溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: Chicken-A-La-Carte?! [打印本頁]

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-14 22:30 標題: Chicken-A-La-Carte?!

I received this clip from a HK friend today, and just wanna share with you guys. Do you have any thoughts/insight/inspiration after watching it? Especially when we're enjoying those all-u-can-eat?

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-5-14 22:53

小弟幾年先食一次自助餐, 主要係唔想浪費食物.

睇完段片, 就覺得捐錢比d 貧窮地方既人係好有意義.
我地捐既錢, 可能只佔我地既收入既一小部分, 但係可以真正既幫到貧窮既人架!

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-5-14 23:26

本帖最後由 B仔於 2009-5-15 00:28 編輯

所以我唔食ALL YOU CAN EAT。。。就算大班人去, 食我等人叫，廢事個個叫D叫得太多。去食BUFFET我唔會淋到大大碟，只係隻碟滿喇，就走去食，食完先再拿。。。拿多3／4碟。
不過我有時唔明，點解已經咁多個細路，咁嘅環境，重要生。。。

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-5-14 23:33

所以我去食ALL YOU CAN EAT我等人叫，廢事個個叫D叫得太多。去食BUFFET我唔會淋到大大碟，只係隻碟滿喇，就走去食，食完先再拿。。。拿多3／4碟。
不過我有時唔明，點解已經咁多個細路，咁嘅環境，重要生。。。 ...
B仔發表於 2009-5-15 15:26

其實, 就算你食自助餐既時候唔浪費食物, 但自助餐既特性就係會有好多食物比你揀, 最後一定會有剩餘的食物. 以小弟所以, o係香港, 有一d 酒店係會將自助餐剩低既食物捐比老人院(當然係合乎衛生果d 食物啦), 比d 公公婆婆食既.

至於點解生咁多細路, 其實我地上一輩再上一輩(或者再上一輩) 都生好多細路, 我諗應該越窮既地方同人文水平越低既地方, 就會有呢個情況.

作者: meowmeowmeow 時間: 2009-5-14 23:54

awww....

sigh.... so sad, but so true...

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-5-14 23:56

OHHH。。。。比老人院好呀～不過時時都剩咁多，係埋應該減少製造量呢HOR？因為剩得太誇張喇吧～

作者: meowmeowmeow 時間: 2009-5-15 00:01

OHHH。。。。比老人院好呀～不過時時都剩咁多，係埋應該減少製造量呢HOR？因為剩得太誇張喇吧～
B仔發表於 2009-5-15 00:56

Bad yield management ar mah... :p
(cuz the management didn't do their forcast properly, wasted food+money+labour.)

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-5-15 00:33

搞自助餐都一定浪費食物架喇...
d 野食款式少, d 客人就會話唔夠, 得咁少選擇我做乜要幫襯呀!
d 野食份量少, d 客人又會話好快冇哂d 好野食, 你間野咁cheap 架!

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-15 01:15

小弟幾年先食一次自助餐, 主要係唔想浪費食物.

睇完段片, 就覺得捐錢比d 貧窮地方既人係好有意義.
我地捐既錢, 可能只佔我地既收入既一小部分, 但係可以真正既幫到貧窮既人架! ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-5-14 22:53

Of course money donation could help. However, how much food and/or how much money do those needed people actually receive at the end?! I think it's about a big concept, in which can be started by every individual. Just try to waste less food as well as all other precious resources such as water and power etc.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-15 01:23

搞自助餐都一定浪費食物架喇...
d 野食款式少, d 客人就會話唔夠, 得咁少選擇我做乜要幫襯呀!
d 野食份量少, d 客人又會話好快冇哂d 好野食, 你間野咁cheap 架! ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-5-15 00:33

True. So that's why my concept is to start from any oneself. Any person who goes for buffet shouldn't grab excessive food so as to minimize any wasteful leftover on the dishes.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-15 01:35

不過我有時唔明，點解已經咁多個細路，咁嘅環境，重要生。。。 ...
B仔發表於 2009-5-14 23:26

Sigh... that's another sad part. Cases are, they're not well educated, and/or they're so poor that there is not enough food already, how can we expect that they'll have money to buy condoms? And more likely, they don't have such concept or even so, they can't conquer the nature calls!

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 02:38

所以我唔食ALL YOU CAN EAT。。。就算大班人去, 食我等人叫，廢事個個叫D叫得太多。去食BUFFET我唔會淋到大大碟，只係隻碟滿喇，就走去食，食完先再拿。。。拿多3／4碟。
不過我有時唔明，點解已經咁多個細路，咁嘅 ...
B仔發表於 2009-5-15 00:26

Letting others order doesn't make it less wasteful. All you are doing is pushing the responsibilty onto others.

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-5-15 07:57

Letting others order doesn't make it less wasteful. All you are doing is pushing the responsibilty onto others.
Austin 發表於 2009-5-15 03:38

我好佩服你架，成世都冇徙過食物，又冇食果BUFFET同ALL YOU CAN EAT～你係邊個慈善團體？我諗好多LYK都會想參與！

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 08:10

我好佩服你架，成世都冇徙過食物，又冇食果BUFFET同ALL YOU CAN EAT～你係邊個慈善團體？我諗好多LYK都會想參與！
B仔發表於 2009-5-15 08:57

You're not making sense. Just because I felt you're leaving responsibility onto others doesn't mean I'm saying I have not wasted food before.

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2009-5-15 09:32

唔同社會有唔同既生活，唯有做好本份，唔好浪費食物，得閒捐多D錢。。
(btw,我覺得教育係脫貧既唯一出路)

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-15 09:52

Letting others order doesn't make it less wasteful. All you are doing is pushing the responsibilty onto others.
Austin 發表於 2009-5-15 02:38

Didn't you doing the same and throw the ball to B仔 that she has the liability to control other people for not wasting food too?
That's why I said this is a self responsibility that every individual should be aware of.

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-5-15 10:53

Didn't you doing the same and throw the ball to B仔 that she has the liability to control other people for not wasting food too?
That's why I said this is a self responsibility that every individual ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-5-15 10:52

係呀，大班人食ALL YOU CAN EAT唔叫野等人地叫野係好IRRESPONSIBLE架～超人，你都唔知，幾大罪呢～不過好似呀AUSTIN就唔同呢，自己推卸責任係冇罪，因為佢話咗人先就冇事架喇！我地要多多學習～～～

作者: 小叻 時間: 2009-5-15 11:01

去食All you can eat 我通常包底~~ 我個胃係深不見底的~~ wakaka~~不過~~ 真係食剩我地會玩包剪"dap" 決定邊個食埋佢~~

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 11:02

Didn't you doing the same and throw the ball to B仔 that she has the liability to control other people for not wasting food too?
That's why I said this is a self responsibility that every individual ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-5-15 10:52

Now you're not making sense. Saying she's passing responsibility isn't the same as saying she should take responsibility of others.

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 11:06

係呀，大班人食ALL YOU CAN EAT唔叫野等人地叫野係好IRRESPONSIBLE架～超人，你都唔知，幾大罪呢～不過好似呀AUSTIN就唔同呢，自己推卸責任係冇罪，因為佢話咗人先就冇事架喇！我地要多多學習～～～ ...
B仔發表於 2009-5-15 11:53

Nothing wrong with just letting others do the ordering. But to use that as "not wasting food" is irresponsible.

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-5-15 11:17

去食All you can eat 我通常包底~~ 我個胃係深不見底的~~ wakaka~~不過~~ 真係食剩我地會玩包剪"dap" 決定邊個食埋佢~~
小叻發表於 2009-5-15 12:01

戀愛猜情尋
你同边個一齊食?
煲魚湯?

作者: 小叻 時間: 2009-5-15 11:25

戀愛猜情尋
你同边個一齊食?
煲魚湯?
sheep 發表於 15-5-2009 11:17

戀愛猜情尋? 我無睇耶~~~

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-5-15 12:02

Nothing wrong with just letting others do the ordering. But to use that as "not wasting food" is irresponsible.
Austin 發表於 2009-5-15 12:06

係呀。。。少一個人叫嚟避免更大機會叫得太多而徙野係好唔負責任架～～
我就係呢D咁唔負責任嘅人～
所以你投訴我係好啱架！

多謝你指點丫～～～

作者: meowmeowmeow 時間: 2009-5-15 12:38

去食All you can eat 我通常包底~~ 我個胃係深不見底的~~ wakaka~~不過~~ 真係食剩我地會玩包剪"dap" 決定邊個食埋佢~~
小叻發表於 2009-5-15 12:01

深不見底!?

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2009-5-15 12:47

我個胃係深不見底的小叻發表於 2009-5-15 11:01

actually, I used to eat A LOT when I was younger, but not anymore lu....後生真係好

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 12:59

係呀。。。少一個人叫嚟避免更大機會叫得太多而徙野係好唔負責任架～～
我就係呢D咁唔負責任嘅人～
所以你投訴我係好啱架！多謝你指點丫～～～ ...
B仔發表於 2009-5-15 13:02

I'm not complaining, I'm telling it as I see it. Everyone is responsible, everyone can order what they can eat and then share it.

You can say you don't order and let others order for you, but then the other person won't know how much you can eat and could be over ordering. But it's not your fault that he/she over ordered right.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-15 14:27

Nothing wrong with just letting others do the ordering. But to use that as "not wasting food" is irresponsible.
Austin 發表於 2009-5-15 11:06

You must think, you can ask your friend: "you shouldn't fall in love with this gal", "you shouldn't get married", "you shouldn't order that much of food", "you shouldn't this and that"..... is rational and reasonable.
One should control himself/herself well and take his/her own responsibility to do or not do any thing. People not controlling others is called irresponsible? I first heard that.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-15 14:29

Letting others order doesn't make it less wasteful. All you are doing is pushing the responsibilty onto others.
Austin 發表於 2009-5-15 02:38

People like you who force own's responsibility to other people is truly irresponsible. Unless you are an infant or retarded.

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-5-15 14:30

I'm not complaining, I'm telling it as I see it. Everyone is responsible, everyone can order what they can eat and then share it.

You can say you don't order and let others order for you, but th ...
Austin 發表於 2009-5-15 13:59

ohh...你同D好生疏嘅人食飯架。。。？我諗你D朋友真係唔知你大概食幾多。。。怪不得啦～
唔點野食就唔識叫人停，差不多夠了。。。原來你睇嘅野咁全面，樣樣都要解剖每情節報告比你聽～

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-15 14:31

深不見底!?
meowmeowmeow 發表於 2009-5-15 12:38

黑色午夜, 深不見底.....

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 14:52

People like you who force own's responsibility to other people is truly irresponsible. Unless you are an infant or retarded.
Ultraman 發表於 2009-5-15 15:29

What a retarded statement. Just because I'm saying B boy is pushing her responsibility to other doesn't make it I'm pushing my responsibility onto her.

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 14:54

You must think, you can ask your friend: "you shouldn't fall in love with this gal", "you shouldn't get married", "you shouldn't order that much of food", "you shouldn't this and that"..... is ration ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-5-15 15:27

People having others do their work while thinking she is contributing is not taking responsibility of their non-action.

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 14:58

ohh...你同D好生疏嘅人食飯架。。。？我諗你D朋友真係唔知你大概食幾多。。。怪不得啦～
唔點野食就唔識叫人停，差不多夠了。。。原來你睇嘅野咁全面，樣樣都要解剖每情節報告比你聽～ ...
B仔發表於 2009-5-15 15:30

I guess your social circle is so small that you can remember how much they eat, or you spy on them so much to know how much they've had before the meal.

If you know how to tell people to stop order, then there shouldn't be problem with order your own stuff.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-15 15:14

What a retarded statement. Just because I'm saying B boy is pushing her responsibility to other doesn't make it I'm pushing my responsibility onto her.
Austin 發表於 2009-5-15 14:52

It's your thinking which is retarded.
One not placing order is not equal to pushing the responsibility to others.
At least, courts won't accept this kind of logic.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-15 15:20

I guess your social circle is so small that you can remember how much they eat, or you spy on them so much to know how much they've had before the meal.

If you know how to tell people to stop orde ...
Austin 發表於 2009-5-15 14:58

Now I know why some grandma and grandpa give big excuse that they are not 老人癡呆but just having a too big social circle!

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 16:27

It's your thinking which is retarded.
One not placing order is not equal to pushing the responsibility to others.
At least, courts won't accept this kind of logic.
Ultraman 發表於 2009-5-15 16:14

Looks like not only your statements are retarded, you seem to have trouble reading too.

What B boy said is like instead of driving her own car, she calls a taxi and said to you she is helping the environment by not driving.

Again, the pushing responsibility part is saying "I'm not wasting food because I have others order for me"...i.e. someone else don't waste food.

作者: Rainy 時間: 2009-5-15 16:33

Austin, ain't you pushing the responsibility to others too?

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 16:34

Now I know why some grandma and grandpa give big excuse that they are not 老人癡呆but just having a too big social circle!
Ultraman 發表於 2009-5-15 16:20

What a terrible thing to say about the elderly. many of them do have a big social cirlce, just because they don't know what their friends want to eat or how much they want to eat doesn't mean they're 老人癡呆

Shame Shame.

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 16:36

Austin, ain't you pushing the responsibility to others too?
Rainy 發表於 2009-5-15 17:33

How so? Because I'm saying B boy isn't?

作者: Rainy 時間: 2009-5-15 16:48

本帖最後由 Rainy 於 2009-5-15 17:51 編輯

Austin, you said Ultraman has trouble reading. If you didn't say it in a confusing way, Ultraman wouldn't have any troubles reading/understanding any statements you've made. Because you didn't make it clear and specific enough, therefore people have troubles reading your so called statments! When people misunderstood you, and you said that it's supposed to be their responsbility for making sure to understand you? the responsiblity is still your's because you cannot clearly express your statements.

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-15 17:18

Austin, you said Ultraman has trouble reading. If you didn't say it in a confusing way, Ultraman wouldn't have any troubles reading/understanding any statements you've made. Because you didn't make it ...
Rainy 發表於 2009-5-15 17:48

And when did I say it's his repsonsibility to understand me completely? It could be me that is confusing him, or it could also be him that have real trouble understanding. Either way, it's only matter of opinion, not responsbility.

with your theory, you are pushing responsiblity onto me. You are saying I'm the one wording it confusingly, not you and him having trouble understanding.

作者: Rainy 時間: 2009-5-15 17:43

本帖最後由 Rainy 於 2009-5-15 18:49 編輯

Either way, it's only matter of opinion, not responsbility.

A matter of opinion. <-- stated by you, austin. There you go. end of story. no need us to say more.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-15 18:39

Objectively, a statement which a reasonable person can't understand have three possibilities:
1. either the statement is not clear/confusing; or
2. that person has reading problem; or
3. both.

I'm not going to put this in court anyways. You can enjoy twisting any meaning of others and make your own comments up to your happiness. Cuz I'm pretty sure I am not a childish kid anymore.

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2009-5-15 22:57

你地洗唔洗OT到咁離譜呀？

作者: meowmeowmeow 時間: 2009-5-16 01:04

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-16 02:05

Objectively, a statement which a reasonable person can't understand have three possibilities:
1. either the statement is not clear/confusing; or
2. that person has reading problem; or
3. both.

I'm no ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-5-15 19:39

See, your comment here is meet your requirement for "childish". As you've put my comment into your Ultraman court over and over again.

作者: Austin 時間: 2009-5-16 02:08

A matter of opinion.
Rainy 發表於 2009-5-15 18:43

Are we in highschool here? It has always been a matter of opinion. Any comment made here are a matter of opinion. Did you not understand it until now?

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-5-16 08:38

"I guess your social circle is so small that you can remember how much they eat..."
Austin 發表於 2009-5-16 02:05

Your the only one assumption other than people could have good memories didn't make an adult's POV at all. Yet I don't need to make you understand cuz I'm not your parent.

(End of my OT.)

作者: Rainy 時間: 2009-5-16 09:44

Are we in highschool here? It has always been a matter of opinion. Any comment made here are a matter of opinion. Did you not understand it until now?
Austin 發表於 2009-5-16 03:08

you are the only person in here to make things like in highschool.
you are the only person who said that people pushing their responsibilities to others.
係你前言不對後語...... 既然你打從一開始係話呢個係 opinions only, 點解你仲要死都話人 push 個 responsibility?

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-5-16 18:39

你地洗唔洗OT到咁離譜呀？
siumaibb 發表於 2009-5-15 23:57

係我嘅錯。鬼叫我出自好心去ALL YOU CAN EAT唔叫野食諗住點都叫少D，搞到比人話我推卸責任咩～對唔住囉！

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)