溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 上海倒塌樓房玻璃一塊沒碎質量世界大驚　　 [打印本頁]

作者: soli 時間: 2009-7-5 16:08 標題: 上海倒塌樓房玻璃一塊沒碎質量世界大驚　　

上海倒塌樓房玻璃一塊沒碎質量世界大驚　　

　　上海樓房整體倒塌事件發生後，國外媒體也給予了報道。報道稱，樓房整體倒塌在國外很普遍，但在中國尚屬首次。其中，讓許多外國人爲之“驚呆”的是，整棟樓房上的玻璃沒碎一塊。

　　《環球時報》引述新加坡《聯合早報》消息稱，很多外國人都抱着“看熱鬧”的心态，有點幸災樂禍地圍觀上海樓房倒塌的“這樁怪事”。但是，現場拍攝的圖片經過放大，外國人驚呆了，整棟樓房上的玻璃沒碎一塊。文章說：“說明了什麽？說明美國總統的林肯車上的防彈玻璃也未必見得比該樓房上的玻璃結實。這些玻璃簡直是玻璃王，是玻璃中的‘極品’。”

　　報道稱，一時間，國外紛紛揣測“該玻璃來源于中國軍方新研制的高科技材料”——彈性大，韌性大，可用于航空潛艇等軍事用途。甚至有媒體稱，這些玻璃是因爲金融危機，被提前進行軍轉民運用了。一位長期從事玻璃研究，拿過諾貝爾化學獎的美國專家甚至斷言，此材料領先世界玻璃研制水平達50年，如果是普通科學家研究出來的成果，那麽此人完全有資格憑此項技術獲得下一屆諾貝爾化學獎。

　　據稱，衆多的外國民衆開始紛紛打聽此玻璃廠家的更多情況。他們紛紛表示，希望将來在自己家裏都裝上這種超級防彈玻璃，價錢貴三到五倍也無所謂。建築商們都看到了商機，他們正緊羅密鼓地聯系中國的出口商，希望盡快将整船的玻璃拉到他們指定的地點，好從中賺取可觀的鈔票。

　　結果可能有點讓他們失望，生産這些玻璃的是中國很普通的一個鄉村玻璃廠，位于浙江義烏西南六十多公裏的起隆鎮附近的一個小山溝裏。産量不大，倒塌的這棟樓房上的所有玻璃，是這個廠一個月的産量。如果這座樓房不倒的話，該廠還會默默無聞地呆在小山溝裏，爲是要關閉還是繼續苦心經營下去而煎熬不已。現在，情況有所變化，該廠一時間成爲了媒體的焦點。廠裏淳樸的鄉村人，面對頻頻閃光的聚焦燈，不知所措。

　　報道稱，這件事情對西方的觸動很大。樓房倒塌是意外，但更意外的是中國産品的質量。一家如此普通小廠生産出來的玻璃，居然可以抵禦原子彈的爆炸威力，“足見中國制造的先進程度”。

　　刊登該文的《環球時報》旗下網站環球網之後撤下了此篇文章，許多網站對此文的鏈接失效，不過該文之後仍然被國内各大論壇争相轉載。

作者: soli 時間: 2009-7-5 16:19

先講明我認為篇野可信性唔高﹐ 玻璃無碎倒似是真的﹐ 但原因不明。

作者: tiffiant 時間: 2009-7-5 16:44

i cna't believe china apartment falls like lego

作者: Quest 時間: 2009-7-5 16:47

Bull****! Who cares about the glass when those bldgs don't even have proper foundations to begin with.

If you are avg joes, do you care about your life living in these bldgs, or you care about something superficial (such as glasses didn't shatter)?

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-7-5 16:48

呢篇野最可疑的地方是﹐沒說是何鐘數塌下﹐有幾多人傷亡。。。而只說給玻璃。。。所以是假新聞居多

作者: Quest 時間: 2009-7-5 16:49

Also: who really gives a dime about chinese made glasses, when they can't even manufacture automobile replacement windshields glasses without "waviness" ....

Only morons with self-inflated egos would still fall for that "oh...some super strong glass panes on the bldg.....world class, proud of what their motherland can achieve in glass manufacturing...ya...yadda..yadda..."

作者: soli 時間: 2009-7-5 17:21

印度七層樓房倒塌﹐ 26人死亡
http://www.toxicjunction.com/get.asp?i=V2716

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-7-5 17:58

印度七層樓房倒塌﹐ 26人死亡
http://www.toxicjunction.com/get.asp?i=V2716
soli 發表於 2009-7-6 09:21

規模好大分別woh, soli.
上海果個, 係大型建築; 而印度果個, 只不過係幾層高唐樓.

作者: Sakura 時間: 2009-7-5 21:42

玻璃再勁都冇用啦…會成棟樓倒塌就真係乜都死…

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-7-6 00:23

Chinese industries are so high-tech these days that they can send their own satellites into space to form their own GPS network.
The Japanese can't even send an astronaut into space.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-7-6 00:38

Chinese industries are so high-tech these days that they can send their own satellites into space to form their own GPS network.
The Japanese can't even send an astronaut into space.
peter236 發表於 2009-7-6 16:23

不如你話中國人口眾多, 一人一啖口水都浸死你啦...
呢個post 講塌樓, 唔好趁機擾亂視聽woh.

作者: rainbow-davie 時間: 2009-7-6 00:38

呢篇野最可疑的地方是﹐沒說是何鐘數塌下﹐有幾多人傷亡。。。而只說給玻璃。。。所以是假新聞居多
Littleprince 發表於 2009-7-5 17:48

There is no body dead because this is a new building. no body moves in yet.

The reason for the collapse is because they dump the soil near to the nearby dike. Which causes pressure to the dike and leaking water. thus, the soil below the building's base is washed away.. so the building collapse.

作者: ricrick 時間: 2009-7-6 00:46

又一共產黨扭曲新聞的實証
跌落地都要拿反炸沙

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-7-6 00:52

There is no body dead because this is a new building. no body moves in yet.

The reason for the collapse is because they dump the soil near to the nearby dike. Which causes pressure to the dike and ...
rainbow-davie 發表於 2009-7-6 16:38

老友, 好清楚咁woh~
咁你覺得, 呢件事係邊個既錯?
1. 建築商
2. 市政府
3. 共產黨
4. 中國人
5. 係社會既錯...

作者: benyaoguai 時間: 2009-7-6 01:28

so... this tells us that they should've made the entire house out of glass? @.@

作者: myversa 時間: 2009-7-6 08:57

http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/vi ... &extra=page%3D2

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-7-6 09:18

There is no body dead because this is a new building. no body moves in yet.

The reason for the collapse is because they dump the soil near to the nearby dike. Which causes pressure to the dike and ...
rainbow-davie 發表於 2009-7-6 01:38

噢。。。謝謝分享。。。好彩D建築工人無事咋﹐唔係甘大棟樓 LUMP 落黎真係死得人多呢。。。又好彩未入伙

作者: 小叻 時間: 2009-7-6 09:22

Also: who really gives a dime about chinese made glasses, when they can't even manufacture automobile replacement windshields glasses without "waviness" ....
Quest 發表於 5-7-2009 16:49

too bad that the truth is... you are using and seeing Chinese manufactured glass daily... you know that those so called Amercian glass company like PPG, Pilkington are also using Chinese manufactured windshield?? The new One World Trade Center in NY is going to use chinese manufactured glass as well? Those brand named hotels in Vegas...maybe they are too so far away from you? how about the Holt Renfrew at downtown? the Richmond Oval? they also use chinese manufactured glass...and do you think their quality is not good? for me they look absoultely fine... not only chinese will have glass defective.. american glass too.. so dun be so races here.. you are also chinese canadian!

作者: rainbow-davie 時間: 2009-7-6 09:40

大家又唔洗上綱上線. 中國產業良莠不齊係事實, 但又唔洗因一件事就打晒整個行業.

作者: Hyde 時間: 2009-7-6 12:02

Chinese industries are so high-tech these days that they can send their own satellites into space to form their own GPS network.
The Japanese can't even send an astronaut into space.
peter236 發表於 2009-7-6 01:23

so what's your view of the collapse building in shanghai?

作者: daimo 時間: 2009-7-6 14:10

老友, 好清楚咁woh~
咁你覺得, 呢件事係邊個既錯?
1. 建築商
2. 市政府
3. 共產黨
4. 中國人
5. 係社會既錯...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-7-6 01:52

it's the engineer's fault.

作者: tofu 時間: 2009-7-6 15:35

just wonder why the building is not broken in pieces?

作者: soli 時間: 2009-7-6 16:35

22# tofu
無偷工減料﹐ 太紮實。
成棟樓打橫訓響度都唔知點清理現場。。

作者: rainbow-davie 時間: 2009-7-6 19:14

so what's your view of the collapse building in shanghai?
Hyde 發表於 2009-7-6 13:02

do you don't understand THEIR point? so simple la. because they only have a simple purpose.

作者: rainbow-davie 時間: 2009-7-6 19:21

老友, 好清楚咁woh~
咁你覺得, 呢件事係邊個既錯?
1. 建築商
2. 市政府
3. 共產黨
4. 中國人
5. 係社會既錯...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-7-6 01:52 [url=http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/re1. 建築商
2. 市政府
3. 共產黨
4. 中國人
5. 係社會既錯...direct.php?goto=findpost&pid=113836&ptid=9137][/url]

1. 建築商 - 一定要負責
2. 市政府 - 如果批地出錯, 係唔應該起樓既地方批地, 就要負責
如果事後不能依法處理, 就要負責
3. 共產黨 - 如果委任唔稱職既人做市長/市委, 就要負責
4. 中國人 - 咁又唔洗上綱, 我都係中國人, 我無錯..我唔認罪 (丁蟹語調)
5. 係社會既錯... 如果因為貪污, 而社會默認呢D行為, 就係社會既錯. 你最好問問Peter236, soli 之流.

我覺得, 事件要依法處理

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-7-6 19:52

1. 建築商 - 一定要負責
2. 市政府 - 如果批地出錯, 係唔應該起樓既地方批地, 就要負責
如果事後不能依法處理, 就要負責
3. 共產黨 - 如果委任唔稱職既人做市長/市委, 就要負責
4. 中國人 - 咁又唔洗上 ...
rainbow-davie 發表於 2009-7-7 11:21

唔知道"依法處理"會點判呢?... 塌樓壓死人, 建築商應該要負責; 市政府批地應該有規定, 跟規定就應該唔駛罰卦; 共產黨委任唔稱職既人做市長/市委, 可惜大陸係一黨專政, 真係罰唔到woh; 中國人有冇錯, 最好問Mr. T; 社會有冇錯, 有冇貪污, 真係要查過先知了.

不如你試下判下佢地, 睇下罰佢地d 乜. 話唔定中國領導人會上LYK, 或者會參考你既意見架~

作者: rainbow-davie 時間: 2009-7-6 20:39

唔知道"依法處理"會點判呢?... 塌樓壓死人, 建築商應該要負責; 市政府批地應該有規定, 跟規定就應該唔駛罰卦; 共產黨委任唔稱職既人做市長/市委, 可惜大陸係一黨專政, 真係罰唔到woh; 中國人有冇錯, 最好問Mr. T; ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-7-6 20:52

我會判個個都有錯, 要賠錢....俾我.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-7-6 21:01

我會判個個都有錯, 要賠錢....俾我.
rainbow-davie 發表於 2009-7-7 12:39

哈哈~
你同我既想法一樣, 都係要判佢地賠錢俾我~

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-7-6 21:03

22# tofu
無偷工減料﹐ 太紮實。
成棟樓打橫訓響度都唔知點清理現場。。
soli 發表於 2009-7-7 08:35

搵d 機(有個大大既流星槌果d ) 打散座樓, 之後就可以慢慢清理啦~

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)