溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 大C姐又公利私用 - 對交通部的不滿 [打印本頁]

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-16 22:25 標題: 大C姐又公利私用 - 對交通部的不滿

本帖最後由大C姐於 2009-8-16 23:29 編輯

其實呢單嘢月頭已經好想講﹐但係我真係到今晚先爆我都覺得我好有收養。

事源幾個星期前有個Critical Mass﹐相信住Vancouver又或者要去Vancouver返工嘅人嚟講都應該知係咩我就唔多講。首先﹐我唔想一竹高打一船人﹐我覺得參與呢個活動嘅人有好幾個原因。有d為環保﹐有D係想政府(交通部)正視道路交通車/單車掙路問題。亦其實有好多容許我講一句蛋散們係趁熱鬧﹐當嘉年華會遊行咁去玩。更加我發現有一部份係帶住個心態"你哋班渣車嘅蛋散﹐食塵啦﹗今次仲唔塞死你﹗"去宣泄自己嘅不滿。

當然﹐我雖然好想支持環保﹐但係你要我呢D淑女路面氣溫30幾40度踩單車係無可能﹐我唔會好虛偽咁為我嘅懶惰同忍耐力辯護。但係我好想講﹐呢班單車朋友﹐花幾個鐘去block人哋D主要道路﹐其實作用有幾大? 我死都唔信﹐塞完第二日會有好多人無啦啦踩單車返工。確之然北美地大﹐居住地方又散﹐你總唔難夠祈望住Mapleridge同Abbotsford嘅人踩單車返工姐? 當然你可以話有D蛋散唔係住得真係咁遠﹐其實行路踩單車都得。但係我想講﹐你而家係block埋巴士﹐送貨車﹐好多我哋所講嘅揾食車﹐白白要塞你45分鐘﹐損失邊個賠? 都唔好話你有某D人可能要出入醫院﹐D老人家唔舒服要去診所﹐你擔誤人哋又點計?

最令人氣結都唔係呢班參加人士﹐呢D可以話係自私無諗後果嘅行為﹐但係執法人員竟然可以配合幫手保持秩序以俾我感覺係助長呢D活動。我真係好唔明呢個係咩邏輯? 我唔係話你哋無權去發表意見﹐你鍾意踩主單車吸幾個鐘廢氣係你嘅事﹐但係路﹐原本係俾車行架嘛﹗做咩唧? 做咩好似要令你班渣車人士好feel guilty霸住條路咁。你要發表意見﹐係咪應該向交通部反影要多D單車徑呢? 你block住條路關咩事呢? 然後﹐交通部有踢個波落D架駛者﹐好似好幫D單車友﹐好支持佢哋搞呢D活動﹐仲叫晒D警察去維持秩序荒死車到D單車友。

我覺得呢﹐呢個係好無__謂嘅活動囉﹐我希望下年唔好再搞。同埋參與人士真係三思﹐唔好損人不利己。

其實仲有D嘢想講﹐不過好夜夠鐘訓﹐聽日再talk。

-- 性感哩士睡衣大C姐

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-8-16 22:38

邊個話路淨係俾汽車行單車唔可以行
你唔想等可以行路

單車讓行人
汽車讓單車
係每個文明城市最基本既秩序

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-8-16 22:39

更加我發現有一部份係帶住個心態"你哋班渣車嘅蛋散﹐食塵啦﹗今次仲唔塞死你﹗"去宣泄自己嘅不滿。

就係要塞死你呢D人
係咪唔得先

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-16 22:46

就係要塞死你呢D人
係咪唔得先
快樂牛郎發表於 2009-8-17 14:39

而家社會係咁架啦~
d 人開始覺得當一d 和平既方法唔work 既時候, 就會有一d 比較激進既方法去宣示自己既不滿.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-8-16 22:54

而家社會係咁架啦~
d 人開始覺得當一d 和平既方法唔work 既時候, 就會有一d 比較激進既方法去宣示自己既不滿.
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009/8/16 22:46

現實就係咁點都要接受
正如人地鄙視你你鄙視人都唔係最好方式但係都要咁做

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-16 22:55

邊個話路淨係俾汽車行單車唔可以行
你唔想等可以行路

單車讓行人
汽車讓單車
係每個文明城市最基本既秩序
快樂牛郎發表於 2009-8-16 23:38

我覺得係部份渣車嘅人都會好識做﹐會讓單車行﹐唔通真係同佢哋肉搏﹐車埋去咩。

但係excuse me﹐呢個活動本身已經係破壞秩序嘅行為啦﹐完全唔理交通規則﹐有何文明可言?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-8-16 23:01

我覺得係部份渣車嘅人都會好識做﹐會讓單車行﹐唔通真係同佢哋肉搏﹐車埋去咩。

但係excuse me﹐呢個活動本身已經係破壞秩序嘅行為啦﹐完全唔理交通規則﹐有何文明可言? ...
大C姐發表於 2009/8/16 22:55

咁溫哥華做得差嘛
好多路都唔見有bike lane

何況你咪當Parade lor
而家夏天
個個禮拜都有Parade 封路好閑

BTW
有冇除衫先

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-16 23:03

現實就係咁點都要接受
正如人地鄙視你你鄙視人都唔係最好方式但係都要咁做
快樂牛郎發表於 2009-8-17 14:54

人地鄙視我, 我唔會鄙視番佢地架...
我寧願比人恰, 我都唔想恰人.

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-16 23:10

我趁敷mask講埋另一個交通部無稽嘅聲明。

話說奧運仲有6個月就到﹐近日竟然叫D返工人士喺奧運期間唔好渣車同搭車返工﹐最好都係行路同踩單車。我聽完真係為之......我都唔知係氣結定係覺得好笑。

你點可能叫人連skytrain都唔好搭要行路踩單車(又踩單車﹐真係單車生產商係咪俾左省政府好多錢呢?)﹐基本上由朝早7點到夜晚9點都唔好搭﹐我好想知係咪叫人唔好返工呢?

當然﹐會有好多遊客﹐但係你連skytrain都唔俾搭真係令人感到恐荒。對一班無見過大場面嘅加拿大人嚟講﹐呢D直頭係白色恐佈。而我所知Vancouver係歷年來最大嘅主辦城市﹐如果連其他小城小鎮都搞得惦﹐Vancouver係咪要驚得咁緊要? 同埋我想講﹐真係唔好話我撥冷水講句﹐其實又係咪真係會有咁多遊客呀? 又係咪真係咁__多人呀? 我覺得有點兒浮誇﹐雷聲大雨點小﹐有D似香港處理豬流感feel囉。

我覺得呢D無謂嘅聲明就算吧啦。你要有可行嘅解決方法先好作呢D呼籲啦。再唔係﹐你求其叫人彈性上班﹐盡量預早出門咪算囉。講呢D不知所謂嘅announcement 係叫人無所適從。

-- 裸睡大C姐

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-8-16 23:27

講起交通部，translink 等就真係把火。

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2009-8-17 09:16

而家社會係咁架啦~
d 人開始覺得當一d 和平既方法唔work 既時候, 就會有一d 比較激進既方法去宣示自己既不滿.
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-8-16 22:46

MJJ you don't even know what the Critical Mass is, how can you comment on it?! Actually it was peaceful, nothing 激進, I was there and the drivers (most of them) are very supportive too.
Can't say the Critical Mass didn't do anything, look at Burrard Bridge bike lane, the government is getting the message. Actually Richmond need some more bike lanes too.

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-8-17 09:22

11# siumaibb

I don't object having bike lane, but don't do it from taking away a proper "car" lane for that. It's not the way of easing traffic congestion. Not all people can bike if they live far. Not everyone can afford the time.

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-8-17 09:35

Take Richmond William Rd for example.
Before, it was two lane both east and west bound. And now, there are two bike lanes and only single lane both east and west bound, only left is a central lane for turning. You can see that the usage of the bike lane is far less than the flow of vehicle.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-8-17 09:42

Take Richmond William Rd for example.
Before, it was two lane both east and west bound. And now, there are two bike lanes and only single lane both east and west bound, only left is a central lane for ...
sheep 發表於 2009/8/17 09:35

If people find the roads more congested they will switch to biking or walking. People like to find excuses such as saying that they don't have time. Everybody has 24 hours a day. Vancouver is so behind compared to Europe and even some cities in the US.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-8-17 09:43

11# siumaibb
Not all people can bike if they live far. Not everyone can afford the time.
fibbi 發表於 2009/8/17 09:22

Nobody asks you to bike all the way from Richmond to downtown, for example. But you can at least bike to your nearest skytrain/bus station and put your bike on the bus.

No time? Too bad. I guess you have a lot of time waiting in traffic.

作者: 布小熊 時間: 2009-8-17 09:48

MJJ you don't even know what the Critical Mass is, how can you comment on it?! Actually it was peaceful, nothing 激進, I was there and the drivers (most of them) are very supportive too.
Can't say t ...
siumaibb 發表於 2009-8-17 10:16 AM

Richmond really needs to improve their bike links. I tried biking to work last year and there are lots of bike links and pedestrian walkway that end suddenly!!!
So where should the bike or the pedestrian go after that.

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-8-17 09:50

15# 快樂牛郎

In order to bus to work, I have to xfer 3 buses and time is about 1 hr, versus 20 minutes if I drive (on highway and most of the time no traffic). Which one will you choose? Not to mention safety issue while I wait at bus stop ....the office area is kinda "remote" and quiet after hours...
I just want to say that some time public transit is not that feasible la.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-8-17 09:58

15# 快樂牛郎

In order to bus to work, I have to xfer 3 buses and time is about 1 hr, versus 20 minutes if I drive (on highway and most of the time no traffic). Which one will you choose? Not to me ...
fibbi 發表於 2009/8/17 09:50

I would take the 1 hr option on any day.
Also, by biking, you are combining exercising with transportation.

I always remember a famous illustration of how ridiculous modern lifestyle is: you drive your car and then take the elevator to your gym to work out on the treadmill.

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-8-17 10:05

講起translink都幾激氣，成日要＄，我哋又無得監管，佢話乜就乜，好此richmond no3 road之前唔知徙咗幾多錢整中間個條 99 express lane，種晒樹，宜家咪又係要嚓哂，徙哂我哋啲血汗錢。仲有，啲 bus stop 整哂glass top，靚就靚，又唔知整咗幾多＄，無＄就唔洗下下整到啲野咁＜靚＞吓嘩。咁又係嘅，啲＄又唔係佢嘅，整靚啲用多啲＄又關佢咩事呢。無咪喺我哋個荷包到羅囉。

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-8-17 10:08

I would take the 1 hr option on any day.
Also, by biking, you are combining exercising with transportation.

I always remember a famous illustration of how ridiculous modern lifestyle is: you drive ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2009-8-17 10:58

Once you workout yourself by biking, walking and save time. In the end of the day, you spend your saved time sitting in front of the computer, or lying in your sofa. What's the difference?

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-8-17 10:14

18# 快樂牛郎

One hour each way = 2 hours a day la.

It's good that you are willing to take time to bike. But too bad it's not that feasible for me. I'd rather use that time to prepare dinner earlier, or to sleep earlier.

作者: hamlet 時間: 2009-8-17 13:04

Oh - so typical of Hongkongese -
ME ME ME! ME first! ME first!
so selfish. Never think of conserving for the environment.
More people like this, we will see the end of the world real fast.

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-8-17 13:48

22# hamlet

Taking public transit is not the only way to save our planet. There are lots of other things as well. e.g. Recycling, don't eat shark fin, or endangerous species etc.

作者: hamlet 時間: 2009-8-17 14:23

23# fibbi
Of course ~~ But failing to understand the importance of changing our collective transportation habit, and refusing to acknowledge other's effort in doing so, is so so so short-sighted.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-8-17 14:29

18# 快樂牛郎

One hour each way = 2 hours a day la.

It's good that you are willing to take time to bike. But too bad it's not that feasible for me. I'd rather use that time to prepare dinner earl ...
fibbi 發表於 2009/8/17 10:14

You will have plenty of time to sleep when the end of the world comes

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2009-8-17 14:36

温可華既公共運輸網係"SUCK".
班次差，route差，想人唔揸車就唔該搞好個運輸網。
仲有冬天唔揸biking isn't fun.

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2009-8-17 14:51

If people find the roads more congested they will switch to biking or walking. People like to find excuses such as saying that they don't have time. Everybody has 24 hours a day. Vancouver is so ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2009-8-17 09:42

So that's what we pay taxes for. So Translink will make the decision for us, for all cases and all individuals that walking and biking is a better transportation option, thus doing a favor by making our roads worse and more congested. Awesome return on our tax money!

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2009-8-17 14:53

You will have plenty of time to sleep when the end of the world comes
快樂牛郎發表於 2009-8-17 14:29

Fibbi, 快樂牛郎 thinks you sleeps too much and better off use your time walking/biking instead. He must know your daily schedule well, so he must be right... Just suck it up and start biking to work already...

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2009-8-17 14:59

23# fibbi
Of course ~~ But failing to understand the importance of changing our collective transportation habit, and refusing to acknowledge other's effort in doing so, is so so so short-sighted.
hamlet 發表於 2009-8-17 14:23

Forcing others to agree and adopt your transportation habit by reducing existing transportation infrastructure's quality, refusing to understand that other individual can have differeing needs, is so so so self-centered...

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-8-17 15:09

24# hamlet

Where do I "not acknowledge" others effort? At least I said it's good for "mr cow" to bike to work. I agree to have bike lane but not sacrify the car lane. And wait for the bus in rather remote area for a girl is indeed not safe.
Do you bring your own bag to supermarket every time? I did.

作者: fibbi 時間: 2009-8-17 15:15

28# BiscottiGelato

I think I don't live that long to see the end of the world.
Btw, I'm not good at biking. I am very bad on balancing...

Back to the original issue that "Miss Big C" mentioned..I am also not happy about the people who join that bike ride...just because they have a good intention (to go "green") doesn't mean they have the right to bring trouble to others.

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-17 16:35

我覺得我要define一下我個觀點。

我唔係對踩單車嘅人有不滿﹐當然任何人都有權用條街﹐行人應該有行人路﹐馬路係俾車行﹐OK? 你唔可以令人feel guilty﹐覺得晌馬路渣車好唔要得。你要express你不滿咪去叫政府加多D單車徑囉。Come on baby﹐你唔去阻住人渣車﹐我相信99。9%車主係好樂意去support加單車徑。但係你一做阻街活動﹐就好分化囉。你見到呢幾版都係biker vs. driver其實個問題係D路無系統丫嘛﹐唔係渣車嘅人違規霸左條單車徑丫嘛。點解交通部會咁支持呢種活動? 我覺得係將個tension transfer左落班車主囉。

另外﹐你話環保呢家嘢﹐其實真係盡做﹐當你有選擇就一定有D人揀慳水慳力嘅方法。你唔可以懲罰人渣車﹐暫時渣車係唔犯法架嘛﹗? 一係你立法禁止人渣車﹐或者好似倫敦收congestion fee﹐無錢人就咪渣去downtown。講到尾﹐你夾硬阻街﹐又唔依交通指示行就係犯法啦﹐我話知你環唔環保。

-- 胸大放上檯大C姐

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-8-17 16:54

本帖最後由快樂牛郎於 2009-8-17 16:56 編輯

Forcing others to agree and adopt your transportation habit by reducing existing transportation infrastructure's quality, refusing to understand that other individual can have differeing needs, is s ...
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2009/8/17 14:59

I think the whole point of having democracy is to be self-centered. I learned that from LYK.

ok maybe self-centered is not the right word

"fight for your belief"
i think that sounds better

and also bash all those who oppose your view

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-17 17:02

I think the whole point of having democracy is to be self-centered. I learned that from LYK.

ok maybe self-centered is not the right word

"fight for your belief"
i think that sounds better

and a ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2009-8-17 17:54

你用唔合法嘅途經去發表一個極合理嘅觀點都係違規。

-- 一乳中的大C姐

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-17 17:51

MJJ you don't even know what the Critical Mass is, how can you comment on it?! Actually it was peaceful, nothing 激進, I was there and the drivers (most of them) are very supportive too.
Can't say t ...
siumaibb 發表於 2009-8-18 01:16

siumaibb, 可以上google search 的... 唔會一d 都唔知既.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-17 17:57

唉... 有人鍾意踩單車, 咪踩law; 有人鍾意揸車, 咪揸law; 有人鍾意行路, 咪行law.

大C姐, 舉個例啦, 香港都成日都有遊行啦, 遊行就要封路, 咁都冇計架woh.
揸車既, 就唯有暫時避避law.

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2009-8-17 21:36

I think the whole point of having democracy is to be self-centered. I learned that from LYK.

ok maybe self-centered is not the right word

"fight for your belief"
i think that sounds better

and a ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2009-8-17 16:54

Hmm... a democracy with low education level probably be filled with voters that votes using short sighted self-centric views. Maybe also some of those force your own views upon others as a bonus.

My naive believe thinks that the point of democracy is to find a consensus of what the majority think is 'right', not so much just what people think will benefit themselves...

Never mind all this, because Canada is just about who speaks the loudest. Idealists and extremist comes first, while majority and taxpayers comes last... Our version of democracy is about finding the lesser of a bunch of evils... or rather, the lesser of a bunch of idiots... ouch...

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-17 21:43

唉... 有人鍾意踩單車, 咪踩law; 有人鍾意揸車, 咪揸law; 有人鍾意行路, 咪行law.

大C姐, 舉個例啦, 香港都成日都有遊行啦, 遊行就要封路, 咁都冇計架woh.
揸車既, 就唯有暫時避避law. ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-8-17 18:57

MJJ兄﹐得罪都要講句。

有時呢...我都有D明點解有人會插爆你﹐你確之然講好多三毫子一擔嘅說話。我又唔話得你錯﹐但係聽落又好似無乜意義。

都唔係嘅﹐你都帶出左我想講嘅一樣嘢。在我而言﹐遊行係一個去到好絕先用嘅絕招。我覺得遊行好多時都係雙輸同埋無咩實質作用。當然﹐都有一兩個成功例子。當年7/1反23條係真係有point去搞﹐有point去遊行。但係老老實實﹐之後D人再搞我就覺得浪費左個impact﹐唔好有少少事就走上街﹐其實呢種原始做法好唔文明囉。

就好似單車遊行係一年大大小小幾次。好多人又以玩玩吓﹐嘉年華會心態出席﹐呢D咪係我所指嘅無__謂囉。

-- 小吊帶凸點大C姐

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2009-8-17 22:12

本帖最後由快樂牛郎於 2009-8-17 22:14 編輯

Hmm... a democracy with low education level probably be filled with voters that votes using short sighted self-centric views. Maybe also some of those force your own views upon others as a bonus.

M ...
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2009/8/17 21:36

Are you saying most voters are long term oriented and selfless? That's really a novelty to me. Because to me democracy is to be as selfish as possible and by having different forces that cancel out each other, an equilibrium can be reached. Whether it's a win-win or a lose-lose situation is irrelevant.

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-8-17 22:27

39# 快樂牛郎

我都好讚成人不為己天誅地滅
但係損人利己就唔係幾好
況且呢D行為係損人更不利己
重要打嚮旗號話為大眾曾取平等

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-17 22:37

39# 快樂牛郎

我都好讚成人不為己天誅地滅
但係損人利己就唔係幾好
況且呢D行為係損人更不利己
重要打嚮旗號話為大眾曾取平等
sheep 發表於 2009-8-18 14:27

唉, 呢個世界, 係有人會做一d 損人不利己既事, 因為佢地會覺得, 當其他人suffer 既時候, 就算自己冇gain, 都relatively 好左.
唔知邊度聽過一個故仔, 有個神仙比左兩個人各一個願意, 第一個許願既人, 第二個就可以擁有第

作者: tofu 時間: 2009-8-17 22:40

"""In order to bus to work, I have to xfer 3 buses and time is about 1 hr, versus 20 minutes if I drive (on highway and most of the time no traffic).""" x2
same here, public transit takes way too long. biking is not an option, i need to wear suit at work. i don't think my boss will like i wear a wrinkle suit(which just take out from my backpack) with a sweat small. it is just not an option for everyone.
compare to other cities in west coast, i think vancouver is doing a pretty good job already. i think they should at least turn the bike lane back to car lane in the winter time, only few people are biking in the winter. and discontinue the bus land. buses don't like to stay on the bus lane.

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-8-17 22:45

唉, 呢個世界, 係有人會做一d 損人不利己既事, 因為佢地會覺得, 當其他人suffer 既時候, 就算自己冇gain, 都relatively 好左.
唔知邊度聽過一個故仔, 有個神仙比左兩個人各一個願意, 第一個許願既人, 第二個就可以 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-8-17 23:37

乜你0甘清楚0既?
講你自己呀?

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2009-8-17 22:45

Are you saying most voters are long term oriented and selfless? That's really a novelty to me. Because to me democracy is to be as selfish as possible and by having different forces that cancel out ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2009-8-17 22:12

Definately the opposite, most voters are short sighted and selfish. But that doesn't mean that that's the original intent of democracy. The problem is definately worst, and sometimes being abused by politician at places where people are less educated, and better at places with more education.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-17 22:46

39# 快樂牛郎

我都好讚成人不為己天誅地滅
但係損人利己就唔係幾好
況且呢D行為係損人更不利己
重要打嚮旗號話為大眾曾取平等
sheep 發表於 2009-8-18 14:27

唉, 呢個世界, 係有人會做一d 損人不利己既事, 因為佢地會覺得, 當其他人suffer 既時候, 就算自己冇gain, 都relatively 好左.
唔知邊度聽過一個故仔, 有個神仙比左兩個人各一個願意, 第一個許

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-17 22:46

39# 快樂牛郎

我都好讚成人不為己天誅地滅
但係損人利己就唔係幾好
況且呢D行為係損人更不利己
重要打嚮旗號話為大眾曾取平等
sheep 發表於 2009-8-18 14:27

唉, 呢個世界, 係有人會做一d 損人不利己既事, 因為佢地會覺得, 當其他人suffer 既時候, 就算自己冇gain, 都relatively 好左.
唔知邊度聽過一個故仔, 有個神仙比左兩個人各一個願意, 第一個許願既人, 第二個就可以擁有第一個double既野.
於是, 兩個人就讓對方許願先, 但兩個都唔制, 結果就搞到反哂面. 最後其中一個人話"我要整盲自己一隻眼!"...

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-8-17 22:51

C姐贈佢兩句

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-18 16:49

C姐贈佢兩句
sheep 發表於 2009-8-17 23:51

我贈左啦﹐但係無咩反應我諗佢當聽唔到啦。

-- 大C姐

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-18 18:05

我贈左啦﹐但係無咩反應我諗佢當聽唔到啦。

-- 大C姐
大C姐發表於 2009-8-19 08:49

我聽到woh~

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-18 19:18

我聽到woh~
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-8-18 19:05

係咩? 你真係有聽?

唔好再講D打圓場﹐三毫子一擔老生常談但係其實係廢話嘅嘢啦。就算係dum啵鐘﹐都搞兩隻爛gag﹐掩掩攘攘扮有point。

唔好話我大C姐行走江湖幾十年唔教路。

-- 出名口臭格衰但係從未俾人ban過嘅美艷大C姐

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-18 19:38

係咩? 你真係有聽?
唔好再講D打圓場﹐三毫子一擔老生常談但係其實係廢話嘅嘢啦。就算係dum啵鐘﹐都搞兩隻爛gag﹐掩掩攘攘扮有point。
唔好話我大C姐行走江湖幾十年唔教路。

-- 出名口臭格衰但係從未俾人ban過 ...
大C姐發表於 2009-8-19 11:18

係呀, 有聽架~
點解唔可以講"廢話"呢? 你覺得廢既野, 可能有人會覺得唔廢架woh, 咁樣會唔會剝削左其他人既權利呢?
雖然我睇番都覺得有時都真係幾廢, 不過冇計啦, 打既時候真係冇乜經過大腦, 純粹隨心而行only.

至於行走江湖幾十年, 大C姐, 小弟行走江湖既時候應該唔比你少, 駛唔駛post 將resume 出黎大家比拼一下? 哈哈~

-- 出名性格溫和但係曾被LYK admin ban 過一個月, 亦試過自ban 一個月既敢言麥莊莊

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-18 20:57

係呀, 有聽架~
點解唔可以講"廢話"呢? 你覺得廢既野, 可能有人會覺得唔廢架woh, 咁樣會唔會剝削左其他人既權利呢?
雖然我睇番都覺得有時都真係幾廢, 不過冇計啦, 打既時候真係冇乜經過大腦, 純粹隨心而行only.

至 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-8-18 20:38

當然啦﹐廢唔廢係見人見智啦﹐我亦唔敢講我字字珠譏。但係有一D三毫子一擔理論真係講完等於無講﹐等同灌水。

你post左一句毫無意義﹐令人無思考價值嘅回帖﹐當然唔會對其他人有壞影響既﹐但係對你自己嘅內涵表達無提升囉。

呢個話晒係討論區﹐你要share一D有用﹐令其他人有得著嘅文字真係要用少少腦。呢個某程度上係網上文化嘅 etiquette。

-- 做完運動好hot嘅濕C姐

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-18 21:04

當然啦﹐廢唔廢係見人見智啦﹐我亦唔敢講我字字珠譏。但係有一D三毫子一擔理論真係講完等於無講﹐等同灌水。

你post左一句毫無意義﹐令人無思考價值嘅回帖﹐當然唔會對其他人有壞影響既﹐但係對你自己嘅內涵表達 ...
大C姐發表於 2009-8-19 12:57

內涵表達... 好老實, 小弟冇乜諗過o係度表達內涵架~
內涵呢d 野, 返工既時候先表現, 唔開工時就回復我開心快活人既本色law.

上黎LYK, 都只係想識多個朋友, 同埋可以得閒就笑下咁. 當然, 好多時都扮下和平使者, 希望LYK可以河蟹d 咁啦~

P.S. 其實3毫子一擔已經好比面, 小弟覺得好多時都係一文不值的, 最多都係just my 2 cents only.

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-18 21:09

內涵表達... 好老實, 小弟冇乜諗過o係度表達內涵架~
內涵呢d 野, 返工既時候先表現, 唔開工時就回復我開心快活人既本色law.

上黎LYK, 都只係想識多個朋友, 同埋可以得閒就笑下咁. 當然, 好多時都扮下和平使者, ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-8-18 22:04

咁我都好佩服你堅持做下把位嘅﹐個個牙尖嘴利尖酸刻薄就做晒C姑啦。

-- 好耐無用過C姑個朵嘅大C姑

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-18 21:14

咁我都好佩服你堅持做下把位嘅﹐個個牙尖嘴利尖酸刻薄就做晒C姑啦。

-- 好耐無用過C姑個朵嘅大C姑
大C姐發表於 2009-8-19 13:09

做"下巴位"其實係好開心, 因為做最叻既人係好辛苦, 一d 都唔enjoy 的. 間唔中可以搵d 時間去低能一下, 係小弟既一個減壓方法~

(其實乜野係"下巴位"? 我斷估架乍...)
你幾時又變左C姑架? 變番C妹啦唔該...

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-8-18 21:22

咁我都好佩服你堅持做下把位嘅﹐個個牙尖嘴利尖酸刻薄就做晒C姑啦。

-- 好耐無用過C姑個朵嘅大C姑
大C姐發表於 2009-8-18 22:09

C姐
呢度交俾妳招呼佢

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-18 21:37

做"下巴位"其實係好開心, 因為做最叻既人係好辛苦, 一d 都唔enjoy 的. 間唔中可以搵d 時間去低能一下, 係小弟既一個減壓方法~
(其實乜野係"下巴位"? 我斷估架乍...)
你幾時又變左C姑架? 變番C妹啦唔該... ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-8-18 22:14

一做上把就好多人會對號入座以為我年紀好大﹐其實我一路都係少女一名﹐但係已經有人叫我C姑。

我都好想做下把﹐但係大C姐個朵實在如雷灌耳﹐轉型唔夠幾個月又變翻巴巴閉嘅C姐。

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-8-18 22:04

一做上把就好多人會對號入座以為我年紀好大﹐其實我一路都係少女一名﹐但係已經有人叫我C姑。
我都好想做下把﹐但係大C姐個朵實在如雷灌耳﹐轉型唔夠幾個月又變翻巴巴閉嘅C姐。
...
大C姐發表於 2009-8-19 13:37

大C姐, 你係唔係羊仔既手下? 點解佢會叫你招呼我既?...

叫你C姑算係比面啦~ 我呢排比人叫牆頭草同埋xx (唔記得左, 又懶得爬文) tim 啦!

C姑又好, C姐又好, C妹又好, C體都好, 都係一個名之麻. 總之o係LYK入面, 有個C字都好似同你有關啦! 哈哈~

作者: Serenade 時間: 2009-8-19 04:00

mcjohnjohn... Gosh, I have had enough of your BS already...
I haven't posted for age and this time I seriously have to voice my opinion on this matter.
STOP POSTING MEANINGLESS CRAP!

I don't want to have to scroll through a million pages just to find someone else's posts that is actually worth reading. (I am sorry, almost all your posts are meaningless, and I tend to skip them all.) You are wasting every LYK's time by writing BS posts.

And stop playing this "I am here to stop the fight, so I agree with both sides." kind of BS attitude, it's not working, and it's only irritating people. I can't agree more when people call you a 牆頭草. If you are going to make a post, say something that actually MEANS something, make a stance. Nobody can actually "agree" with you because you don't even have a stand point for people to side on. Then what's the point of joining the conversation if you don't even have an idea to propose? you are not contributing, you are wasting people's time.

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-19 22:48

mcjohnjohn... Gosh, I have had enough of your BS already...
I haven't posted for age and this time I seriously have to voice my opinion on this matter.
STOP POSTING MEANINGLESS CRAP!

I don't want to ...
Serenade 發表於 2009-8-19 05:00

你又唔好咁激﹐佢有時都好有point嫁﹗

人人都有唔同意見﹐你有你講佢有佢講囉。個個都有權發表言論呀嘛﹐最緊要係開心~﹗

-- 扮緊MJJ嘅大C姐

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-8-19 23:05

舉手問問題﹕

點解大C姐成日都“公器私用”既﹖ 我開親老友記都見呢幾只字。。。

不如考慮下次“私器公用”﹐搞搞新意思喇﹐好無﹖

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-19 23:10

舉手問問題﹕

點解大C姐成日都“公器私用”既﹖ 我開親老友記都見呢幾只字。。。

不如考慮下次“私器公用”﹐搞搞新意思喇﹐好無﹖
Littleprince 發表於 2009-8-20 00:05

呢個係我一個抱不平嘅title﹐都好耐無用過啦﹐唔係好多公利嘢俾我批評。

-- 社會評論C

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-8-19 23:26

呢個係我一個抱不平嘅title﹐都好耐無用過啦﹐唔係好多公利嘢俾我批評。

-- 社會評論C
大C姐發表於 2009-8-20 00:10

Are you on vacation now?

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-20 07:36

Are you on vacation now?
peter236 發表於 2009-8-20 00:26

都有工在身架﹐不過無咁忙咋。下個月又搏殺過。

得閒出嚟飲茶。

-- 忙裡偷閒大C姐

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-8-20 09:30

都有工在身架﹐不過無咁忙咋。下個月又搏殺過。

得閒出嚟飲茶。

-- 忙裡偷閒大C姐
大C姐發表於 2009-8-20 08:36

Nice, let's go to 飲茶.

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-21 19:52

Nice, let's go to 飲茶.
peter236 發表於 2009-8-20 10:30

好啦﹐你PM個電話俾我啦。

作者: auyatyat 時間: 2009-8-21 20:19

23# fibbi

agree...
我o既工作性質唔容許我唔開車
今日o既客人分佈o係Vancouver, Richmond, Langley, Maple Ridge, 我無可能坐巴士或者skytrain
不過我會用其他方法支持環保,例如去food court 食o野會帶個飯盒,同埋每日我都會帶自己o既水樽o係車飲...

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-8-21 21:17

23# fibbi

agree...
我o既工作性質唔容許我唔開車
今日o既客人分佈o係Vancouver, Richmond, Langley, Maple Ridge, 我無可能坐巴士或者skytrain
不過我會用其他方法支持環保,例如去food court 食o野會帶個飯盒, ...
auyatyat 發表於 2009-8-21 21:19

大把人做地產﹐做sales﹐做field marketing﹐做presentation﹐做搬運﹐做service都要渣車﹐老老實實﹐呢類架駛者唔係少數啵﹐一般路面佔幾成都係做生意車。你一下子要塞人哋一個鐘做咩唧?

你有大把時間不如同政府計劃點樣起多D單車線啦﹐浪費人力時間。

不過講開環保﹐其實我唔知算唔算環保﹐不過都係一個江湖小智慧。話說我成日出trip﹐隨身係唔會帶太多日用品。尤其而家帶liquid上機咁多限制﹐好多平日用開嘅產品係帶唔到上機。

但係我發現平日用嚟沖咖啡嘅袋裝brown sugar原來好有用。除左你可以用嚟洗杯裡面嘅茶積之外﹐呢D大粒硬嘅brown sugar用嚟磨手確有功效。平日如果你買H2O, Crabtree果D專用磨沙hand therapy係好大樽﹐你係唔會帶出trip。但係平日關左每星期一兩次磨手嘅大C姐好開心發現呢個小秘密﹐可以用coffee shop裡面一袋袋brown sugar嚟洗手﹐好方便。

-- 滑不流手大C姐

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-8-21 23:10

大把人做地產﹐做sales﹐做field marketing﹐做presentation﹐做搬運﹐做service都要渣車﹐老老實實﹐呢類架駛者唔係少數啵﹐一般路面佔幾成都係做生意車。你一下子要塞人哋一個鐘做咩唧?

你有大把時間不如同政 ...
大C姐發表於 2009-8-21 22:17

係噃
洗完手仲可以好似貓咁
用條脷................吓

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://loyaukee.com/forum/)