rockypath

但假如我地睇吓同類嘅案件，如果罪犯個阿爸係稍有權位，咁又會如何呢？我爸是李剛一案當中嘅李啓銘同樣車死人（仲傷多咗一個添），大家又記唔記得佢判咗咩刑呢？
Lik 發表於 2011-6-7 11:27

I am really sick of your BS.

這兩件案件是不同性質的案件，定罪當然會不同。你居然厚顏無恥顛倒黑白。 如果你是法官，我敢肯定你一定是個為所欲為的黑心法官。

rockypath

師兄，

你講漏咗案件裡面重要嘅一環：李啓銘醉酒駕駛而發生意外，當中係有一死一傷。雖然酒後駕駛係極度 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-6-7 22:33

Use your brain instead of your axx la......   

First, according to your position, the guys should get additional jail time just because he said "我爸是李剛"? Is it another form of 以言入罪?

What if he said - "我殺你全家"？Should he get capital punishment?

Second, you want the guy to be prosecuted based on the more server crime. Just read the article again. Do you think you can make the case successfully? I don't think so.

rockypath

脫乜罪？？大陸係法官話有罪就係有罪。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-8 00:23

脫乜罪？？老友記上力仔話有罪就係有罪。

rockypath

會唔會係佢地覺得告重果條會比較難入罪? 咁隨時令到李啓銘脫罪呢?
小弟對大陸既司法制度完全唔了解, 唔知 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-6-7 23:38

According to my knowledge, China also adopts the principle of “一案不二讼”.

rockypath

[quote]會唔會係佢地覺得

rockypath

低能兒，

量刑係要考慮好多因素，而犯人嘅 intent 同悔意絕對係需要列入考慮因素之內。條靚仔把口講得出 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-6-8 23:25

Haven’t you embarrassed yourself enough, Moron Lik?

First, regardless of what the guy said or whether he was regretful for his behaviours or not, the judge can only convict according to the type of crime the guy committed and consequences caused by his action, but not by what he said!  

Second, if you want to make a statement – these two cases are the same type and they all committed the same degree of crime and should serve the same level of punishment. Then you need to prove these two cases are both – 故意殺人和殺人滅口！

Third, can you quote from any trust worthy source by your standards that can give you any support for your claim of these two cases are the same type of crime and deserve the same level of punishment?

I will wait for you moron Lik. I am sure that you will once again be a gutless coward and run away like a dog again.

To save your own face, I will suggest you – STFU.


P.S.

Moron Lik. Have you even been in a court? Do your really believe the reality is same as what you saw in TVB dramas? What a stupid moron!

rockypath

回復  eddie


    殺人滅口 is a first degree murder
   醉酒駕駛" + "事後逃逸  is a second degree mu ...
eddie 發表於 2011-6-9 12:32

As defined in the Criminal Code of Canada, murder is a culpable homicide with SPECIFIC INTENTIONS.

Can you justify  "醉酒駕駛 + 事後逃逸" is a second degree murder according this definition?

rockypath

仆街，

話你唔撚識野就即係唔撚識野。

早就話咗條友係應該用條重嘅罪來告佢，但你就響度借啲易想擾亂視聽 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-6-10 00:16

仆街，

Just get your gut out to answer my question directly – what did you base on to determine 李啟銘’s action is a murder according to the Canadian criminal code - murder is a culpable homicide with SPECIFIC INTENTIONS? Don’t tell us you based on – “我爸是李剛”!   

Just remind you the moron again – it was you who told us these two cases are 同類案件. Will you admit that or not?   

If you don’t STFU, so we will continue watching you – a pitiful clown tried to entertained people but failed. Sorry for you.   


P.S.   BTW, just a little education to you the stupid moron, 量刑 and 定罪 are two different concepts. Even if the 量刑 of these cases are the same, but the 定罪 will absolutely not be the same (there is no way these two cases can be 同類案件). Get that straight first before embarrassing yourself again publically in front of LYKs.   

Be a man instead of a dog. Just answer my question directly instead of continuing to BS.

P.S. #2   I left a little tail above and let's see whether the stupid moron Lik will bite the bait or not.