溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 【89.64】天安門兄弟 (獻給殉難者) [打印本頁]

作者: fishbelly 時間: 2009-6-3 13:20 標題: 【89.64】天安門兄弟 (獻給殉難者)

同時獻給指鹿為馬，是非不分，眼睛瞎了的人.....

[youtube]Lq650ZCZzag[/youtube]

作者: soli 時間: 2009-6-3 14:06

一起悼念殉職軍人吧。
[youtube]mBOsEJ6UWN8[/youtube]

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-6-3 14:40

一起悼念殉職軍人吧。
mBOsEJ6UWN8
soli 發表於 2009-6-3 14:06

Even it is all true, which is hard to believe, it is only a small number compare to the missing students and citizen of Beijing. How many PLA and innocent Chinese died in Korean War which has nothing to do with China? A soldier die for the sake of defending his country is a hero, a soldier killing innocent civilian is a man-slaughter deserved nothing but shame.

作者: Lik 時間: 2009-6-3 15:37

魚肚兄，

小弟比較鍾意阿梅姐嘅呢一隻多啲...

[youtube]pO4VCyXguSU[/youtube]

唉...

-力

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-6-3 15:44

Even it is all true, which is hard to believe, it is only a small number compare to the missing students and citizen of Beijing. How many PLA and innocent Chinese died in Korean War which has nothin ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-6-3 15:40

A soldier that maintains society order and protects citizens from some other rioting citizens is a hero.

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-6-3 15:46

5# peter236

The PLA that rescue in Sichuan earthquake are heroes
the PLA who killed civilian are murderers

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-6-3 15:53

5# peter236

The PLA that rescue in Sichuan earthquake are heroes
the PLA who killed civilian are murderers
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-6-3 16:46

the civilians who are disrupting society order are criminals.

作者: soli 時間: 2009-6-3 15:56

"How many PLA and innocent Chinese died in Korean War which has nothing to do with China? "
不如問下哈巴要死幾多加軍佢先滿足啦~

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-6-3 16:04

7# peter236
Exercising constitutional rights is not crime, do some reading
Their crime is foolish enough to trust the CCP, that they are deemed
to die.
I work with the Canadian government, my value is different from you,
to me, freedom of speech, gathering, mobility and free election are basic
human right. Your belief in Animal Farm is your choice. After all, some people
still believe that Dr. Sun Yat Sen was a traitor and should be procecuted for
treason.

作者: soli 時間: 2009-6-3 16:15

乜憲法有授權人民佔領天安門廣場﹐ 堵塞交通﹐ 就圍設路障﹐ 甚至破壞公物﹐ 放火燒車嗎?

聞所未聞

作者: rockypath 時間: 2009-6-3 16:17

7# peter236
Exercising constitutional rights is not crime, do some reading
Their crime is foolish enough to trust the CCP, that they are deemed
to die.
I work with the Canadian government, my value ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-6-3 17:04

So, what is the truth that your uncle told you about 6.4.?

We can continue to discuss how they excercised the consititutional rights after hearing the TRUTH of 6.4. from you.

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-6-3 16:25

According to the Classified Internal Document, the killing did happened, his role as
a local security official should follow and dispatch only the news from the Central,
and be watchful for the local democratic voices, and to collect intelligence.
It is impossible to remember all the journal for 5 years, and I did not intent to get
involved and caused him trouble.

作者: rockypath 時間: 2009-6-3 16:31

According to the Classified Internal Document, the killing did happened, his role as
a local security official should follow and dispatch only the news from the Central,
and be watchful for the local ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-6-3 17:25

You cannot tell us exactly what happend. When you say - "Killing", what does exactly mean? What kind of order the soldier received? Why there is a need of open fire? Under what condition they opened fire? How many people were killed and at where they were killed?

I believe you just lie.

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-6-3 16:57

You are in Canada, you can say whatever you like, it is not likely you'll get house arrest or
sentenced for treason, or crushed by tank.
I did not even say anything about the military order, he wrote in his diary that civilian casualty was about 1,500, again, that is from his high officials he was unable to verify.
I say only what I know, and please note that I reply to my own post most of the time,
and I've called a Racist, Qing, Traitor and other name, you choose what you want to believe, don't waste time reading the post and call somebody a liar

作者: rockypath 時間: 2009-6-3 17:40

You are in Canada, you can say whatever you like, it is not likely you'll get house arrest or
sentenced for treason, or crushed by tank.
I did not even say anything about the military order, he wrot ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-6-3 17:57

I only asked you to give a concrete information for the claim that you know the inside information of the truth of 6.4.

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-6-3 17:55

I talked about what I read from the 5 diaries and from the conversation with a
municipal level  security official.  What do I need to lie? I've nothing to do with
Chinese Central government, I only deal with  Ministry  of PRC Labour and Education
and ShanDong Provincial Gov't.
Inside information or nit? I don't know, but they are stamped as "Classified Internal
Studying Materials"
And you do not have to believe I possess the " Family  of Revolutionary Martyr" certificate
issued by the Ministry of  Internal Affair too.

作者: soli 時間: 2009-6-3 18:03

somewhere 君原本一面正經﹐ 話有獨家一手資料可以爆﹐ 點知原來又係吹水。。
真係係令人失望。

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-6-3 18:10

I said what I read and what I was told, nobody ask you to believe,
one thing for sure it was not just boiling water.
At least I spent 1 week reading the diaries carefully and asked questions
when it was not clear. Then another 10 years finding materials to
verify the recording.
And this is a posting, not a reply to anyone.

作者: fishbelly 時間: 2009-6-3 23:55

血染的風采當然係經典, 但天安門兄弟係身歷 6.4 0既生還者所寫的歌, 老實講, 唱得好有瑕疵, 但勝在真摯, 有種身歷其境 0既真實感

魚肚兄，

小弟比較鍾意阿梅姐嘅呢一隻多啲...

pO4VCyXguSU

唉...

-力
Lik 發表於 2009-6-3 16:37

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-6-4 00:06

總有人選擇性相信，
但永遠唔會懷疑自己手上資料有幾真。
土共如是，
民主派如是。

別忘記，
無論學生有幾錯，都不及中共當年錯。

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-6-4 00:44

總有人選擇性相信，
但永遠唔會懷疑自己手上資料有幾真。
土共如是，
民主派如是。

別忘記，
無論學生有幾錯，都不及中共當年錯。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2009-6-4 16:06

贊成~
所以, 我呢d 又唔係民主, 又唔係共產既人真係好難定位.
我愛民主, 但不愛民主派啊!

作者: ricrick 時間: 2009-6-4 02:09

d共狗成日亂吠真係好銀耳

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)