, PRC was still proclaiming that they have the sovereign rights to the Diaoyu Islands. Furthermore, PRC's formal stance on Taiwan is that it is merely a rebel province, and is ...
Lik 發表於 2009-4-22 00:17

wahahahahaha. You stupid self-hating Chinese, this is the consensus of the current situation of Diaoyu Islands. We all know about the current situation. Just stop your stupid BS.

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-4-22 10:00

wahahahahaha. You stupid self-hating Chinese, this is the consensus of the current situation of Diaoyu Islands. We all know about the current situation. Just stop your stupid BS.
peter236 發表於 2009-4-21 23:39

Consensus or not, PRC repeatedly claims on the international stage that the Diaoyu Island is theirs, and yet they have done absolutely NOTHING to back up their claims. Given the extended Japanese presence and occupation of the Island and surrounding waters, PRC would most certainly lose any international lawsuit on the island's ownership.

THAT is the consensus of the current situation.

Stop repeating the propaganda that Grandfather feeds you and start using your own eyes, ears, and brain.

-Lik

作者: clearance 時間: 2009-4-22 11:03

崖上的霸王還是回去賣洗髪水吧

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-22 11:30

Consensus or not, PRC repeatedly claims on the international stage that the Diaoyu Island is theirs, and yet they have done absolutely NOTHING to back up their claims. Given the extended Japanese pre ...
Lik 發表於 2009-4-22 11:00

You stupid moron, I am not repeating their propaganda. The Diaoyu Islands were illegally given to the Japanese by the US. There was no legal basis to give those islands to the Japanese invaders. The Americans are just trouble makers who created this issue between China and Japan. I just hope mainland China and Taiwan will join forces and get back those islands.
The only so-called concrete action that can be done is to send a large number of warships, and fishing boats etc from both mainland China and Taiwan to reclaim those islands. Both the PRC and ROC should do it together soon, if not it is such a shame for them.

作者: news 時間: 2009-4-22 12:48

本帖最後由 news 於 2009-4-22 12:50 編輯

33# peter236

buying a foreign brand that is partly made or entirely made in china doesn't make you more patriotic...you are still using a foreign brand

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-22 13:42

33# peter236

buying a foreign brand that is partly made or entirely made in china doesn't make you more patriotic...you are still using a foreign brand
news 發表於 2009-4-22 13:48

This is why we should set up more of our own Chinese brands and our own flagship handbag stores, LOL.

作者: auyatyat 時間: 2009-4-22 17:09

一向唔鐘意佢.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-4-22 17:40

This is why we should set up more of our own Chinese brands and our own flagship handbag stores, LOL.
peter236 發表於 2009-4-23 05:42

熊貓牌定中華牌?...

作者: 老友四號 時間: 2009-4-22 17:47

You dumb fuc, just STFU.
peter236 發表於 2009-4-21 22:46

唔好咁呀！累到你老母俾人話佢冇家教就認真衰仔啦，知冇！

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-4-22 18:31

唔好咁呀！累到你老母俾人話佢冇家教就認真衰仔啦，知冇！
老友四號發表於 2009-4-23 09:47

佢都比人話左好耐啦...
你試下可唔可以教好佢吧~

作者: myversa 時間: 2009-4-23 08:06

No need to swear. People have different opinion and why if some people cannot convince others, they always end up swearing or personally attacking others?

If China wants to setup their own brand stores, they have to improve their quality first. Japanese buy their own brand because their products are at least above the average and they have confidence on their product with better warranty too.

作者: matt72178 時間: 2009-4-23 09:36

熊貓牌定中華牌?...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-4-22 18:40

解放軍牌會唔會有霸氣D 呢?

作者: ricrick 時間: 2009-4-23 09:53

日本仔將d好野留比自己人，中國人將d衰野毒害自己人

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-4-23 12:06

中國貨亦唔係無好野，但呢個世界裡面，信譽可能要用十幾廿年先至建立得到，而搞臭個朵卻只須要一、兩單醜事就可以破壞晒之前辛辛苦苦建立返來嘅一切。而偏偏同國貨有關係嘅醜聞卻一單接一單咁揚晒出來，而且重要鑊鑊新鮮、鑊鑊甘。

唉...

力

作者: yayaya 時間: 2009-4-23 13:27

讲讲下又5知讲到边

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-4-23 14:01

講來講去，咪又係啲人奴性甚重，唔識得用自己嘅腦筋去思考。明明身在自由嘅國度之中，卻唔懂得去珍惜自由嘅空氣，而返轉頭向對阿爺嘅尊權管治獻媚？

唔知有無講錯呢，Peter仔？

-力

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-4-23 17:35

No need to swear. People have different opinion and why if some people cannot convince others, they always end up swearing or personally attacking others?

If China wants to setup their own brand sto ...
myversa 發表於 2009-4-23 09:06

You are one of the few here who actually understands the situation. But, you know, it is going to take some time to improve the quality.

Japan started its modernization during the Meiji era around the 1860's. It took them over a hundred years to catch up with the western countries.

Japanese products were not even above average yet, even in the 1950's and 1960's, but their patriotic culture was to buy their own national brands first.

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)