返回列表 發帖
we do our part to support them online,
what did you do?
rat.
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-2-14 04:14


Did I not make my point clear? You guys just use their name to 抽水.

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-2-14 11:59 編輯

82# somewhereintime

I never laugh at those people who took action, I laugh at people who took this kind of news by shock/surprise after all these year... e.g. your truly.

Speaking of action, what have you done lately except barking here and there trying to stir **** up?  Hahaha... isn't it so ironic after what you have posted?  Criticizing others is so easy I know... LOL...zoids 發表於 2009-12-27 06:54


I believe I am not the only one believe you are using their name to 抽水.  

You just try to use their name to posture that you are a defender of freedom and figther of democracy. People like me are the pastrio to CCP (your own term) and tell me to GO BACK TO CHINA.

Did I say a word to deny anthing happening in China? Did I say a word to defend CCP?

So, don't use their name for your own benefits. It is shameful on you.

TOP

就係要抽你呢啲敗類出泥
抽水嗰個係你
等你收多斗零人民幣啦
sheep 發表於 2010-2-14 10:40


I feel pity for you since you only have the capability to spit out garbage like this.

I always have a doubt whether you are truly an old cake as you clamed since you are naïve, do not have much knowledge and can hardly make any thoughtful comment.

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-2-14 12:13 編輯
I have studied the CCP history, some 5000 volumes,
some were translated from Russian,from the formation of Chinese Soviet to 1989
...
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 09:11


WOW.. that is so ..... impressive.

Just a few months back you said you had read 2000 volumes about communism. Within a few months and you make another claim of reading 5000 volumes of CCP history.

hmmmm... instead of questioning from where you find 7000 volume about CCP, I just want to do a simple math.

Assume you can finish one volume in every 2 days (it would take me at least 3-4 weeks to finish a book), 7000 volume will take 14,00 days which translate to 40 years. Wow, you have truly dedicated yourself to CCP. You should be called the true patriot to CCP instead.   LOL.

However, you failed to answer my simple question about communism -- "what is communism and why it was once popular". How ironic.   LOL.

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-2-14 18:23 編輯
I have read some 50,000 books since 1967,  possessed over 10,000 Chinese
books before I left Hong Kong.
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 17:40


WOW... 50,000 books!!!...  Very....... impressive.  You are over qualified to be my 偶像.

Hmmmmm.... let's do a simple math again.

Let's say you can maintain a superb reading efficiency of 2 books a day. 50,000 books will take 25,000 days and it translates to 70 years!!! WOW... that is called - "The Impressive". You must began to read before your mom gave birth to you or even before your parents met each other since they must be little child that time.  If you can only go through 1 book a day, then you need to live 140 years to finish the 50,00 books. I am not sure whether you can live that long.... LOL..

You should be a university professor instead....  

So will you say 500,000 book instead in next post? You are such a joke maker.... maybe you can join the Little Sheep to be clown as well.

TOP

I can read up to 8 books a day, what is wrong with that?
..
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 18:25


NO. There is nothing wrong with that! You should say you can read up 80 books a day so that you can claim that you read up 500,000 books... Professor M.

However, you always had difficulties to answer my simple questions. That makes me wondering what had you read. Are they  屎片?  哈哈。。 You can certainly go through 800 pieces a day.

TOP

Who set the rule that it takes 2 days to read a book?
...
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 18:50


No one set the rule to take 2 days to read a book. If it takes 2 days to read a book, then you will need to live 280 years to finish your 50,000 books.

You just made yourself look foolish in front of everybody on LYK.

TOP

年初一,同rockypath拜個年:屌你。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-2-14 21:44


你屌唔起,因爲你陽痿。你發育之後先講啦。 唔需在此丟架,低能仔。

TOP

84# rockypath

同你講啲有深度嘅野
你會跌落無底深潭
永不超生
sheep 發表於 2010-2-14 22:27


真搞笑,你有野講先算啦。你又係另一個低能仔。

TOP

No point whining and arguing here, go and prove yourself.
I've done it, with records and witnesses, it can be done.
since you think you outsmart me
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-2-14 20:53


Were you ever able to argue with me? I only see I have been kicking your ass around.

Don't have to prove anything. You don't have the gut to face me, keep making fool of yourself and don't have the ability to answer my simple questions. What else do I need to prove?

If you can answer my questions, I will believe you had read 50 books.

S.M.S -- 低能三人組

TOP

返回列表