返回列表 發帖
本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-10-19 21:31 編輯
你係咪有病??理解能力有問題???
J-11係Su-27,Su-27唔係艦載機,並唔可以用係航母上面(呢架航母又 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-10-19 21:18


Are you kidding here? The Russians had no money to complete aircraft carrier. Now China is fitting it with indigenous Chinese equipment.

China now makes the indigenous J15 with indigenous Chinese radar, avionics and the folding wings. There is no need to buy from the Russians.

China is now modernizing the J11 into the J11B, again better than the Russian Su27.

I would not be surprised if the Japanese want to copy from China, since the Japanese can't make any modern fighter jets.

TOP

咁Admiral Kuznetsov係乜東東黎嫁????
J﹣15抄晒Su-33架prototype,咁就緊係唔洗再買Su-33添啦~ ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-10-19 21:53


The Varyag was not complete due to Russia lack of $$.

The Chinese has now fitted it with Chinese radar and equipment.

TOP

回復  peter236
Varyag無完成係因為1992年ussr解體隻船落左係烏克蘭手上而並繼續做,並唔係你既大話「俄羅 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-10-19 22:40


It was because of Russia had no $$. The reason is back then the oil prices was still very low. Russia later got more $$ to spend because of rising oil prices.

TOP

定係烏克蘭冇錢呀?
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-10-20 01:06


If Russia had the money, then there was no need to transfer ownership to Ukraine. The Russians could have kept the ship and complete construction.

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-10-20 01:17 編輯
的確,上面乜都冇,
中國要死掂套彈射技術出黎...唔係的話呢舊20M既廢鐵又會變做主題公園. ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-10-19 23:15


China gained a lot of insight into the structure of an aircraft carrier. The knowledge gained is worth way more than the price they paid.

TOP

你真係唔明白彈射系統有幾重要......冇呢樣野或者技術唔成熟,係會闔包散~~~~ ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-10-20 01:18


It depends on what type of aircraft carrier you talk about.
For the US aircraft carriers, they need the steam catapult to send the planes up.
For the Varyag, it has a curved slope that allows the planes to take off.

TOP

Hei men, the topic of this posting is "TAXI"...
lo_pak 發表於 2010-10-20 01:32


They are always like that. They like to use every chance to bash the Chinese.

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-10-20 01:55 編輯
ski jump ramp~~~咁就要睇下架A貨Su-33同班機師夠唔夠料子玩ski jump ramp 囉~~
原來係taxi~~~車我唔 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-10-20 01:49

You claimed that the Chinese need to use the steam catapult. Now you realized the Varyag uses the ski jump, that means they don't need to use the steam catapult for take off. Do you even know how the Varyag looks like?

TOP

回復  MoiRhapsody


    拿拿拿,開german car唔一定係rich嘅切記切記。
fibbi 發表於 2010-10-21 18:18


You said you use luxury European handbags?
You better switch to Chinese brands.

TOP

其實呢一個時代既車邊一度既都唔可靠,太多電子野,太多小毛病,
唔似得以前的車,打開車頭蓋,一目了然, ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-10-21 19:44


That's not true at all. You have not even looked at the designs of any Chinese car.

TOP

返回列表