Ultraman

就算真的偷背包也罪不至死吧﹖溫哥華的警察是否真的很害怕﹖少少事都像驚弓之鳥﹖這樣的人我們可以靠他們保障我們的生命和財產安全嗎﹖ 我們每年交的稅去哪兒了﹖﹖

還有﹐若真有刪除片段的事情﹐實在是國際之恥﹐ RCMP 亞頭應該出黎道歉謝罪﹐唔該好好地教育 D RCMP﹐唔好成為別人的笑柄喇
Littleprince 發表於 2009-3-25 16:51

"Crows are all black" la.

Ultraman

一切都未查清楚，點解你地咁快就有結論，咁快就知到係個警察唔岩？唔通你地當時晌現場？
siumaibb 發表於 2009-3-25 22:44

Not sure about the killing part (the "suspect" might have attacking action).
But if the deleting of the video clip is true, then this action was not right.

Ultraman

ok, 比晒 benefit of doubt﹐就算亞伯係想用刀危害女警安全﹐她也無需 panic 到開槍吧﹖她們無受過訓練咩時候先開槍咩﹖我地看電視都知﹐警察就算遇襲開槍自衛﹐都唔應該置人於死地格﹖乜她不是應該射手腳或者其他 ...
Littleprince 發表於 2009-3-26 14:11

Cops should be even more shameful, for they can't shoot accurately on the aiming target according to their wishes (as seen on TV that they want left arm then shoot on the left arm, and then they want right ear then shoot on the right ear... ). In this case, I think the chance was the female cop didn't intend to kill the old man but just shot him down by accident!

Ultraman

ok, 比晒 benefit of doubt﹐就算亞伯係想用刀危害女警安全﹐她也無需 panic 到開槍吧﹖她們無受過訓練咩時候先開槍咩﹖我地看電視都知﹐警察就算遇襲開槍自衛﹐都唔應該置人於死地格﹖乜她不是應該射手腳或者其他咩﹖點解會致命呢﹖
Littleprince 發表於 2009-3-26 14:11

Cops should be even more shameful, for they can't shoot accurately on the aiming target according to their wishes (as seen on TV that they want left arm then shoot on the left arm, and then they want right ear then shoot on the right ear... ). In this case, I think the chance was the female cop didn't intend to kill the old man but just shot him down by accident!