rockypath

Three things come into my mind.

1)        Establishing the road map for getting rid of functional groups and realizing general election in 10 ~ 15 years. Some people will think it takes too long. For me, it is an acceptable time frame.

2)        Establishing a system to provide affordable housing to HK citizens with the injunction of creating new economies (or diversifying HK industries). I will not support it if the policy is implemented solely.
a)        Restart building public housing
b)        Restricting foreign hot money to flow into real estate market and limit foreigners’ purchasing of HK real estate (HK government may not want to do this since it will damage HK’s reputation as an international metropolis and a free market)
c)        Increase land supplies strictly for affordable housing projects
d)        Increase levy on luxury apartment projects and unit transfer

3)        Invest in developing new economies and set up policies to attract investments both domestically and internationally into these new industries. (Singapore is doing pretty good at it. Many HK people worry about Shanghai is taking over HK as a world finance center. In my opinion, I would rather watch out for Singapore instead of Shanghai.) Establish systems to get average worker Joe to be retrained so that they can get a higher pay job in those new industries.

rockypath

回復 8# Lik

#1)        If you can realize general election next year, GREAT! I have no complain about that. But, to me, 10 years is an acceptable time frame, but 15 years is more practically realistic. Let’s see what it actually takes.

#2)        Why do I insist on the providing of affordable housing should be injunction with the development of new economies? It is because I think it is more viable and possible. Reasons? Read what I already said.

#3)        The details of policies of increasing land supplies for affordable housing is beyond my capabilities of discussion. I don’t know what will work or will not work in Hong Kong.

#4)        Ask yourself this question – does the failure of trying to developing new industries conclude it is a wrong idea or it is a right idea but was wrongly executed? Singapore has been taking this direction. Are they stupid? (btw, I am suspicious whether you are confused by the word – “industry”. Manufacturing is only a type of industries. Filming is also an industry, for example.)

rockypath

回復  rockypath

10 years may be the best after compromising with CCP... I understand what Lik's an ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-7-17 23:06

To me, general election is not an pressing issue compare to affordable housing . I can wait for another additional 10 years to exchange for the problem of affordable housing can be resolved and  HK can established other high value industries so that the average income level of HK people can be increased.

rockypath

回復 16# Lik

Instead of 即係響度狗up, do some research first, shameless mad dog.

Do you know what Singapore is doing? Find it out first instead of 響度狗up.

If you continue madly barking, you just keep embarrassing and disgracing yourself publicly in front of LYKs. I don't think people will welcome or appreciate you continue ruining a meaningful discussion.


hmmmm........, maybe I should change my mind to support banning you this mad dog.

rockypath

回復 16# Lik

Shameless idiot mad dog Lik,

Did you find out what Singapore has been doing?  Show us what you found.  

rockypath

仆街，

例子係你指出來嘅。點解要我幫你做埋功課？

餐餐都係咁，無啲長進～

-力 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-7-18 10:49

仆街，

只不過你餐餐都唔做功課就出來亂吠狗ｕｐ！ 好意提醒下你不要繼續做小丑俾人恥笑。

次次都係咁，無啲長進～     

rockypath

狗up？你估我係你呀？舉埋例子俾你去查證，教埋你方法㗎喇，係你自己無料到，一味齋吹水～

連出 post 嘅 f ...
Lik 發表於 2011-7-18 11:06

癲狗力，你估我係你呀？舉埋例子俾你去查證，教埋你方法㗎喇，係你自己無料到，一味齋吹水～

連功課都唔肯做都夠厚面皮出D狗up post，你都真係折墮囉～   

Ｐ。Ｓ。
傻仔，呢Ｄ就係以人之道還人之身。 希望你知道一味只識得用粗言穢語鬧人只不過是在作踐你自己。對其他人沒有任何影響。