Board logo

標題: LYK民意調查: 你愛共產黨嗎? [打印本頁]

作者: ricrick    時間: 2009-7-17 12:02     標題: LYK民意調查: 你愛共產黨嗎?

此poll純屬個人意見,與政治無關
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2009-7-17 12:11

Are you Pe_t_ 11??   LOL
作者: ricrick    時間: 2009-7-17 12:38

係詢salad_bread 的意見開的
http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/vi ... omuid=492#pid116908
作者: daimo    時間: 2009-7-17 12:42

我不愛, but  我不反共.
作者: Lik    時間: 2009-7-17 13:09

多狗餘啦~ 要數人頭鬥多嘅話,老共有 13億個 head count,而網民數量亦係全世界最多嘅。

-力
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2009-7-17 13:22

^_^    Lik gor ..  let's see what P11 will response to you ..  lol
作者: rainbow-davie    時間: 2009-7-17 13:32

本帖最後由 rainbow-davie 於 2009-7-17 14:35 編輯

其實, 共產黨都有分理想中既共產黨同現實中既共產黨.. 仲有係死忠真正共產黨或掛羊頭賣狗肉既共產黨或牆邊草共產黨

我Ok with 理想中既共產黨  (i.e. 發夢啦)
But dislike 現實中既共產黨 (將社會理想私有化)
I am ok with 死忠真正共產黨 (敬佩咁都可以生存)
but not ok with 羊頭賣狗肉既共產黨或牆邊草共產黨 (不嬲憎D搖尾狗. )
作者: tofu    時間: 2009-7-17 14:10

yes 理想中既共產黨
作者: myversa    時間: 2009-7-17 14:49

I do not like any political parties.
作者: 快樂牛郎    時間: 2009-7-17 17:27

共產 is bullshxt

winner takes all
作者: rockypath    時間: 2009-7-17 18:11

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2009-7-17 19:28 編輯

我不愛共產黨, 但我愛中國. 作爲一個身在海外的中國人, 我會自尊和自重.

Loving China is not equal to loving communist party. 反貪污腐敗不等于反共產黨.
作者: soli    時間: 2009-7-17 18:39

共產主義 = 各取所需
資本主義 = 各取所得

共產主義令人懶
資本主義令人貪
作者: soli    時間: 2009-7-17 18:40

這個是記名投票﹐ 無代表性可言。
作者: peter236    時間: 2009-7-17 18:47

First of all, what a stupid poll? Many countries have communist party, including here. Which country are you talking about, LOL?
作者: peter236    時間: 2009-7-17 18:49

我不愛共產黨, 但我愛中國. 作爲一個身在海外的中國人, 我會自尊和自重.

Loving China is not equal to loving communist party. 反貪污腐敗不等于反共產黨.
rockypath 發表於 2009-7-17 19:11

wahahahaha, there are many LYK who think pro-China is pro-communist.
So if you like Chinese food, then you are pro-communist.

If you are a fan of Yao Ming, then you are pro-communist, LOL.
作者: 老友四號    時間: 2009-7-17 21:19

少年十五二十時曾經对 共產主义 滿怀理想!以意是建立 烏托邦 的基石!

如今年紀一把對 共產主義 的理想徹底幻滅!
作者: salad_bread    時間: 2009-7-17 21:22

本帖最後由 salad_bread 於 2009-7-17 22:43 編輯
係詢salad_bread 的意見開的
http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/vi ... omuid=492#pid116908
ricrick 發表於 2009-7-17 13:38

DON'T PUT YOUR WORD IN MY MOUTH!!
THIS IS WHAT I WROTE!

[attach]5656[/attach]

不愛黨不代表反共
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2009-7-17 21:45

Who is the SECOND person who voted  我愛共產黨  ?  

*_*
作者: salad_bread    時間: 2009-7-17 21:50

Who is the SECOND person who voted  我愛共產黨  ?  

*_*
Catpiano 發表於 2009-7-17 22:45

I will not vote for this stupid topic so it's not me!
作者: Lik    時間: 2009-7-17 22:44

Loving China is not equal to loving communist party. 反貪污腐敗不等于反共產黨.
rockypath 發表於 2009-7-17 18:11

但對好多擦鞋狗來講,黨即係國,有啲甚至乎覺得黨大於國、有黨先有國,所以愛國就必須愛黨!(劉迺強之流就係呢庭無恥擦鞋狗!)

而好多時候國內嘅反貪腐亦只係權力鬥爭嘅 by product。你失勢俾人鬥臭咯,咪俾人堂而皇之咁用個貪污罪來整死你囉。而事實上你又真係有貪喎?

-力
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2009-7-18 05:22

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2009-7-18 05:24 編輯
少年十五二十時曾經对 共產主义 滿怀理想!以意是建立 烏托邦 的基石!

如今年紀一把對 共產主義 的理想徹底幻滅!
老友四號 發表於 2009-7-17 21:19

Same here, I read most of the works by Karl Marx, Frederic Angels, Lenin and Mao's,
and a lot of documents translated from Russian back in 60-70's, 2,000 books in all. My uncles from both of my parent side were lifetime Communists,  my father's brother was killed counter combating Japanese and my mother's in-law participated in Liberating Hai-Nan. I was activitist in Protect Our Diu-Yu Islands, Anti-Corruption, Youth Against Drug  ..... Hong Kong student movements back in early 70's.
I witness the corruption and fall of Communist Empire since then.
It is nothing wrong with the original communism ideology, I actually admire the early CCP martyrs killed by Chiang,  it is the corruption and  dictatorship after the CCP took over regime that change me forever.
作者: rockypath    時間: 2009-7-18 08:39

Same here, I read most of the works by Karl Marx, Frederic Angels, Lenin and Mao's,
and a lot of documents translated from Russian back in 60-70's, 2,000 books in all.  ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-7-18 06:22


If you know so much about communism, can you explain to us what communism is and why it was once popular?
作者: rainbow-davie    時間: 2009-7-18 09:52

Same here, I read most of the works by Karl Marx, Frederic Angels, Lenin and Mao's,
and a lot of documents translated from Russian back in 60-70's, 2,000 books in all. My uncles from both of my paren ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-7-18 06:22

既然你對共產主義有深入認識. 有個問題, 共產主義本身係唔係排斥民主, 理論上..應該共產主義比資本主意更擁抱民主.. Hmmm
作者: tiffiant    時間: 2009-7-18 11:18

what is this for?
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2009-7-18 11:41

23# rainbow-davie

Communism at its ideology state is what Confucius and Dr. Sun Yat Sen advocated:
The Great harmony (Tai-Tung),
The State belongs to all citizen
it is our ultimate goal for 5,000 years as Chinese
Mencius pledged:
The People are precious
The Social Structure go second
The Head of State only plays a small role
It was the corruption of CCP and tyrannical political system  that changed me
作者: peter236    時間: 2009-7-18 12:08

23# rainbow-davie

Communism at its ideology state is what Confucius and Dr. Sun Yat Sen advocated:
The Great harmony (Tai-Tung),
The State belongs to all citizen
it is our ultimate goal for 5,000  ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-7-18 12:41

Please explain to us why corruption in democratic India is worse than in China.
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2009-7-18 12:45

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2009-7-18 12:49 編輯

Power and rank hierarchy corrupt politicians.
In PRC, there is absolute power not to be challenged.
In democratic India, the mid-level politicians are not educated enough
to understand the substance of politic and their mission as governors,
they merely use their position to grab money and, well, more power.
Similar situation happen in China as well
作者: rockypath    時間: 2009-7-18 14:44

23# rainbow-davie

Communism at its ideology state is what Confucius and Dr. Sun Yat Sen advocated:
The Great harmony (Tai-Tung),
The State belongs to all citizen
it is our ultimate goal for 5,000  ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-7-18 12:41


You just showed that you know nothing about communism. If you had read 2 books (not talking about 2000 copies) about communism. You definitly would give a much meaningful answer or definition than this. Someone already mentioned about one of the key definitions about communism and you just didn't get it.

You don't even make an effort to google about communism before telling people how well you know about it.

Give you one more chance. Will you mind to tell us what communism is?
作者: Lik    時間: 2009-7-18 14:56

Rocky dude,

You are not somebody's teacher here. We don't have to prove to you what we know what we don't know and explain stuff at your command. The communism ideology itself is no worse than any other political ideal, yet in the hands of the CPC, it has turned into a means to exercise and retain absolute power above all else. If you fail to see and understand that yourself, I don't see how you can pretend to know communism at all.

-Lik
作者: rockypath    時間: 2009-7-18 15:21

Rocky dude,

You are not somebody's teacher here. We don't have to prove to you what we know what we don't know and explain stuff at your command. The communism ideology itself is no worse than any ot ...
Lik 發表於 2009-7-18 15:56


It is very funny that you dare to post your opinion here and do not dare to accept some meaningful challenges. It is not even a challenge. If someone had read 2000 books about communism, he definitely can be my teacher and I am listening to his teaching – a more meaningful answer.

又想搞一言堂? I would suggestion you setup a “溫哥華一言堂論壇” and enjoy yourself there. I promise I won’t go there to bother you guys.
作者: soli    時間: 2009-7-18 17:05

30# rockypath


somewhere 君既吹牛本領之前我地已經領教過啦~
唔需要太認真窩
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2009-7-18 20:30

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2009-7-18 20:49 編輯

I have had my hands on hundreds of CCP  classified documents in China,
and my family possess certificates signed by Mao right here. That's enough
to tell the next generation what CCP is all about.
You can choose not to believe, doesn't bother me a bit.
Oops, revealing National secret to foreigners, the CCP may kidnap me
back to China and charge me for treason>
作者: rockypath    時間: 2009-7-19 01:41

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2009-7-19 02:47 編輯
I have had my hands on hundreds of CCP  classified documents in China,
and my family possess certificates signed by Mao right here. That's enough
to tell the next generation what CCP is all about.
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-7-18 21:30


Do you have some mental difficulties to understand other people's questions? Did anyone ask you about CCP? We just ask you simple questions about communism since you are so knowledgeable on this topic.

Oops, revealing National secret to foreigners, the CCP may kidnap me
back to China and charge me for treason
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-7-18 21:30


We have no interest in knowing your national secrets. You cannot even make a straight answer to a simple question. Cannot expect too much from you.
作者: playingtoy    時間: 2009-7-19 01:44

係咪搵我。
作者: playingtoy    時間: 2009-7-19 01:47

係咪搵我。
playingtoy 發表於 2009-7-19 02:44


sorry。認錯人。
作者: playingtoy    時間: 2009-7-19 01:51

咁多高手。我都係做番學生。
作者: somewhereintime    時間: 2009-7-19 07:07

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2009-7-19 07:10 編輯

Give me a valid reason to love communism.
I chose to ignore CCP's muppets, I hardly reply to them.
作者: rs1985    時間: 2009-7-25 09:24

我不愛共產黨, 但我愛中國. 作爲一個身在海外的中國人, 我會自尊和自重.

Loving China is not equal to loving communist party. 反貪污腐敗不等于反共產黨.
rockypath 發表於 2009-7-17 19:11


very well said
作者: rs1985    時間: 2009-7-25 09:28

well
i mean
to keep it simple
the CCP now wasn;t the communist the tried to show people they are
they are very right compare to the communist ideology that is suppose to be on the left side
作者: sheep    時間: 2009-7-27 17:58

well
i mean
to keep it simple
the CCP now wasn;t the communist the tried to show people they are
they are very right compare to the communist ideology that is suppose to be on the left side
rs1985 發表於 2009-7-25 10:28

Gang of the Prince theory still applies to Wu JinTao
作者: skaterwaye    時間: 2009-7-28 16:02

我不愛, but  我不反共.
daimo 發表於 2009-7-17 13:42


me too




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2