peter236

今次真係超級大鑊，不過睇個款呢度都無乜人關心㗎喇～

-力
Lik 發表於 2011-4-30 22:31

Compared with Sichuan, Indonesia, Chile, Japan, or Katrina at New Orleans, this is small.

peter236

廢柴，龍捲風好似吹襲咗最少 8、9個州，死亡人數到目前最少 340人，而受災情況更係嚴重同廣泛，有好多城鎮 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-4-30 23:25

hahaha, Mr Lik, the number of people killed this time is far smaller compared with those of Sichuan, Indonesia, Chile, Japan, or Katrina at New Orleans.

By looking at the destroyed houses, it is clear that those tofu houses were not built to withstand hurricanes. But the Americans knew all along that hurricanes are common in those states. Clearly, they were using shoddy building materials and government regulation is also inadequate.

The trails of the hurricane may be widespread, but mostly over sparsely populated areas. Destruction to buildings is much much smaller as a result. The destruction in $ terms is also much smaller than those of Sichuan, Indonesia, Chile, Japan, or Katrina at New Orleans.

Mr Lik, there is no argument here, you lost the discussion and you should just admit it.

peter236

我diu你條毫無同情心嘅死仆街！

你知唔知龍捲風嘅風速可以去到幾快？又有乜野 building code可以抵受成棵大樹跌落來，將你個廳斬開一分為二？

你條賤種乜撚到唔識就唔該你收吓你把死人爛臭口！
Lik 發表於 2011-5-1 00:55

Mr foul mouth Lik, your accusation is illogical.

We are talking about the relative severity of these disasters.
Clearly, this hurricane is not as bad as those other previous disasters at Sichuan, Indonesia, Chile, Japan, or Katrina at New Orleans.
That does not mean people do not sympathize with those affected.

Clearly, those tofu houses were built with shoddy materials and are not hurricane proof.