Ultraman

First, this case warn us we should behave ourselves well in the public.
Second, even the Cathy staff didn't tape this video, there might be any other bystander doing the same thing anyways, just can't trace him/her down jeh.
Conclusion, if we behave and act like any normal person, nobody is interest in spying us! Wakaka.....

Ultraman

If people think the lady was over-reacting and being too annoying/disgusting in the public area, they could try to sue her (no idea if that is valid to make a sue).
As I said, any bystander may also feel funny to tape a video like that too, yet no one might able to trace him/her down, and thus no one would be dug out for blame or apology. However, the Cathy staff took that video while he/she was in duty, which meant doing personal stuff at work, plus doing a thing that was harming a customer's image/reputation. If you were the Cathy boss, would you think your staff was not doing a wrongful thing at all?

Seems like many people are confused with right and wrong value and moral standard nowadays. Maybe that's why the world is getting more messy.

Ultraman

原帖由 老友四號 於 2009-3-5 15:36 發表
發覺当今之世只要唔怕醜,肯当众發斕渣,则冇往而不利.因一切过錯都係人哋嘅;自己不過只係受害者而己！

就畫面所見 老夫 以為即使係在途中 亞嬸 遇上意外未能準時搭机,只能話係唔好彩！點都唔可以話係 國泰

嘅錯.但由於 亞嬸 縲地發爛渣 現在由錯變啱,既得贈送飛行哩数又可以免費升級.真係爽！: 所以下次如果

老夫 遲到,一於叫 四婆 扮演 机場亞嬸 咁就夫憑妻贵,實行唔使钱坐啇务位,真係唸起都開心!  

You didn't get it.
The lady could have received compensation from Cathy because the Cathy staff taped the video (which shouldn't have), not because of her 縲地發爛渣 or missed the plane.
Next time, be sure you'll do the same in the airport and I'll tape you and post on youtube. Surely, nothing you can get.

Ultraman

原帖由 Catpiano 於 2009-3-5 15:52 發表
Actually, there is nothing wrong .. if that is the CX staff who took the video ..  

Someone was 發斕渣 in his/her company, so it does make sense for him to record a video etc ..  so .. in case, his/her manager comes, and askes what happened ..  he/she can show the video.

Of course, If that CX staff is the one who post the video .. then that is his/her fault too.

If the staff taped that video all because of making a valid evidence just in case his/her manager/supervisor/boss would ask about, or even to submit it as court evidence for further possible legal matters, then that's OK, and even smart. However, if it's intentionally made for personal interest, that's a problem. So, the fact was, did the staff hand over this tape to his/ber manager/supervisor/boss? But on the other hand, he/she didn't keep the tape privately and carefully or didn't delete it, and "someone" spread it over on the internet. Should that staff free from liability?

Ultraman

原帖由 siumaibb 於 2009-3-5 16:13 發表
樓上話咩咩唔應該影，老實講，如果俾你見到D咁好笑既野，你返到屋企會唔會同老公講先？會唔會同朋友講先？同人講咪又係分享，不過唔同形色，呢個年代資訊發達，有畫面睇點都好過用口講。...

Back to the olden days (without internet yet), if 俾你見到D好笑既野, you may tell your husband when you get home; but would you phone all your uncles and aunties, schoolmates and friends and colleagues... etc one by one about that funny thing?
All because nowadays technology has been improving and developing a lot, almost everyone has a camera/camera-cell-phone and knows how to use internet, so people doing this kinda "mo liu" things just messing up the correct moral standard in the whole society. Really doesn't mean "the majority is doing this means right".

Ultraman

原帖由 老友四號 於 2009-3-5 17:57 發表
唉！E家D人真係公私不分濫用所謂私瘾權。如果亞嬸喺佢屋企發爛渣缧地，俾佢鄰居眏咗之

後放上網，咁就話侵犯私瘾啫。但Ｅ家成件事係發生係公众地方，咁點萛侵犯私瘾呀？如果咁

都係侵犯私瘾，咁Ｅ家喺温哥华開紧嘅机場电擊死亡事件 ...

What did the lady harm the public? The most, we can say she was being annoying in a public area. Sharing the video on the internet is just for personal fun (or make fun to other people).
The video clip of cops using taser is a different story. Since a man has been killed by that, the public wants to know what had happened, and thus that video could be a valid and important evidence to the case. Which also prevents those cops wanted to cheat and lie. That's truly related to public concern. You don't see the difference?

Ultraman

原帖由 老友四號 於 2009-3-5 18:23 發表

與其怪責別人！為什么不拿出更大的勇氣來怪責自己.如果自己能尊重別人更尊重自己,在公众地

方能檢點自己控制自己,多點礼貌少點無理取鬧.事情總有平靜的解决方法,又可至於現在因醜態

百出而名揚国際呢！贵 閣下不妨照 ...

You probably forgot what you said, or you just want to avoid admitting your mistake.
You said the lady has compensation all because of her over-reacted action. I corrected you that it's because of Cathy counted as their staff's fault. You didn't wear your glasses or what?

Ultraman

原帖由 老友四號 於 2009-3-5 20:41 發表
咁請教兩位明理之人 机場亞嬸 嘅行為係啱定錯先？

You really want to know right or wrong?
The lady getting mad in a public area (just screaming and lying on the floor) without physically hurting another, you can easily find it online if she was breaking any law or committing any illegal matter. As I said, you can seek for civil action if you like, yet I doubt what should you sue her.

老夫 则認为亞嬸錯在先,国泰 管理層錯在後,點解:因为佢哋立場軟弱,为咗息事寧人犧牲员工

將錯為啱.假如 老夫 係当日嘅 国泰 員工亦會眏低当日嘅情况,费事第日亞嬸投訴時口同鼻拗。

Can you find any staff handbook from any company that, the bosses allow their employees do personal affair (going to washroom kind of stuff is excluded) at work? The staff taping the video and didn't treat it as a official use but personal one, this action was not enough to charge him/her committed a crime and send to jail, but of course from the employer's POV, this action was not allowed at work duty and definitely not encouraged.
The apology and the compensation made was not only to please the lady (or media), but also gave a warning tone to all other staffs, let them know this kind of issues could be serious and warn them better not to do it again.

再者如果你哋有见過一D示威場面,你哋都會见到有警察眏VIEDO.如果照你哋所講佢哋咪喺喥浪費

時間同资源.因為1:不能作呈堂証物(因為警察眏警察及示威者).2:分分鐘俾示威者反告侵犯私瘾.

請問兩位D差佬明知冇用點解佢哋仲要眏呢？

再者 老夫 亦唔認同該国泰員工將該段影片上網是不当行為,(假定是該名員工所為)因為1:整件事

件發生在公眾地方.2:對方是成年人要為自已的行為負責及承擔後果.正如拍芝曰:打就企定.而且

該名員工並沒有加上任何主觀的意见,只是客觀的紀銾一切而已.

Did the cops who taped the video post them on youtube or any other public forum for personal use? Or do you know they're taping it for their own interest, or was ordered by their head government?
Moreover, such as official press persons have rights to photograph and video anythings and post them on official medias for press purpose, and yes, they don't need to get your agreement and they won't be charged.
You think the Cathy case was anything comparative to the above situations?

Ultraman

原帖由 老友四號 於 2009-3-5 21:06 發表


但如今卻係變咗只要唔怕醜;夠爛就 YOU CAN GET WHAT U WANT !

Hello...? Did you read me? You still didn't get it right.
If the Cathy staff has not taped the video, Cathy wouldn't need to apologize and compensate the lady. NOT BECAUSE OF WHAT YOU THINK!
Well, I'm not going to tell you again anyways. I'll let your brain stuck.

Ultraman

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-3-5 21:46 發表
四號, 唔好花時間同Ultraman 糾纏喇, 佢係辯論既能手, 唔做律師既話真係浪費左佢天賦既才華.

Did I tell you I am not a lawyer? But thanks to your compliment anyways.