返回列表 發帖
本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-11-16 13:15 編輯
Another good example of poor public relation.
Obviously the prolonged disclosure is a problem, the r ...
lo_pak 發表於 2010-11-16 13:06


According to international rules, these incidents are classified from class 0-7. Classes 0 and 1 need not be disclosed immediately. So there is no problem with the report mechanism as it conforms to international standards.

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-11-16 14:07 編輯
回復  peter236

HK public are generally weak in confidence for this type of condition. Even though  ...
lo_pak 發表於 2010-11-16 13:45


Do you know if other countries disclose class 0 and class 1 incidents immediately?
If HK public is weak mentally, and you tell them there is something going on right now?

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-11-16 16:08 編輯
Yeah, ignorance is bliss. Best to tell them nothing even when there is a nuclear meltdown.

BTW, th ...
Lik 發表於 2010-11-16 14:17


According to international rules, these incidents are classified from class 0-7. Classes 0 and 1 need not be disclosed immediately. So there is no problem with the report mechanism as it conforms to international standards.
Do the other countries report class 0 and class 1 incidents immediately?

This is another example of: if other countries do it, it is okay
                                            if HK or China does the same thing, it is wrong.

TOP

Another piece of crap from mad dog wong.
According to international rules, these incidents are classified from class 0-7. Classes 0 and 1 need not be disclosed immediately. So there is no problem with the report mechanism as it conforms to international standards.
Do the other countries report class 0 and class 1 incidents immediately?

TOP

返回列表