Ultraman

I know many people 已信, 但不返教會.

Ultraman

Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-1 14:00

When it's peace here, why there are some people want to agitate others to start fire; and once a fire is being started, then the one who got stimulated will always be blamed but not the one(s) who agitated others.

Ultraman

(No intention to start any fire at all.)
My opinion:
1. Generally speaking, to believe in something without solid (scientific) proof usually would be called 迷信. For example, to wear some kind of crystal can bring you good luck. But not to believe in something without solid (scientific) proof not usually called 迷信, the most people would called stubborn.
2. Why to believe there is a God is more logical? And even there is a God, why the Christianity God is more logical?

Ultraman

Why people only have 2 hands and 2 legs... but not 3 eyes and 4 hands....? Who knows if 3 eyes and 4 hands could be better? All because of we see human is like what we see now, but we can't conclude that this must because of God made us, or there must be a God. For example, if someone found a $20 bill in a forest, he/she might think there must be someone who has passed by the forest and dropped the money on the ground. However, the fact might be the money bill was originally left on a busy city street and then wind blew it to the forest. That's called logic-- someone dropped the money is not the only possible answer.
I really have no idea why there were dinosaurs up to nowadays human and all living form, but that doesn't prove that God is the only possibility.

Ultraman

Yes, of course, if there is solid proof, people won't need to discuss.
But now the case is like, a person thinks he/she is always in very bad luck, but once he/she started to wear a crystal bracelet, he/she becomes luckier.
It's like a debate game in school, how can we show both sides in a logical way?

Ultraman

點解吾比人迷信？
不如大家講下大迷信啦
ricrick 發表於 2009-12-2 13:54

I didn't mean "吾比". Instead, I meant since both concepts can't provide solid proof, people have own will to choose what they believe and can't say the other(s) is/are wrong.