Ultraman

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-22 01:19 發表


woo, how can you be sure that there is ONE, but not two?

No ar, it's just my feeling. Not necessary correct wor. I know I'm not always right, just some people think/say so.

Ultraman

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-22 01:39 發表


Hey man, I really don't care how you quote...
what was my reaction when I saw that you used the word girl?
my reaction was, I am a man too...

From #453 & #456, you quoted something I said and I thought you were talking to/about me, and you denied.
Now I quoted something you said, and actually I was talking to a "girl", obviously it's not you (cuz I know you're a man). But then you thought I was talking about you and you corrected me that you are a man but not a girl. You are tricked by me and you still didn't realize.

Ultraman

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-22 03:07 發表


You are twisting my words.  You could've sign up another e-mail account, hotmail, yahoo, gmail are all free.  You don't need to get your family involved and still could post your own e-mail address. ...

Didn't we emphasize true & real actual current email account? Of course, anyone can sign up a new fake account right away and post it up here, yet I won't call this trick gut! This act is just to cheat people. Cheating means gut? Oh I see, gut of cheating.

Ultraman

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-22 03:25 發表


Fake account are one that people cannot e-mail to.  Signing up an account you can send and check e-mails.  I don't care what you call that act, I never force you to have the same POV as I do.

I call it "fake" because I can create a new account just for posting it here, I won't care to receive any attacking messages including swear words etc, cuz I need not to sign in again to check what's going on there. According to this act, I call it cheating and you call it gut. Very fine, as you said, we have very different POV. I have no intention to persuade/force you to agree with me, and absolutely no intention to make friend with you either. So, whatever la. At least, I call our conversation a discussion, and a discussion won't always come to only one compromised result. (OK, this is also only my personal POV, you don't need to agree with.)

Ultraman

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-22 06:12 發表

因為我地同一陣線丫麻~
唉, 玩左咁耐開始無癮, 烈士兄又唔o係度, 唔玩了~

Never mind. At least you guys let me know what true "cow skin lantern" is.

Ultraman

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-22 12:24 發表


I never said posting = having guts.

In your post #381:
(A): "And I never said I have gut."
(B): "Do you have gut to post your e-mail address?"
According to my understanding, (just talk about part B), you challenge if people have gut to post their email address, implies that once they post means they have gut.
Now you conflict to yourself, and said "posting =/= having gut".
OK, I surrender.

Ultraman

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-22 13:19 發表


The post was direct to Lancer...

No matter to whom, isn't that your thinking? Or just 意氣之言? Anyways, gotta bear the responsibility for what you said.

Ultraman

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-22 13:41 發表


Sure it does.  And I would bear the responsibility.  I challenged Lancer to post his e-mail and real name because of the comment he made previously, and he is gutless to do it.

So, you meant posting = gut but also said posting =/= gut. You are conflicting yourself.
Anyways, I'll zip up my mouth when it hits 50 page.

Ultraman

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-22 14:45 發表



As I said few pages back, not posting to me means gutless.

Oh right, not posting means gutless, but posting doesn't mean gut. OK, I got it.