Ultraman

Honestly, anything can't be trusted nowadays due to too much digital computer animations, truth is always difficult to be revealed. Even those so called "witnesses", their statements were differently made in different period of time, and also not sure whether they're the truth or not. Unless you were there in person, what we keep seeing can't be trust 100%.

Ultraman

32# chunsh
The natural duty of a soldier is to protect their people from invader,
but not crushing them with tanks.
There are only 4000-5000 students at Tienanmen square, the army
linking arms toget ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-5-28 15:39

How your background makes the truth of what did happen in 6.4?

Ultraman

40# Ultraman [
Personally I have nothing to do with CCP, however, my uncle had been
CCP all his life and he headed the municipal  police dispatch for some 20 years
so I have some insights  from  the ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-5-28 22:10

Did you mean your background/experience could be a valid evidence to prove that there were killing or no killing in the 6.4 event? How're they related?

Ultraman

I understand this kind of "logic". However, it doesn't necessary reflect the truth this way.

Ultraman

68# somewhereintime
I read  5 of his diaries,  covering 1988-1993,  he regretted  what had happened and felt ashame for what the army had done in Tienanmen Square.
He did not involve in the killing ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2009-5-29 17:53

Please just simply make your sentences clear. May I ask:
Your uncle said/meant that CCP received official order from the China government, that they had to kill the students. Was that right?
Your uncle didn't kill any student himself, but he saw other CCP did kill students intentionally because of the order. Was that right?
And;
The girl of your uncle's daughter said she saw CCP killed students intentionally. Was that right?