the original article quoted no source at all ...
daimo 發表於 2011-3-30 14:33
It is no the first time Mr Lik quote with no source or with questionable source. In this case, the source is FLG 法輪功.
What does this show us? Is shows us again that whenever Mr Lik sees something that gives him an excuse to bash the Chinese, he would just eagerly jump at that opportunity, without checking the credibility of the source.
發表於 2011-3-30 17:18
| 