本帖最後由 ACC-HE 於 2009-4-27 11:08 編輯
you and 字典仔 are the experts... if both of u think that's a bad idea, then I should forget about it.  Thanks.
ACC-HE 發表於 2009-4-27 00:26 
but...
quoted from: http://tsx.acurazine.com/forums/ ... 39&postcount=20
The stock crank pulley/damper is what is called an audible harmonic damper, in laymen’s terms that means control of harmonics you would hear in the occupant compartment. Similar example is the factory use of baffles and resonators in the intake manifold. These methods are used because of the factories fanaticism about quiet in the occupant compartment. They have nothing to do with engine longevity... association of the stock crank pulley being the primary damper is incorrect, it is the dual mass flywheel that accomplishes this task. But even replacing this dual mass damper with an aluminum flywheel would not cause long-term damage as long as the flywheel were properly balanced.
now I'm having 2nd thought... |
發表於 2009-4-27 10:05
| 
