布小熊

Well, the translation was completely correct.
http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/re ... =283462&fromuid=190

但香港仍有不少綠色空間，郊野公園近在咫尺，加上香港位於亞熱帶的島嶼之上，可供開發的平地不多，故以可使用的空間比例計算，香港反而超越其他城市。

To be sure, it has lush vegetation. But that is because the city sits on such a vertical, tropical rock that it is impossible to build in many places.

Both Vancouver and Sydney are not ranked. So doesn't matter how many big cities they included for the ranking.
Vancouver won't be in the top 20 or even 100 if it's NOT included.

布小熊

So, all the green area I see from my windows are all FAKE!
Damn Vancouver ...
吳孟達 發表於 2012-7-6 10:28 AM

They are not fake but since Vancouver isn't being ranked at all. It doesn't matter how much green area, how good it is.

布小熊

but CTV news said Vancouver wasn't included only because we didn't meet the minimum population under ...
ACooperFan 發表於 2012-7-8 10:05 AM

That's what I've been saying repeatedly.
Vancouver, Sydney, Vienna are NOT ranked because they only included cities that reach certain population (larger). Usually when someone say a city is BIG, it means the number of population; not the geographic/land size.
@_@And it's not the same as 取消資格.