原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2007-12-13 11:59 發表 
Marriage is a commitment, and also a test of tolerance. If a woman (or men for the gals) had went through divorce, doesn't that introduce risk that this person might not be all that committed, tolerab ...
I agree marriage is a commitment. But to say "a test of tolerance", hmm.... then implies the test could have good or bad result. For good result of course the marriage can be maintained, so how about bad result? That's why there would be a divorce. Or you think the couple should still stay together even for bad result? Then why the "test" is needed?
Besides, the divorced person you meet with might not necessary to be the one at fault in the previous marriage (although I believe both parties have responsibility). It's not fair to comment whether she/he was not committed or tolerate enough in the previous marriage, cuz she/he might be the innocent one. Moreover, even she/he didn't commit and/or tolerate enough in the previous marriage (or with the previous partner), doesn't mean she/he can't commit and/or tolerate the relationship with you. There must be a reason behind each relationship and divorce, but every couple doesn't work the same. |