繁簡有別 的, 怪, 文章

fishbelly

偶爾看到網上一篇爭論關於簡體字同繁體字的文章， 如下

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_47458e650100cd9d.html

本人舉腳贊成廢除簡體字， 但係請各位看回覆！   唔怪得上年 CNN 條友會話中國人係 “暴徒”， 雖然我並不同意此說。

fishbelly

Didn't simplification start before communist party gained power?
jake123 發表於 2009-3-18 20:02

Yes, and the spin (Commies claim anyway!) on using simplified is that firstly, it's easy to learn and read so that it could lower iliteracy; secondly it's the political trick to make people think the "past has gone" and there comes a new set of rules and fonts

Beside simplifying Chinese writing our lovely chairman Mao also promotes Pinying, which makes chinese language easier to communicate with western world.  I personally think it's OK and convienient to use english piniying as chinese input, but of coz it could create many "same pronounciation different words different meanings" problem....

fishbelly

"...don't mean to argue with you, but just by looking at the spelling of "w"..."o"..."r"..."d", how can people tell it means "文字" (one of the meanings)? Does "w" tell anything by itself? Does "o" tell anything by itself? ...... People learn the word as a whole, as "word", whenever people..." Ultraman

that's a whole set of differnt values btn East and West.

Generally Latin based languages and writings are deemed to be more precise, easy to get to the point, various Chinese words are picture based, which is quite ambiguous but very artistic....